National Guard deploys in LA as Trump warns of 'troops everywhere'
LOS ANGELES: Security forces clashed with protesters outside a detention centre in Los Angeles on Sunday (Jun 8) as National Guard troops deployed by President Donald Trump fanned out across the city following two days of unruly protests over raids by immigration agents.
Trump on Sunday vowed the troops would ensure "very strong law and order", while appearing to leave the door open to deploying soldiers in other cities.
The US military said 300 soldiers from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team had been sent to three separate locations in the greater Los Angeles area, and were "conducting safety and protection of federal property & personnel".
Helmeted troops in camouflage gear and carrying guns were stationed at a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles, where they joined Department of Homeland Security forces.
Pepper spray and tear gas were fired into a small crowd - including journalists - as forces moved protesters back to allow a convoy of vehicles to enter the detention centre.
Trump, asked about the use of troops, appeared to leave the door open to a more widespread deployment in other parts of the country.
"You have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it," he told reporters. "I think you're going to see some very strong law and order."
Responding to a question about invoking the Insurrection Act - which would allow the military to be used as a domestic police force - Trump said: "We're looking at troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country."
The deployment in California - the first over the head of a state governor since the Civil Rights era - was "purposefully inflammatory", Governor Gavin Newsom said.
"Trump is sending 2,000 National Guard troops into LA County - not to meet an unmet need, but to manufacture a crisis," Newsom posted on X on Sunday.
"He's hoping for chaos so he can justify more crackdowns, more fear, more control. Stay calm. Never use violence. Stay peaceful."
Newsom's warning came after Los Angeles was rocked by two days of confrontations that saw federal agents firing flash-bang grenades and tear gas toward crowds angry at the arrests of dozens of migrants.
"INTIMIDATION"
Republicans lined up behind Trump to dismiss the pushback by Newsom and other local officials against the National Guard deployment.
"I have no concern about that at all," Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson told ABC's "This Week", accusing Newsom of "an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary".
As for threats by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday to send in active-duty Marines on top of the Guard troops, Johnson said he did not see that as "heavy-handed".
"We have to be prepared to do what is necessary," he argued.
Demonstrators told AFP the purpose of the troops was not necessarily to keep order.
"I think it's an intimidation tactic," Thomas Henning said.
"These protests have been peaceful. There's no one trying to do any sort of damage right now and yet you have the National Guard with loaded magazines and large guns standing around trying to intimidate Americans from exercising our first amendment rights."
Estrella Corral said demonstrators were angry that hard-working migrants who have done nothing wrong were being snatched by masked immigration agents.
"This is our community, and we want to feel safe," she told AFP.
"Trump deploying the National Guard is ridiculous. I think he's escalating, he's trying to make a show for his agenda."
Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders said the move demonstrated "Trump's authoritarianism in real time".
"Conduct massive illegal raids. Provoke a counter-response. Declare a state of emergency. Call in the troops," he wrote on social media, adding: "Unacceptable.
"GOOD MEN AND WOMEN"
The National Guard - a reserve military - is frequently used in natural disasters, and occasionally in instances of civil unrest, but almost always with the consent of local authorities.
Trump has delivered on a promise to crack down hard on undocumented migrants - whom he has likened to "monsters" and "animals" - since taking office in January.
Raids by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency in other US cities have triggered small-scale protests in recent months, but the Los Angeles unrest is the biggest and most sustained against Trump's immigration policies so far.
A CBS News poll taken before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority of Americans still approved of the immigration crackdown.
Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum on Sunday defended migrants living north of the border.
"Mexicans living in the United States are good men and women, honest people who went to the United States to seek a better life for themselves and to support their families. They are not criminals! They are good men and women!" she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump jumps at the chance for a stand-off in Los Angeles over immigration
National Guard troops have been deployed in Los Angeles to quell protests arising from the Trump administration's attempts to deport migrants. PHOTO: AFP Trump jumps at the chance for a stand-off in Los Angeles over immigration WASHINGTON – It is the fight US President Donald Trump had been waiting for, a showdown with a top political rival in a deep blue state over an issue core to his political agenda. In bypassing the authority of Governor Gavin Newsom of California, a Democrat, to call in the National Guard to quell protests in the Los Angeles area over his administration's efforts to deport more migrants, Mr Trump is now pushing the boundaries of presidential authority and stoking criticism that he is inflaming the situation for political gain. Local and state authorities had not sought help in dealing with the scattered protests that erupted after an immigration raid on June 6 in the garment district. But Mr Trump and his top aides leaned into the confrontation with California leaders on June 8, portraying the demonstrations as an existential threat to the country – setting in motion an aggressive federal response that in turn sparked new protests across the city. As more demonstrators took to the streets, the president wrote on social media that Los Angeles was being 'invaded and occupied' by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs', and directed three of his top Cabinet officials to take any actions necessary to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion'. 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers. Nobody's going to spit on our military,' Mr Trump told reporters as he headed to Camp David on June 8, although it was unclear whether any such incidents had occurred. 'That happens, they get hit very hard.' The president declined to say whether he planned to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act, which allows for the use of federal troops on domestic soil to quell a rebellion. But either way, he added, 'we're going to have troops everywhere.' Mr Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, posted on social media that 'this is a fight to save civilisation'. Mr Trump's decision to deploy at least 2,000 members of the California National Guard is the latest example of his willingness and, at times, an eagerness to shatter norms to pursue his political goals and bypass limits on presidential power. The last president to send in the National Guard for a domestic operation without a request from the state's governor, Lyndon B. Johnson, did so in 1965, to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. But aides and allies of the president say the events unfolding in Los Angeles provide an almost perfect distillation of why Mr Trump was elected in November. 'It could not be clearer,' said Mr Newt Gingrich, the former Republican House speaker and ally of the president who noted that Mr Trump had been focused on immigration enforcement since 2015. 'One side is for enforcing the law and protecting Americans, and the other side is for defending illegals and being on the side of the people who break the law.' Sporadic protests have occurred across the country in recent days as federal agents have descended on Los Angeles and other cities searching workplaces for undocumented immigrants, part of an expanded effort by the administration to ramp up the number of daily deportations. On social media, Mr Trump, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. They have shared images and videos of the most violent episodes – focusing particularly on examples of protesters lashing out at federal agents – even as many remained peaceful. Officials also zeroed in on demonstrators waving flags of other countries, including Mexico and El Salvador, as evidence of a foreign invasion. 'Illegal criminal aliens and violent mobs have been committing arson, throwing rocks at vehicles, and attacking federal law enforcement for days,' wrote Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. Mr Newsom, whom the president refers to as 'Newscum', has long been a foil for Mr Trump, who has repeatedly targeted California and its leader as emblematic of failures of the Democratic Party. 'We expected this, we prepared for this,' Mr Newsom said in a statement to The New York Times. 'This is not surprising – for them to succeed, California must fail, and so they're going to try everything in their tired playbook despite the evidence against them.' On June 8, the governor sent a letter to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth formally requesting that Mr Trump rescind the call-up of the National Guard, saying federal actions were inflaming the situation. He was echoed by other Democratic officials, who said the mounting demonstrations were the result of Mr Trump's own actions. The president and his aides 'are masters of misinformation and disinformation', Senator Alex Padilla of California, a Democrat, said in an interview. 'They create a crisis of their own making and come in with all the theatrics and cruelty of immigration enforcement. They should not be surprised in a community like Los Angeles they will be met by demonstrators who are very passionate about standing up for fundamental rights and due process.' Republicans defended Mr Trump's moves, saying he was rightfully exercising his power to protect public safety. 'The president is extremely concerned about the safety of federal officials in LA right now who have been subject to acts of violence and harassment and obstruction,' Representative Kevin Kiley, R-California, said in an interview. He added: 'We are in this moment because of a series of reckless decisions by California's political leaders, the aiding and abetting the open-border policies of President Biden.' Trump officials said on June 8 that they were ready to escalate their response even more, if necessary. Mr Tom Homan, the president's border czar, suggested in an interview with NBC News that the administration would arrest anyone, including public officials, who interfered with immigration enforcement activities, which he said would continue in California and across the country. Mr Trump appears to be deploying against California a similar playbook that he has used to punish universities, law firms and other institutions and individuals that he views as political adversaries. In May, he threatened to strip 'large scale' federal funding from California 'maybe permanently' over the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. And in recent days, his administration said it would pull roughly US$4 billion (S$5.15 billion) in federal funding for California's high-speed train, which would further delay a project that has long been plagued by delays and funding shortages. 'Everything he's done to attack California or anybody he fears isn't supportive of him is going to continue to be an obsession of his,' Mr Padilla said. 'He may think it plays smart for his base, but it's actually been bad for the country.' White House officials said there was a different common denominator that explains Mr Trump's actions both against institutions like Harvard and immigration protests in Los Angeles. 'For years Democrat-run cities and institutions have failed the American people, by both choice and incompetence,' Ms Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement. 'In each instance,' she added, 'the president took necessary action to protect Americans when Democrats refused.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Does US law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?
Members of the California National Guard stand guard, as a demonstration against federal immigration sweeps takes place in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: REUTERS Does US law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests? US President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids, saying that the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framing them as a possible 'form of rebellion' against the authority of the US government. California Governor Gavin Newsom on June 8 said he had formally requested that the Trump administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County" and return them to his command. What laws did Mr Trump cite to justify the move? Mr Trump cited Title 10 of the US Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service. A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 - allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the US is invaded, there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' or the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' What are National Guard troops allowed to do under the law cited in Mr Trump's order? An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect US Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. What are the implications for freedom of speech? The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press. Experts have said that Mr Trump's decision to have US troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticises his administration's policies. Is Mr Trump's move susceptible to legal challenges? Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organisations have cast doubt on Mr Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Mr Trump's actions would only escalate tensions. The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the US, experts said. Title 10 also says "orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States," but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops. Could California sue to challenge Mr Trump's move? California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no 'rebellion' or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said. What other laws could Mr Trump invoke to direct the National Guard or other US military troops? Mr Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent. Casting protests as an 'insurrection' that requires the deployment of troops against US citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the US in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial. But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Gold falls on strong US jobs data and improved trade outlook
[BENGALURU] Gold prices fell on Monday (Jun 9) as a stronger-than-expected US jobs report cooled expectations of interest rate cuts from the Federal Reserve, while optimism over easing trade tensions between US-China weighed on the bullion's safe-haven demand. Spot gold fell 0.2 per cent to US$3,303.19 an ounce, as at 0056 GMT. US gold futures fell 0.7 per cent to US$3,323.40. Three of US President Donald Trump's top aides will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving the trade dispute between the two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The US economy added 139,000 jobs in May, surpassing analysts' expectations, while the unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.2 per cent, the Labor Department said. Wage growth also exceeded forecasts, dampening the likelihood of imminent rate cuts. Investors have scaled back bets on rate cuts, now anticipating one reduction in October. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Trump, meanwhile, said that a decision on the next Federal Reserve chair would be announced soon, adding that a 'good Fed chair' would lower interest rates. The US dollar index edged slightly up, making gold more expensive for overseas buyers. On the geopolitical front, Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the US goes into effect on Monday. Russia stated on Sunday that its forces had advanced to the edge of Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region amid tensions over peace talks and the repatriation of soldiers' remains. Gold, often seen as a hedge against inflation and geopolitical uncertainty, could face pressure from higher interest rates, which reduce its appeal as a non-yielding asset. Elsewhere, spot silver remains unchanged at US$35.94 per ounce, platinum fell 0.5 per cent to US$1,163.10, while palladium was down 0.5 per cent to US$1,041.75. REUTERS
