logo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia to stay in jail as lawyers spar over potential deportation if he is released pending trial

Kilmar Abrego Garcia to stay in jail as lawyers spar over potential deportation if he is released pending trial

CBS News5 hours ago

Judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia's release, but he could still be detained by ICE
Washington — Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Salvadoran man who was deported back to his home country and then returned to the U.S. for federal prosecution, is set to remain in jail for several more days as lawyers debate whether the Justice Department can stop him from being deported if he is released from federal custody pending his trial on human smuggling charges, according to The Associated Press.
Lawyers for Abrego Garcia and federal prosecutors met in court in Nashville on Wednesday for a hearing to discuss the conditions of his release after U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes on Sunday denied a Justice Department request to keep Abrego Garcia detained while awaiting a criminal trial.
In her decision, Holmes said Abrego Garcia should be released, with certain conditions. But she noted, and lawyers for both sides acknowledged, that the Salvadoran man would likely be detained by federal immigration authorities for removal proceedings if released on criminal charges.
The Justice Department has appealed Holmes' release order, but a federal district judge on Wednesday declined to pause that decision.
The judge, Waverly Crenshaw, set a hearing for July 16 to consider the government's bid to revoke the release order.
"The government emphasizes that absent a stay, it will incur the irreparable injury of Abrego possibly facing deportation from the United States pursuant to the immigration detainer lodged against him by DHS," Crenshaw wrote in his decision denying the Justice Department's stay request. "If deported, the government argues, the Department of Justice will be deprived of the opportunity to pursue its criminal charges against Abrego. At bottom, the government asks the court to save it from itself because it may suffer irreparable harm completely of its own making."
Abrego Garcia was charged with two counts arising out of what federal prosecutors said was his participation in a yearslong conspiracy to smuggle migrants into the U.S. unlawfully. He pleaded not guilty to both charges at a hearing earlier this month.
Holmes' acknowledged in her order that Abrego Garcia was likely to remain in custody — either of the U.S. Marshals or Immigration and Customs Enforcement — regardless of how she ruled on the detention request, and said her analysis was "little more than an academic exercise." But in a filing with the court, the Justice Department said that a release of Abrego Garcia into custody of immigration authorities "poses potentially irreparable problems" for the prosecution of his case and the public.
If the court refuses to pause Holmes' release order and Abrego Garcia is moved to ICE custody and deported, "the prosecution would lose the meaningful opportunity to try its case," prosecutors said, acknowledging that his potential deportation would not be "instantaneous."
But Abrego Garcia's lawyers called the Justice Department's concerns about his potential deportation while awaiting trial a "possible self-inflicted injury by its executive branch colleagues at the Department of Homeland Security."
Abrego Garcia's case garnered significant public attention after a Trump administration immigration official acknowledged in a court filing that his deportation to El Salvador was an "administrative error." A Salvadoran native, Abrego Garcia came to the U.S. illegally in 2011 and has resided in Maryland for more than a decade.
He was placed on a removal flight in March as part of President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration and promise of mass deportations, and sent with hundreds of other migrants to El Salvador. Abrego Garcia, however, had been granted a legal status known as withholding of removal in 2019, which prevented the Department of Homeland Security from deporting him to his home country of El Salvador because of likely persecution by gangs.
A federal judge in April ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S., and that portion of her order was affirmed by the Supreme Court later that month. While the Trump administration resisted efforts to bring Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. for weeks, it finally did so earlier this month so he could face prosecution for alleged human smuggling.
A federal grand jury in Tennessee returned the indictment against Abrego Garcia in late May. The charges stem from a November 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee, when he was pulled over by the state Highway Patrol for speeding. Abrego Garcia had at least eight people in the car with him when he was stopped and said they had been performing construction work in St. Louis, according to body camera footage released by the Highway Patrol.
An April report from the Department of Homeland Security regarding the incident said Abrego Garcia was suspected of human trafficking, though he was not arrested or charged with any crime. He was given a warning citation by the Tennessee officers.
Abrego Garcia was arraigned earlier this month, and Holmes held a hearing to determine whether he should be detained or released ahead of his trial.
In finding that Abrego Garcia should be released, the magistrate judge said that she "cannot find from the evidence presented that Abrego's release clearly and convincingly poses an irremediable danger to other persons or to the community."
Holmes called the government's evidence "unreliable" and claims of Abrego Garcia's alleged membership in the gang MS-13 "simply insufficient," as government cooperating witnesses gave an ICE investigator "conflicting" information.
The judge said the government put forth "hearsay statements" from cooperating witnesses who stand "to gain something from their testimony in this case."
One of the cooperators has two felony convictions, has been deported five times and was released early from a 30-month federal prison sentence for human smuggling for providing information to the government in Abrego Garcia's case, Holmes wrote. He is also the purported "domestic leader" of the human smuggling organization that prosecutors allege Abrego Garcia participated in, the judge said.
The second cooperator is an "avowed member of the human smuggling organization," according to the judge, and is in custody charged with a federal crime "for which he hopes to be released in exchange for" his testimony before the grand jury. Holmes said the second man has also been deported before and has now requested deferred action on his removal in exchange for his cooperation with the government in Abrego Garcia's case.
Holmes said their statements about Abrego Garcia — namely regarding his alleged smuggling trips from Maryland to Houston and back — "defy common sense."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The National Garden of American Heroes: A Folly in Three Dimensions
The National Garden of American Heroes: A Folly in Three Dimensions

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

The National Garden of American Heroes: A Folly in Three Dimensions

Next Tuesday, July 1, is the deadline for artists to submit applications to contribute to the National Garden of American Heroes, a joint venture of the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts. The project, proposed during the first Trump administration and revived this year, would create an outdoor display, in an as yet undetermined location, of 250 life-size statues of individuals 'who have contributed to our cultural, scientific, economic and political heritage,' as the NEH's April 24 press release states. Grants of up to $200,000 per statue are available, with the subjects drawn from a wide-ranging list contained in President Trump's Jan. 18, 2021, Executive Order 13978. Applicants must 'submit a two-dimensional or three-dimensional graphic representation of the preliminary concepts for up to three statues of selected individuals, accompanied by a description of the proposed project and workplan.' Successful applicants will be notified by Sept. 25 and must deliver their finished statue(s) by June 1 of next year. According to Acting NEH Chairman Michael McDonald, 'The projected unveiling date for the Garden is on or about July 4, 2026.'

Minnesota faces federal lawsuit for offering illegal immigrants college tuition benefits denied to Americans
Minnesota faces federal lawsuit for offering illegal immigrants college tuition benefits denied to Americans

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Minnesota faces federal lawsuit for offering illegal immigrants college tuition benefits denied to Americans

The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint challenging laws in Minnesota that provide free and reduced in-state tuition to illegal aliens, claiming the laws are unconstitutional. Under federal law, higher education institutions are prohibited from providing benefits to illegal aliens not offered to U.S. citizens. According to the DOJ, Minnesota's laws unconstitutionally discriminate against U.S. citizens and are in direct conflict with federal law. "No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens," Attorney General Pam Bondi said. "The Department of Justice just won on this exact issue in Texas, and we look forward to taking this fight to Minnesota in order to protect the rights of American citizens first." By filing the lawsuit, the DOJ is demanding that Minnesota stop the enforcement of a law requiring public colleges and universities to provide in-state tuition rates and free tuition based on certain income circumstances to immigrants in the country illegally who maintain state residency. Federal law prohibits higher education facilities from providing education benefits to illegal immigrants, which are not offered to U.S. citizens. The lawsuit comes just weeks after the DOJ took actions against Texas for providing similar benefits to illegal immigrants. Both lawsuits have been filed in response to two executive orders signed by President Donald Trump since returning to the Oval Office in January. The executive orders were signed to ensure illegal immigrants cannot receive taxpayer benefits or preferential treatment. One of the orders, "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders," ordered all agencies to "ensure, to the maximum extent permitted by law, that no taxpayer-funded benefits go to unqualified aliens." The other order, "Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens," directs officials to "take appropriate action to stop the enforcement of State and local laws, regulations, policies, and practices favoring aliens over any groups of American citizens that are unlawful, preempted by Federal law, or otherwise unenforceable, including State laws that provide in-State higher education tuition to aliens but not to out-of-State American citizens." Ultimately, Texas complied with the DOJ and stopped enforcing the Texas Dream Act, which was originally introduced in February 2001. The legislation, signed by Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, June 16, 2001, removed federal immigration status as a factor in determining eligibility to pay in-state tuition at Texas public colleges and universities for students who graduate from a Texas high school and who meet the minimum residency, academic and registration criteria. While the state immediately stopped enforcement, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has since intervened. On Tuesday, the ACLU of Texas, alongside organizations like the Texas Civil Rights Project and Democracy Forward, filed a motion to intervene in the litigation to defend the constitutionality of the Texas Dream Act against the DOJ. The ACLU said the DOJ's order was agreed to by Texas without proper process and creates "sweeping uncertainty" for students and colleges. "As students prepare to attend school in the fall, the failure of neither the DOJ nor the attorney general to defend the Texas Dream Act threatens their ability to afford tuition – and suddenly threatens their dreams of pursuing higher education," the ACLU said in a press release. "By moving to intervene, these groups and individuals hope to challenge this abusive litigation strategy and defend the Texas Dream Act, which has enabled a generation of Texans to grow their careers and become leaders in our communities." Fox News Digital has reached out to Gov. Greg Abbott's office for comment on the matter.

Driver held without bond, accused of going over 120 mph in fatal 2024 Lauderhill crash, police say
Driver held without bond, accused of going over 120 mph in fatal 2024 Lauderhill crash, police say

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Driver held without bond, accused of going over 120 mph in fatal 2024 Lauderhill crash, police say

A driver is being held without bond, accused of reaching speeds over 120 mph before a crash that killed a man and injured three others in a 2024 Lauderhill crash, police said. The crash happened shortly after 4 a.m. on May 23 in the 1400 block of NW 31st Avenue, when Cristian Dupont Gonzalez, 24, the driver of a blue Mercedes, allegedly fled from police and collided with a silver Chevrolet sedan. The Chevrolet's sole occupant, 50-year-old Daryl L. Walker, was later pronounced dead at Broward Health Medical Center. Dupont Gonzalez remains in custody Dupont Gonzalez was being held at the Broward Sheriff's Office Main Jail. The State Attorney's Office requested no bond on the most serious charges: fleeing and eluding and vehicular homicide. Three others injured According to Lauderhill police, the Mercedes was carrying three adult occupants who were all transported to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store