logo
The secret psychology of dogs and cats: do we ever really know what they are thinking?

The secret psychology of dogs and cats: do we ever really know what they are thinking?

The Guardian9 hours ago

I am lost in Morris's eyes. They are brown, almond-shaped and fringed by impossibly long lashes. He looks back at me, softly blinking occasionally, and then reaches out his tongue and licks my cheek, just once.
I've been depressed lately, and while I've received compassion and support from many dear people, Morris, my 10-year-old terrier, has been one of the greatest sources of comfort. With that reassuring lick, that steady gaze, he's conveying a message: 'It's OK. Everything will be all right.'
Or is he? Could the look actually be saying: 'Those biscuits in the tin … Fancy getting me one?' Was he merely licking a fleck of mayonnaise off my cheek?
Dr Jon Bowen, a behavioural consultant at the Queen Mother hospital for animals in Hertfordshire, waves my doubts away. 'I'm sure your dog was showing empathy and support,' he says. 'It's part of why our mutual bonds with them are so powerful.' He also tells me that the close eye contact we shared would have released oxytocin, the bonding hormone – in both of us.
A 2021 study found that 80% of dog owners felt that their pet helped them get through tough times, and I've recently spoken to many people who felt the same. Sally Bayly, a yoga teacher from Rye in East Sussex, told me that when her husband, Michel, died in 2020, Lola, their black labrador, became extra attentive to her and her two sons. 'It was as if she'd lost one of her pack and was determined not to lose any more,' she said. 'Whenever one of us is feeling down, she'll come over and lie near us, put her head close to us, or lick our hands, face, even clothes.' Lola accompanies Bayly to classes, where she plays an important role: 'During relaxation, she walks around quietly, standing near people or sniffing them until they settle. She only lies down on her blanket when she feels everyone is totally relaxed. This helps me to know, too.'
Margaret Walsh, a health and safety manager in the west of Ireland, told me how her cavachon helps her autistic son through difficult moments. 'Conor rocks when he's overstimulated, and as soon as Missy becomes aware of his distress she will jump on his lap, which helps them both relax.'
Not everyone in the scientific community is willing to recognise such behaviour as empathy, however. One recent study concluded: 'It appears unlikely that dogs are capable of sympathy or empathy.'
'There is a belief in some quarters that certain emotional and cognitive capacities, like being empathic, are a human preserve,' says Dr Karen Hiestand, a lecturer in veterinary and animal ethics at the Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, whose research centres on human-animal relationships. 'Attributing such qualities to other species is considered anthropomorphism or 'bad science'.'
If our pets' seemingly caring behaviour isn't empathy, then what is it? One theory is that it could be driven by curiosity: why is my human not getting out of bed/making those strange sobbing sounds?
Then there's what's known as 'emotional contagion', whereby witnessing an emotion in another 'infects' the observer with the same emotion. (This is easily seen in young toddlers – one begins to cry and soon the room is full of crying infants.) Emotional contagion doesn't require any understanding of why someone is feeling what they're feeling, or motivate support. That would be what Hiestand calls 'top-shelf empathy', 'where there's a cognitive component – a thought process that says: I know how you feel, and I'm going to try to do something to help.'
One of the ways this has been investigated in nonhuman animals is by replicating studies originally designed to test toddlers. The parent/owner feigns some kind of sudden distress and the infant/animal's response is monitored – will they simply carry on with what they were doing? Will they get excited? Try to offer comfort?
One such study sought to distinguish between emotional contagion and higher empathy by bringing a stranger into the mix. When the owner cried, the majority of dogs showed empathic concern and comfort offering: they approached them slowly and gently – some nuzzled or put a paw on their owner, a couple made whimpering noises.
But what about the stranger? If they were only experiencing emotional contagion, the dog would go to their owner for comfort when the stranger cried. If empathy was at work, however, then the dog would approach the crying stranger and seek to comfort them. This is what happened: the dog noticed the stranger's distress and went to them to offer comfort.
Hiestand's recent research adopted a similar experimental protocol – owners faked a sudden injury. But her study also included cats.
A self-professed cat person ('till I die,' she says) Hiestand believes our feline friends are widely misunderstood – and unfairly compared with dogs.
'While we share our lives and homes with both, they are completely different, evolutionarily speaking,' she says. 'Dogs are highly social, group-living animals who have co-evolved with us for at least 40,000 years. Their ability to read us is huge. Domestic cats evolved from a completely solitary ancestor – the African wildcat – and have lived alongside us for far less time; any sociability they display is a domestication effect, not an inherent part of them.' By this token, a display of empathy from a cat in Hiestand's experiment would be quite extraordinary.
So what happened? Like dogs, the cats did change their behaviour in response to the feigned injury. 'They stopped what they were doing. They looked at the owner more, though did not necessarily approach them. And they showed signs of stress, typically grooming a paw. Whether that's empathy, or whether it's 'something weird is happening to this important resource in my world, so I'll keep an eye on them', it's still significant.'
Anne Hadley, a PhD student from Brighton, is convinced that her cat Harry is responsive to her emotional state. 'When I am distressed, he seems to sense my need for comfort without me seeking him out, and he provides it in the only way he knows – snuggling up to me and purring,' she says. 'He also loves being around me when I meditate, lying as close to me as possible.'
Does Hiestand think her cat, Hermione, understands her? 'I don't know if she understands me, but recently she got beaten up by a neighbour's cat and sustained some nasty injuries,' she says. 'The normal thing for a cat that's in pain or stressed is to go away and hide. But she came to me for comfort and support. When a cat behaves that way, it is motivated solely by their relationship with you, it's not an innate response. She wanted to be close to me, and that made me feel amazing.'
This raises an important point. If believing that Morris is taking extra care of me helps me feel better, then his actions are of value, regardless of what motivates them. Hiestand agrees. 'The participants in my study all reported increased bonds with the animals they believed were able to empathise with them, which provided great support.'
Regardless of whether cats and dogs really care about our feelings, the fact that they can read our emotions so accurately in the first place is in itself remarkable.
In a recent Seed Talk called The Psychology of Dogs, Bowen explains how dogs have learned that humans need to be looked at differently from dogs in order to read emotions. 'In humans,' he says, 'emotions are more clearly readable on the left side of the face. When we try to read each other's feelings, we tend to focus more – and for longer – at the left side of the face due to this asymmetry'. But dogs don't have one side of the face more expressive than the other. 'When they look at each other, they don't focus on the left side of the face because there's no need to. But when they look at us, they do,' says Bowen.
Eye-tracking studies – which use technology to follow the focus of a subject's gaze – show something similar. If it's another dog they're looking at, a dog's first port of call will be the ears, then the mouth and eyes; but if it's a human, they look first at the frontalis muscles (that wrinkle the forehead or raise the eyebrows), then the cheeks (which work hard when we smile) and eyes.
Cats, too, recognise the emotions represented by different human expressions and tones of voice. They have also learned to use their voices as a way of communicating what they are feeling – miaowing is primarily directed at humans, not other cats.
'Harry is the most vocal cat I have ever known,' says Hadley. 'He leaves you in no doubt about his feelings. His miaows vary from chatty to purry, to a demanding no-nonsense miaow and a tragic wail.'
As a woman and a cat owner, Hadley represents the cohort of people who fared the best in a 2020 study by the University of Milan, which sought to test how adept people were at identifying the emotions associated with different cat miaows. Most people failed miserably.
Given our long, shared history, you'd think we'd do better at reading dogs – but we're pretty hopeless at that, too.
In research by Dr Holly Molinaro, from the Canine Science Collaboratory at Arizona State University, the majority of her 300 participants could not reliably gauge whether a dog in the video footage they were shown was happy or sad.
Molinaro filmed a dog encountering a variety of situations: for example, being offered a treat, seeing a cat, or facing a man holding a leash or brandishing the vacuum cleaner. In the first instance, she only showed participants footage of the dog itself. Then she showed them the whole video. Given this new contextual information, they were much more forthcoming about whether the dog was happy or sad, calm or agitated. However, Molinaro noticed that they judged the dog's emotions not on his behaviour but on the situation. 'If he was in a positive scenario, they assumed he was happy; if it was negative, they assumed he was not happy,' she says.
To test this out, Molinaro edited the video, swapping around the dog and background. For example, people were shown footage recorded when the dog was staring down the barrel of the vacuum cleaner, but in which he now appeared to be getting shown his leash. Despite having described him as feeling 'bad and agitated' in the first instance, they now rated him 'happy and calm'. 'The results clearly showed that people judged the dog's emotions not on his behaviour, but on the context,' Molinaro says.
Even worse, when those who'd watched the doctored footage were asked what information they'd used to judge the dog's emotions, they chose 'context' the least, claiming to have observed the dog's actions and demeanour. 'We think we're looking at the dog but we're not.'
Hiestand points out that even when we do look at our pets' expressions, we often misconstrue what we see.
'The idea that animals feel guilty when they've done something 'bad' is widespread, but it's incorrect,' she says. 'When you get home and they've ripped up a cushion, what you're seeing isn't guilt – it's fear. They are picking up that you are angry or upset.'
Part of the problem is that we can't help imagining how we would feel in a given situation and projecting our own feelings on to them. 'It's so easy to do,' says Molinaro, admitting that despite her research, she still catches herself doing it with her cat.
While our failure to read our pets' feelings can, on occasions, be disastrous (Hiestand calls the recent rise in dog bites an epidemic), the consequences are generally less serious: a dog having to endure a hug, when research shows the vast majority don't enjoy it; or as Hadley confesses, a longsuffering cat who, as a child, she would dress up in doll's clothes – and 'who never once scratched or protested'.
But that doesn't mean we shouldn't try to do better.
'There's an assumption that because we love our pets, their lives are good,' says Hiestand. 'That is categorically not the case. We need to be mindful of ignoring their needs. We need to get to know them, not just as a dog or a cat but as an individual.'
Bowen agrees. Over the last few years, he has used his considerable knowledge and skill to address an important question. What makes Wisley tick?
Wisley is a black labrador who, says Bowen proudly, is the best dog in the world. (Well, that's a coincidence, I say …)
'He likes playing Frisbee. But what exactly about the game does he like? Is it the chase? Is it catching? Does he like chasing and catching other objects – or only a Frisbee? By observing him and pinpointing the moment he enjoys the most, I've learned what he likes and can fulfil it,' he says. 'Knowing how to make your dog happy makes you happy.'
I'd always liked to think I was pretty good at reading Morris. He has this way of talking with his eyes: I want a drink. I need to go outside. Can you two go to bed now? I'm tired.
But writing this piece has given me paws (sorry) for thought. I've begun to notice that while he likes to come to me and sit very close when he senses I'm upset, he isn't comfortable with me forcing such contact – say, picking him up and carrying him to where I'm going. And, no, he isn't keen on being hugged. He'll tolerate it, but after a few moments he'll get down and sidle off.
In future, rather than basing my interactions with Morris around what I want, I'm going to make the effort to be more mindful of how he is feeling. After all, he is the best dog in the world.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Completion of £16m Trowbridge medical centre 'firmly in sight'
Completion of £16m Trowbridge medical centre 'firmly in sight'

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Completion of £16m Trowbridge medical centre 'firmly in sight'

The completion of a £16m integrated care centre is "firmly in sight" following the installation of a new roof. The Trowbridge Integrated Care Centre in Wiltshire has been described as a "state-of-the-art health and care facility" and is due to open to patients early next site will become the location for the minor injury unit and X-ray department that are currently based within the nearby Trowbridge Community executive lead for cancer, planned care and community, Caroline Holmes, said: "The building work is well under way, the finish line is firmly in sight, and local people can now see their new integrated care centre really begin to take shape. Using the latest green technology, such as solar panels and heat pumps, the centre is designed to be fully self-sufficient and net zero carbon. Representatives from Bath and North East Somerset, Swindon and Wiltshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) marked the "milestone" occasion on the recently installed were joined by the Mayor of Trowbridge, along with a number of NHS colleagues who will soon call the new centre Holmes thanked those who had helped bring the new centre to added: "When the very first spades went in the ground, it was difficult to picture how a brand new health and care facility could emerge from what was essentially a very muddy field. Yet, here we are."The new centre is set to be a "flagship location" for local health and care, with teams from many different organisations, including HCRG Care Group, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership and the Royal United Hospital, working together under one roof.

Mum thought four-year-old was faking sick to get off school - then doctors gave a heartbreaking diagnosis
Mum thought four-year-old was faking sick to get off school - then doctors gave a heartbreaking diagnosis

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Mum thought four-year-old was faking sick to get off school - then doctors gave a heartbreaking diagnosis

When four-year-old Farihah complained of a painful sensation in her leg, her mother thought it was an excuse to skip school. But the truth turned out to be much worse as the youngster, from East London, was later diagnosed with a rare illness that would no doubt be any parent's worst nightmare. Now 18, Farihah explained her symptoms started as unexplained wounds on her body, as well as alarmingly heavy nosebleeds that would come out of nowhere. Then, during her second week of reception, she complained to her mother of a pain in her right leg, after feeling like she couldn't walk. 'My mum thought it was an excuse not to go to school, but I generally couldn't walk. That's when my mum thought there was something wrong,' she told the Mirror. Farihah visited her local GP before undergoing further tests, but nothing could have prepared the family for the tragedy that followed. In October 2011, the little girl was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, a rare type of cancer. Did something similar happen to YOU? Email 'They told my family, while I was sitting outside with my uncle, and they were really heartbroken,' Farihah said. 'At the time, I was confused, but I also felt relieved in a sense, because I knew that I was being treated. I had been feeling ill for so long.' Farihah started an intense two-year course of chemotherapy treatment, which made her hair fall out three times and caused trouble walking. In 2013, the little girl and her family were told her intense course of treatment had ended - greeted with the news by a large banner with her name on it at the hospital. While it was around 14 years ago, Farihah said she is still grateful for the care she received at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH). Today, the 18-year-old said she has remained cancer free and is sitting her A-Levels, with dreams of going to university to study film.

I ditched the gym and you can too – here are six ways to get fit without it
I ditched the gym and you can too – here are six ways to get fit without it

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

I ditched the gym and you can too – here are six ways to get fit without it

After almost two decades of regular gym-going, I've finally cancelled my membership. The reasons for this are many and varied – I'm trying to save money, gym music is terrible these days, everyone seems to have forgotten how to share the equipment – but the main one is, I think it may actually make me fitter. Working for Men's Fitness magazine for almost 10 years, I got to try out every trend, workout style and fitness event I wanted, and I noticed something interesting: quite frequently, the people with the fewest resources were in the best shape. I'm not including Hollywood actors in this, but otherwise, it's often true: powerlifters working out in unheated concrete sheds get the strongest, runners who stay off treadmills get the fastest, and people exercising in basements have a focus rarely seen in palatial upmarket gyms. Browsing through photos from when my own gym membership was (briefly) paused during Covid lockdowns, I look … if not quite like Jason Statham, then at least his off-brand office-party equivalent. I might not have had the best cardio of my life – even social distancing couldn't convince me to run more than three miles (5km) at a time – but I was certainly lean. Some of the correlation and causation here might be muddled, obviously – Covid also prevented me from getting to my favourite cake shop – but let's not worry about that right now. So what's the plan? Well, as a 46-year-old father with a lot to do, I'm focusing on fitting workouts into my life wherever is feasible, combining cardio, strength and mobility as much as possible, and buying as little kit as I can. Here's what I'm up to. Over recent years, it's become increasingly clear that VO2 max, a measure of your body's ability to use oxygen during intense exercise, is a key indicator of health and lifespan: to the extent that it's probably one of the main things worth focusing on for longevity. Unfortunately, building up a good VO2 max takes a little bit longer than getting strong – but there are things you can do to speed the whole process along. One is the so-called 'Norwegian protocol': working out at a high intensity for four minutes, then at a lower intensity for three minutes, then repeating – four times altogether. With a warmup on top, you're done in little more than 30 minutes – and if you do that once a week, any other running workouts can be more ponderous or plodding. Recently, I've been a regular at my local Parkrun, which is always delightful – there are plenty of people far faster than me to keep me motivated, but nobody bats an eye if you put an audiobook on and turn in a 40-minute three miles. The final thing I'm doing run-wise is hill 'sprints' – a bit of a misnomer, as my nearest hummock is angled so steeply that I can barely get up it faster than a jog. This is actually a good thing; with a couple of hamstring pings in my past, my actual sprinting days are probably over, but the hilly variety still force you to work hard, generate power with each stride, and recruit dozens of muscle fibres with every step. Being strong is good for you: apart from the obvious benefits (carrying furniture, shopping and weary children), it can improve bone density, balance and mobility, heart health, and might even have protective effects against dementia. Some sort of strength training should be a non-negotiable part of your workout week, but the good news is that it really doesn't have to take long – recent research suggests that two 'sets' of exercise per body part, per week can be enough to build strength, with the diminishing returns kicking in quickly afterwards. These workouts can also be very simple: unless you want to look like a Marvel character, there's no need for dozens of movements. All you really need to focus on is what many trainers call the fundamental human movements: push, pull, squat, 'hinge', and carry – all of which can be done with a kettlebell, set of dumbells, or a bag of books if you're on a budget. My twice-weekly strength plan is as simple as it gets: two sets each of overhead presses (push), one-armed rows (pull) and goblet squats (hopefully obvious), and one set of kettlebell swings (this is the 'hinge', but so is any movement where the power comes from your hips, from picking a weight off the ground to doing the long jump). I get my carrying by doing the shopping – I usually do a big bagload or two once or twice a week. This style of working out – popularised by former Soviet strength coach Pavel Tsatsouline – has been around for decades, but it's never been more relevant than in an era where lots of people work from home. The idea is that you're getting into the groove of the movements you do a lot, so not just working out your muscles but also your neuromuscular efficiency, or how well your brain and nervous system can activate your muscles. Basically, you do one or two exercises at a relatively manageable intensity multiple times throughout the day, rather than in one workout session. Each set ought to feel fairly easy (you never go to 'failure', or even get sweaty), allowing you to focus on perfect form and make your body more efficient at recruiting muscle fibers. It won't make you huge, if that's the goal – but it will make you stronger. I'm currently doing it with pullups. There's a bar in my kitchen, so whenever I let our new pup out in the garden – for a wee, for a little dash around, for the sheer joy of trying to eat a plastic plant-pot – I do seven or eight pullups, or roughly half the number I could manage if I really tried. I don't do another set for at least half an hour; I might do anywhere between three and about 10 sets a day: and in a couple of weeks, I'll probably add a rep or two. It's a great system for pullups, but it also works for more beginner-friendly movements – you could try it with wall pressups, squats, or lunges. Sandbags, now making a comeback in functional fitness classes and Hyrox events, are great for lots of reasons. They challenge your body in a way that's difficult to do with barbells alone, working your stabiliser muscles and challenging your balance even at lower weights. You can also drop them on most sorts of flooring without too much fuss. And here's the secret: you can make your own sandbag, which is better and more versatile than most pre-made sandbags, for a fraction of the cost of the ones you see in the gym. My preferred method is to fill a bunch of little sandwich bags with builders' sand (20kg in total is enough to start with), then duct-tape them closed: this helps to minimise leakage, and lets you adjust the weight. After that, just fling as many as you'd like in an old duffel bag or rucksack, and play around with it: lift it off the ground, squat with it on your shoulders, press it overhead or do glute-bridges with it balanced across your lap (much more comfortable than a barbell). You'll build the sort of strength that lets you throw a bag effortlessly into an overhead locker, and also be ready for the next idea … 'Rucking', or putting on a big backpack and going for a hike, might be better for most people than running: there's less impact on your joints, it builds a bit more strength in your legs and core, and it still elevates your heart rate and challenges your cardio. It's currently catching on as a trend, with dedicated clubs and ergonomically designed 'plate carrier' bags that can cost upwards of a hundred pounds – but let's be realistic, there's nothing to stop you throwing a few books in a rucksack and carrying it along on your everyday activities. For me, the school run is perfect: it's about a mile each way, there are a couple of big hills, and if I get too out of breath to talk, my seven-year-old's perfectly happy to pick up the conversational slack. I've been loading myself up with 10kg for the trip for a couple of weeks now, and I'll probably add to that soon – if anything, it makes the treats I pick up at the en route bakery a lot easier to justify. It's the simplest thing of all, but one of the most worth doing. One 2022 study found that taking up to 10,000 steps a day has protective effects against cardiovascular disease and cancer, but the benefits go far beyond that – walking in nature seems to improve mental health, while daily walks also seem to correlate with improved sleep. I'm lucky that I live in a very walkable city, and semi-lucky that I work from home – even though I don't have a commute to worry about, I quite often go for a little wander around (with my dog), to solve work problems that seem impossible when I'm sitting at my desk. Try skipping the headphones for a couple of weeks – you'll probably notice a big difference in how much creative thinking and problem-solving you get done. You can get enough equipment to give you dozens of home-workout options for just more than 30 quid – less than a month's membership at most gyms. Once you've got the workout bug, upgrade as you save. Here's the order to invest in. Resistance bands (£5+)These are excellent for back health and shoulder mobility. Doing a few band pull-aparts (hold the band in front of your chest and stretch it until your arms form a T with your body) whenever you have a spare moment will work wonders for your posture and dislocates (where you hold the band with straight arms, then slowly raise it over your head and behind your back). Adjustable dumbbells (£20-£60)These can be as basic as you like: the main thing to bear in mind is that, after a while, they might not be heavy enough to actually challenge you much. Aim for a pair that you can load up to at least 10kg each – you can use them for everything from squats to overhead presses, and they'll let you directly target muscle groups that are tough to hit with bodyweight alone. An ab wheel (£7+)These are underrated – they're cheap, light enough to throw in a bag, and might be the only bit of kit you ever need to train your midsection. Ab wheel 'rollouts' (the main movement you'll do with them) are a move to build up to – even one can be tricky, so start off by rolling towards a wall that'll stop you short of the full move, or even practising your roll on a shallow incline (if you can find one). These aren't absolutely essential, but if you can hold a plank for two minutes, it might be time to step it up. A pullup bar (£20+)You might never plan to do a pullup, but these can be handy simply for doing dead hangs – and if they're securely anchored enough, you can also use them with a suspension trainer (see below). The version that clips over a doorframe will be fine for pullups, but if you're planning on anything fancier, consider the style that screws into the wall. A kettlebell (£20-£40)The key thing about kettlebells is picking one with a nice shape to it – the official 'sport' versions come in a standard size (with a chunky 'bell' section) that should rest nicely against your forearm when you're doing more complex movements. The other consideration is weight – if you're only getting one (because they're pricey), you'll want the option that allows you to do the most movements, with a weight that's easy enough to lift at first but still stays reasonably challenging as you get stronger. A 12kg or 16kg kettlebell will work if you've never exercised before, but consider a 20kg version if you're a bit stronger. A suspension trainer (£40+)These are the priciest thing on the list, and not strictly necessary – but if you've got somewhere to put one up (or a nearby tree), they'll vastly increase the movements you can do, including the excellent-for-your-shoulders inverted row. TRX is the brand everyone knows, but there are lots of others that are equally good – read the reviews.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store