logo
Trump's Greenland Bid Poses Global Dangers, Says the Woman Facing Him Down

Trump's Greenland Bid Poses Global Dangers, Says the Woman Facing Him Down

Newsweek5 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
U.S. President Donald Trump's push to prise Greenland away from Denmark poses global dangers as growing security challenges imperil the world order, Denmark's prime minister told Newsweek.
Leader of one of Europe's smaller countries, Mette Frederiksen has been thrust into an unexpected confrontation with the world's most powerful president over the giant Arctic island, which she says must decide its own fate. Earlier this month, Trump said he would not rule out the use of force to acquire Greenland on the grounds it is critical for U.S. and world security.
"I have tried to de-escalate the situation, because in this world, with a very aggressive Russia, with a closer cooperation between Iran, North Korea and Russia, helped by China, I will do what I can to ensure that nothing goes wrong between allies and good friends and partners. But at the same time, we have to stick to the most important values and principles," Frederiksen said in an exclusive interview at her office in Copenhagen's Christiansborg Palace.
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen told Newsweek she "will do what I can to ensure that nothing goes wrong between allies and good friends and partners."
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen told Newsweek she "will do what I can to ensure that nothing goes wrong between allies and good friends and partners."
Kasper Loftgaard for Newsweek
Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, a member of NATO. While opinion polls in January showed the vast majority of Greenlanders sought independence from Denmark, even more were opposed to it joining the United States.
NATO at Stake
"I'm pretty sure that there is a big interest in the U.S., especially from the president, when it comes to Greenland. I'm also listening when officials and representatives from the government are saying that, 'of course, we will not do anything by force,'" she said.
"We have to believe that. Because a situation where an ally attacks another ally would be very, very wrong, and it will challenge not only the relationship to the Kingdom of Denmark, but the transatlantic relationship and that would be, I think, very dangerous for all of us."
Denmark was very ready to help step up security for Greenland and the Arctic in conjunction with NATO allies, she said, but could not accept the principle of big states taking over other parts of the world or another country's territory.
A situation where an ally attacks another ally would be very, very wrong
"It's not only a question about Denmark and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark. We cannot agree with U.S. on this point, because then we will undermine the world order that we have built up since the Second World War."
The tussle over Greenland came as a shock to Frederiksen, a 47-year-old Social Democrat who has been prime minister since 2019 and grew up in an era of gratitude to the United States for both the help it gave Europe in World War II and the role it had played in the NATO security alliance.
Frederiksen chose her words carefully. She paused occasionally to pick from the carrot and cucumber sticks placed alongside the coffee and tea on the meeting room table as healthy snacks.
"When you are a true believer in the transatlantic alliance, and by the way, always have been a very good ally to the U.S., it has been quite a surprise to listen to the words coming from the U.S.," she said.
Trade Wars
The tariffs imposed by Trump on Europe to try to redress trade imbalances have been another source of friction. As a member of the European Union, Denmark does not hold separate trade negotiations with the United States.
"I think a trade war will be a problem, not only for Europe, but for everybody, and therefore everything we're doing is to avoid it," Frederiksen said. "What I'm trying to say to our American friends and colleagues is that there are so many challenges globally. At the moment, things are moving in the wrong direction."
I don't think it's fair to ask somebody else to come and defend you if you're not willing to do it yourself
Now it was time to rearm Europe, Frederiksen said: not because the United States could not be trusted, but because Europe had been failing to do enough to defend itself—a theme echoed by officials in the Trump administration who say Europe funded its welfare states as U.S. taxpayers paid for its security umbrella.
"It has been a mistake that after the end of the Cold War that we reduced our military budgets in a big part of Europe. It was a mistake, and maybe one of the most important things right now is to agree that it will never happen again," she said.
"We have to be able to defend ourselves, to deter Russia, and I don't think it's fair to ask somebody else to come and defend you if you're not willing to do it yourself."
Ukraine War
Relative to its economic might, Denmark has been one of the biggest financial supporters of Ukraine since the Russian invasion in 2022. Frederiksen said it would be "a disaster" if Russia won the war.
If European countries thought the strains on the relationship with the United States should push them toward China, it would be the "wrong answer," she said.
Prime Minister Frederiksen speaks with Newsweek's Matthew Tostevin.
Prime Minister Frederiksen speaks with Newsweek's Matthew Tostevin.
Kasper Loftgaard for Newsweek
"The answer is building a strong Europe and a strong Europe that is open minded and able to work, of course, globally, with different partners, including China," she said.
"To make a strategic choice now, less U.S., more China will be, I think, not the right way forward."
One area on which Frederiksen and Trump may share common ground is immigration. Denmark adopted one of the toughest asylum policies in Europe with broad political support in the face of surging arrivals of people from the Middle East and Africa, some with radical Islamist ideologies.
While it curbed inward immigration, Denmark now faces the challenge of deporting migrants who have committed crimes. In doing so, it has come against rulings from the European Court of Human Rights based on the European Convention on Human Rights.
Immigration Court Challenge
"The court has, of course, the right to be a court, but not to be an activist or not to take decisions. And I think the balance has tipped so we need to be in political and therefore democratic control with the legislation," she said.
"Europe is not able to welcome everybody, and maybe most important now, we have to be sure that we can get rid of people again if they don't behave well. It's not a human right to enter Denmark and do a rape and stay."
Alongside her Italian counterpart Giorgia Meloni, Frederiksen is now spearheading a push to get the court to make it easier to deport foreign criminals.
Climate Ambitions
Given the multiple global security challenges, Frederiksen voiced concern that climate change could end up being sidelined. Denmark has become a leader in green energy—particularly from the winds that all too often bluster the flat land pinned between the North Sea and the Baltic.
Trump, meanwhile, has voiced skepticism over climate change and declared a national energy emergency in order to ramp up production of coal, oil and gas, which emit the carbon dioxide that many scientists say is causing global temperatures to rise.
"I have this feeling that climate change, the green transition renewables, you know, there's not the focus that just was there a few years ago," she said. "But I really think we have to keep our ambitions of the green transition very, very high."
Frederiksen said of energy that "we have to keep our ambitions of the green transition very, very high."
Frederiksen said of energy that "we have to keep our ambitions of the green transition very, very high."
Kasper Loftgaard for Newsweek
Read the full interview in the June 20-27 issue of Newsweek, out on June 13 and online from June 11.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain is getting a defense boost aimed at sending a message to Moscow, and to Trump
Britain is getting a defense boost aimed at sending a message to Moscow, and to Trump

Associated Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Britain is getting a defense boost aimed at sending a message to Moscow, and to Trump

LONDON (AP) — The United Kingdom will build new nuclear-powered attack submarines and create an army ready to fight a war in Europe as part of a boost to military spending designed to send a message to Moscow — and Washington. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain 'cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses' as he pledged to undertake the most sweeping changes to Britain's defenses since the end of the Cold War more than three decades ago. 'We have to recognize the world has changed,' Starmer told the BBC. 'With greater instability than there has been for many, many years, and greater threats.' What's happening on Monday? The government is to respond to a strategic defense review commissioned by Starmer and led by George Robertson, a former U.K. defense secretary and NATO secretary general. It's the first such review since 2021, and lands in a world transformed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and by the re-election of President Donald Trump last year. The government says it will accept all 62 recommendations made in the review, aiming to help the U.K. confront growing threats on land, air sea and in cyberspace. Defense Secretary John Healey said the changes would send 'a message to Moscow, and transform the country's military following decades of retrenchment, though he said he does not expect the number of soldiers — currently at a historic low — to rise until the early 2030s. Healey said plans for defense spending to hit 2.5% of national income by 2027 a year are 'on track' and that there's 'no doubt' it will hit 3% before 2034. Starmer said the 3% goal is an 'ambition,' rather than a firm promise, and it's unclear where the cash-strapped Treasury will find the money. The government has already, contentiously, cut international aid spending to reach the 2.5% target. Starmer said he wouldn't make a firm pledge until he knew 'precisely where the money is coming from.' Deterring Russia Even 3% falls short of what some leaders in NATO think is needed to deter Russia from future attacks on its neighbors. NATO chief Mark Rutte says leaders of the 32 member countries will debate a commitment to spend at least 3.5% of GDP on defense when they meet in the Netherlads this month. Monday's announcements include building 'up to 12' nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarines under the AUKUS partnership with Australia and the United States. The government also says it will invest 15 billion in Britain's nuclear arsenal, which consists of missiles carried on a handful of submarines. Details of those plans are likely to be scarce. The government will also increase conventional Britain's weapons stockpiles with up to 7,000 U.K.-built long-range weapons. Starmer said rearming would create a 'defense dividend' of well-paid jobs — a contrast to the post-Cold War 'peace dividend' that saw Western nations channel money away from defense into other areas. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Healey said Russia is 'attacking the U.K. daily,' with 90,000 cyberattacks from state-linked sources directed at the U.K.'s defense over the last two years. A cyber command to counter such threats is expected to be set up as part of the review. 'This is a message to Moscow,' Healey told the BBC. Bolstering Europe's defenses It's also a message to Trump that Europe is heeding his demand for NATO members to spend more on their own defense. European countries, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't pull their weight. Robert Jenrick, justice spokesman for the main opposition Conservative Party, called on the government to be more ambitious and raise spending to 3% of national income by 2029. 'We think that 2034 is a long time to wait, given the gravity of the situation,' he told Sky News.

Poland Election: Ukraine Skeptic Candidate Swings Surprise Victory
Poland Election: Ukraine Skeptic Candidate Swings Surprise Victory

Newsweek

time25 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Poland Election: Ukraine Skeptic Candidate Swings Surprise Victory

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Poland's relationship with Ukraine and the U.S. will become a new focus of the country's politics following the presidential election victory of right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki, a Warsaw-based political expert has told Newsweek. Why It Matters Sunday's election was being closely watched as a signifier of Poland's political direction including its approach to Polish-Ukrainian relations. Nawrocki, who was supported by the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, is said to adopt a "Trumpian" style of politics and during the campaign he visited the Oval Office where he was pictured with the U.S. president. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had urged Poles to elect him. Karol Nawrocki, presidential candidate for the Law and Justice Party, following the Polish presidential runoff election on June 1, 2025, in Warsaw, Poland. Karol Nawrocki, presidential candidate for the Law and Justice Party, following the Polish presidential runoff election on June 1, 2025, in Warsaw, Poland. Sean Gallup//Getty Images What To Know In Sunday's run-off, Nawrocki defeated his liberal rival, Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, according to Poland's National Election Commission, in a surprise turnaround from the first exit poll which indicated that Trzaskowski was ahead. Nawrocki got the support of President Donald Trump and he backs Warsaw's support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, but does not want to see Kyiv join NATO nor the EU. "Poland remains deeply divided," Piotr Buras, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told Newsweek on Monday. After all the votes were counted, Poland's electoral commission said Nawrocki had won 50.9 percent of the vote, compared with Trzaskowski's 49.1 percent. It was a switch from an exit poll at 9 p.m. Sunday that showed Trzaskowski ahead 50.3 percent to 49.7 percent, after which he declared a premature victory. Trzaskowski's campaign hinged on supporting Prime Minister Donald Tusk's democratic reforms. While Poland has a parliamentary system in which the president's authority is largely ceremonial, the head of state can veto legislation proposed by lawmakers. The president has a key role in foreign affairs and serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces and Nawrocki is likely to continue to use his veto power to block Tusk's pro-EU program. The result is also likely also rejuvenate the conservative PiS opposition that lost power eighteen months ago as it eyes taking on Tusk's coalition in 2027 parliamentary elections. Buras, head of the ECFR's Warsaw office, told Newsweek that Warsaw's relations with the U.S. and Ukraine are likely to become subject to party political conflict. Buras said Nawrocki and the PiS will play the Trump or American card in domestic politics, criticizing Tusk's alleged abandoning of the trans-Atlantic partnership by siding with Poland's European allies. Nawrocki has struck an "anti-Ukrainian" sentiment on the campaign trail, reflecting his own convictions as the head of the Institute for National Remembrance which embraces nationalist historical narrative, he said. Both Poland's role as a promoter of a stronger EU defense policy and as an important actor in Ukraine's EU and NATO integration process could be seriously hampered given the changed domestic political context, added Buras. What People Are Saying Piotr Buras, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations: "This election was a battle between two strong negative emotions—or 'projects fear' Between the rejection of the Tusk government and the fear of [a] PiS return to power." What Happens Next Nawrocki will succeed Andrzej Duda, a conservative whose second and final term ends on August 6. Poland's president serves for a five-year period and may be reelected once under the country's constitution. The U.S. has about 10,000 troops in Poland and Homeland Security Secretary Noem suggested military ties could deepen with Nawrocki as president. But Buras said Poland will enter a period of conflict and instability, with a weakened government in terms of legitimacy and ability to act. While a snap election is not likely this year, it could happen as early as 2026, Buras added.

The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies

timean hour ago

The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies

WARSAW, Poland -- Poland has elected Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and staunch nationalist, as its next president in a closely watched vote that signals a resurgence of right-wing populism in the heart of Europe. Nawrocki, who is set to take office on Aug. 6, is expected to shape the country's domestic and foreign policy in ways that could strain ties with Brussels while aligning the Central European nation of nearly 38 million people more closely with the administration of President Donald Trump in the United States. Here are some key takeaways: Nawrocki's victory underscores the enduring appeal of nationalist rhetoric among about half of the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union, and its deep social divisions. The 42-year-old historian who had no previous political experience built his campaign on patriotic themes, traditional Catholic values, and a vow to defend Poland's sovereignty against the EU and larger European nations like Germany. His win also reflects the appeal of right-wing nationalism across Europe, where concerns about migration, national sovereignty, and cultural identity have led to surging support for parties on the right — even the far right in recent times. Far-right candidates did very well in Poland's first round of voting two weeks earlier, underlining the appeal of the nationalist and conservative views. Nawrocki picked up many of those votes. As his supporters celebrate his win, those who voted for the defeated liberal candidate, Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, worry that it will hasten the erosion of liberal democratic norms. Nawrocki's presidency presents a direct challenge to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who returned to power in late 2023 pledging to mend relations with the EU and restore judicial independence which Brussels said was eroded by Law and Justice, the party that backed Nawrocki. But Tusk's coalition — a fragile alliance of centrists, leftists, and agrarian conservatives — has struggled to push through key promises including a civil union law for same-sex couples and a less restrictive abortion law. Nawrocki, who opposes such measures, will have the power to veto legislation, complicating Tusk's agenda and potentially triggering political gridlock. Nawrocki's election could signal a stronger relationship between Poland and the Trump administration. Poland and the U.S. are close allies, and there are 10,000 U.S. troops stationed in Poland, but Tusk and his partners in the past have been critical of Trump. Nawrocki, however, has a worldview closely aligned with Trump and his Make America Great Again ethos. Trump welcomed Nawrocki to the White House a month ago and his administration made clear in other ways that he was its preferred candidate. While Nawrocki has voiced support for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, he does not back Ukrainian membership in NATO and has questioned the long-term costs of aid — particularly support for refugees. His rhetoric has at times echoed that of Trump, for instance by accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of what he said was insufficient gratitude for Poland's assistance. With growing public fatigue over helping Ukrainian refugees, Nawrocki's approach could shift Poland's posture from strong ally to conditional partner if the war drags on much longer. The election result is a setback for the EU, which had welcomed Tusk's return in 2023 as a signal of renewed pro-European engagement. Nawrocki and the Law and Justice party have criticized what nationalists view as EU overreach into Poland's national affairs, especially regarding judicial reforms and migration policy. While the president does not control day-to-day diplomacy, Nawrocki's symbolic and veto powers could frustrate Brussels' efforts to bring Poland back into alignment with bloc standards, particularly on rule-of-law issues. Though an EU member, Poland has its own currency, the zloty, which weakened slightly on Monday morning, reflecting investor concerns over potential policy instability and renewed tensions with EU institutions. Billions of euros in EU funding has been linked to judicial reforms which Tusk's government will now be unlikely to enact without presidential cooperation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store