logo
Trump's ONCD Nominee Sean Cairncross Awaits Pivotal Senate Vote

Trump's ONCD Nominee Sean Cairncross Awaits Pivotal Senate Vote

Forbesa day ago

As cybersecurity threats multiply, from ransomware and AI-enhanced espionage to supply chain breaches, the United States stands at a critical crossroads. Both the strategic and operational heads of America's cyber defense infrastructure remain vacant, even as a sweeping new Executive Order From President Trump resets federal cybersecurity priorities. The nomination of Sean Cairncross to lead the Office of the National Cyber Director comes at a pivotal moment, but his confirmation remains pending. So too does the nomination of Sean Plankey to lead the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. At a time when America needs coordination, clarity and capability, there is no confirmed leadership in either role.
In June 2025, President Trump issued a landmark cybersecurity Executive Order that reverses or revises several Biden-era initiatives. It eliminates centralized federal digital ID programs and mandatory open-source software frameworks. In their place are a tighter geopolitical posture toward adversaries like China. The order favors decentralization, autonomy for federal agencies and a realignment of cyber priorities around economic and national resilience.
The ONCD will be responsible for interpreting and coordinating this directive across the federal landscape. Without a confirmed leader, implementation is on hold.
The ONCD, is one of the most consequential yet least known policy entities in the federal cybersecurity ecosystem. Created by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, it was born from the recommendations of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, a bipartisan panel led by Senator Angus King (D) and Representative Mike Gallagher (R).
The ONCD officially launched on January 1, 2021. It is housed in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building and statutorily tasked with advising the President on national cybersecurity strategy, coordinating agency efforts and building consensus on international cyber norms. Although Congress authorized up to 75 staff positions, it initially failed to appropriate funding. Only after passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in late 2021 did the ONCD receive its first operating budget of $21 million.
In March 2023, the office published the Biden administration's National Cybersecurity Strategy, positioning itself as the federal government's central policy engine for cyber coherence. Since then, it has worked to align defense, civilian and private-sector efforts under one strategic umbrella.
Current senior staff include Deputy Director Harry Wingo, Chief of Staff Michael Hochman, Acting Principal Deputy Jake Braun and deputies including Chris DeRusha, Drenan Dudley and Camille Stewart Gloster. However, the top role of National Cyber Director remains vacant as the Senate weighs Cairncross's nomination.
Both ONCD and CISA are essential to the United States cyber defense posture. One sets the strategy. The other executes it. These roles are complementary, not redundant.
CISA is the operational backbone of federal cybersecurity. It defends critical infrastructure, supports incident response and provides tools and advisories to state, local and private-sector partners. It operates under the Department of Homeland Security.
The ONCD, by contrast, is strategic. It resides in the Executive Office of the President and focuses on national coherence, budget alignment and executive-level coordination across agencies. The two work in close collaboration. They jointly released the Cybersecurity Playbook for Infrastructure Grants and updated the National Cyber Incident Response Plan. Still, without confirmed leaders at either agency, the bridge between policy and execution is fragile.
Sean Cairncross was nominated in February 2025 to serve as National Cyber Director. A seasoned political and government leader, he previously served as CEO of the Millennium Challenge Corporation, Deputy Assistant to the President, and Chief Operating Officer of the Republican National Committee. The Millennium Challenge Corporation is an independent U.S. government agency established by Congress in 2004. It provides time-limited, large-scale grants, known as 'compacts', to developing countries that meet strict standards for good governance, economic freedom, and investments in citizens, as measured by 20 independent policy indicators
During the first Trump administration, he also supported the White House through overseas missions, including a 2019 trip with advisor Ivanka Trump to Morocco where he accompanied her to promote the Women's Global Development and Prosperity initiative, met with local leaders and toured olive groves and land empowerment programs. He holds degrees from NYU Law, Cambridge University and American University. While lacking formal technical cybersecurity credentials, Cairncross has emphasized that the National Cyber Director role is about strategic coordination, not engineering: 'If ONCD tries to do everything, it will be ineffective,' he said during his June 5 confirmation hearing.
His nomination has received bipartisan support, including a letter from 24 cybersecurity and national security experts backing his appointment. 'We, the undersigned, strongly endorse the nomination of Sean Cairncross for the position of National Cyber Director,' wrote former director Chris Inglis and 23 other former cyber and national security officials. 'As a group of senior national security experts with decades of experience in both the public and private sectors, we believe his ability to coordinate across federal agencies and execute strategy makes him the right choice,' the letter added. Still, some lawmakers expressed concern. Senators Elissa Slotkin and Andy Kim challenged him on his lack of technical depth and his defense of proposed budget cuts to CISA.
Despite these reservations, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is expected to advance his nomination on June 12th to a full Senate vote, where confirmation appears likely barring broader political complications.
Cairncross is not the only cybersecurity leader awaiting Senate confirmation. Sean Plankey, nominated to lead CISA, also remains unconfirmed. A U.S. Coast Guard veteran and former DHS official, Plankey brings operational cyber expertise that complements Cairncross's policy credentials.
CISA protects civilian infrastructure from attack. If the administration's directive is to streamline and refocus the agency, that initiative still requires leadership. Regardless of one's political view, the absence of confirmed leaders at both ONCD and CISA is unsustainable. Merging the two offices might someday be debated in the interest of efficiency, but that conversation is premature without stable leadership in place.
Cybersecurity is no longer a future problem. It is a current and persistent national security challenge. Threats from hostile states, AI-enabled attacks, cloud infrastructure breaches and election interference are all converging. The new EO provides a policy blueprint, but the blueprint is only as strong as the builders tasked with executing it.
The Senate must now decide whether to confirm Cairncross and Plankey or leave the country's cyber leadership in a state of prolonged uncertainty. These decisions should be guided by pragmatism, not partisanship.
Leadership matters. Strategy matters. Coordination matters. The ONCD may not be a household name, but its influence extends from the Situation Room to hospital networks to the servers powering small businesses across the country. It is time to staff it accordingly.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After 18 Years, Apple Is Killing Its 9-Minute Snooze—That Can Only Mean One Thing
After 18 Years, Apple Is Killing Its 9-Minute Snooze—That Can Only Mean One Thing

Gizmodo

time35 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

After 18 Years, Apple Is Killing Its 9-Minute Snooze—That Can Only Mean One Thing

For years, it's always been nine more measly minutes. If you don't know what the hell I'm talking about, you've probably never owned an iPhone, or you're one of those freaks who wakes up without a device screaming in your face to do so. If you are in one of those camps, let me explain: for 18 years, Apple has maintained a vice grip on its alarm snooze feature, which grants nine more minutes to your alarm. No more, no less. Just nine minutes. And there's no adjusting that in settings. No adjusting that until now, that is. As noted by MacRumors, iOS 26, which was just introduced at Apple's WWDC 2025, finally lets you manually set your snooze time, which means one thing: it's time to sleep the f**k in, at least for as much as 15 whole minutes. In normal, non-sleep-related time, six minutes more isn't a lot, but when it comes to waking up, if you're anything like me, six minutes is basically a lifetime. Imagine all the horrible stress dreams about your teeth falling out you could have had in that time. Or heck, you might even luck out and get the one where you're driving a car and the brakes go out. The possibilities are really endless, or at least endless within a 15-minute span. Not only that, but you can even—if you're a total masochist—set your snooze time to be shorter. As noted by MacRumors, the developer beta allows you to choose anywhere between one and 15 minutes. The world is now your sleepy little oyster, and you are able to shuck it into the future up to 15 minutes at a time. On one hand, it's kind of wild that it's taken this long to give people the option to extend or retract their snooze times, but also very Apple-like. For many years, Apple was known for its definitive design that locked people in, though that's changed as the years have gone by. In today's iOS, you can change app icons, customize wallpapers, and—soon in iOS 26—choose backgrounds for your threads in Messages, and much more. Those are all things that iOS users of yore only dreamed about, and now they're a reality. It's a shift for Apple, but in this case, probably one that most people will welcome. As for the 9-minute default, well, it'll still have its place as the iOS default and also its own place in history. The 9-minute snooze, if you'll allow me a quick reverie, is a vestige of alarm clock history, originating from GE's Model 7H241 from 1956, which was the first alarm clock with a snooze feature. Why nine minutes exactly? Well, back in the day, clocks had gears, and that meant you had to work around the physical constraints of said gears. GE wasn't able to set 10 minutes exactly due to those constraints—it had to choose nine minutes and change or 10 minutes and change, and ultimately it went with nine. Clearly that decision lasted a lot longer than nine minutes in the long run. If you're ready to break out of the 9-minute prison Apple has kept you in, you'll have to wait a little bit, though. Currently, iOS 16 is only available via a developer beta, and the first public beta launches next month. The non-beta software should launch in the fall in full, along with Apple's newest-generation iPhones, and once that happens, we can all rest easy—at least for 15 more minutes.

Dollar Hits Multiyear Lows
Dollar Hits Multiyear Lows

Wall Street Journal

time37 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Dollar Hits Multiyear Lows

The dollar sank to its weakest level in years, losing ground against the euro, Japanese yen and other currencies. The WSJ Dollar Index traded as low as 94.48, the lowest intraday level since July 2023, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That gauge and the U.S. Dollar Index were recently both on pace to settle at their lowest levels in years. The euro surged above $1.16, and was on course for its strongest end-of-day level since October 2021.

Shaq Signs $1.8 Million Check to End His Crypto Drama
Shaq Signs $1.8 Million Check to End His Crypto Drama

Gizmodo

time39 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Shaq Signs $1.8 Million Check to End His Crypto Drama

Shaquille O'Neal can finally breathe a sigh of relief. The basketball legend turned businessman and TV personality has agreed to pay $1.8 million to settle a class-action lawsuit over his role in promoting the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX. While the payment closes a legal chapter for the former Laker, it also marks a turning point in how courts are treating celebrity endorsements in the volatile world of crypto, a space where stardom once offered both hype and cover. O'Neal is among the first big names to reach a settlement in the high-profile FTX case, which also names football legend Tom Brady, his ex-wife Gisele Bündchen, NBA superstar Steph Curry, tennis player Naomi Osaka, and Seinfeld creator Larry David. Some of the claims against these celebrities, who say they weren't aware of the risks, have already been dismissed. But O'Neal's decision to settle stands out. He was accused of promoting FTX to his fans and investors, appearing in a string of marketing campaigns. In return, the company allegedly sponsored his music festival venture, Shaq's Fun House. According to the lawsuit, O'Neal promoted the partnership through social media posts and videos. He was allegedly paid $750,000 for his endorsement. 'Plaintiffs seek class-wide relief from Mr. O'Neal, who was an alleged influencer and celebrity paid by FTX to present FTX to his followers and event attendees as a safe and legitimate alternative to other cryptocurrency exchanges,' states the court document (FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation, Docket No. 1:23-md-03076, S.D. Fla. Jun 5, 2023). An initial settlement was reached last November. It was unveiled in May by the court, and on June 9, the final $1.8 million agreement was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Adam Moskowitz, the plaintiffs' attorney. O'Neal must pay the amount within 30 days. FTX, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Nov. 11, 2022, had become a crypto juggernaut thanks in part to its celebrity ambassadors. But behind the scenes, the platform was using customer assets as collateral to borrow funds that were funneled to its sister company, Alameda Research, for trading and investments. When the house of cards collapsed, both companies went under, sparking lawsuits against founder Sam Bankman-Fried, his inner circle, and the stars who endorsed the brand. O'Neal's settlement isn't just about resolving his personal liability. It's a wake-up call to celebrities who cashed in on the crypto boom without fully understanding, or disclosing, the risks. 'I don't understand it,' O'Neal told CNBC in 2021 about cryptocurrencies. 'So, I will probably stay away from it until I get a full understanding of what it is.' He added, 'From my experience, it is too good to be true.' Yet he didn't stay away. Since the FTX implosion, regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission have been cracking down on undisclosed paid crypto endorsements. The SEC now emphasizes 'fair disclosure' and 'financial literacy,' warning that fame is no longer a shield. The message to celebrities is unequivocal: if you promote it, you are now expected to 'own' it, even if the venture collapses. And this isn't Shaq's only crypto-related legal headache. Last November, he was ordered to pay $11 million to settle a separate lawsuit involving Astrals, a failed non-fungible tokens (NFT) project he co-founded with his son Myles O'Neal. (NFTs are digital collectibles that can be owned, sold, or traded online.) The project promised a metaverse experience where users would interact via NFT avatars. But after FTX's downfall, Shaq reportedly distanced himself from the venture, leaving investors to fend for themselves. Now, with $12.8 million in crypto settlements under his belt, O'Neal may think twice before lending his name to another crypto venture.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store