Trump says he has spoken to Putin about Ukraine, Iran
US President Donald Trump says he has discussed the recent drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia and developments concerning Iran in a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
During the conversation, Putin told Trump that Russia will have to respond to the Ukrainian drone attacks, the US president said.
Trump said the two men "discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides".
"It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace," he said in a Truth Social post.
Trump said he and Putin also discussed Iran.
Putin suggested he would participate in talks aimed at reaching a new nuclear deal with Iran, Trump said.
"I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement."
Russia said earlier on Wednesday that military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused Ukraine's allies of being involved in them.
UK and US officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend Ukrainian attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers and, separately, bridges that killed seven and injured 115 more.
US President Donald Trump says he has discussed the recent drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia and developments concerning Iran in a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
During the conversation, Putin told Trump that Russia will have to respond to the Ukrainian drone attacks, the US president said.
Trump said the two men "discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides".
"It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace," he said in a Truth Social post.
Trump said he and Putin also discussed Iran.
Putin suggested he would participate in talks aimed at reaching a new nuclear deal with Iran, Trump said.
"I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement."
Russia said earlier on Wednesday that military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused Ukraine's allies of being involved in them.
UK and US officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend Ukrainian attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers and, separately, bridges that killed seven and injured 115 more.
US President Donald Trump says he has discussed the recent drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia and developments concerning Iran in a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
During the conversation, Putin told Trump that Russia will have to respond to the Ukrainian drone attacks, the US president said.
Trump said the two men "discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides".
"It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace," he said in a Truth Social post.
Trump said he and Putin also discussed Iran.
Putin suggested he would participate in talks aimed at reaching a new nuclear deal with Iran, Trump said.
"I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement."
Russia said earlier on Wednesday that military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused Ukraine's allies of being involved in them.
UK and US officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend Ukrainian attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers and, separately, bridges that killed seven and injured 115 more.
US President Donald Trump says he has discussed the recent drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia and developments concerning Iran in a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
During the conversation, Putin told Trump that Russia will have to respond to the Ukrainian drone attacks, the US president said.
Trump said the two men "discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides".
"It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace," he said in a Truth Social post.
Trump said he and Putin also discussed Iran.
Putin suggested he would participate in talks aimed at reaching a new nuclear deal with Iran, Trump said.
"I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement."
Russia said earlier on Wednesday that military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused Ukraine's allies of being involved in them.
UK and US officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend Ukrainian attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers and, separately, bridges that killed seven and injured 115 more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
11 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘Petulant child': Elon Musk slammed amid Trump fallout
Wrong Speak Publishing Founder Adam B Coleman slams billionaire Elon Musk's fallout with US President Donald Trump, claiming he is acting like a 'petulant child'. 'Elon is upset with Trump because of the Big Beautiful Bill – he felt that that bill was lacking in codifying all the cuts or the proposed cuts that DOGE had recommended,' Mr Coleman told Sky News host Caroline Marcus. 'Elon has sacrificed his time, much of his reputation, his effort to help get Trump elected. 'I can understand, to a degree, why Elon would be upset; however, I do think he's handling this much like a petulant child.'
Sydney Morning Herald
31 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
US beef might be on the table, but we don't have to eat it
If the government deals with Donald Trump's tariffs by opening our nation to beef imports, Australians' response should be quite simple – don't buy American beef (' Albanese to put beef on the table in Trump trade talks ', June 6). Australians must make a point of checking where products come from and make the decision to buy Australian. In our capitalist system, the consumer is boss. If the issue of beef imports really is a biosecurity threat, as our farmers suggest, it is also our civic duty to avoid it. I do not buy the 'grown in USA' grapes that have recently replaced the Australian ones in my local fruit barn. I also don't trust home brand products from the big two supermarkets as many of them are imported. The added bonus of telling Trump where to put his tariffs is that we support Australian jobs and reduce our carbon footprint. Lesley Maguire, Marsfield Sure, we have a beef with Trump over tariffs and presidential demands, but our biosecurity protocols are sacrosanct. Importing beef from the US may be Russian roulette for our farmers. Our agricultural industries would be devastated should they be afflicted with the diversity of pests and pathogens assailing the natural environment. One of our greatest exports is the international reputation of our quarantine and biosecurity sentinels. Steve Dillon, Thirroul On Britain's exemption from US steel tariffs, Sussan Ley said: 'We stand ready to work with the Albanese government to ensure Australia can achieve the same outcome. The Coalition wants the government to succeed because that is in the national interest.' With two sentences, the Liberal leader has hopefully begun a period of bipartisanship and a return to true Liberal principles. I congratulate her and hope she can succeed in her rebirthing of a centrist Liberal Party. Rowan Godwin, Rozelle If the US Department of Agriculture's food safety and inspection service was affected by the DOGE cuts, the prime minister should be very careful in reviewing the ban on beef from the US, or any other food products for that matter. There's too much at stake. Judith Campbell, Drummoyne The government is willing to negotiate with Trump on beef but not on pork. Clearly, surrendering their pork barrels is a bridge too far. Richard Grant, St Leonards At long last, the federal government has come to understand and appreciate the value of Australia's primary export products. For far too long, our city-centric governments have failed to value or understand that the nation's wealth has always been based on our primary exports, be it minerals, livestock, wool, grains, wine or seafood. Cost of living was a big issue at the last election, the rising price of eggs a case in point. Some time soon, urban communities will finally learn to appreciate what people living in rural and regional areas have contributed to the nation's living standards, as prices increase and shortages of supply become evident. The nation's wealth is spent but not created in our cities. Bruce Clydsdale, Bathurst Bros become foes In Trump's fickle world, one thing was always certain: his chumminess with Elon Musk would end in a mudslinging fight (' Bromance is over: Musk accuses Trump of being in the Epstein files, June 6). So many times we have watched the humiliating drubbings dished out by Trump on those he deems disloyal or with whom he disagrees. This time, however, he may have met his match. Musk's bombshell post to the world that 'Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the reason they have not been made public', may prove to be Musk's leverage in the relationship. As he cynically posted: 'Have a nice day DJT.' Mary Carde, Parrearra (Qld) Trump Derangement Syndrome. Well, there it is, from his own pen, what we've been seeing for years but didn't know what to call it – and now he's named it for us. Shrinks will be studying Trump for a long time to come, but in the meantime, can we give him the honour he richly deserves – the front cover of Mad Magazine. Patrick McGrath, Potts Point Trump, the fabulist in chief versus Musk, a certifiable megalomaniac. 'Rumble in the Jungle' on steroids. Best show in town. Maureen Moss, Beecroft Peace Prize at stake The US veto of the latest UN Security Council ceasefire resolution simply reminds us that the power to bring the Gaza conflict to an end lies in the hands of one person, the president of the United States (' US vetoes Security Council call for a ceasefire', June 6). The UN itself is powerless, as Israel's ambassador Danny Danon made defiantly clear, saying that 'no resolution, no vote, no moral failure, will stand in our way'. If Donald Trump has set his sights on the Nobel Peace Prize, as often claimed, he should sign one of his famous executive orders to immediately top supplying Israel's war machine. Tom Knowles, Parkville (Vic) Stick with Israel Josh Szeps advises Jews to abandon Israel because supporting it at present conflicts with Jewish values (' It's time for Jews to abandon Israel ', June 6). But abandonment itself is an abdication of essential and core Jewish values of, among others, Chesed and Emunah, which mean loving kindness, steadfast loyalty and faith. To suggest that Israel should be abandoned because of the way its current government is prosecuting the tragic war in Gaza could not be more un-Jewish. Raymond Schwartz, Bellevue Hill Josh Szeps writes a powerful but problematic article. When he calls for Jews to abandon Israel, I presume he means diaspora Jews – that is, Jews living outside of Israel. But what about the seven million Jews living in Israel? Are we to eschew our friends, family and religious kinsmen, tarring them all with the same brush as their government? Do I know how to fix the abhorrent situation in Gaza? No. But I do know that no solution will come from turning away. It is now, more than ever, that we need to turn towards each other and find the strength to get through this latest threat to Jewish survival. Yehuda Bassin, North Bondi Josh Szeps brutally tears the scab off what the state of Israel is doing to the Palestinian people. Is there any legitimate reason why there is space in the world for a Jewish state but not for a Palestinian state? Richard Sergi, Summer Hill Smokes and ire First Chris Minns wants to increase the threat tobacco poses to public health by reducing prices, and now the police minister wants to give a boost to organised crime by excluding the police force from acting against the tobacco black market (' Police 'can't regulate' tobacconists ' June 6). Just whose interests is the government of NSW protecting? It certainly doesn't appear to be ours. John Croker, Woonona 30-year itch The opposition is attacking the government's proposal to adjust the taxation on higher superannuation balances (' Coalition shuts down deal on super tax ', June 5). A mainstay of its argument is the government's failure to index the proposed cut-in point of $3 million. The opposition says inflation will pull in ever more super-holders so that young workers in 30 years' time will have to pay this tax as soon as they start earning. Really? Even if wages do balloon like that, does anyone know of a taxation measure still in force from 30 years ago without change or adjustment? Perhaps the Coalition expects to remain in opposition for the next 30 years, with no opportunity to introduce any changes themselves. E. Mark Latham, Croydon Park Multi-party preferred The path to desperately needed taxation reform must involve bipartisan agreements with the conservatives (' Deal or no deal: Chalmer's mistake ', June 6). The Liberals may be weak, almost irrelevant at present, but they'll not always be so. The best way to achieve this is with the support of the conservatives, Greens and independents. Obviously, some concessions will be necessary by Jim Chalmers, but increased taxation is essential and must be set in stone. Geoff Harding, Chatswood Libs doomed by inability to learn It's hard to believe that the Liberals could sink much lower after their 'near-death' electoral defeat, but they continue to surprise (' Elder statesman has taken his party backwards ', June 6). A divorce with their whacky National partners, followed only days later by a reconciliation (of sorts); old stale, pale males (Abbott and Stockdale) sniping, undermining, and publicly putting the little ladies back in their places; and even a shadow cabinet position given to someone (Kapterian), before the vote count was completed, who didn't end up winning a seat in parliament. With their inability to learn from their past defeats, it seems that the Liberals will always be the party of greater ridicule and incompetence. Alan Marel, North Curl Curl Aside from the misogyny, may I suggest that the most prominent characteristic of a certain Mr Stockdale is his eyebrowage. Photos of him sitting beneath a portrait of Bob Menzies, also magnificently eyebrow endowed, make me wonder whether the only way for women to get ahead in the Liberal Party is to put those tweezers away. Kate Coates, Wangi Wangi It's bleeding obvious that the federal intervention into the NSW Liberal Party has always been a move to consolidate the influence of the conservative faction in NSW. Ironically, the intervention team is dominated by two right-wing fossils from Victoria, a state where the Liberal Party has long been on life support. If the present intervention team prevails, the Liberals will remain increasingly irrelevant, and Australia will be the worse for it. Bruce Spence, Balmain Anyone who follows the intrigues of Victorian state politics would know that former Labor premier Dan Andrews was able to win three elections, arguably owing to the disarray of the Liberal opposition. To send two relics from that disorder of the Victorian age (sorry, Victorian state) is quite insulting. I wonder if Alan Stockdale and former NSW Liberal leader Peter Collins caught up for a bevvy or two. Peter King, Windsor Downs Women's issue Hysteria is an old word that relates to the uterus – a 'woman thing'. I'm guessing that Mark Speakman, though the product of a uterus, has not, and probably will not, understand that his use of the word 'hysterical' has just lost him a swag of women's votes. Mine especially (' Catley slams Speakman after he calls her 'hysterical', ' June 6). Kathryn Coates, Wangi Wangi Pyrrhic victory Those who celebrated North Sydney Council's failure to implement a rate rise as a win for the community should now see the reality of this Pyrrhic victory (' Inside the fight to save famous oval that's slowly falling apart ', June 6). A much-loved iconic oval is in disrepair, council buildings leak when it rains, community services will need to be curtailed and there may have to be a fire sale of income-generating assets. All of this when current residential rates are lower than those of neighbouring councils and the ill-conceived pool continues to drain council finances at an alarming rate. Catherine Turner, Cremorne Left in limbo Workers' rights are under constant pressure, every hour of every day. The ABC keeping staff members on revolving fixed-term contracts is just another example (' Play School staffer sues ABC ', June 6). Such staff members are not chess pieces to be moved around at the whim of management. Flexibility to quickly and easily sack staff is not conducive to loyalty or good mental health. It also erodes the ability of staff to plan their lives. It is not a moral way to improve any organisation's bottom line. Greg Baker, Fitzroy Falls A fair race The final election result for the federal seat of Bradfield has been called, with independent Nicolette Boele declared the winner by a margin of just 26 votes over the Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian (' Teal candidate Nicolette Boele wins final Bradfield recount ', June 5). The Australian Electoral Commission should be applauded for the thorough way in which the full recount was conducted over the past week and a half. The genuine commitment to democracy was evident at every stage and the staff were consistently polite and obliging. My respect for our democratic processes was constantly reinforced as I watched the process unfold. Each vote was treated with the respect it deserved and the intention of the voter was paramount. I feel nothing but gratitude for our amazing AEC and our democratic processes. Robyn Thomas, Wahroonga Waste costs schools I have been following reports in the Herald of the ICAC hearings into allegations about improper spending at the public schools building unit (' Unravelling top schools unit's network of consultants ', June 6). As a lifelong advocate for public schooling (I attended public schools, my children and grandchildren attended public schools and I taught in public schools), I am alarmed at the reported amounts of money that were spent on consultants and the awarding of contracts to friends. Public schools are crying out for money for building maintenance, extra resources, specialist staff, heating and cooling for classrooms, and proper classrooms for additional enrolments. Now we are learning where the money was being spent. Shame on those responsible, shame, shame, shame. Helen Russell, Leichhardt Rare birds It seems calling someone a 'bird brain' is no longer an insult (' Smart cockies crack the water fountain test ', June 6). Mexican sparrows have even found a way to make tobacco into a health aid – they put cigarette butts in their nests to repel parasites. Paul Doyle, Glenbrook It's good to know my visiting cockatoos might come in handy when I have a jar I can't open. Lisa Clarke, Watsons Bay Hard to swallow Jeremy Brender (Letters, June 6), why would anybody consider paying an exorbitant price for an egg and lettuce sandwich at Sydney airport when they could buy a $10.30 meat pie instead? Robert Peters, Maitland Name brand Maiden name? A woman's 'maiden' name is really her father's name. Patriarchy still rules (Letters, June 6). Betsy Brennan, Wahroonga Ruff and ready While I'm in full agreement with correspondent Alison Stewart's views on misogyny in the Liberal Party (Letters, June 6), I must, in defence of old dogs, take issue with her last sentence. You can, actually, teach them new tricks. It just takes a little longer. Jo Bond, South Melbourne (Vic) Postscript Who can trust a politician? We all know the answer to that one, yet Australians trusted Anthony Albanese enough to vote for him in record numbers only a month ago. Buyer's remorse seems to be creeping up fast, as it does in politics, not least among readers who had hoped for a meaningful shift away from fossil fuels. Labor's approval of Woodside's North West Shelf gas project until 2070 was viewed by many, including Herald columnist Ross Gittins, as an inexcusable breach of trust. 'Why, Albo, why? Make it make sense,' pleaded reader Ross Hudson. In bringing Labor back for a second term, Australians had also hoped for tax reform, but the prime minister's unwillingness to slap mining companies with a resources rent tax further undermined public faith. 'Albanese has lost his spine,' lamented Peter Nash. 'Labor has been intimidated by mining companies and by business opposition to changing negative gearing and capital gains tax.' People with fat super balances are also having trust issues after Labor announced its plan to raise earnings tax on accounts above $3 million. The government's extravagant tobacco tax seems to have backfired too, leading to a proliferation of illegal imported cigarettes and vapes. 'Labor's disastrous tobacco taxes are a timely warning about their proposed super taxes,' wrote William Lloyd. Albanese's rejection of American demands for Australia to jack up defence spending didn't inspire confidence among defence hawks. David Sinclair didn't mince words. On the matter of public security 'our PM either has his head stuck firmly in the sand, or in another part of his anatomy entirely.' The defection of Greens senator Dorinda Cox to Labor this week only created more suspicion. 'Albanese's welcoming of that political turncoat adds insult to injury,' said James Fliece. A cynical Sue Dyer added: 'The prime minister and Cox should come clean about when she applied and how this was facilitated and approved.' Labor wasn't alone in the firing line. Liberal elder Alan Stockdale's 'light-hearted' remarks about 'assertive women' – in an address to the NSW Liberal Women's Council no less – drew howls of derision. Alison Stewart had some advice for Liberal women: 'You can't teach old dogs new tricks. Look elsewhere for representation.' That's always an option Alison, but the question is, who do you trust?
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
'In ruins': Russia sees dim prospects for nuclear pact
Russia sees little chance of saving its last nuclear accord with the United States, due to expire in eight months, given the "ruined" state of relations with Washington, its top arms control official says. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov also told TASS news agency US President Donald Trump's proposed Golden Dome missile defence project was a "deeply destabilising" factor creating formidable new obstacles to arms control. His comments were among Moscow's bleakest yet about the prospects for the New START agreement, the last remaining nuclear arms treaty between the two countries, which caps the number of strategic warheads that each side can deploy. President Vladimir Putin in 2023 suspended Russian participation in New START, blaming US support for Ukraine, although he said Moscow would remain within the treaty's limits on warheads, missiles and heavy bomber planes. But if the treaty is not extended or replaced after it expires on February 5 next year, security experts fear it could fuel a new arms race at a time of acute international tension over the conflict in Ukraine, which both Putin and Trump have said could lead to World War III. The Federation of American Scientists, an authoritative source on arms control, says if Russia decided to abandon the treaty limits, it could theoretically increase its deployed nuclear arsenal by up to 60 per cent by uploading hundreds of additional warheads. Ryabkov described Russia-US ties as "simply in ruins". "There are no grounds for a full-scale resumption of New START in the current circumstances. And given that the treaty ends its life cycle in about eight months, talking about the realism of such a scenario is increasingly losing its meaning," Ryabkov told TASS. "Of course, deeply destabilising program like the Golden Dome - and the US is implementing a number of them - create additional, hard-to-overcome obstacles to the constructive consideration of any potential initiatives in the field of nuclear missile arms control, when and if it comes to that." Trump said last month he had selected a design for the $US175-billion Golden Dome project, which aims to block threats from China and Russia by creating a network of satellites, perhaps numbering in the hundreds, to detect, track and potentially intercept incoming missiles. Ryabkov's comments came in the same week that Ukraine stunned Moscow by launching drone strikes on air bases deep inside Russia that house the heavy bomber planes that form part of its nuclear deterrent. Russia has said it will retaliate as and when its military sees fit.
