AUDIO: Victim questions Victoria Police's family violence unit's response
Sabra Lane: The ABC's obtained new documents showing a disparity between cases of Victorian police officers accused of family violence and criminal defendants in the general community. Victoria Police has a special team dedicated to investigating serious cases of sexual and family violence by serving officers. Anti-abuse advocates say there are now serious questions about the unit. A warning, the story details allegations of sexual and family violence. Kimberley Price reports.
Kimberley Price : When Kate, that's not her real name, was 17, she alleges her boyfriend's father started making sexual advances, initially with forced hugs. A voice actor is being used.
Kate: Like, my hands are just down to my side and he would just make me do it again.
Kimberley Price : Kate didn't want to hug her boyfriend's dad, who was a Victoria Police officer, but she says he insisted.
Kate: Well, I felt really uncomfortable, but we never, like, spoke about it, like ever.
Kimberley Price : Kate told her mum Claire, also not her real name, what was happening. Kate also revealed instances where the police officer would allegedly tell her to sleep in the same bed with him and touched her inappropriately. Claire was shocked.
Claire: That night I couldn't even sleep. I'm thinking, who do I tell about this? I literally have no idea. I honestly didn't have a clue what to do and so I googled.
Kimberley Price : Claire came across SOFU, Victoria Police's Sexual Offences and Family Violence Unit, which is tasked with investigating allegations of serious and complex sexual and family violence against Victoria Police employees. So she approached a SOFU police officer.
Claire: He says, you know, you don't live there, so you can choose never to go back to their house again. So the fact that he just took our phone call, gave us ridiculous advice, didn't do any investigation, didn't do any follow-up calls. What's the whole point of this department? And I did think, you know, if it was a different independent body who'd run this department, I really think that it would have been done a full investigation.
Kimberley Price : Through a separate Victoria Police investigation, the police officer was charged with two counts of intentionally touching. The Office of Public Prosecutions later recommended the charges not proceed, and they didn't. While advocates note some positive interactions with the Special Investigations Unit, SOFU, documents obtained by the ABC under Freedom of Information show, statistically, Victoria Police officers charged with family violence are more likely to have their matters withdrawn compared to defendants in the community. It also shows Victorian police officers are less likely to be found guilty. Lauren Caulfield is a coordinator of the Beyond Survival Policing Family Violence Project.
Lauren Caulfield : We know that police officers remain significantly less likely to have any charges against them actually prosecuted in court, and vastly more likely to avoid conviction.
Kimberley Price : SOFU's Detective Superintendent Sharon Congreve said in a statement, the figures actually show Victoria Police is relentless in pursuing those employees who choose to perpetrate family violence. Detective Congreve also says Kate's case was fully investigated, and SOFU is focused on providing a victim-centric response.
Sabra Lane: Kimberley Price and Hayley Gleeson reporting, and if you or anyone you know needs help, you can call 1800RESPECT, that's 1800 737 732. If it's an emergency, call 000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
4 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Victims at risk as cops waver on warning about abusers
Failing to alert victims about the release of their abusers from jail is putting lives at risk, a domestic violence advocate warns. A state coroner recommended victims be given at least 48 hours' notice before violent partners are released from custody. It follows an inquest into the 2020 death of Noeline Dalzell, who was fatally stabbed by her abusive ex-partner in front of their three children. The proposal has drawn criticism from Victoria's police union, which says officers should be focused on responding to family violence incidents, not delivering release notifications from behind a desk. Swinburne sexual violence expert Rachael Burgin said the recommendation reflected the bare minimum of police responsibility, saying "the most fundamental job of police is to protect and serve". She said timely information was crucial for victims, so they can plan for their safety and access support from family violence services. "We cannot continue to see women and children's safety be at risk because of challenges like resourcing," Dr Burgin told AAP. "I would expect police in their role to protect and serve the community, would be taking this very seriously." State Coroner John Cain in November found police missed opportunities to protect Ms Dalzell before she was murdered by James Fairhall. Fairhall was released from custody three months earlier for breaching a family violence intervention order designed to protect Ms Dalzell. He is now serving a 25-year sentence for her murder. Among 11 recommendations, Judge Cain echoed calls from the 2016 Royal Commission into Family Violence for an improved information-sharing system between agencies. He also called on police to carry out an independent review of its family violence units, saying investigators' actions fell short of best practice. Victims are only notified about their abusers' movements if they opt-in to an alert system through the Victorian Victims Register. The Police Association of Victoria said notifications should sit solely with the Department of Justice and Community Safety. "We don't have enough police to respond to victims of violence when they call us in the first place, let alone committing to further processes that would further diminish our emergency response and preventative abilities, by sending officers out in person to deliver these messages," the union told AAP on Thursday. Victoria Police echoed those sentiments in a letter to the coroner. "We believe it wouldn't be appropriate for Victoria Police to have sole responsibility for notifications in every family violence related case within the Victorian court system," the statement said. The force's stance highlights systemic failure when addressing victim safety, opposition police spokesman David Southwick says. "Victoria Police saying it doesn't have the resources to warn women when violent perpetrators get out of jail shows a failure in the system and a failure of government," Mr Southwick said. A state government spokesperson said it was "completely unacceptable" women were still placed in danger after perpetrators were released from of custody. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) Lifeline 13 11 14 Men's Referral Service 1300 766 491 Failing to alert victims about the release of their abusers from jail is putting lives at risk, a domestic violence advocate warns. A state coroner recommended victims be given at least 48 hours' notice before violent partners are released from custody. It follows an inquest into the 2020 death of Noeline Dalzell, who was fatally stabbed by her abusive ex-partner in front of their three children. The proposal has drawn criticism from Victoria's police union, which says officers should be focused on responding to family violence incidents, not delivering release notifications from behind a desk. Swinburne sexual violence expert Rachael Burgin said the recommendation reflected the bare minimum of police responsibility, saying "the most fundamental job of police is to protect and serve". She said timely information was crucial for victims, so they can plan for their safety and access support from family violence services. "We cannot continue to see women and children's safety be at risk because of challenges like resourcing," Dr Burgin told AAP. "I would expect police in their role to protect and serve the community, would be taking this very seriously." State Coroner John Cain in November found police missed opportunities to protect Ms Dalzell before she was murdered by James Fairhall. Fairhall was released from custody three months earlier for breaching a family violence intervention order designed to protect Ms Dalzell. He is now serving a 25-year sentence for her murder. Among 11 recommendations, Judge Cain echoed calls from the 2016 Royal Commission into Family Violence for an improved information-sharing system between agencies. He also called on police to carry out an independent review of its family violence units, saying investigators' actions fell short of best practice. Victims are only notified about their abusers' movements if they opt-in to an alert system through the Victorian Victims Register. The Police Association of Victoria said notifications should sit solely with the Department of Justice and Community Safety. "We don't have enough police to respond to victims of violence when they call us in the first place, let alone committing to further processes that would further diminish our emergency response and preventative abilities, by sending officers out in person to deliver these messages," the union told AAP on Thursday. Victoria Police echoed those sentiments in a letter to the coroner. "We believe it wouldn't be appropriate for Victoria Police to have sole responsibility for notifications in every family violence related case within the Victorian court system," the statement said. The force's stance highlights systemic failure when addressing victim safety, opposition police spokesman David Southwick says. "Victoria Police saying it doesn't have the resources to warn women when violent perpetrators get out of jail shows a failure in the system and a failure of government," Mr Southwick said. A state government spokesperson said it was "completely unacceptable" women were still placed in danger after perpetrators were released from of custody. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) Lifeline 13 11 14 Men's Referral Service 1300 766 491 Failing to alert victims about the release of their abusers from jail is putting lives at risk, a domestic violence advocate warns. A state coroner recommended victims be given at least 48 hours' notice before violent partners are released from custody. It follows an inquest into the 2020 death of Noeline Dalzell, who was fatally stabbed by her abusive ex-partner in front of their three children. The proposal has drawn criticism from Victoria's police union, which says officers should be focused on responding to family violence incidents, not delivering release notifications from behind a desk. Swinburne sexual violence expert Rachael Burgin said the recommendation reflected the bare minimum of police responsibility, saying "the most fundamental job of police is to protect and serve". She said timely information was crucial for victims, so they can plan for their safety and access support from family violence services. "We cannot continue to see women and children's safety be at risk because of challenges like resourcing," Dr Burgin told AAP. "I would expect police in their role to protect and serve the community, would be taking this very seriously." State Coroner John Cain in November found police missed opportunities to protect Ms Dalzell before she was murdered by James Fairhall. Fairhall was released from custody three months earlier for breaching a family violence intervention order designed to protect Ms Dalzell. He is now serving a 25-year sentence for her murder. Among 11 recommendations, Judge Cain echoed calls from the 2016 Royal Commission into Family Violence for an improved information-sharing system between agencies. He also called on police to carry out an independent review of its family violence units, saying investigators' actions fell short of best practice. Victims are only notified about their abusers' movements if they opt-in to an alert system through the Victorian Victims Register. The Police Association of Victoria said notifications should sit solely with the Department of Justice and Community Safety. "We don't have enough police to respond to victims of violence when they call us in the first place, let alone committing to further processes that would further diminish our emergency response and preventative abilities, by sending officers out in person to deliver these messages," the union told AAP on Thursday. Victoria Police echoed those sentiments in a letter to the coroner. "We believe it wouldn't be appropriate for Victoria Police to have sole responsibility for notifications in every family violence related case within the Victorian court system," the statement said. The force's stance highlights systemic failure when addressing victim safety, opposition police spokesman David Southwick says. "Victoria Police saying it doesn't have the resources to warn women when violent perpetrators get out of jail shows a failure in the system and a failure of government," Mr Southwick said. A state government spokesperson said it was "completely unacceptable" women were still placed in danger after perpetrators were released from of custody. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) Lifeline 13 11 14 Men's Referral Service 1300 766 491 Failing to alert victims about the release of their abusers from jail is putting lives at risk, a domestic violence advocate warns. A state coroner recommended victims be given at least 48 hours' notice before violent partners are released from custody. It follows an inquest into the 2020 death of Noeline Dalzell, who was fatally stabbed by her abusive ex-partner in front of their three children. The proposal has drawn criticism from Victoria's police union, which says officers should be focused on responding to family violence incidents, not delivering release notifications from behind a desk. Swinburne sexual violence expert Rachael Burgin said the recommendation reflected the bare minimum of police responsibility, saying "the most fundamental job of police is to protect and serve". She said timely information was crucial for victims, so they can plan for their safety and access support from family violence services. "We cannot continue to see women and children's safety be at risk because of challenges like resourcing," Dr Burgin told AAP. "I would expect police in their role to protect and serve the community, would be taking this very seriously." State Coroner John Cain in November found police missed opportunities to protect Ms Dalzell before she was murdered by James Fairhall. Fairhall was released from custody three months earlier for breaching a family violence intervention order designed to protect Ms Dalzell. He is now serving a 25-year sentence for her murder. Among 11 recommendations, Judge Cain echoed calls from the 2016 Royal Commission into Family Violence for an improved information-sharing system between agencies. He also called on police to carry out an independent review of its family violence units, saying investigators' actions fell short of best practice. Victims are only notified about their abusers' movements if they opt-in to an alert system through the Victorian Victims Register. The Police Association of Victoria said notifications should sit solely with the Department of Justice and Community Safety. "We don't have enough police to respond to victims of violence when they call us in the first place, let alone committing to further processes that would further diminish our emergency response and preventative abilities, by sending officers out in person to deliver these messages," the union told AAP on Thursday. Victoria Police echoed those sentiments in a letter to the coroner. "We believe it wouldn't be appropriate for Victoria Police to have sole responsibility for notifications in every family violence related case within the Victorian court system," the statement said. The force's stance highlights systemic failure when addressing victim safety, opposition police spokesman David Southwick says. "Victoria Police saying it doesn't have the resources to warn women when violent perpetrators get out of jail shows a failure in the system and a failure of government," Mr Southwick said. A state government spokesperson said it was "completely unacceptable" women were still placed in danger after perpetrators were released from of custody. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) Lifeline 13 11 14 Men's Referral Service 1300 766 491
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson's final words to the jury
The defence rested its case today after arguing a final point about the Enrich clinic where Erin Patterson claimed she was pursuing weight loss surgery in 2023. In today's episode Rachael Brown and Stephen Stockwell take you through the last of the prosecution's challenges and the defence's clarifications, before the jury was given an early mark. If you've got questions about the case that you'd like Rachael and Stocky to answer in future episodes, send them through to mushroomcasedaily@ - It's the case that's captured the attention of the world. Three people died and a fourth survived an induced coma after eating beef wellington at a family lunch, hosted by Erin Patterson. Police allege the beef wellington contained poisonous mushrooms, but Erin Patterson says she's innocent. Now, the accused triple murderer is fighting the charges in a regional Victorian courthouse. Investigative reporter Rachael Brown and producer Stephen Stockwell are on the ground, bringing you all the key moments from the trial as they unravel in court. From court recaps to behind-the-scenes murder trial explainers, the Mushroom Case Daily podcast is your eyes and ears inside the courtroom. Keep up to date with new episodes of Mushroom Case Daily, now releasing every day on the ABC listen app.
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Kate Beckinsale sues Canary Black producers for negligence following knee injury
Kate Beckinsale is suing the producers of Canary Black for negligence after she was injured on set. The 51-year-old actress has claimed she was subjected to "dangerous and unsafe conditions" on the set of the crime drama, which was released last October, and is taking legal action against Anton Entertainment Media Services, Inc., and its employees, including producer John Zois, after accusing them of negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and battery, Puck reports. Kate initially filed her lawsuit under the anonymous alias Jane Doe in December, but she issued an amended complaint on 21 May, which included communications with the producers and further details of her injury. In the complaint, Kate alleged she arrived on set in Croatia in 2022 to discover the personal trainer, massage therapist and gym equipment she had been promised were not present, 15-hour days were common, and she was pushed to do her own stunts after her body double broke her ankle and producers drafted in an "unqualified" replacement, who was the girlfriend of Canary Black's stunt coordinator. People magazine reports her agent, Shani Rosenzweig, wrote to Zois: 'No one is actually taking real action to put a plan in place to fix this situation so it never happens again… [Ms. Beckinsale] keeps showing up to set for her call time and everyone around her has been made aware it's going to be a 15 hour [or more] day except for her. "If you're trying to kill a person, you're doing a great job." He allegedly replied and agreed to shorten the "unsustainable" work days. He added: "I don't know what else to say other than you're right.' However, the 15-hour days were said to have continued. The lawsuit alleged concerns about on-set safety were largely ignored and production was halted for months when Kate suffered a complex meniscus tear in her left knee during a scene when a male co-star threw her against a wall. Filming finally resumed after consultations with the actress' surgeon and lawyer, who asked an on-set physiotherapist to be able to shut things down and a list of limitations was agreed on, including no running, humping, harness suspension, squatting or kicking. But the lawsuit stated: "Production made little to no attempt to adhere to the list [and] acted intentionally … to put Ms. Beckinsale in unsafe situations, and coerce her while on camera to perform.' Kate alleged she suffered further injuries "including aggravation and exacerbation of her existing injuries, which was entirely avoidable", as a result of the alleged negligence and "conscious and reckless decisions" being made on set. In the newly amended complaint, Beckinsale allegedly suffered a 'significant trauma' to her knee after she was exposed to "dangerous and unsafe conditions" on the Canary Black set. "Ms. Beckinsale and her team repeatedly raised red flags regarding unsafe conditions on and off set to Defendants, including long, dangerous set days, often lasting fifteen hours, inadequate equipment and medical personnel to help manage the high physical workload and recover from the exertion off set, and failure to adequately inform Ms. Beckinsale of what stunts she was expected to perform until often the moment she had to perform it,' the complaint read. The actress also alleges that although she raised her concerns repeatedly, the producers put her " in harm's way" after they "continued to recklessly and intentionally forge ahead with unsafe filming conditions, forgoing safety to maintain profit margins."
