Trump Cuts Research Lab That Helped Nurture ‘Mississippi Miracle'
When Mississippi lawmakers in 2013 approved legislation to improve students' basic reading skills, it fell to State Superintendent Carey Wright to make it happen.
She ensured that all K-3 teachers were trained in the 'Science of Reading' and hired literacy coaches at schools that had the highest percentage of low-achievers.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
To guide the effort, Wright turned to the Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast, based at Florida State University, one of 10 federally funded labs nationwide. Little-known even among many educators, the labs, created by Congress in 1965, work with states and school districts to implement research-based practices.
Related
By 2019, Wright and her colleagues had pulled off what is now known as the 'Mississippi Miracle,' with students in this deep red state making greater literacy gains than in any other. Fourth-graders in Mississippi rose from 49th in the nation to 29th — adjusting for demographics, it now ranks near the top of the U.S. in both fourth-grade reading and math, behind just Florida and Texas, according to the Urban Institute.
'They were huge partners with us,' Wright said of the lab in an interview this week. 'It's just this amazing group of researchers and content-area specialists.'
I can't say enough about how important they were.
Carey Wright, Maryland schools superintendent
But that distinction wasn't enough to save the Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast — or the nine other RELs, as they're called. On Thursday, the U.S. Education Department announced that it had terminated $336 million in contracts with the labs, saying auditors had uncovered 'wasteful and ideologically driven spending not in the interest of students and taxpayers.'
It cited one lab's work advising schools in Ohio to undertake 'equity audits,' but provided no other examples.
Related
The move has left researchers and literacy advocates shaking their heads. A director at a top research firm with many federal contracts, who asked not to be identified to avoid retaliation, said she got the sense from the sudden, broad cuts that 'no one went in and took a really careful look at where the RELs were being helpful.'
While some lab projects likely haven't led to improvements in practices or student outcomes, she's doubtful that department officials even pored over such data. 'Someone decided that this whole program needed to go.'
An Education Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Since the centers are mandated by Congress, the department has said it will offer contracts to new bidders, but several observers said they were skeptical of this claim.
While Mississippi's 2013 law mandated that Wright implement research-supported teaching, as state superintendent 'you can't really be in every classroom making sure that's happening,' said Rachel Dinkes, CEO of the Knowledge Alliance, an advocacy group that pushes for evidence-based policy.
That's where the lab came in: It developed tools that allowed Wright to gather data about what was actually happening in classrooms, tell lawmakers about its effectiveness and ask for more money to continue the work.
It focused primarily on helping teachers learn about the Science of Reading, implementing a survey that evaluated their knowledge of early literacy skills — as well as instructions for literacy coaches to observe classrooms.
Related
Together, these allowed Wright to track teachers' engagement with students and identify where teachers needed improvement.
'They helped us develop resources that our teachers could use, that our leaders could use,' Wright said. 'If there was something that we wanted to have evaluated programmatically, they would come in and evaluate that for us to inform our decision making. I mean, I can't say enough about how important they were.'
Wright also implemented tough reforms that weren't always popular, such as a policy of retaining students in third grade as a 'last resort.' In 2019, nearly 9,000 third-graders, or more than one in four, failed the state's literacy promotion test, also known as the 'third-grade reading gate.'
In a 2023 op-ed in The 74, Wright and co-author Kymyona Burk, a senior policy fellow for early literacy at ExcelinEd, said previous research is clear that students who aren't reading at grade level when they enter fourth grade 'are not prepared for a critical transition — reading to learn — and have dramatically lower odds of succeeding in school or even graduating.'
A 2017 study from the lab found that teachers' understanding of early literacy skills rose substantially, from the 48th percentile of teachers to the 59th. In schools that Wright targeted for extra help, average teacher ratings on instructional quality also rose, from the 31st percentile to the 58th.
The lab also connected Mississippi educators to others in the region, Wright said, offering 'a chance for us to learn from each other, share what we were doing — share strategy, share resources and kind of help each other grow.'
Though Wright hesitated to credit REL Southeast for this achievement, several observers have noted of late that states in the Deep South now lead the nation in improved literacy. In this year's NAEP report, released last month, four Southern states — Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina — turned in the largest gains in fourth-grade reading from 2019 to 2024. All four are member states of REL Southeast.
In all, Wright said, she worked with lab personnel for nine years, until she left Mississippi in 2022. She called them 'a group of expert partners' ready to help and beloved by her staff, who relied upon them heavily.
'Imagine having content experts at your beck and call for no charge,' she said. 'They were really, I thought, just gems of somebody's creation.'
Related
Losing the labs, Wright said, is 'a huge disappointment' for states focused on evidence- and research-based practices. 'To not have a reliable partner is a real loss for a state chief.'
The move to zero out funding for the labs may also stand in opposition to a few priorities of the Trump administration itself. In a 74 op-ed last July, Wright, along with Penny Schwinn, a former Tennessee education commissioner, praised RELs as centers that stand ready 'to generate and apply evidence to improve student outcomes,' even if too few leaders take advantage of them.
Schwinn now awaits Senate confirmation as deputy secretary of education.
Last week's move has thrown several major research organizations into turmoil.
In a statement, Jannelle Kubinec, CEO of the research group WestEd, which runs two RELs, said the cancellation halts a project in Alaska to support student mental health, one in Nevada that addresses chronic absenteeism, another in Oregon that works to strengthen literacy instruction and one in Utah to address early-career teacher attrition.
The research organization Mathematica, which runs two RELs, said cancellation of the contracts shuts down support for 'a wide range of evidence-based work' requested by state and local education leaders, including a project helping teachers in Nebraska improve differentiated math instruction, one helping teachers in New Jersey use evidence-based practices for writing instruction, and one in Maryland that helps educators prepare high school students with disabilities to transition to adult life.
Mathematica also said its labs have worked with South Dakota and Wyoming to combat teacher shortages in rural districts via apprenticeships.
Dinkes noted another instance in which a REL had a huge impact: In Michigan, state leaders turned to their regional lab to find out why so many certified teachers were no longer teaching. It undertook a survey of 60,000 teachers and found that they wanted, among other things, higher salaries, better promotion opportunities and more access to full-time jobs. They also wanted smaller class sizes and student loans, as well as easier, less costly ways to renew their certification.
The state tweaked laws affecting several of these factors and expanded the number of certified teachers who opted to teach.
Several observers noted that the RELs are, in a sense, a response to long standing GOP complaints about federal education policy's top-down focus: They actually help local educators apply research to problems they themselves identify as crucial.
'The REAL work is driven by the state's or the community's needs,' said Dinkes. 'It is not directed by the Hill.'
Related
Many states don't have the research capability to undertake big projects like remaking literacy on their own, said Sara Schapiro, executive director of the Alliance for Learning Innovation, a coalition of non-profit, private and philanthropic organizations that advocate for more R&D investment. 'The RELs were really set up as the infrastructure to help them do that.'
She said the labs 'are a really good example of this notion of returning responsibility of different functions to the states,' where local leaders can drive a research agenda.
(The labs) are a really good example of this notion of returning responsibility of different functions to the states.
Sara Schapiro, Alliance for Learning Innovation
Several people with knowledge of the situation also said it's ironic that the RELs would get caught up in a battle over DEI and 'woke' ideology, since much of their equity work is driven by states and school districts 'seeing disparities and outcomes for their students,' said the research director who asked not to be named. 'They're trying to figure out how they can best address those disparities, and so they've come to the REL team with requests for help in that area.'
Related
Dinkes, the Knowledge Alliance CEO, said the impact of the labs' work is 'not abstract — it has a direct impact on schools, communities and what parents know.' She said the way the federal contracts were severed, in the fourth year of a five-year cycle, in most cases, 'derails years of work' that was having a direct impact on students.
Wright, who now leads Maryland schools, was until last week planning to partner with the REL Mid-Atlantic about essentially recreating the literacy and math work she did in Mississippi.
Reached by phone after a legislative hearing in Annapolis, Wright said she had just begun developing a relationship with the Mid-Atlantic lab, led by Mathematica, when word of the cancelled contracts came down.
'We were thinking, 'This is great. We can establish another partnership with another REL.' But that is not going to be the case now. It's a real shame.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
15 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Massive Tech Layoffs May Be the Fault of a 2017 Trump Tax Cut
The good times in Silicon Valley are over—at least as far as the current generation of coders is concerned. The software industry is shrinking and, since 2023, the tech industry has been hemorrhaging jobs at an astounding rate. Workers who would've been secure several years ago are now out on their asses. While the reasons for this are diverse (AI is often discussed as a potential culprit and the overall economy has had its ups and downs over the past several years), one potential driver could also be the tax cuts that Trump passed in 2017. It turns out that a little-known provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 altered a longstanding loophole, known as Section 174, that allowed the tech industry to offload the cost of its research and development operations onto the federal government. Prior to the TCJA, tech companies could deduct 100 percent of the costs of R&D, allowing tech businesses the freedom to commit significant resources towards innovation. Bloomberg reports that, as Congress sought to find a way to offset the cost of giving big tax cuts to billionaires, one place where they discovered fat to trim was the tech industry's R&D funding. 2017's bill shifted the deduction from a full write-off to funding that would have to be parsed out over a period of several years. The provision that pared back the funding did not kick in until 2022, however. Not long after it went into effect, the tech industry began shedding jobs like nobody's business. Indeed, 2023 and 2024 were historically bad years for the tech industry, with major companies like Meta, Amazon, and Google booting workers by the thousands. Quartz took a deeper look at the ties between this policy shift and the tech industry's troubles and now speculates that there is a positive correlation: …the delayed change to a decades-old tax provision — buried deep in the 2017 tax law — has contributed to the loss of hundreds of thousands of high-paying, white-collar jobs. That's the picture that emerges from a review of corporate filings, public financial data, analysis of timelines, and interviews with industry insiders. One accountant, working in-house at a tech company, described it as a 'niche issue with broad impact,' echoing sentiments from venture capital investors also interviewed for this article. Some spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive political matters. Quartz also notes that the policy change would have translated into a loss of income for a variety of positions: The tax benefits of salaries for engineers, product and project managers, data scientists, and even some user experience and marketing staff — all of which had previously reduced taxable income in year one — now had to be spread out over five- or 15-year periods. The reality of the government's subsidization of Silicon Valley is particularly ironic given the rabid anti-government sentiment currently circulating in the industry. People like Marc Andreessen would have you believe that tech's R&D can be funded through private money alone, despite no reputable track record of it happening. Elon Musk's DOGE, meanwhile, recently attacked the very parts of the government that have been responsible for helping companies like his own (Tesla) flourish. It's yet another sign that America's billionaires are so greed-addled that they're willing to shoot a gift horse in the mouth and call it victory. Not everybody in the tech industry is an idiot, however. There is currently a concerted effort to reestablish the government's R&D subsidy. The American Innovation and R&D Competitiveness Act, which was introduced by a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers, would restore the full flow of federal dollars for tech's development needs. Last month, representatives from major tech firms reportedly signaled to the Trump administration that they might pull back from previous pledges of U.S. investment if the full tax subsidy didn't return.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bipartisan lawmakers seek to reverse Trump's staff cuts at program that helps Americans afford heat, air conditioning
A bipartisan set of lawmakers is introducing a bill that seeks to reverse the Trump administration's staffing cuts at a program that helps Americans afford heat and air conditioning. Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) are introducing legislation aimed at undoing staff cuts at the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). The Trump administration fired every staffer who works on the program as part of larger staff cuts at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and has proposed zeroing out LIHEAP's budget. The Lawler-Gottheimer bill, which was first shared with The Hill, requires HHS to have at least 20 people working on the program, 60 percent of whom cannot be contractors. In an emergency, 30 people would have to be employed as part of the program. It's not entirely clear whether the legislation could actually pass or whether it might be attached to any larger bills. However, it represents a signal that the Trump administration's move to fire the LIHEAP staffers is generating at least some Republican pushback. 'Nearly 6 million families nationwide — and 240,000 in Jersey — rely on LIHEAP to keep the heat on in the winter and the AC running in the summer,' Gottheimer said in a written statement. 'President Trump is hell-bent on dismantling this critical program, firing its entire staff back in April and proposing to eliminate LIHEAP completely in his budget to Congress. My new bipartisan bill will stop these reckless cuts and ensure that no family is left in the cold or heat without help.' 'I'm proud to co-lead this bipartisan bill to fix LIHEAP's staffing crisis, ensuring Hudson Valley families get the energy assistance they need to stay warm this winter,' Lawler said in a written statement. 'With minimum staffing requirements and smart use of contractors, we're tackling inefficiency and protecting our most vulnerable who depend on it.' Asked about the cuts of the program during a recent congressional hearing, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argued that cost savings from President Trump's energy policies would make it redundant. 'President Trump's rationale and OMB's rationale is that President Trump's energy policies are going to lower the cost of energy so that everybody will get lower costs…and in that case this program would simply be another subsidy to the fossil fuel industry,' he said, referring to the Office of Management and Budget. 'If that doesn't happen and Congress chooses to appropriate the money, I, of course, will spend it,' he added. The introduction of the legislation also comes as Gottheimer is running for governor of New Jersey in a crowded Democratic field. Both lawmakers currently represent swing districts. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican urges Trump to reconsider proposed broadcasting cuts
Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.) on Monday urged the Trump administration to reconsider a request to Congress for public broadcasting cuts, warning of the potential impact some local communities face if funding is yanked back. In a joint statement, Amodei and Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), co-chairs of the Public Broadcasting Caucus, defended public broadcasting funding, saying local stations' ability to 'continue offering free, high-quality programming would be eliminated if the federal funding is rescinded.' 'Rescinding this funding would also isolate rural communities, jeopardizing their access to vital resources they depend on,' they said, while noting public broadcasting 'represents less than 0.01 percent of the federal budget, yet its impact reaches every congressional district.' 'Cutting this funding will not meaningfully reduce the deficit, but it will dismantle a trusted source of information for millions of Americans,' the statement continued. President Trump last week sent Congress a request for $8.3 billion in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and foreign aid, and more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides some funding to NPR and PBS. The move kickstarts a special process that would allow Republicans to begin codifying some of the cuts pursued by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) despite widespread Democratic opposition. Some Republicans see the first batch of proposed cuts as potentially the easiest one to deal with, as many in the party have been critical of foreign aid and funds going to outlets like PBS and NPR, which they've accused of political bias. But there are Republicans in both chambers who have expressed concerns about the scope of the proposed package of cuts, including how clawing back funds for public broadcasting programs would impact folks back home. 'You go to rural America, public television is how you get emergency broadcasting and all that kind of stuff,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. 'I look at Idaho Public Television, they're a great organization, and we don't see the politics that some states do in them, or at least they believe they see that and stuff,' Simpson said, although he added that he still intended to support the package if it comes to the floor. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) also told reporters earlier last week that, before he agrees to the funding clawback, he wanted to know what the cuts 'would do to my Native American populations who use the AM radio, I think FM in some areas, to actually communicate throughout those rural areas.' 'I tell folks we've got some stuff in public radio that for Native Americans who don't have anything else to communicate with out there for emergencies and so forth,' he said. Amodei and Goldman said in the new statement that 'of the 544 radio and television stations that receive federal funding, 245 serve rural communities and collectively support more than 5,950 local jobs.' 'Rural broadcasters face significant challenges in raising private funds, making them particularly vulnerable if government funding is cut,' they also said. 'Public media has demonstrated a willingness to listen to the American public and adapt. While we reaffirm that public media must be objective and legitimate concerns about content should be addressed, funding decisions should be objective as well.' The plan being considered in Congress calls for rescinding $535 million in funding for the CPB in both fiscal 2026 and 2027. 'These funds would be used to subsidize a public media system that is politically biased and an unnecessary expense to the taxpayer. Enacting the rescission would eliminate Federal funding for CPB,' the administration's rescissions request said of the proposed cuts last week. The CPB also reacted to the recent request in a statement at the time, as well as the president's budget request for fiscal 2026. It said the request would cut 'all funding for public media except $30 million in closeout costs for CPB.' 'Federal funding for the public broadcasting system is irreplaceable. Public media serves all – families and individuals, in rural and urban communities – free of charge and commercial free,' CPB said. 'American taxpayers rely upon and trust public media for high quality educational content, information, and life-saving alerts.' 'The path to better public media is achievable only if funding is maintained. Otherwise, a vital lifeline that operates reliable emergency communications, supports early learning, and keeps local communities connected and informed will be cut off with regrettable and lasting consequences.' At the same time, hardline conservatives are dialing up pressure on Congress to further cut spending and lock in Trump's DOGE cuts. 'Raise money,' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) told The Hill last week when asked about concerns over the proposed public broadcasting cuts. 'I mean, look, my bottom line is, we're $36 trillion in debt. You tell me where we're gonna find the cuts. Here's $9 billion. Let's go.' 'We got, I don't know, about $4 trillion more to go if you want to get the balance. So, I know we're not gonna get all that done in one fell swoop, but there's just no more room in the end.' 'And I've got my concerns about the merits on both PBS and NPR and by the way, I say that like I'm an Austin City Limits guy,' he added. 'I love it, but you don't think there's some rich people in Austin that can fund Austin City Limits?' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
