Brazilian Supreme Court panel orders ex-president Bolsonaro to stand trial over alleged coup plan
The former president has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and says he's being politically persecuted. A lawyer for Bolsonaro did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
'It seems that there is something personal against me,' Bolsonaro told journalists after the panel's decision. 'The accusation is very serious and [is] unfounded.'
Advertisement
Under Brazilian law, a coup conviction carries a sentence of up to 12 years. When combined with the other charges, it could result in a sentence of decades behind bars.
'Coups kill,' Justice Flávio Dino said when casting his vote. 'It doesn't matter if it happens today, the following month or a few years later.'
Gonet on Tuesday said those facing charges sought to keep Bolsonaro in power 'at all costs,' in a multistep scheme that accelerated after the far-right politician lost to the current president.
As in his February indictment, Gonet said part of the plot included a plan to kill Lula and Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who were put under surveillance by the alleged conspirators. The plan did not go ahead at the last minute because the accused failed to get the army's commander on board, Gonet said.
'Frustration overwhelmed the members of the criminal organization who, however, did not give up on the violent seizure of power, not even after the elected president of the republic was sworn in,' he said.
That was a reference to the Jan. 8, 2023, riot when Bolsonaro supporters stormed the Supreme Court, presidential palace, and Congress in Brasilia a week after Lula took office.
Advertisement
De Moraes on Wednesday showed the panel a video with scenes from that day. 'We had a very violent coup attempt,' he said. 'A savage violence, in total incivility, with the request for military intervention in the coup d'état.'
Bolsonaro on Wednesday denied any involvement and said he was in the United States at the time, having left a few days before the end of his term. 'One of the five charges against me is destruction of property. Only if it were by telepathy,' he told journalists.
Bolsonaro's running mate during the 2022 election and former defense minister Walter Braga Netto, former justice minister Anderson Torres and his aide-de-camp Mauro Cid, among others, will also stand trial. The court will decide on the others' fate later.
Observers had expected the charges to be accepted.
'The votes were not at all surprising,' said João Pedro Pádua, a law professor at the Fluminense Federal University. But he said they were historic. 'It is the first time a former head of state will be tried for the crimes of coup d'état and violent abolition of the democratic and legal state.'
Bolsonaro, a former military officer who was known to express nostalgia for the country's past dictatorship, openly defied Brazil's judicial system during his 2019-2022 term in office.
He has sought to shore up political support before the possible trial, including with a protest in Rio de Janeiro earlier this month. Local media said around 18,000 people attended, based on figures from a monitoring project linked to the University of Sao Paulo.
Bolsonaro's allies had hoped to draw 1 million people. Some analysts have said his ability to mobilize voters is diminishing. He has called for a new demonstration on April 6 in Sao Paulo.
Advertisement
The former president and his allies also will push for Congress to grant amnesty to those in jail for their roles in the Jan. 8, 2023, riot.
Carlos Melo, a political science professor at Insper University in Sao Paulo, said he didn't expect Wednesday's decision to have much impact on next year's presidential election.
Bolsonaro has already been banned by Brazil's top electoral court from running in elections until 2030 over abuse of power while in office and casting unfounded doubts on the country's electronic voting system.
'Bolsonaro will claim he's a candidate anyway. Why? To avoid being sidelined. He will claim it's him, or someone he appoints. He doesn't want to give up a political asset he has,' Melo said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
To fulfill their promises to voters, Republicans must govern like Democrats
Say this about Democrats: They know how to pass their agenda much faster than Republicans. Four-and-a-half months into the second Trump administration, Republicans have achieved next to nothing legislatively, despite its total control of Washington. Sure, President Trump has issued a slew of executive orders, but all of them will be repealed the moment a Democrat wins the White House. Laws are what really matter and stand the test of time. And despite endless talk about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' Republicans are still weeks away from passing it. There's a decent chance they won't even be able to do it. Compare this Republican failure to Democratic success exactly four years ago. By this point in the Biden administration, he and Democratic majorities in Congress had already passed a major bill on a much faster timeline. The American Rescue Plan was a $1.9 trillion monstrosity that rewarded leftist special interests, trapped millions of people on welfare and stifled a stronger economic comeback — all while making America's mountain of debt even higher. Democrats showed the same speed the last time they controlled the White House and Congress. In 2009, they passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act — another pork-barrel, debt-heavy, anti-growth monstrosity — within a month of President Obama's inauguration. And that's just one of many big laws they had passed by this point. Democrats clearly felt the need to act — to show voters they would do what they promised. What are Republicans waiting for? Unlike Democrats, they have the benefit of supporting an agenda that will strengthen America. They want to cut taxes for families and job creators, spurring a new era of entrepreneurship and growth. They want to cut spending and reform entitlements like Medicaid and food stamps, connecting welfare to work. And they want to secure the southern border, protecting Americans from crime while restoring the all-important rule of law. It's the understatement of the year to say these policies are urgently needed. They should have been passed yesterday — or perhaps Jan. 21, the day after Trump returned to the White House. But Republicans in Congress are too busy bickering. The infighting is coming from multiple sides. On the one hand are conservative purists who say that Congress isn't cutting spending or taxes enough. On the other side are moderates who want less aggressive cuts and more carveouts for issues like state and local tax deductions. Neither camp is huge, but both have enough members to stop legislation in its tracks. After months of squabbling, it's an open question whether the GOP can make everyone happy and pass their bill. In the first Trump administration, the answer was no. Their bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare — the party's signature policy — was in limbo through July. And when it finally came to the Senate floor for a vote, the Republican majority still couldn't pass it. Imagine if that happened again — if the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' goes down to defeat in a month or two, killed by the party that authored it. Guess what: Democrats have the same kind of divide, between relative moderates who want a slightly bigger government and wacko leftists who want outright socialism. But they still find a way to get bills across the finish line. In 2021, they had basically the same slim majority that Republicans do now, but they papered over the differences to move America dramatically to the left. Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot. I personally tend toward the conservative purist position. But you know what I like better than a perfect bill? A bill that can pass. A bill that moves America in the right direction. Tax cuts, spending cuts and welfare reforms that are good enough. I recognize that they can be improved, and hopefully will be improved the next time Republicans are elected. By any stretch of the word, Republicans have an exceptional bill. It does so much of what they want — so much of what America needs. Perhaps most important, it keeps so many promises to the American people. Voters aren't stupid. When they vote for change, they want to see change. And in 2024, they voted for an enormous change. Halfway through 2025, voters are still waiting for Republicans to keep their promises. They can certainly be pleased with much of what Trump has done unilaterally. But they're still waiting for the important reforms — the kind that only Congress can pass. Democrats govern when they get the chance, even if they move the country in the wrong direction. If Republicans don't get their act together, and fast, it may be a long time before the American people trust them again. John Tillman is CEO of the American Culture Project.
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Could President Trump cancel Juneteenth as a federal holiday?
Thursday is Juneteenth, a holiday that celebrates the day the last American slaves officially learned they were free on June 19, 1865 — more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation had been issued. It has also become, as my colleague Kevinisha Walker put it last year, a day to celebrate Black history, culture and unity. Black communities have celebrated Juneteenth for more than 150 years. But it gained increased national prominence in the wake of the racial reckoning sparked by George Floyd's murder at the hands of Minneapolis police in 2020. That same year, many private companies announced that they would be giving employees the day off. And in 2021, then-President Biden signed legislation into law to make Juneteenth, or June 19, a federal holiday. Biden's signature made Juneteenth the country's 12th federal holiday — and the first new one created since Martin Luther King Jr. Day was established in 1983. But there have been questions about whether President Trump — who has made attacking diversity, equity and inclusion efforts a cornerstone of his agenda — would try and rollback Juneteenth as a federal holiday. Trump wouldn't have the power to do that on his own, according to Loyola Marymount University Law School professor Jessica Levinson. 'Federal holidays are created and abolished by Congress,' Levinson explained, adding that presidents can make recommendations and sign and veto bills, but they cannot unilaterally create or cancel laws. There will be a number of Juneteenth events in Los Angeles Thursday and this weekend, including a Juneteenth Freedom Ride biking event in Leimert Park, an exhibit and panel discussion on reparations for descendants of enslaved African Americans at the California African American Museum and a celebration of Black women athletes at the Autry Museum, among others. There will also be free admission to all national parks and forests. Red-hued foods like watermelon, barbecue and red velvet cake are typically associated with Juneteenth. There are, as my colleague Danielle Dorsey previously reported, differing theories on where this tradition stems from. 'Some believe that early celebrants simply worked with easily accessible and in-season ingredients that happened to be red… Others say that it honors the bloodshed and suffering of enslaved ancestors,' Dorsey wrote in 2023. Black Lives Matter-LA co-founder Melina Abdullah said she and others from her organization would be 'restoring ourselves in the midst of the chaos that's swirling around in the world' at a Juneteenth celebration at BLM-LA's Center for Black Power in Leimert Park. The event will be free to the public, but only open to Black people, Abdullah said. Which brings us to a broader question: Should white people celebrate Juneteenth? There are varied opinions on the matter, with some — like activist and writer Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman — saying that 'White people should celebrate this holiday in the way that centers Black Americans.' Abdullah had a narrower view of the matter. 'This is not a day for white people to be crashing a Black party and eating our food,' Abdullah said. If white people do want to celebrate or commemorate Juneteenth, they should do that by paying reparations, Abdullah said, suggesting they donate to Black organizations. 'We celebrate our freedom. It shouldn't be a time when we have to make everyone else comfortable with that,' Abdullah continued. 'This is a specific and particular African American holiday.' On June 19, 1865, Union Army Major Gen. Gordon Granger entered Galveston, Texas, with General Order No. 3, a proclamation to alert the enslaved Black residents of the state that they were free under the provisions of the Emancipation Proclamation. The day has been commemorated every year since 1866 as Juneteenth, a combination of the words June and nineteenth, as we mentioned above. In 2021, The Times talked to Black Angelenos about their first Juneteenth and why it's a day they'll never forget. Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Read Not Guilty, Transgender Treatment Ban and Fancy New Flags on White House Lawn
In this episode of the NYPOSTcast: Karen Read is found not guilty of murdering her Boston cop boyfriend after an earlier trial ended with a hung jury, the Supreme Court rules on a Tennessee law that bans transgender treatments for minors and President Trump's personal gifts to the White House lawn - two giant flags - are unveiled. Subscribe to the NY POSTcast on your favorite podcast service and follow us on YouTube.
