How Cutting Public Lands Workforce Will Impact Mountain Bike Recreation
The new presidential administration has led the Forest Service and other agencies to reduce their workforce by about 10%, primarily targeting employees with less than a year of service. Reports show that this could affect approximately 200,000 federal employees and counting.
These layoffs impede agencies' capacity to protect public lands and preserve beloved outdoor spaces. They will also reduce the staff responsible for public lands' day-to-day operations, including hundreds of miles of mountain bike trails, hiking trails, and national park operations.
In the past decade, staffing at land management agencies like the National Park Service (NPS) and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) has declined despite rising visitation. Since 2010, NPS staffing has been down 20%, while visitation rose 16%. Last autumn, the Forest Service faced ongoing budget deficits and implemented a hiring freeze for seasonal workers, hindering its ability to maintain trails, campgrounds, and recreation areas nationwide.
With fewer employees within the USFS, over 90,000 mountain bike trials will be left without adequate staffing for maintenance and upkeep as we quickly approach the summer and visitor rates increase. This means that critical facilities that improve quality of life will not be maintained for thousands of visitors to trail systems. This impact might seem small on paper, but the lack of staffing nationwide will quickly become noticeable during peak seasons and winter when most maintenance is performed on these trail systems. Trails will not receive the attention required to keep them running smoothly. Volunteers and local IMBA chapters will be responsible for facilitating the upkeep of the trails we enjoy.
Get involved with a local trail crew or support your local . Despite Congress enacting the EXPLORE Act in December to improve outdoor recreation on public lands, it underscored the importance of outdoor access for communities and public health. However, implementing the Act is just one small part of the mission; progress will falter without adequate staffing at land management agencies.Recent budget cuts at the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service widely affect less seasoned employees who are essential for outdoor recreation. They maintain trails, oversee campgrounds, assist visitors, issue permits, support search and rescue, respond to emergencies, monitor wildlife, and restore landscapes by removing invasive species and aiding reforestation. Eliminating these positions will significantly harm the quality and accessibility of outdoor recreation and increase the risk for everyone visiting parks and recreational areas.
Terminating early-career employees does not resolve inefficiencies; instead, it undermines the future workforce and prevents constructive growth and progress within these agencies. While it might appease a delusional system in the short term, the long-term ramifications will be noticeable in the coming years. Such reductions disproportionately impact on-site staff responsible for keeping public lands, trails, and visitor centers operational. Consequently, this will undoubtedly lead to a noticeable deterioration in the outdoor recreation experience for anyone who enjoys these national parks or even local trail systems.
These reductions will hinder emergency search and rescue operations, putting more responsibility on individuals to remain prepared and vigilant. One of the scariest impacts of these budget cuts is the negative impact on wildfire prevention and response, straining the already limited firefighting resources. Seasonal employees are crucial for improving wildfire preparedness by reducing fuel buildup and assisting with initial fire suppression efforts on the ground during a burn. Cutting back on wildfire prevention will raise the risk of uncontrolled fires in public lands and nearby communities, especially as we see real-time effects of climate change rapidly change the areas we know and love, and wildfire-affected regions continue to grow yearly.
We strongly encourage you to write to your lawmakers and ask them to oppose cuts to land management agencies, especially those that affect on-the-ground staff, which are crucial to outdoor recreation experiences.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay
The group responsible for the landmark ruling on the definition of a woman said it may have to take the Scottish Government back to court if it does not speed up its implementation of the decision. For Women Scotland (FWS) challenged the meaning of a woman in the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act, with the UK's highest court ruling the definition in the 2010 Equality Act referred to biological sex. The decision is likely to have far-reaching implications for transgender people in accessing services, but the Scottish Government has declined to make changes to guidance until the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issues its own guidance, which is expected to take place in the coming months. But speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, FWS co-director Susan Smith said the group was considering a further legal challenge against the Government. Speaking to journalists after the event, she said: 'We have spoken to the Scottish Government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action. 'They're telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' Ms Smith added that, if a woman were to be assaulted in prison by a transgender prisoner, the Government could be taken to court by the victim. 'I think they need to step up and take a bit of responsibility because these things are under their remit,' she said. She added: 'We don't want to go back to court, we really, really don't, but if we don't see some action that may be something we will have to consider.' Ms Smith said the group is speaking with its lawyers but she would not say if there was a timeline for action to begin. The co-director stressed that if ministers were concerned about a challenge to their guidance from the pro-trans rights side of the argument, they should be worried about one from FWS and other such groups too. 'They seem worried about a legal challenge from the other side,' she said. 'But my message to them would be they should be more worried about a legal challenge from the people who have the law on their side.' Ms Smith was joined at the fringe meeting – which was hosted by Tory MSP Pam Gosal – by former foreign secretary James Cleverly. Mr Cleverly was part of the Conservative-led government which blocked the Scottish Government's controversial gender reforms. The Government proposed removing the need for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria as a requirement for obtaining a gender recognition certificate – a process known as self identification. The move was scuppered by then-Scottish secretary Alister Jack, who used Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block the legislation. Mr Cleverly told attendees the move showed the 'importance of the union'. 'This issue was clearly spiralling out of control, badly out of control,' he said.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOP sneaks 10-year halt to State-driven AI regulation into budget bill
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. House republicans are trying to sneak a 10-year pause on AI regulation into the Budget Reconciliation bill. Representative Brett Guthrie (R-KY), who chairs the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, introduced a provision to the Budget Reconciliation bill last Sunday night that will prevent states and local governments from enforcing any legislation on AI. According to 404 Media, this limitation was inserted into an already controversial bill and would take away the power of individual states to regulate artificial intelligence as they would see fit. The text of the proposal, which is under Title IV, Subtitle C, Part 2c of the bill, says, 'In general — except as provided in paragraph (2), no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.' This means that states will lose power over anything related to AI, as they cannot implement their own rules and must follow the federal directive. Several states have already enacted laws that control the use of AI in their respective territories. For example, California mandates that health care providers must tell their patients if they use generative AI to communicate with them. Furthermore, AI developers in the state must document and publicly share the information about the data they used to train their models — a crucial law to help prevent AI companies from stealing copyrighted data. New York also requires businesses that use AI for hiring to conduct audits of their tools to avoid any bias. The bill's text covers a broad spectrum of AI, including models, systems, and even 'automated decision systems'. This means that both new AI models and old algorithms that can make automated decisions are covered by the federal law. Many AI and tech companies have been trying to get closer to the new administration. Several key personalities involved in AI have become key members of the administration, including Elon Musk, former PayPal COO David Sacks, and venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who has invested in Facebook, Twitter, and OpenAI. The current government has also suspended or reversed former President Biden's executive orders aimed at reducing the threat of uncontrolled AI development. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Which monuments, memorials will be closed, open for the military parade?
WASHINGTON (DC News Now) — The National Park Service (NPS) said that many areas around the National Mall will be closed on Saturday for the Army's 250th birthday parade and festival. In a notice, NPS said that a few sites will stay open — the Belmont-Paul Women's Equality National Monument, the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial, Ford's Theatre National Historic Site, the Thomas Jefferson Memorial, the World War I Memorial, the African American Civil War Memorial, and the American Veterans Disabled for Life Memorial will remain open on June 14. What to know about Trump's military parade in DC However, most of the memorials and parks will be closed. The Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial, Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial and West Potomac Park are already closed and will remain closed until around 11 p.m. on Saturday. NPS said that the following memorials and sites will be closed starting at 12:01 a.m. until around 11 p.m. on Saturday: Lincoln Memorial The Mall between 7th Street and 9th Street NW/SW Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Old Post Office Tower Vietnam Veterans Memorial Washington Monument White House Visitor Center World War II Memorial Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.