An Open Letter to the President: Addressing our Debt
Donald J. TrumpThe Mar-a-Lago Club1100 South Ocean BoulevardPalm Beach, Florida
Dear President Trump:
I voted for you in all three of your presidential campaigns. The first time, I cast my vote with cautious optimism. The third time, with enthusiasm. And I contributed financially to your campaign.
You have achieved what few thought possible - a triumphant return, driven by a deep-seated belief among millions of Americans that only you can effectively challenge the entrenched political establishment. Your first 100 days were extraordinary, but if your presidency is to be remembered not just as bold but also historic, one challenge must rise above all others: - the national debt.
The national debt, currently $37 trillion, is the result of pervasive fiscal irresponsibility, accumulated over many decades. Our annual interest payments now exceed $1trillion - more than we spend on our national defense. This is not just a financial burden. It is a threat to the survival of our country as a democratic republic.
Without immediate, decisive action, the consequences are predictable: more credit downgrades, more increases in interest rates, and crippling obligations to service the debt. What would happen to our great country if annual interest payments exceeded not just our defense budget but also Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare? Mr. President, if we are to remain a vibrant nation, this exploding national debt has to be attacked immediately and significantly. That will not happen without your leadership.
Sadly, the Republican Party has shown that it is not a reliable ally.
Even before Republicans regained control of the House, they held a secret vote. By a margin of 158 to 2 they brought back earmarks - the very same pork barrel spending practices that Speaker John Boehner put to bed. Since then, the Democratic Congress never dared to bring back earmarks.
House Republicans did.
The results were predictable, and immediate: $16 billion in earmarks. More than 7,500 pet projects. In the Senate, eight of the 12 largest earmarkers are Republicans. In the House, 48 of the top earmarkers are Republicans.
Here are the largest earmarkers:
Sen. Susan Collins of Maine (population 1.4 million) secured $870 million in earmarks.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski grabbed $851.1 million in earmarks.
Sen. Mitch McConnell took nearly $500 million in earmarks.
My own congressman, Brian Mast, walked away with $437 million in earmarks.
Obviously, eliminating pork barrel spending wont, by itself, address the structural problems in Washingtons budget process - or make the "big, beautiful bill" currently being debated in Congress deficit-neutral. But if members of Congress cant even control themselves, what kind of example do they set for the American people? How can politicians ask their fellow Americans to sacrifice when they wont do it themselves?
Actions speak louder than words. Fiscal irresponsibility dominates the culture within Congress, within our government. That culture, obviously, will not change on its own. It can be changed. But only with your leadership.
Mr. President, fortunately, today you have a tool to attack waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence. Because of the cloud, Big Data, and the Freedom of Information Act, you can deliver every government expenditure to every citizens cell phone, iPad, and computer. You can bring a new era to government, i.e., transparency. Mr. President, you can be the launch pad for transparency.
Imagine a government where every single taxpayer dollar that government spends is tracked and reported to the public. Imagine the cultural shift from secret votes, from wasteful spending to one where every government official knows their budgets will be scrutinized in detail.
Mr. President, here are several all-encompassing, culture-changing, deficit-attacking actions you can announce tomorrow:
Lead by example: Cut White House expenses by a defined percentage. Report the savings to the public every quarter.
Challenge Congress: Ask every member to cut their office and committee budgets. Suggest at least 10%. Publish a quarterly report on every senator and representative.
Eliminate pork-barrel projects: Call on Congress to abolish earmarks. Shine a light on every remaining earmarker until they fall in line.
Mobilize the bureaucracy: Instruct all agencies to focus on rooting out waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence, and report the progress quarterly. Say explicitly that you will monitor progress and report the bold and expose the complacent.
Bringing transparency to government can do more than clean up wasted taxpayer dollars. It can rebuild trust. It can remind the American people that the government can still work for them. It will solidify your legacy as the chief executive who did not just talk about draining the swamp, you did it.
Imagine our country if we did not have to spend $1 trillion each year on interest payments. That is the future Americans deserve.
Mr. President, you have been given a historic mandate. You can leave office with a legacy as the president who did not just promise to "Make America Great Again," but who actually did it. America cannot be made great again without addressing the greatest threat to our countrys survival as a democratic republic - the exploding national debt.
Respectfully,
Thomas W. Smith
Thomas W. Smith is the founder of Prescott Investors, Inc.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Thousands throughout Michigan peacefully protest Trump policies, military parade
Thousands rallied Saturday, June 14, in Detroit's Clark Park, and more locations across the state, to protest Trump administration policies under the banner No Kings and to draw attention from a military parade in Washington, D.C., commemorating the Army's 250th anniversary. In 70 or so Michigan cities, from Midland to Muskegon and Milan to Marquette, thousands expressed their dissatisfaction. Each event was different, some were smaller gatherings, like in Bedford Township, and in larger ones, like in Detroit, speaker after speaker addressed massive crowds. Later, the protesters marched to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office. Protesters vented and talked about their worries that America is moving toward authoritarianism, and, given the last week's events, in which the president deployed the Marines and California's National Guard against the will of the state's governor, some even said they feared America could end up under martial law. "We are protesting Trump," said Elizabeth Williams, 35, of Detroit, who called President Donald Trump a fascist. "We are protesting his immigration policy because ICE is the new Gestapo. And one thing we are saying is that L.A. has shown the way." More: Skirmish at No Kings rally in Detroit Meanwhile, thousands more protesters met at the Michigan State Capitol with a series of speeches and street performances with a carnival theme, organizers said, "to highlight the absurdity of the military parade Trump has planned on his birthday." The event included a drive to collect food, first aid supplies and clothing. Susan and Steve Swaton, retired teachers from Marshall, said they went to Lansing to protest cuts to education and the Trump administration's efforts to change school curriculum. Steve Swaton, who taught U.S. history, said he was concerned that the changes were whitewashing history, emphasizing his view that students learn the "good, the bad and the ugly" of the past, in part, so they don't repeat mistakes. In Ferndale, hundreds more protesters lined both sides of Woodward Avenue holding signs that read, "Live, Laugh, Lock Him Up," and "If there's money for a parade, there's money for Medicaid." They tried to keep the mood festive, blowing bubbles and wearing costumes from the TV show "The Handmaid's Tale," in which a totalitarian society is ruled by a fundamentalist regime that treats women as property of the state. Activists held American flags upside down, a sign of distress, along the route, and cars driving through created a cacophony of honks. To make sure it didn't get out of hand, police cars were parked on the median. In Three Rivers, more than 350 gathered. In Gaylord, another 300 showed up at the Gateway Trailhead and fanned out onto Main Street downtown. They hoisted signs, many directed at the president, that expressed dissatisfaction. About 200 showed up in Monroe, where a 78-year-old man, James Goodridge, held up a copy of the Constitution near Monroe's Custer Statue, a monument to a Civil War general. He said: "Everything that's going on is against the Constitution." Protesters even gathered from some of the more remote parts of the state, the Upper Peninsula, converging in downtown Sault Ste. Marie to participate in the No Kings protest. Early on in the day, protest organizers and Michigan's political leaders called for peaceful protests. Attorney General Dana Nessel and the head of the Michigan Republican Party, Jim Runestad, a state senator from White Lake, urged groups to avoid violence. For the most part, they did. In Detroit, a protester got hit in the face by a biker and had to seek medical treatment. In Palm Beach, Florida, marchers got as close to Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate as police would allow, USA TODAY reported. In Philadelphia, where the Continental Army was formed, a rally kicked off. In Atlanta, protesters shouted down a group of Proud Boys. And in Minnesota, officials urged protesters to quit their plans to rally after a Democratic state representative and her husband were killed, and another state lawmaker and his wife were shot. No Kings flyers, police there said, were in the vehicle of the suspect. But in Bedford Township, near Monroe, about 120 people gathered at the Government Center to take a stand for democracy, organizers said. The crowd — which held signs and chanted "Love not hate makes America great" — were united in one thing: decrying the president. One protester, Grace Rabbitt, said she was pleased with the turnout, calling the community "a very conservative area," and another, Justin McCullough, emphasized that the crowd there was made up of Democrats and Republicans. Contact Frank Witsil: 313-222-5022 or fwitsil@ Contributing: Nour Rahal, Natalie Davies and Sally Tato Snell, Free Press; Connor Veenstra and the Monroe News; Paul Welitzkin, the Petoskey News-Review; Matt Mencarini, Lansing State Journal; Dan Cherry, Sturgis Journal; Brendan Wiesner, Sault Ste. Marie News. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Thousands in Michigan protest Trump policies, military parade


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Fetterman: Military parade comprised of ‘the verbest of us'
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) said that President Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C., commemorating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, is comprised of the 'best of us' and that it should be celebrated regardless of where one might stand on the political spectrum. 'This parade is comprised of our sons, daughters, mothers and fathers—the very best of us,' Fetterman wrote in a Saturday post on social media platform X. 'Regardless of your politics, it's appropriate to celebrate the 250 years of sacrifice, dedication and service.' Fetterman demonstrated rare Democratic support for the parade that is taking place on Trump's 79th birthday. The parade has drawn criticism from Democrats and some Republicans over the expected cost of the festivities, projected to be between $25 and $45 million. 'We're a lion, and a lion doesn't have to tell you it's a lion,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said on Tuesday. 'I would save the money, but if the president wants to have a parade, he's the president, and I'm not.' Most GOP senators said they would skip the parade. Other Republicans in Congress, like Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) and Rep. Maria Salazar (R-Fla.), are in attendance at the military parade, the first one to be held in Washington in 34 years. Fetterman has in recent months broken with his caucus on a few other issues, including on immigration and on his stance regarding Israel's war in the Gaza Strip. The Pennsylvania senator was also the only Democrat to introduce the Laken Riley Act and has criticized the Democratic Party over its response to the protest in Los Angeles against federal immigration raids. 'My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement,' Fetterman wrote on Monday. 'I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that.'


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
White House slams 'utter failure' of anti-Trump protests as America celebrates Army's historic milestone
White House communications director Steven Cheung addressed the nationwide "No Kings" protests on Saturday, describing them as "a complete and utter failure with minuscule attendance." Thousands of planned protests, which remained peaceful as the Army's 250th anniversary parade commenced, followed a week of violent anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles and other cities. No Kings organizers chose to hold the demonstrations the same day as the military parade, which coincided with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. "It is sad Democrats and liberals would rather support criminals and illegals instead of celebrating the 250th anniversary of our great U.S. Army and Flag Day," Cheung wrote in an X post. "But many more Americans are commemorating our brave military men and women who have given the ultimate sacrifice and those who continue to serve our country." Republican lawmakers cheered the effort, describing it as an "incredible opportunity" to showcase the strength, discipline and teamwork of the U.S. military. "It's an honor to support our service members in our nation's capital," Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., wrote in an X post. "Thank you to every man and woman in uniform for your dedication and service to our country!" However, Democrats mostly criticized the Army celebration, citing its cost and alleging it was an excuse to celebrate Trump's birthday. California Gov. Gavin Newsom spoke out shortly after the parade began on Saturday, saying the celebration "should be about" service members. "Our service members are the heroes," Newsom wrote on X. "We are PROUD of the U.S. Army and the brave men and women who serve. They've dedicated their lives to something bigger than themselves. Today should be about them. Not Donald Trump." Minutes later, Newsom's press office posted a photo from the event, with the caption, "THIS IS THE LARGEST PRESIDENTIAL BIRTHDAY PARTY EVER." Despite the divisive rhetoric about the event, the U.S. Army said the parade "is a reminder that we've always been there for America, and we always will. THIS WE'LL DEFEND."