NPA recovers remains of anti-apartheid activists after four decades
The NPA recovered the bodies of two anti-apartheid activists, who the apartheid regime buried without their families' consent.
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) recovered the remains of Benjamin Malesella Moloise and Abraham Zakhele Mngomezulu. The apartheid state hanged both activists in the 1980s. Four decades later, authorities discovered their graves in Mamelodi, Pretoria, far from their homes and without family consent.
Moloise was convicted of the killing of a security police officer in 1982 and was executed in 1985. The ANC declared him innocent, and he maintained that authorities coerced his confession. His execution sparked international outrage, and several protests erupted globally, condemning his execution.
The apartheid regime convicted Mngomezulu in a politically charged trial for a death during a protest in Soweto. They executed him in 1989 at the age of 23.
The apartheid government quietly buried the bodies to avoid public funerals that could cause more protests. HAND OVER OF REMAINS
On Sunday, 4 May 2025, Minister of Justice Mmamoloko Kubayi will hand over the recovered remains at a ceremony at the Orlando Communal Hall in Soweto.
In a media statement, the NPA said that they commend the hard work of the Missing Persons Task Team and the TRC Unit in bringing closure to the families of these anti-apartheid activists.
They said that this milestone marks an important step towards healing, justice, and reconciliation in South Africa.
Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
NPA's Leadership Crisis: Eroding Legal Integrity in Favour of Political Expediency
Calls intensify for National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi's removal as the NPA faces accusations of incompetence and strategic missteps in the wake of a deepening crisis in the criminal justice system. Image: Henk Kruger/ Independent Newspapers Clyde N.S. Ramalaine On 3 June 2025, the Free State High Court in Bloemfontein ruled that the extradition of Moroadi Cholota from the United States to South Africa was unlawful. This landmark judgment has not only released the state's key figure in the high-profile R255 million asbestos corruption case but also cleared the way for the prosecution of others involved. Still, it has also exposed deep procedural and constitutional failings within South Africa's prosecutorial regime. Her unlawful extradition from the United States and subsequent release by the Free State High Court reveal more than just procedural oversight, they expose systemic dysfunction, a repurposing of primary objectives of the NPA as articulated in its strategic ethos within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and unravels the credibility of South Africa's anti-corruption drive. The Ruling A Blow to Prosecutorial Credibility Presiding over the matter, Judge Phillip Loubser was unequivocal: "The prosecution has not found reasonable doubt, or at all, that there was a valid or lawful request from South Africa for the extradition of Ms Cholota from the United States. It follows that if there was no valid extradition request, then the extradition itself was without any basis and, therefore, unlawful." The National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) failure to adhere to the legally mandated process in the extradition request of Moroadi Cholota reveals not merely a procedural blunder, but an institutional failing. By initiating the extradition request instead of the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, as explicitly required by law, the NPA not only invalidated its case but compromised the integrity of South Africa's justice system on the international stage. The NPA will contend that this is not the first time it has led to extradition cases and that this is the first instance in which a case has been registered in this regard. It will furthermore argue that it is appealing the Schultz case, which constitutes a legal precedent. Notwithstanding this counter, the NPA cannot deny that this deviation from legal protocol suggests either gross incompetence or a willful disregard for constitutional processes, raising serious ethical questions about accountability within the NPA. Moreover, by allegedly providing misleading or incomplete information to U.S. authorities, the South African state stands accused of deception — a charge that, if substantiated, undermines its moral authority and diplomatic credibility, and reveals a prosecutorial body more concerned with performance politics than with the pursuit of justice. The unlawful handling of Cholota's extradition reflects a disturbing pattern in which the state weaponises legal instruments while bypassing constitutional safeguards. This erosion of legal integrity in favour of political expediency suggests the NPA, whether by design or acquiescence, has become a tool in internal power struggles rather than a guardian of justice. In failing to uphold the rule of law and misleading an international partner in the process, the NPA exposes a justice system teetering between institutional collapse and captured governance. The court's ruling on the lack of jurisdiction underscores a foundational pillar of constitutional and international law, that the legitimacy of a trial is inseparable from the legality of the accused's presence before the court. In Moroadi Cholota's case, the unlawful initiation of the extradition process rendered her transfer to South Africa constitutionally defective, thereby stripping the court of jurisdiction to try her. Any attempt to prosecute her under such conditions would not only violate Section 35 of the Constitution, which guarantees fair trial rights and due process but also contravene international legal norms governing extradition and state sovereignty. This ruling affirms that procedural integrity is not merely a technicality, but a substantive requirement of justice; the state cannot bypass lawful channels to secure an accused and still claim the authority to prosecute. To do so would be to legitimise executive overreach, dismantle legal safeguards, and invite the erosion of the rule of law under the guise of criminal justice. Moroadi Cholota giving evidence at the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture. Last week the Bloemfontein High Court ruled that her extradition from the United States was unlawful. Image: Independent Newspapers archive Systemic Indictment of the NPA The judgment handed down by the Free State High Court should not be read in isolation; it must be understood as a judicial demand for accountability, procedural discipline, and institutional humility. The NPA's failed prosecution of Ms Moroadi Cholota is, regrettably, not an isolated mishap. In a 2023 article co-authored with Paul M. Ngobeni (available at: " we called for the NPA leadership to be held accountable as we critically examined eight high-profile cases pursued by the NPA under the rubric of its 'state capture' prosecutions. Our analysis revealed a pattern of endemic institutional failures, particularly under the leadership of the current National Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Shamila Batohi. Among the most pressing concerns were the following: Politicisation of Prosecutions The NPA's alignment with factional battles in the ANC undermines its credibility. Its selective use of the Zondo Commission's findings, non-binding and inadmissible in court, has raised alarms about the weaponisation of commissions of inquiry to serve political ends. Strategic Misuse of Evidence The collapse of cases like the Estina Dairy Farm prosecution revealed the dangers of substituting public rhetoric for admissible evidence. The NPA has repeatedly stumbled in converting politically sensational findings into courtroom success. Selective Disclosure and Narrative Framing The NPA has routinely withheld countervailing evidence, especially in asset forfeiture cases such as Optimum Coal, to curate a prosecutorial narrative while undermining procedural fairness. Civil society organisations such as Freedom Under Law and Corruption Watch have raised repeated concerns about this trend. Institutional Inefficiencies Structural deficiencies, ranging from poor leadership and resource mismanagement to political interference, continue to plague the NPA's capacity to lead credible prosecutions. These points not only relate to individual accountability but also to the need for institutional redesign. The location of the NPA under executive control remains a structural vulnerability. Lack of Accountability and Transparency The NPA has consistently deflected public criticism, painting itself as the victim of attacks rather than accepting legitimate concerns about its performance. This erodes public confidence and corrodes prosecutorial independence. Calls for an independent oversight body to scrutinise prosecutorial decisions have gained renewed urgency. NPA's Compulsive Overreliance on Appeals – Default Mechanism As expected, the NPA informed South Africa that it intends to appeal the court's findings. While the doctrine of appeal is a constitutional provision, it is important to appreciate the context and primary intentions of the state in pursuing such an appeal. A fundamental yet under-examined pathology within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is its compulsive reliance on appeals, not as a last resort for justice, but as a default mechanism to shield prosecutorial ineptitude. At the heart of this phenomenon lies a psychology unmoored from accountability: senior prosecutors and executive leadership pursue prolonged legal contests not at their own personal or professional expense, but through the seemingly bottomless reservoir of the public fiscus. This distance between institutional action and individual consequence fosters a culture of indifference towards both fiscal prudence and judicial efficacy. The decision to appeal, often against the weight of legal reasoning and precedent, is thus less a matter of legal necessity than a strategic deflection—an effort to postpone institutional reckoning, preserve internal reputations, and obscure prosecutorial failures. There appears to be little regard for the economic burden imposed on the state, the rights of the accused whose lives are held in indefinite legal limbo, or the broader erosion of public trust in the justice system. In the Cholota case, this is strikingly evident: despite the court's scathing findings, the NPA has signalled its intention to appeal, oblivious to the potential litigation costs should the state be sued for unlawful detention or rights infringements. This illustrates a prosecutorial psychology that prioritises institutional face-saving over constitutional integrity, emboldened by the knowledge that the price of legal misadventure will not be borne by those who authorise it. In the final analysis, the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Advocate Shamila Batohi, can no longer be exempt from the dismal performance of the NPA. She, together with her senior executive team, must be held accountable for the institution's persistent failures, including the frivolous pursuit of appeals and plausible wasteful expenditure incurred in cases that consistently collapse in court.
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘Purges in police drive up crime' says expert
Criminal law expert Cornelia van Graan said, despite SA's progressive and inclusive Domestic Violence Act, the femicide crisis persisted. Criminal law expert Cornelia van Graan said despite South Africa's progressive and inclusive Domestic Violence Act, the femicide crisis persisted. Picture:The removal of specialised units was the reason for the increase in violent crimes, including the murder of Olorato Mongale last week, according to experts. Mongale had gone on a date with her alleged killer, who picked her up from her residential complex on 25 May and drove her to Alexandra, where she was allegedly murdered. ALSO READ: Public urged to beware of strangers from dating apps Please, stop killing women Her body was dumped between Alexandra and Lombardy West. Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu said his department had noted an increase in incidents where women fell victim to relationships developed online. 'We caution young women in particular and women in general to be alert and to be in control when such communication and appointments are made,' he said. Mchunu pleaded with men: 'Please, stop killing women. This horrific act has deeply shocked and angered the nation. We unequivocally condemn the gruesome and inhumane killing of Olorato Mongale. 'No-one deserves to suffer such cruelty and our thoughts remain with her family, friends and community during this profoundly painful time.' Criminal law expert Cornelia van Graan said despite South Africa's progressive and inclusive Domestic Violence Act, the femicide crisis persisted. 'The police and the justice system have been gutted over the years and the police have been accused of being incompetent, with many members facing criminal accusations,' she said. ALSO READ: Man arrested for using fake Facebook profile to lure, kidnap, and rape women Police' additional funding But Van Graan noted the police received additional funding in the budget speech. 'The question is will the government implement strategies that can effectively curb violent crime and make crimes against women and children a priority, or is the new budget just showboating for the international community that has their eyes on the country due to the G20 summit:' she asked. Criminal defence expert advocate Johan Gaum said: 'It's ineptitude from the police because Jackie Selebi the then police commissioner neutralised all specialised detective services from murder to robbery.' NOW READ: ActionSA-ANC slams Zille's plans for Joburg: 'They do not believe in black excellence'
The South African
17 hours ago
- The South African
Man sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering partner
A man was sentenced to life imprisonment after murdering his partner in early May 2025. The Free State High Court handed down the sentence to Abel Serame Mathige (39), who was found guilty of murdering his partner, 51-year-old Anna Motaung, after assaulting her. She later succumbed to her injuries at Boitumelo Regional Hospital. Police responded to a report about a patient who passed away following an alleged assault by their partner. Upon arrival, the police were escorted to the body of the deceased, identified as Motaung, who had been declared dead by the hospital. A 57-year-old man allegedly murdered her partner at an automotive dealership in Mthatha on Saturday, 31 May 2025. According to a police statement, the deceased went to the dealership, where her partner is an employee at. The two lovebirds got into a heated argument where the suspect allegedly assaulted the victim and took her to a hospital. Initially, the suspect said that thugs assaulted her lover near the dealership. The police statement mentioned, 'The suspect visited the victim in the hospital, bringing her refreshments. The victim subsequently became sick and ultimately died at approximately 13:55 that same day.' The postmortem results are said to reveal the cause of the victim's death. The police arrested the suspect on Friday, 6 June 2025. A manhunt has been launched after the dead bodies of a couple were discovered at a residence in Sekonye village, Limpopo. A worried family member went to the residence where her relative was after she could not reach him on his phone. Upon arriving, she discovered the lifeless body of her relative and his 34-year-old partner. Initial investigations reveal that both the victims had sustained gunshot wounds. Additionally, a firearm, believed to have been used in carrying out the murder, was found at the scene. 'The motive behind the tragedy remains unclear; however, domestic violence cannot be ruled out as a possible factor,' read the statement. A case of murder and an inquest has been opened while investigations continue. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
