Court fines independent candidate for wrongly challenging Sena MLA's election
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday directed an independent candidate who contested last year's Maharashtra Assembly elections from Mumbai's Jogeshwari East seat to deposit Rs 3,50,000 in court as security of costs incurred by the Shiv Sena UBT candidate against whom he filed a petition, challenging his election.Independent candidate Rohan Satone, who sought the election of Anant B Nar be declared void, has been directed to deposit the amount within two weeks.advertisementNar won the 2024 elections after he polled 77,044 votes and defeated his nearest rival, Manisha Waikar of the Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde), by a margin of 1,541 votes. Petitioner Satone was among the candidates contesting the elections, who filed a petition on January 4, following which notices were served to other candidates.
Over the course of the hearing, advocate Amit Karande, appearing for Nar, pointed out basic errors in the petition, saying it did not seek the declaration of the returned candidate to be void but that of Waikar, who had lost the election."Moreover, the petition was not even in the prescribed format, such as an Election petition is mandatorily required to be accompanied by as many copies as there are respondents mentioned in the petition and every such copy has to be attested by the petitioner to be a true copy," he submitted.advertisementFollowing the submission of these arguments in court, no lawyer appeared for Satone. His erstwhile lawyer informed the court that the Vakalatnama had been withdrawn by Satone. Taking note of the "awkward situation", the bench of Justice Abhay Ahuja, on April 21, granted time to the petitioner to make sure a lawyer appears on the next date.However, on the next date, on April 28, a lawyer's visiting card was put forth with the submission that the lawyer is going through the papers. The bench said that this kind of practice was "unheard of" and deprecated it.The court then directed a new lawyer's Vakalatnama to be filed within two weeks. Meanwhile, Karande requested the court to impose costs on the petitioner as Nar was entitled to costs incurred by him in contesting the plea.On June 9, advocate Sholden D'Souza appeared for Satone and sought two weeks' time, arguing he had just been handed over the petition.Karande opposed it as the Vakalatnama had been filed by the lawyer on May 20.On June 23, another lawyer, Surbhi Agarwal, appeared for Satone, and while arguing, also sought leniency from court in withdrawing the Election Petition.The court then considered Karande's application for costs and saw that Nar had incurred Rs 3,50,000 as fees towards his counsel, and asked Satone to pay the same.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC grants Centre time to file affidavit in misuse of national emblem
1 2 3 Cuttack: Orissa high court granted the Centre time till July 22, 2025 to submit a more detailed affidavit in response to a PIL alleging widespread misuse of the national emblem of India. Adopted on Jan 26, 1950, the national emblem is based on the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath, with the words Satyameva Jayate inscribed below in Devanagari script. A two-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice M S Raman on Tuesday, granted the time following a request by deputy solicitor general P K Parhi to file the improved affidavit. The PIL, filed by Ganjam-based Alone Trust on Dec 27, 2024, seeks strict action against unauthorised and incorrect usage of the national emblem. The petition highlighted several instances where the emblem is misrepresented, including omission of key elements like the animals and the motto Satyameva Jayate. Advocate Pabitra Kumar Dutta represented the petitioner. The court had earlier expressed dissatisfaction with the Centre's counter affidavit filed on March 12, following its directives dated Jan 22 and Feb 19. "There has to be verification, action taken and report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Counter will be accepted on adjourned date upon advance copy served," the court stated, setting the next hearing on March 26. I n its Feb 19 order, the HC criticised repeated adjournments sought by the Centre and emphasised the seriousness of the allegations regarding the emblem's misuse. "We do not appreciate prayer for adjournment, earlier obtained for verification and rectification," the bench had observed. The PIL also calls for the inclusion of the national emblem of India in school curricula and campaigns to promote public awareness about its legal, cultural, and symbolic significance. It argues that a lack of awareness is contributing to its misuse across the country. Interestingly, the PIL was filed on Dec 27, 2024, just two days after the Centre proposed stricter regulations, including a fine of up to Rs 5 lakh and jail terms, to curb unauthorised use of national symbols, as well as names and photographs of the President and Prime Minister. Currently, the emblem's usage is governed by two separate laws — the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005, overseen by the ministry of home affairs, and the emblems and names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, enforced by the consumer affairs department. The Centre is reportedly considering merging the two laws under a single administrative authority for better enforcement.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mob violence strikes at heart of constitution, says HC, grants bail to nine accused in Nagpur riots
Nagpur: Observing that mob violence strikes at the heart of constitutional order, the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court on Wednesday granted bail to nine men accused in the Nagpur riots, while issuing caution against hate crimes and vigilantism. Riots erupted on March 17 this year over a controversy surrounding Mughal emperor Aurangzeb's tomb in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar district. "Mobs cannot be allowed to take law into their own hands," noted Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke while quoting Supreme Court rulings. "Nobody has the right to become a self-appointed guardian of law and forcibly administer his or her interpretation of law on others, especially not with violent means," the judge observed. Quoting orders of the apex court in the Kodungallur Film Society's case, the judge described hate crimes as "a product of intolerance, ideological dominance and prejudice" and emphasised that such conduct must not be tolerated "lest it results in a reign of terror." She added, "extra-judicial elements and non-state actors cannot be allowed to take the place of law or the law-enforcing agency." Petitioners Mohammad Iqbal Ismail Ansari and eight others were arrested in March and April this year in connection with the violence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025년 가장 여유 넘치는 농장 게임. 설치 없음 Taonga: 아일랜드 팜 플레이하기 Undo They were booked under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including rioting, the Arms Act, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, the Maharashtra Defacement of Property Act, and the Maharashtra Police Act. Defending the accused, senior counsel Avinash Gupta, along with advocates Naved Opai, Shreerang Bhandarkar, Atharva Khadse, Rafique Akbani and Syed Ateeb, argued that their clients were not individually named for any specific crime and the identification process was delayed. Public prosecutors and senior counsel Deven Chauhan and Neeraj Jawade opposed the bail, stating the violence was premeditated and involved use of arms. They cited CCTV footage and video evidence to establish the accused were part of an unlawful assembly that injured police personnel and damaged property. However, Justice Joshi-Phalke ruled that no specific role or overt act was attributed to any of the applicants and the delayed test identification parade diminished its legal weight. "Considering that investigation is over, chargesheets are filed, and no further custodial interrogation is required, continued detention is unwarranted," she said. Each accused has been directed to execute a personal bond of Rs1 lakh with one solvent surety. They must report to local police on the 1st and 15th of every month, avoid involvement in similar offences, abstain from influencing witnesses, and attend trial proceedings unless faced with extraordinary circumstances. The petitioners were accused of forming an unlawful assembly at Bhaldarpura Square, armed with deadly weapons and stones, and attacking police personnel. They allegedly used petrol bombs and hurled abuses at the officers. They were further accused of molesting women police officers and constables. They also allegedly caused damage to public and police vehicles, as per the prosecution.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
How India Ramping Up Army Firepower Following Israel-Iran Conflict, Eyeing Indigenous Edge Over Pakistan And China
New Delhi: Seemingly taking lessons from the recent Israel-Iran conflict, India has quietly shifted gears to strengthen its own military muscle. The Ministry of Defence, under Rajnath Singh's leadership, has approved a fast-track plan to arm the Indian Army with new-generation weapons sourced from domestic firms. The list includes high-tech drones, loitering munitions and advanced counter-drone systems – tools tailored for today's evolving battlefield. These purchases carry weight beyond just numbers. They signal a strategic message that New Delhi is preparing for any threat looming on its western or northern frontiers. The decision is likely to cause unease in both Islamabad and Beijing. The Indian Army has been given full autonomy to make rapid acquisitions. It is already in talks with domestic companies to deliver precision-guided systems, artillery shells and long-range strike equipment. These tools are being treated as essentials for operations ranging from counter-terror missions to high-altitude defence posturing. One of the most notable acquisitions is the Nagastra 1R loitering munition. The Army has placed an order worth Rs 158 crore with Solar Industries to procure 450 units. These munitions are already deployed in select sectors and have proven effective. Capable of eliminating infiltrators and destroying enemy infrastructure along the Line of Control, the new batch is expected to be delivered within a year. Another key addition is the hybrid mini Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) – a fixed-wing VTOL system that can take off and land vertically. It has been tested thoroughly by two high-level technical committees to ensure that no components are of Chinese origin. These UAVs have been field-tested during recent military exercises and are now approved for frontline use. Behind these decisions is a larger plan. The Army is drawing up contracts worth tens of thousands of crores. In the coming weeks, purchases totalling Rs 44,000 crore are on the table. These include long-range strike weapons, smart jammers, advanced radars and an arsenal of ammunition built for sustained warfare. The Army's focus remains sharp on 'long-range vectors' – systems capable of hitting deep inside enemy territory without needing boots on the ground. The need for stronger air defences is also high on the list. After 'Operation Sindoor', where Pakistani drones posed a serious threat, the Army wants to deploy low-altitude radars and anti-drone systems in more locations. These tools were critical during that operation and are now seen as a core component of India's future defence architecture. A new security doctrine is quietly taking shape. It favours homegrown innovation, battlefield autonomy and 24x7 readiness. The Army is also ensuring that modernisation does not get entangled in red tape. Instead of waiting years for approvals, it is now signing faster contracts with domestic vendors. This is no ordinary procurement push. It is a recalibration of India's military approach in a world where regional conflicts can spill across borders within hours. As global powers react to the Israel-Iran war, India is making its own moves – which appear to be calculated, quiet and deeply strategic.
