Forestry Plan Change To Be Integrated
How to progress Council's forestry plan changes given ongoing uncertainty around the Government's proposed changes to the National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry (NES-CF) was endorsed at the Tairāwhiti Resource Management Plan Committee on 30 April.
The outcome of those changes will determine whether Council can introduce stronger rules to manage forestry activities.
The committee agreed to bring together the forestry plan change work with other related workstreams, including the new 'Transition Land' overlay and farm/forestry planning.
Chief Executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said it was important to take a thorough and joined-up approach.
'Aligning with the freshwater planning work gives us a more cohesive and effective regional solution,' she said.
'We know delays are frustrating, but it's important we take the time to do this properly.'
'Waiting for national direction where necessary helps avoid costly rework and ensures we're building something that lasts.'
The need to improve forestry management across Tairāwhiti is well recognised, particularly following severe erosion and slash damage from Cyclones Hale and Gabrielle. These events, combined with strong community concern and the findings of the Government's Ministerial Inquiry into Land Use, have shaped Council's focus on strengthening environmental protections and reducing long-term risk.
Since 2023, Council has been actively working on a transition to more sustainable land use and responding to the Inquiry's recommendations. Progress so far includes:
Drafting policies and rules under the freshwater provisions
Commissioning supporting technical work
Establishing a cross-sector Transition Advisory Group (TAG)
Completing a landslide susceptibility model with Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research to inform the 'Transition Land' overlay
Advancing freshwater catchment planning
Developing new forestry consent conditions
Exploring integrated farm and forestry planning
This work will continue alongside freshwater planning, with pre-notification engagement scheduled for mid-2026. Stakeholders and the community will have opportunities to provide feedback ahead of formal notification.
Ms Thatcher Swann said Council would continue adjusting its approach as national direction becomes clearer.
'We'll keep working with our communities to shape a practical, locally relevant plan that reflects the realities of Tairāwhiti.'
In the meantime, Council has rolled out new forestry consent conditions to provide greater environmental safeguards. These are already in place while the broader planning framework is developed.
For more information and updates, visit gdc.govt.nz.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Government announces new 'Parent Boost' visa to bring families together
Immigration minister Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Parents of New Zealand citizens and residents will be able to access visas, with the government announcing a programme it says will bring families together. From September, parents will be able to access a multi-entry five-year visa, provided they meet specific requirements. Applicants will also be able to renew it once, meaning the maximum length of a visit can be up to ten years. Immigration minister Erica Stanford said a longer-term visa was an important consideration for migrants when deciding where they want to build their lives. "The Parent Boost Visa strikes the balance of making New Zealand more attractive for people who want to make our beautiful country their home, without putting additional strain on public services," she said. To be eligible for a Parent Boost visa, applicants must: They must also meet income requirements, either through their sponsor or through their own ongoing income, as well as having cash of up to $250,000 for a couple or $160,000 for a single parent. "The Parent Boost Visa strikes the balance of making New Zealand more attractive for people who want to make our beautiful country their home, without putting additional strain on public services," Stanford said. "We are committed to delivering an efficient and predictable immigration system that drives economic growth to take New Zealand forward." ACT's immigration spokesperson Parmjeet Parmar said she was proud to see the commitment fulfilled. "Ultimately, this visa makes New Zealand a more attractive destination for the talent we need to drive economic growth. A skilled workforce means more productivity, stronger communities, and more prosperity for all New Zealanders." ACT's own proposal for the visa would have introduced an annual fee to fund healthcare costs. The government policy requires comprehensive health insurance instead. In October 2022, then Immigration Minister Michael Wood announced the new parent visa to help clear a backlog of more than 8500 parents waiting to permanently join their adult children in New Zealand. About 12,000 parents were waiting in June last year, but only 500 had been picked to apply in the year before that. In February Immigration New Zealand announced a one-time increase in the parent visa quota , which had an annual cap of 2500, with 2000 visas allocated to queue-based applications and 500 to ballot-based applicants. But Stanford authorised an extra 331 queue-based visas to combat the backlog which had caused lengthy delays for families. Some parents had reportedly died while waiting . The new Parent Boost applications open on 29 September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
Let's call ‘taxing the rich' what it really is
Opinion: Last month the Government, under urgency, halted all pay equity claims thereby disproportionately affecting women who experience pay inequality. This is one of many policies that included gutting government departments and cutting public service spending to accommodate a massive wealth giveaway in the shape of tax cuts to landlords (a policy designed to supposedly stabilise rents but which seems to have had little impact). As reported in March last year, the tax giveaway to landlords is estimated to cost the country $2.9 billion. To put this in perspective, that is more than the amount paid in Treaty settlements since 1985, which is about $2.7b. In other words, in one year, the current Government awarded landlords more money than has been paid out to Māori in 40 years as compensation for historical wrongs. I note this to introduce my central concern that economic policy, as has been the case for the last four decades, is dominated by the central myth (now axiomatic for almost every government) that all our ills will be solved if we keep giving as much money as possible to the rich. This is based on three central assumptions of current economic dogma that those who question are branded as 'radical leftists'. These assumptions are underpinned by the beliefs that wealth trickles down; deregulation is good for business; and the state should stay out of the market and everything should be privatised. First, wealth, especially when given away in tax cuts, does not trickle down. It stays at the top. Ever-increasing wealth inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient or any study of income trends show this. Second, seen from a purely corporate perspective deregulation is no doubt a path to profit. However, it is also socially disastrous as costs of deregulation are outsourced via public bailouts following financial crises, for example, that are directly caused by the rolling back of legislation designed to safeguard the wider economy. Third, the state has always been an economic entrepreneur funding all kinds of technological innovation, such as the internet, but this often goes unreported in the dominant economic journalism. All this results in top-heavy, financially starved economies as governments continually try to make the wealth giveaways fit into a budget by stripping support for public services or selling off public assets at knockdown prices. (There is a tendency to undervalue the future social benefits of publicly owned resources.) Such sales are no more than an attempt to generate a short-lived financial hit that dissipates as quickly as the resources we all once owned. The fact that the global economic outlook as well as specific national economies remain so fragile and unstable, and are increasingly unable to secure the basic needs of their populations in terms of health, education and social support, is surely enough evidence that the principle of continually moving wealth upwards doesn't work, certainly not for society as a whole. However, because it has become communal liturgy, recited from almost every media pulpit for the last 40 years, it has become increasingly difficult to challenge. Just as there is no economic justification for structuring an economy in which only the very wealthy are the true beneficiaries, there is also no moral justification. From inside this dogma, the moral justification has always been that it is the rich in the form of investors and entrepreneurs that are the only wealth creators, and so they deserve to reap the wealth they create. But you only have to see the collapse in wealth creation during the pandemic when workers could not work, to know that workers also create wealth. Yet many are told they do not even deserve a living wage. Supressed wages is of course one way to structure an economy (there is no such thing as 'the' economy, by the way) to ensure wealth moves upwards. This results in a phenomenon called corporate welfare where the state has to step in to pay benefits to allow workers to actually live. What this means is that the money taxpayers pay out in social welfare is really a direct contribution to shareholder dividends. Welfare often compensates for the company not paying enough to workers so it can pay more to investors. This is another example of the outsourcing of problems for which the government picks up the tab. Just as the Joker begrudgingly loves Batman for maintaining the order he gets to break, the neoliberals love the government because they know it will be compelled to bail them out – a phenomenon known as the 'Greenspan Put' named after the US Fed chair who first bailed out the banks in 1987. Tax breaks are, of course, the main way to benefit the wealthy by directly increasing the wealth they keep and by breaking the public purse and public services. This then opens up new opportunities for privatisation and profit that will benefit a very small group. And I haven't even mentioned our non-existent capital gains tax. The assault on the Te Tiriti ō Waitangi is another example of efforts to structure an economy to favour the wealthy. Aside from the persistence of a colonial mentality hostile to all things Māori, Te Tiriti remains a firm barrier to expanding corporate appropriation of public resources. Should the Regulatory Standards Bill get passed (another piece of legislation aimed at weakening democratic control of resources and opening them up to private exploitation), Te Tiriti will be all that protects us. As our society is placed under increased stresses and strains beneath the extreme weight of amassed, socially useless wealth that sits with a very small class of people, there have been increased calls to tax the rich. I think we need a different slogan. In keeping with the dogma, conservative supporters have made tax a dirty word. Rather than tax being an individual or corporate contribution to the maintenance of a functioning society, the corporatist right has over the past four decades tried to make it a synonym for theft. The idea that taxing the rich is really a form of theft also makes it easy for the dogmatists to present the call as a form of envy; a petty resentment of the successful. Instead of a call to 'tax the rich', the call should be to 'reclaim the wealth'. I believe this phrase more adequately represents the request to return a greater share of what was commonly created. It is also a call to give back even just a small amount of what was taken through the design of an economy knowingly and carefully organised to purposefully benefit the few. Even if the progenitors of the dogma genuinely thought it would be a social good, which is hard to believe because they themselves do not believe in society, there is no reason to believe the fantasy now.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Napier councillor Nigel Simpson launches second bid to be mayor
Nigel Simpson. Photo: Supplied Napier City councillor Nigel Simpson is having another crack at the top job. The second-term councillor says he is determined to deliver the "decisive change" Napier needs. "I'm standing for mayor for the same reasons I did in 2022. Napier needs someone to lead it who knows how to think strategically and can plan ahead," he said. "At the moment the staff are at sixes and sevens because of the constant inconsistency, which doesn't help with efficiency and affects the ability of staff to do their job. "That's not a criticism of staff, that's on elected members' shoulders for constantly changing the rules on how we operate." He says several councillors have indicated they won't be seeking re-election. "This is an opportunity to find councillors with the skills to create strategic plans for staff to get stuck in." Simpson says Napier has been let down by poor decisions, costly distractions, and a lack of consistent governance, and "the city deserves better". "Our community deserves a mayor and council that knows how to think strategically, set a clear and consistent direction, and keep rates under control. Right now, we have the opposite: chaotic budgeting, reactive decisions, and a long list of broken promises. He says he would immediately fight to scrap an unbudgeted $20 million plus regional park to filter stormwater into Ahuriri, rethink the $110m library and Council building project and reset the council. "There must be a strong focus on essential infrastructure and core services." The consultant and part-time farmer says when he's not working he likes to walk and enjoys getting away in his caravan for micro breaks. "Sadly I take my laptop and work. But hey, they say a change is as good as a holiday." LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
