
World Food Prize for scientist for growing food with fewer chemicals
A Brazilian scientist who pushed back against the use of chemical fertilisers and studied biological approaches to more robust food production has been honoured with this year's World Food Prize, the organisation announced on May 13.
Microbiologist Mariangela Hungria has been researching biological seed and soil treatments for 40 years, and has worked with Brazilian farmers to implement her findings. Her accomplishment has now won her $500,000 from the Iowa-based World Food Prize Foundation.
'I still cannot believe it. Everybody said, my whole life, it's improbable, you are going the wrong way, just go to things like chemicals and so on. And then, I received the most important prize in the world of agriculture,' Hungria said in an interview.
Norman Borlaug, who received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 for his work to dramatically increase crop yields and reduce the threat of starvation in many countries, founded the World Food Prize. Since the first prize was handed out in 1987, 55 people have been honoured.
Hungria said she grew up wanting to alleviate hunger. Early in her career, she decided to focus on a process called biological nitrogen fixation, in which soil bacteria could be used to promote plant growth. At that time, farmers in Brazil and around the world were reluctant to reduce their use of nitrogen fertilisers, which dramatically increase crop production but lead to greenhouse gas emissions and pollute waterways.
Hungria studied how bacteria can interact with plant roots to naturally produce nitrogen. She then demonstrated her work on test plots and began working directly with farmers to convince them that they wouldn't have to sacrifice high crop yields if they switched to a biological process.
The work is credited for increasing yields of several crops, including wheat, corn, and beans, but it has been especially affective on soybeans. Brazil has since become the world's largest soybean producer, surpassing the US.
Although Hungria's research could be applied on farms in other countries, soybean production in the US is different than it is in Brazil. American farmers typically rotate crops between growing corn and soybeans. Enough nitrate fertiliser applied to corn still remains in the soil when soybeans are planted and little or no fertiliser needs to be applied, Hungria said.
Brazilian agricultural companies have faced fierce criticism for clearing forested land to create farmland, largely to grow soybeans. Much of that criticism is justified, Hungria said, but she added that her approach builds up the soil and makes further encroachment into forested areas less necessary.
'If you manage the crop well, the crop will enrich the soil with nitrogen,' she said.
Hungria will be awarded her prize at an annual October gathering in Iowa of agricultural researchers and officials from around the world.
Gebisa Ejeta, chair of the World Food Prize Laureate Selection Committee, credited Hungria for the transformative effects of her research in South America.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Shocking! 183-million-year-old Dinosaur-era sea creature found with skin and scales intact
In a discovery that's catching the attention of scientists, researchers have found a remarkably well-preserved fossil of a marine reptile that's challenging what we thought we knew about how these creatures lived. The fossil, identified as Plesiopterys wildi, is around 183 million years old and was uncovered in southern Germany. What makes it especially rare is the presence of preserved soft tissues, like skin, scales, and keratin, which are almost never found in marine reptiles from the Jurassic period. The findings, published in Current Biology, offer a rare and detailed look at the texture, colouring, and movement of plesiosaurs– long-necked marine reptiles that lived during the Mesozoic era. Until now, scientists had to rely mostly on bones to imagine what these animals looked like, but this discovery gives a much clearer picture. Fossil found in 1940, but only studied recently The fossil specimen, labelled MH 7, was originally discovered in 1940 near Holzmaden, a region known for its fossil-rich Posidonia Shale. However, the specimen remained unprepared for decades. It was only in 2020 that researchers began to remove the surrounding limestone carefully and realised the fossil contained patches of soft tissue. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo 'Fossilized soft tissue, such as skin and internal organs, is exceptionally rare. We used a broad range of techniques to identify smooth skin in the tail region as well as scales along the rear edge of the flippers. This provided us with unparalleled insights into the appearance and biology of these long-extinct reptiles,' says Miguel Marx, a PhD student at Lund University and the study's lead author, as quoted by Lund University. Flippers show signs of specialised movement When researchers examined the fossil under a microscope, they found that the flippers were covered with tiny, triangular scales made of beta-keratin—a tough protein found in reptiles. These sturdy flippers likely helped the animal move with precision and control underwater. On the other hand, the skin on the tail was smoother and made of alpha-keratin, suggesting it had a different function. This difference in texture shows that various parts of the body were specially adapted for different roles in swimming and steering. 'Apart from the mosaic of smooth skin and scales, it was an incredible moment to visualize the cells in thin sections of the fossilized plesiosaur's skin. I was shocked when I saw skin cells that had been preserved for 183 million years. It was almost like looking at modern skin,' says Marx, as quoted by Lund University. Traces of pigment suggest patterned colouring One of the more unexpected findings was the discovery of melanosomes– tiny structures that carry pigment– in the skin of the tail. This suggests that the animal may have had patterns or variations in skin colour, instead of the plain or pale look that scientists usually imagine for marine reptiles. The researchers noted that this pigmentation could have played a role in camouflage or communication, though further analysis would be needed to confirm such functions. Discovery of a tail fin adds new clues Along with the preserved skin and scales, researchers also found a soft-tissue tail fin– something rarely seen in plesiosaur fossils. This broad and flexible structure suggests the tail may have helped the animal steer more effectively or even boosted its speed while swimming. Exceptional preservation thanks to Posidonia Shale The exceptional condition of the fossil is thanks to the unique environment where it was preserved. The Posidonia Shale– an ancient seabed with very low oxygen levels– slows down the process of decay, sometimes allowing soft tissues to fossilise along with bones. This kind of preservation is extremely rare in marine reptiles, which makes MH 7 a remarkable find and an important discovery for paleontologists. Adding detail to the story of Plesiosaur evolution Most studies on plesiosaurs have focused only on their bones, but this fossil gives a much fuller picture of the animal's biology. The preserved soft tissues offer new insights into how different parts of its body worked and how these features may have evolved over time. According to the research team, these findings may also contribute to understanding how plesiosaurs adapted to specific environments over time. 'Our findings help us create more accurate life reconstructions of plesiosaurs, something that has been extremely difficult since they were first studied over 200 years ago. Also, the well-preserved German fossil really highlights the potential for soft tissue in providing valuable insights into the biology of these long-extinct animals,' explains Marx, as quoted by Lund University. After sitting untouched for nearly 80 years, this discovery is now offering one of the most detailed views yet into the biology of a creature that swam the Earth's oceans almost 200 million years ago. The MH 7 fossil not only deepens our understanding of plesiosaurs but also highlights how valuable it can be to revisit and study old, forgotten specimens. Thumb image credit: X/@JoschuaKnuppe (Illustration of "Skin, scales, and cells in a Jurassic plesiosaur")


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Can crocodiles and alligators make babies? Scientists finally reveal the truth
Can crocodiles and alligators make babies? Scientists finally reveal the truth Alligators and crocodiles, two of the most ancient and powerful reptiles on Earth, have fascinated humans for centuries with their fearsome appearances and shared traits. Both belong to the order Crocodylia, exhibit similar body structures, and are apex predators dominating swamps, rivers, and wetlands. Their evolutionary lineage stretches back over 80 million years, leading many to wonder: can these two closely related creatures mate and produce offspring? Despite their surface similarities, the answer isn't as straightforward as it seems. Here, you can explore the deep genetic divides, evolutionary divergence, and reproductive barriers that reveal why a crocodile-alligator hybrid is biologically implausible. Why crocodiles and alligators are family—but not that close While alligators and crocodiles share the same order, Crocodylia, they diverge at the family level. Alligators belong to the family Alligatoridae, which includes alligators and caimans, whereas crocodiles are part of the Crocodylidae family. This taxonomic separation indicates significant evolutionary divergence, leading to distinct genetic makeups and physiological differences. Why alligators and crocodiles can't crossbreed The evolutionary paths of alligators and crocodiles split approximately 90 million years ago. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo This extensive period allowed for substantial genetic drift and the development of unique adaptations suited to their environments. Such a prolonged separation has resulted in considerable genetic incompatibility, making interbreeding highly improbable. Genetic incompatibility: The barrier to hybridization For two species to produce viable offspring, their genetic material must be compatible. In the case of alligators and crocodiles, their DNA sequences have diverged to the extent that successful fertilization and embryo development are virtually impossible. Even in controlled environments where both species coexist, there is no documented evidence of hybrid offspring. Behavioral and reproductive differences Beyond genetic factors, behavioral and reproductive differences further hinder the possibility of interbreeding. Alligators and crocodiles have distinct mating rituals, nesting behaviors, and breeding seasons. These differences reduce the likelihood of mating attempts, even in shared habitats like the Florida Everglades. Instances of hybridization in other crocodilian species While alligators and crocodiles cannot interbreed, hybridization has been observed among certain crocodile species. For example, the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) and the Cuban crocodile (Crocodylus rhombifer) have produced hybrid offspring in overlapping territories. These instances are exceptions rather than the norm and are limited to species within the same genus.


Economic Times
12 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump-Musk ties strain as Isaacman ousted, Musk exits DOGE; NYT alleges drug use
AP (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File) US president Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk appear to be drifting apart after a series of high-profile moves involving their close associates, political roles, and a damaging media report. Trump withdrew his pick of Jared Isaacman to lead NASA, while Musk exited his advisory role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump pulls Isaacman's NASA nomination Trump on Saturday said he was rescinding the nomination of Isaacman, a private astronaut and payments entrepreneur, to head the US space agency. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space.' Isaacman, founder of Shift4 Payments, has worked closely with Musk's SpaceX and is known for leading the first all-civilian space mission. His ties to Musk reportedly played a key role in his nomination. The New York Times reported that Trump decided to pull back after learning that Isaacman had previously donated to well-known Democratic candidates. Responding to that report, the White House told AFP in an email, 'It is essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with president Trump's America First agenda. The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute president Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars.' Musk leaves DOGE amid growing scrutiny Appointed by the president himself, Musk became in-charge of DOGE, a key project aimed at cutting government spending. His appointment made headlines and sparked strong reactions from both supporters and many expected Musk to step down, his exit came shortly after he publicly disagreed with parts of Trump's policy plans. That added to growing concerns about his role in his time at DOGE, Musk pushed for major spending cuts. Several government agencies were shut down and thousands of jobs were cut. These changes led to public protests and raised questions about whether it was appropriate for someone running large private companies to be involved in such Musk led DOGE, his companies, including Tesla, SpaceX and Neuralink, continued to operate, Tesla shares fell sharply, and protests erupted following DOGE's sweeping budget cuts and the closure of several federal agencies. Musk denies drug use claims by NYT Meanwhile, Musk hit back at a New York Times report that accused him of regular drug use during the 2024 campaign newspaper reported that Musk had used ketamine, ecstasy, and mushrooms and even developed bladder issues from frequent ketamine use. It said he carried a pill box and it was unclear whether he continued using drugs after joining the Trump administration in rejected the claims on Saturday. 'To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs. The New York Times was lying their ass off,' he wrote on added, 'I tried 'prescription' ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this is not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then.'When asked by a reporter if he knew about Musk's alleged drug use, Trump replied, 'I wasn't. I think Elon is a fantastic guy.'