Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's 'biggest hint' at royal return leaves critics 'bewildered'
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reportedly submitted passport applications for their two children, in which they have kept their HRH titles as well as the surname Sussex
Royal insiders have been left "utterly bewildered" by what's being dubbed the "biggest hint yet" that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle might consider a return to royal duties. It comes after they stepped down from 'the Firm' back in 2020, and relocated across the pond.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have caused quite a stir within the royal household with their actions since stepping back from public roles five years ago. This includes allegations of racism within the family and Meghan's viral video earlier this month, where she appeared to be "twerking" in a maternity ward before daughter Lilibet's birth.
Recent revelations about passport applications for their children, six-year-old Prince Archie and four-year-old Princess Lilibet, have sparked speculation, according to reports in the Mirror.
The documents reportedly include their HRH titles and the surname Sussex, suggesting Harry and Meghan want their kids to choose their own paths regarding royal duties when they are older.
rejoining royal life.
However, with Harry said to be estranged from both his father King Charles and brother Prince William, there would be a long way to go in mending fences.
Daily Mail's royal correspondent Richard Eden notes: "The suggestion gives the biggest hint yet that they're hoping to mend fences." He added: "Could the Sussexes, who left behind the drudgery of Royal duties for a new life in America, be plotting a comeback through their children?"
The Guardian initially reported the revelation last week, as they stated: "The Guardian understands that Prince Harry wants to keep the HRH titles for his children so that when they grow older they can decide for themselves whether they want to become working royals, or stay out of public life."
Insiders have expressed surprise and doubt in response to Harry and Meghan's actions and revelations since their move to the US, where they have attempted to kick-start their careers in other fields. Mr Eden quotes a royal source, saying: "I find this very hard to understand, one royal source told me this week... 'Harry and Meghan apparently found official duties and life within the Royal Family unbearable, yet they want this for their children. It doesn't make sense'.
"It's true that the Sussexes have spent considerable time and effort publicising their dissatisfaction with royal life. It's difficult to forget Harry's smile on a video as he described their 'freedom flight' to Los Angeles when they embarked on their American journey in 2020."
Meghan recently discussed the possibility of running a business with daughter Lilibet in the future. However, a source recently informed People that the Suits actress is focused on the future and is "very business about it", while Harry reportedly has "one foot in the past".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Lip reader spots King Charles discussing Prince Harry 'issue' with Queen Camilla
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info King Charles was overheard discussing a concern regarding Prince Harry with Queen Camilla during Trooping the Colour, according to a lip reader. As they rode in a carriage along The Mall, the royal couple greeted thousands of onlookers with smiles and waves. However, lip reader Nicola, on behalf of Fruity King, claims that the monarch, 76, and his wife, 77, were having a discreet discussion about an issue involving Harry. The exchange comes on the heels of Harry revealing to the BBC last month that the monarch refuses to communicate with him. According to Nicola, Charles instructed Camilla to "wave and smile so that we can keep talking" as they interacted with the crowd. Camilla then allegedly inquired: "Yes. What else did he want?" Charles responded: "He keeps dragging it all up, there seems to be another issue, right now." (Image: Chris Jackson, Getty Images) The lip reader asserted that the conversation was indeed centred around Prince Harry. Nicola also reported that Camilla asked her husband: "What are you going to do about it?". Charles replied: "We will tackle it sooner or later, it's all very messy and I will talk to Harry. That'll be fun." Camilla's alleged retort was: "Oh yes, problematic." Today's ceremony marks another year that Prince Harry has been absent from proceedings. The last time that the 40-year-old made an appearance at the event was in 2022. During another discussion between the King and Queen Camilla, lip reader Jeremy Freeman told the Scottish Daily Express that the King could be seen saying: "Absolutely crazy, disgrace, absolutely extraordinary." (Image: Getty Images) Later, the 76-year-old then reportedly said: "On my way out", before adding: "Meanwhile, not like me. That's the difference between me and him." While it is unclear as to exactly what or who King Charles was referring to, it comes amid an ongoing dispute between him and Prince Andrew about the future of the Royal Lodge. Despite the underlying tension, both King Charles and Queen Camilla appeared delighted at the event, an annual tradition commemorating the monarch's official birthday celebrations. Away from his discussions with Queen Camilla, the festivities passed without any noticeable hiccups, with King and Queen seen alongside their younger family members, including Prince William and Princess Kate, as well as their three children Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis. Other members of the Royal Family present at the event included Princess Anne, Duchess Sophie and Prince Edward. The event wrapped up this afternoon with a magnificent flypast.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Reclusive star hailed 'next Prince' vanished from spotlight and changed name
Terence Trent D'Arby shot to fame in the 1980s after releasing his debut studio album, but after just a few years, his music career came to an abrupt halt and he disappeared from the limelight The 1980s was a decade that produced some iconic music legends, including Prince, Michael Jackson, and Whitney Houston. However, one name that was once mentioned alongside these stars has largely faded into obscurity. Terence Trent D'Arby exploded onto the scene in 1987, following a whirlwind of publicity surrounding his music. Just a few years prior, he had been an amateur boxer and a soldier in the US army. His debut studio album, Introducing The Hardline According to Terence Trent D'Arby, generated significant buzz after he claimed it was as groundbreaking as The Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. Although his bold statements about his work earned him a reputation, the album proved to be a hit, featuring some of his most popular tracks, including If You Let Me Stay, Sign Your Name, and Dance Little Sister. Critics praised the album, which won him a Grammy and a BRIT award, drawing comparisons to music legends like Prince, Michael Jackson, and Sam Cooke. Reflecting on that time and his provocative statement, the singer told The Guardian: "I said a lot of s***, but Muhammad Ali was one of my heroes, and I similarly realised that if you say outrageous things, it gets attention. "As a young artist, you've got to get your work heard and to a degree, I hypnotised myself into believing I was a genius. It worked like a charm, but I didn't understand the degree I'd have to pay for that." However, just as he gained momentum, his commercial success abruptly ended with the release of his second album Neither Fish nor Flesh in 1989. The album's different sound failed to resonate with fans and critics, halting his promising career. Four years later, after moving to Los Angeles, D'Arby released his third album, Symphony or Damn, which showed promise but couldn't match his original hits. He then became a recluse, rarely leaving his California mansion, as per the Mirror US. In 2001, he made headlines again by changing his name to Sananda Maitreya, stating: "Terence Trent D'Arby was dead... he watched his suffering as he died a noble death. After intense pain, I meditated for a new spirit, a new will, a new identity." Maitreya released new music under his new name, without big-label backing, and left Los Angeles for a quieter life. He moved to Munich, then Milan in 2002, and married Italian architect and television host Francesca Francone the following year. From Italy, he continued to release new music, uploading it to his website.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Nan Shepherd: Naked and Unashamed cements her place in literary canon
The play tells the story of Shepherd as an author, teacher, hillwalker and lover, and explores the 30-years-delay in the publication of her masterpiece The Living Mountain. Now in its second run in Pitlochry, I did not want to miss. Before entering the studio space, we were told the show was 'very clever' by staff and it had sold out the remainder of the performances. The thirst for knowledge about Shepherd has not been quenched since her appearance on Scotland's five-pound note in 2016. She has taken her rightful place among the great Scottish writers of her time, of whom she was friends with, and with that, becoming a posthumous celebrity. Holding the titular role, Susan Coyle effortlessly shifted as a child playing in the woods with her father, to a young woman teasing a married man, a middle-aged teacher relishing in the outdoors, and an old woman reflecting on her life's work, then later in her final days. Around and around, we were carried, spinning through time and Shepherd's life. Along the way, Adam Buksh joined her, embodying several men who played key roles in her life. He transformed into her father, her lover John Macmurray, an American journalist who tracked her down in 1976, and her mentor Neil Gunn. The periods of her life that were played out each helped capture a full-bodied picture of Shepherd. We saw her as a child in the Quarry Wood by her house in 1901, aged eight – which later inspired her first novel, by the same name, published in 1928 – playing with her father and learning about communication between trees. We were then transported to 1981, to see Nan grown and old, in a care home in Aberdeen slightly lost and confused. These two scenes bookend the play, with us returning to them again for the final two scenes. The play makes clear that Nan was closely attached the granite city, with the audience asked to fill in the evident gap: 'I was born in Aberdeen, I went to school in Aberdeen, and so I teach in …' when we meet her in 1938 in a classroom. Again, none of the staging has been moved, and Coyle doesn't change outfits at any point during the 90-minute production. Yet, it is an entirely different time, place and person in front of us. While embodying Shepherd as a teacher, Coyle asks audience members to read passages written by several authors which relate to Scotland and its literary renaissance of the 20th century. We also hear from Charles Murray, Hugh MacDiarmid, Rupert Brooke, James Joyce, and Thomas Hardy, The delivery of these passages by both Coyle and Buksh ensnared the audience and we were hooked on every word. Later, while going through old clippings with Robertson, a review written by Lewis Grassic Gibbon of The Quarry Wood is found, in which he savagely tears apart her work and her use of Scots language. READ MORE: 20 years, 7000 fans, one folk family: Skerryvore's castle show was for them Gibbon would go on to publish Sunset Song four years later, and we are told by Shepherd that his autobiographer said he never read Shepherd's novel. Robertson is aghast that as a student in the US, he was taught Sunset Song and told it was one of the greatest Scottish novels there had ever been but had never heard of Shepherd or her work which embodies the same world as Gibbon's but came first. Shepherd in 1976 notes her novel was written in Scotland, while his was written in England. The audience is left to make their own conclusion, as historians have been also. Instead of holding the audience in a grudge, we explore the deeper impact of what Shepherd was attempting to do at a time when the world was not built for a 'female feminist Scottish writer,' unmarried and uncovering the secrets ready to be shared by the great outdoors in ways that would rival and overtake any male counterpart. So harsh was this backlash, from Gibbon and others, she locked The Living Mountain away. This is the catalyst of the show, with the direction, sound, and writing using this moment to give the narrative a sense of release once the drawer is open. READ MORE: 'Show some respect': Scots hit out at Danish influencer for 'damaging' protected land The relationship between Shepherd and Gunn is also explored but not with conclusion. The journalist pries into whether love letters were exchanged between the two, who had decades-long written correspondence, but Shepherd remains steadfast that he was her mentor. Again, it's not clear whether the pair were intimately involved but both the writing and direction of the show allows the narrative to be explored without making any conclusions about Shepherd's life. The audience is left to read between the lines of all we know about Shepherd. An Aberdonian woman who wrote before her time, saw beyond her reality, and truly understood what the beauty and intricacies of Scotland's landscape and culture could give to this world if seen in its entirety. Her final moments are played out, with a final scene between Shepherd and her father bringing tears to many in the audience who closed the show with a standing ovation.
