Danielle Smith pitches B.C. on pipeline project, saying it benefits ‘all Canadians'
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is making a pipeline pitch directly to British Columbians.
Smith told Global News that Canada needs to take advantage of this moment of national unity to respond to U.S. President Donald Trump's threats.
'When you look at the potential for a million barrels a day at today's prices, that's about 20 billion dollars worth of value,' Smith told Focus BC.
'It doesn't just go to Alberta, it benefits all Canadians.'
Smith is leaning on the Team Canada approach but does acknowledge that there still need to be work to address Indigenous concerns.
'We hear the environmental concerns and that is why it is good to have Indigenous partners so we can reroute the route, and deal with issues on the ground,' she said.
Story continues below advertisement
'I know a few things need to be modified, but we can get to yes.'
2:01
Pipeline dream: Alberta premier makes pitch at Global Energy Show
There is still no proponent for the pipeline project but the previous iteration of a pipeline to the coast destroyed the relationship with then Alberta Premier Alison Redford and then B.C. Premier Christy Clark.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Smith said the difference this time is the vision to export the material out of Prince Rupert, rather than Kitimat, where navigating tankers is harder.
'Let's go to a port that is already shipping goods, that is ice-free year-round,' she added.
B.C. Energy Minister Adrian Dix says the province is opposed to the new pipeline and instead, Alberta should focus on building out the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion, which already cost taxpayers more than $34 billion.
Story continues below advertisement
'We still need to get some work to get value for that pipeline,' Dix said.
'We have been supportive of that now that taxpayers have paid for it. The idea that taxpayers would subsidize a project that has no proponent makes no sense to us.'
Watch the full interview with Smith above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Letters to the Editor, June 15, 2025
Sunday letters Photo by Illustration / Toronto Sun SCHEER IS READY This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Canada has failed itself in the last few elections. The NDP self-exploded after the death of Jack Layton, a staunch, common-sense politician who was favoured to take Canada by storm prior to his passing. Jagmeet Singh was not a leader but an opportunist. One thing for sure, dental is in Canada to stay — thank you, Jagmeet, even though your party was destroyed for sleeping with the devil. As for the Conservative Party, Andrew Scheer has done his time in the galley and this time is ready to take the helm. Wayne Robertson Chatham (Time will tell. Poilievre will likely be back in House of Commons in the next few months and has to keep his party united and ready for the next election – hopefully with many lessons learned from the last one) This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. FREE SPEECH UNDER THREAT Canada's popular podcaster and superb scholar Jordan Peterson has been warning Canadians for months that Mark Carney is a grave threat to free speech in this country. Peterson believes that Carney will resurrect democracy-crushing Bill C-63, the so-called Online Harms Act, which will greatly threaten free speech in Canada. During the election campaign, Carney banned independent media from attending his events: Hence one could conclude that independent news outlets are at risk of being censored or shut down. Additionally, increased funding for the CBC will only serve to promote Liberal propaganda. Both Peterson and America's renowned academic scholar and historian Victor Davis Hanson have pointed out that Carney is a Marxist who has expressed admiration for Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin. Canada beware: Free speech and democracy are at risk. Harley Whitlock Brantford (It's terrible legislation – but the Liberals will get the NDP's support) TIME FOR A REPUBLIC I strongly support Canada becoming a republic and ending recognition of the governor general, Charles and Camilla, and William and Kate. Forget the King. Forget the monarchy. I'd rather have Donald Trump than Charles. And U.S. liquor should be back on the shelves and the misguided handgun legislation should be repealed. Jason Hutton Windsor (You're right about the booze – bring it back) World World Golf Golf Sunshine Girls
Toronto Star
7 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Ottawa's GST/HST relief for first-time new home buyers is a broken promise — and too little, too late for GTA
Two weeks ago, the federal government unveiled a measure designed to improve housing affordability: a targeted GST/HST rebate for first-time buyers of newly built homes. Unfortunately, this narrowly focused policy is not just inadequate, it's a broken promise decades in the making. The new proposal offers a full GST/HST rebate for first-time buyers of new homes up to $1 million, with a partial rebate for homes priced between $1 million and $1.5 million. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW While this may sound generous on paper, it ignores the reality for hundreds of thousands of Canadians in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and lower mainland British Columbia, where average prices for new homes exceed these thresholds. In practice, very few buyers in these two key regions will benefit. The Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) has made its position clear: this initiative is both geographically biased and far too narrow in scope to meaningfully impact affordability. But what makes this situation worse is the federal government's failure to uphold a commitment it made to Canadians more than three decades ago. When the new GST was being designed in late 1980s, very specific thought went into how the tax would apply to new homes and how the rebate structure would be put together to ensure that the tax would not impact affordability. Business Opinion What's behind the GTA's housing crisis? Two studies shine a light on the problems By addressing approval delays, reducing municipal fees, and focusing on construction of homes, A federal technical paper released in 1989 by then-Finance Minister Michael Wilson outlines those homes under $350,000 would receive a rebate of up to 36 per cent of GST paid, tapering off to zero at $450,000. As seen on Page 19 of this technical paper, the government also committed to reviewing and adjusting these thresholds every two years to keep pace with economic and housing market conditions. That review and adjustments never happened. At the time, the government estimated that 95 per cent of new homes would qualify for at least a partial rebate, with 90 per cent receiving the maximum. This promise helped sell the tax to Canadians with the reassurance that GST would not be a barrier to home ownership. Today, that assurance rings hollow to buyers in the GTA, where average new home prices have long since eclipsed those 1990s thresholds and so now virtually no homes in the region qualify for a rebate. What was supposed to support 95 per cent of new homebuyers now supports close to 0 per cent. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW According to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), the average price of a single-detached home in Ontario has increased from $276,000 in 1990 to $1,023,000 in 2023, an increase of 270 per cent. Over the same period, the net federal HST collected on these homes increased by 479 per cent, from $8,832 to more than $51,000. This isn't just a statistic; it's a growing burden. That additional $43,000 in taxes, when rolled into a standard 25-year mortgage at 4 per cent, results in an extra $220 in monthly payments, $24,000 in additional interest, and a total financial hit of more than $66,000 over the life of the loan. And that's for a typical new home, not a luxurious mansion. In fact, by failing to update the rebate thresholds as promised, the federal government has quietly extracted nearly $4 billion in additional GST/HST revenue from new homebuyers in Ontario alone — most of it in just the last decade. Business Opinion Sky-high development charges make new home building in the GTA near impossible. Here's what needs to change Failure to cut building costs by modernizing the Development Charges Act, writes Dave Wilkes, The federal government's recently proposed GST/HST relief on new homes for only first-time buyers does not even begin to address the real problem. First-time buyers represent just five-to-10 per cent of new home purchases in the GTA. The rest, like young families upsizing and seniors downsizing, get no help. Plus, the proposed program is geographically biased, as the average price for a condo in the GTA is more and $1 million and the average price of a single-family home (including townhouse and semis) is more than $1.5 million — meaning even those who qualify in the GTA will receive less relief than buyers in lower-cost markets, despite paying more for the same (or lesser) product. The government acknowledges that GST/HST contributes to unaffordability but stops short of meaningful action, so if the federal government is serious about addressing the housing crisis, it needs to start by removing the barriers it helped build. This means expanding GST/HST relief to all new home buyers, not just first-time buyers, and adjusting the rebate thresholds to reflect today's housing markets across the country. This isn't radical, it's simply delivering on a promise made in 1989 and long overdue.
Toronto Star
10 hours ago
- Toronto Star
As Trump heads to the G7, Canada hopes to avoid another Charlevoix-style eruption
OTTAWA - U.S. President Donald Trump is set to arrive Sunday in Alberta for the G7 summit — his first visit to Canada since leaving in a huff seven years ago. Ottawa could use everything from golfing and creative scheduling to special cabinet orders to make the visit successful and avoid a repeat diplomatic disaster. 'He is somebody who is very prickly when he feels like he's not being fully respected,' said Eric Miller, president of Rideau Potomac Strategy Group, a cross-border consultancy. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'You want to make absolutely sure that … he walks away and says, 'You know, those Canadians aren't so bad after all.'' Better than last time The last time Trump was in Canada — for the G7 summit in the Charlevoix region of Quebec — things ended in a blowout. Trump refused to sign the communiqué, the published list of statements on common G7 issues that are mostly negotiated and agreed to by member nations ahead of time. He left early and lambasted Trudeau as 'very dishonest and weak' in a spat over tariffs. The summit included what Miller called the 'photograph for the ages' — of then German chancellor Angela Merkel and others standing sternly over a seated Donald Trump, who appeared to be glaring back with crossed arms. German Ambassador to Canada Matthias Lüttenberg put it bluntly when he told a June 4 panel that Ottawa was again navigating 'very difficult circumstances' as G7 chair — and capably, in his view. 'I mean, I wouldn't like to negotiate with a country at the table who's questioning my sovereignty as a state,' he said. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Sen. Peter Boehm, who was summit head in 2018, recalled two late nights of negotiations because the Trump administration didn't align with the others on including climate change or references to the 'rules-based international order.' Informal talks Prime Minister Mark Carney won office in April after repeatedly saying he could stand up to Trump's threats to ruin the Canadian economy in order to make the country an American state. Carney had a cordial visit to Washington in early May and even got praise from Trump on social media and in person, despite the president insisting Canada should still become a U.S. state. The two have continued talking. U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra revealed earlier this month that the president and Carney have exchanged frequent calls and texts on trade and tariffs. Miller said facetime between the two leaders in Alberta could help them make progress on economic concerns, as well as Trump's pitch to bring Canada into his proposed Golden Dome missile shield project. 'Given that there is this conversation underway, it is important that they have an opportunity to continue that, and to meet perhaps in a setting that is less structured and formal than the Oval Office,' Miller said. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'Life is about imperfect choices, and it's absolutely the right thing to have Mr. Trump come to Canada.' He said he's not sure if there will be any formal announcement, though he added Trump is keen to sign agreements with multiple countries ahead of his self-imposed July 9 deadline for so-called retaliatory tariffs. Miller said both Canada and the U.S. are likely to take credit for Ottawa announcing this month it will drastically speed up its pledge to meet NATO's defence spending target. Trump might also take note of the fact that he's in one of the few provinces that have opted to resume sales of U.S. alcohol, after all provinces banned it from their liquor store shelves in response to U.S. tariffs. Lower expectations Ottawa's decision to schedule relatively short group discussions among G7 leaders, and to invite numerous other world leaders, could mean more of the one-on-one meetings that Trump prefers. 'Trump does not like multilateral meetings particularly. He loses interest,' Boehm said. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Canadian officials have said they are concentrating on releasing shorter, focused statements, which could avoid the sort of major blowups that may come from trying to craft the massive joint communiqués typical of almost all prior G7 summits. Former prime minister Jean Chretien told a panel Thursday that if Trump does have an outburst, G7 leaders should ignore him and 'keep talking normally.' Miller said that for Canada, 'ensuring a positive agenda that doesn't lead to acrimony afterwards' means advancing its interests without isolating the U.S., particularly with so many guest leaders attending. 'The trick that Mr. Carney has to pull off is to reassure the U.S. that it wants a good, positive relationship — while at the same time running vigorously, as quickly as possible, to try to build new relationships,' he said. It's also entirely possible that Trump will leave before the meetings conclude. A visiting felon Keeping it positive is also likely why Ottawa will skirt rules that might bar Trump from crossing into Canada after he was found guilty on 34 criminal counts in a 'hush money' trial in May 2024. Immigration lawyers say those convicted of serious crimes abroad must serve their time and wait five years before seeking a certificate of admissibility to Canada, though there are loopholes if someone seeks a visa for a compelling reason. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The federal cabinet passed a formal order published in February that gives diplomatic immunity and privileges to 'representatives of a foreign state that participate in the G7 meetings.' The office of Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab would not say whether she had issued a special exemption, with her department citing privacy legislation. 'Inadmissibility decisions are made on a case-by-case basis,' spokesman Remi Lariviere wrote. Fore! Another way Canada could ensure a successful visit could be to get Trump to the Kananaskis Country Golf Course — a prospect much discussed in media reports that remained unconfirmed as of Friday afternoon. Carney gave Trump a hat and golf gear from that course during his visit to the Oval Office in May. Miller said that wasn't just a gimmick — Trump loves making deals while teeing off, and it could provide Carney or others with hours of facetime on a golf cart, which is Trump's comfort zone. 'Golf has been pretty central to his life,' he said. 'It makes eminent sense to have Mr. Trump playing at a high-quality golf course.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 14, 2025. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
