Israel hits Gaza hospital as strikes resume following hostage release
Israel struck a hospital in Gaza early Tuesday, a day after briefly pausing military activity for the release of Israeli-American Edan Alexander by Hamas.
The Israeli military resumed strikes in Gaza about an hour after Alexander left the territory, hitting the Al Daraj neighborhood in northern Gaza on Monday evening, before striking the Nasser medical complex in southern Gaza on Tuesday, according to hospital officials.
The IDF strike targeted the surgical ward on the hospital's third floor, which is now 'completely out of service,' killing two patients and wounding medical staff, Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) said.
The target of the strike appeared to be Hassan Eslaiah, a prominent Gaza photojournalist. He was being treated at the hospital after being wounded in an earlier targeted Israeli airstrike in April.
The IDF claimed at the time of the April strike that Eslaiah had taken part in the attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023 and belonged to Hamas' Khan Younis Brigade, although it did not provide evidence to support the claim. It asserted that he worked 'under the guise of a journalist and owns a press company.' On Tuesday, the Israeli military said it 'precisely struck significant Hamas terrorists' at Nasser hospital, but did not name Eslaiah.
Eslaiah crossed into Israel on October 7, 2023, documenting the attacks in photographs that were published by multiple major news organizations. He had previously said he had no forewarning of the attacks and rushed to the scene to document a major news event alongside other photojournalists.
CNN, along with other news organizations, had periodically used material provided by Eslaiah. CNN cut ties with him in November 2023 after new allegations emerged of links to Hamas. CNN said he was not working with the network on October 7, 2023.
Eslaiah said from his hospital bed in April that he faced 'false allegations' from the IDF and that he was 'not fighting or anything.'
The Ramallah-based Palestinian Journalists Protection Center condemned Eslaiah's killing, demanding an international investigation into what they described as a 'heinous assassination.' The center called Eslaiah's killing the 'deliberate targeting of the voice of truth.'
The Nasser hospital strike on Tuesday is the latest example of deliberate Israeli attacks on medical facilities in Gaza, for which Israel has been accused of violating international law.
Hospitals are entitled to special protections during armed conflict under international humanitarian law and can only be targeted under extremely limited circumstances, such as if they are being used to actively commit 'an act harmful to the enemy,' according to the Geneva Conventions.
The latest attack on Nasser hospital 'totally destroyed' two patient rooms, partially damaged three others and a nursing station, according to MAP's medical activity coordinator who is based at Nasser Hospital.
'The extension of the intensive care unit, which contains three ICU beds, was also affected – its electrical and oxygen systems were damaged in the strike – rendering the entire section non-operational,' the coordinator said in a statement provided by MAP.
The strike adds to an already rapidly deteriorating situation for Gaza's medical facilities.
Nasser hospital's medical director Dr. Atef Al-Hout said the hospital is rapidly running out of fuel to power its generators amid Israel's now 10-week blockade of the strip.
Following the release of Alexander, the Israeli American hostage, the United States is renewing its push for a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas.
An Israeli delegation was set to fly to Qatar on Tuesday to resume negotiations, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed those talks will continue 'under fire,' with no slowdown in Israeli strikes expected without a deal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
34 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One — but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president. Installing capabilities equivalent to the decades-old 747s now used as Air Force One would almost certainly consign the project to a similar fate as Boeing's replacement initiative, which has been plagued by delays and cost overruns . Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers Thursday that those security modifications would cost less than $400 million but provided no details. Satisfying Trump's desire to use the new plane before the end of his term could require leaving out some of those precautions, however. A White House official said Trump wants the Qatari jet ready as soon as possible while adhering to security standards. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not provide details on equipment issues or the timeline. Trump has survived two assassination attempts , and Iran allegedly also plotted to kill him, so he's well aware of the danger he faces. However, he seems willing to take some chances with security, particularly when it comes to communications. For example, he likes to keep his personal phone handy despite the threat of hacks. He boasted this week that the government got the jet 'for free,' saying, 'We need it as Air Force One until the other ones are done.' Here's a look at what it would take to make the Qatari plane into a presidential transport: What makes a plane worthy of being Air Force One? Air Force One is the call sign for any plane that's carrying the president. The first aircraft to get the designation was a propeller-powered C-54 Skymaster, which ferried Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Yalta Conference in 1945. It featured a conference room with a bulletproof window. Things are a lot more complicated these days. Boeing has spent years stripping down and rebuilding two 747s to replace the versions that have carried presidents for more than three decades. The project is slated to cost more than $5.3 billion and may not be finished before Trump leaves office. A 2021 report made public through the Freedom of Information Act outlines the unclassified requirements for the replacement 747s under construction. At the top of the list — survivability and communications. The government decided more than a decade ago that the new planes had to have four engines so they could remain airborne if one or two fail, said Deborah Lee James, who was Air Force secretary at the time. That creates a challenge because 747s are no longer manufactured, which could make spare parts harder to come by. Air Force One also has to have the highest level of classified communications, anti-jamming capabilities and external protections against foreign surveillance, so the president can securely command military forces and nuclear weapons during a national emergency. It's an extremely sensitive and complex system, including video, voice and data transmissions. James said there are anti-missile measures and shielding against radiation or an electromagnetic pulse that could be caused by a nuclear blast. 'The point is, it remains in flight no matter what,' she said. Will Trump want all the security bells and whistles? If the Qatari plane is retrofitted to presidential standards, it could cost $1.5 billion and take years, according to a U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details that aren't publicly available. Testifying before Congress this week, Meink discounted such estimates, arguing that some of the costs associated with retrofitting the Qatari plane would have been spent anyway as the Air Force moves to build the long-delayed new presidential planes, including buying aircraft for training and to have spares available if needed. In response, Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said that based on the contract costs for the planes that the Air Force is building, it would cost about $1 billion to strip down the Qatar plane, install encrypted communications, harden its defenses and make other required upgrades. James said simply redoing the wiring means 'you'd have to break that whole thing wide open and almost start from scratch.' Trump, as commander in chief, could waive some of these requirements. He could decide to skip shielding systems from an electromagnetic pulse, leaving his communications more vulnerable in case of a disaster but shaving time off the project. After all, Boeing has already scaled back its original plans for the new 747s. Their range was trimmed by 1,200 nautical miles, and the ability to refuel while airborne was scrapped. Paul Eckloff, a former leader of protection details at the Secret Service, expects the president would get the final say. 'The Secret Service's job is to plan for and mitigate risk,' he said. 'It can never eliminate it.' If Trump does waive some requirements, James said that should be kept under wraps because 'you don't want to advertise to your potential adversaries what the vulnerabilities of this new aircraft might be.' It's unlikely that Trump will want to skimp on the plane's appearance. He keeps a model of a new Air Force One in the Oval Office, complete with a darker color scheme that echoes his personal jet instead of the light blue design that's been used for decades. What happens next? Trump toured the Qatari plane in February when it was parked at an airport near Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort. Air Force chief of staff Gen. David Allvin was there, too. The U.S. official said the jet needs maintenance but not more than what would be expected of a four-engine plane of its complexity. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said it would be irresponsible to put the president and national security equipment aboard the Qatari plane 'without knowing that the aircraft is fully capable of withstanding a nuclear attack.' 'It's a waste of taxpayer dollars,' she said. Meanwhile, Boeing's project has been hampered by stress corrosion cracks on the planes and excessive noise in the cabins from the decompression system, among other issues that have delayed delivery, according to a Government Accountability Office report released last year. Boeing referred questions to the Air Force, which said in a statement that it's working with the aircraft manufacturer to find ways to accelerate the delivery of at least one of the 747s. Even so, the aircraft will have to be tested and flown in real-world conditions to ensure no other issues. James said it remains to be seen how Trump would handle any of those challenges. 'The normal course of business would say there could be delays in certifications,' she said. 'But things seem to get waived these days when the president wants it.' ___ AP writer Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 5, 2025
The rundown: President Trump has reinstated and expanded a travel ban targeting citizens from 12 countries, citing national security concerns following a recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado. Get more details. Why it matters: On June 1, Soliman, a 45-year-old Egyptian national, carried out a firebombing attack at a pro-Israel rally in Boulder, injuring 12 people. Soliman, who had overstayed his visa, used Molotov cocktails and a makeshift flamethrower during the assault. Trump announced a reinstated ban would prohibit entry for citizens from 12 countries; Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. However, the country of origin of the attacker—Egypt—is notably absent from the list, raising questions about the ban's effectiveness and underlying motivations. The National Iranian American Council told Newsweek the move would "not make America safer." When asked why Egypt was left of the list, Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma told CNN that the order was being considered before the Boulder terrorist attack. Read more in-depth coverage: Trump's Travel Ban: Exceptions Travellers Need to Know TL/DR: The omission of Egypt, the home country of the Boulder attacker, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, suggests potential inconsistencies in the policy's application. What happens now? Legal challenges to the travel ban are anticipated, with opponents likely to question its consistency and potential discriminatory impact. Deeper reading Donald Trump's Travel Ban Surprisingly Omits One Country
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
BROADCAST BIAS: Networks downplay illegal immigrant's alleged antisemitic attack in 'sanctuary city'
Violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants are typically not considered "newsworthy" by ABC, CBS, or NBC. The subject is too "Trumpy." Their collective reflex is to ignore each murder or injury as some sort of obscure local news anecdote that doesn't rise to a national news story. On Sunday, June 1, an illegal immigrant from Egypt named Mohamed Soliman allegedly tried to kill Jewish protesters in Boulder, Colorado, who were advocating for the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. The first headlines from the networks were aerobically vague. NBC News drew the most social-media mockery for "Multiple Gaza hostage awareness marchers injured in attack in Boulder. "People" were "set on fire," it said underneath. Jews were just "Gaza-hostage-awareness marchers." CBS's vague headline — "Attack at Boulder's Pearl Street Mall in Colorado burns several people, police say" — gave no indication that the assailant was antisemitic. The attack first drew police attention at about 3:30 pm Eastern time. On Sunday night's CBS "Weekend News," they began with the Boulder attack, but only stuck with it for about 40 vague seconds before moving to a story blaming Israel for shootings of civilians looking for food in Gaza. "PBS News Weekend" never mentioned Boulder on Sunday evening. Sunday night's "All Things Considered" on NPR didn't consider a segment on this. On Monday morning, the vagueness continued. The attacker was an "Egyptian national" and his victims were "people" in a "peaceful crowd." Once legal proceedings kicked in, the specifics followed in Monday night's coverage. Soliman reportedly confessed to police that he planned the attack for a year, and he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead, and he said he would do it again. CBS White House reporter Nancy Cordes suggested Trump and his aides were exploiting the attack. "The president and the White House, more generally, they are using this case to hammer the Biden administration over its immigration policies, which they are arguing enabled the suspect to stay in the country." Anchor John Dickerson then asked Cordes what might have happened to the assailant under Trump's border policies. She conceded it was "unlikely" he would have been allowed to enter the country and claim asylum. On Monday, PBS White House reporter Laura Barron-Lopez also noted the information was "seized" for political benefit. "President Trump today seized upon that on his social media, writing: 'This is yet another example of why we must keep our border secure.'" By Wednesday night, the story had turned to the Trump administration moving to deport Soliman's wife and five children, who are also illegal immigrants. As usual, a judge stepped in to delay it. While they usually highlight judges acting as the "resistance," ABC, CBS and PBS barely touched on it. At least NBC devoted a full story to this. Reporter Morgan Chesky even relayed a video shared on a pro-Hamas Telegram channel, shot before Sunday's attack, which showed Soliman saying in Arabic "God is greater than the Zionists… than America, and its weapons." NBC could have aired a fuller, subtitled version of the alleged firebomber's remarks to include "Jihad is more beloved to me than my mother, wife, and children." That would seem relevant to the question of America deporting his wife and children. The networks didn't talk about how the liberals who run Boulder proclaimed themselves a "sanctuary city," protecting illegal immigrants from federal law enforcement. Daily Caller White House reporter Reagan Reese asked White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt about that topic, but no one expected liberal networks would notice. NBC News drew the most social-media mockery for "Multiple Gaza hostage awareness marchers injured in attack in Boulder. "People" were "set on fire," it said underneath. Jews were just "Gaza-hostage-awareness marchers." A week before the attack, the state of Colorado doubled down on its sanctuary "protections" in new legislation signed by Gov. Jared Polis, which underlined that, by nature, Democrats in blue states want to keep all illegal immigrants, including criminals, from being deported. This has been a disturbing trend in antisemitic attacks in recent weeks. On April 13, a man started a fire at Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's home. Shapiro is Jewish, and the suspect allegedly did the attack to support the Palestinian cause. And on 21, two Israeli employees were gunned down outside the Capital Jewish Museum. In each case, the networks covered the crime for a few days and then moved on. It's likely that these broadcast networks will be eager to put Boulder in the rearview mirror as well.
