Amazon to invest 40 billion pounds in UK, four new fulfilment centres planned
Marketplace giant Amazon has unveiled plans for a 40 billion pound investment in the UK market where, over the next three years, it is looking to establish four new fulfilment centres and two new London offices.
The company, which already employs over 75,000 people in the UK, said the plans will only expand on this number, creating 'thousands of new permanent, full-time jobs in the UK, with the vast majority outside of London and the South East'.
These will include the 4,000 jobs set for Amazon's new fulfilment centres in Hull and Northampton, with additional positions expected within new sites in the East Midlands and new delivery stations across the country. A further 60 different specialised roles are to also be introduced, including robotics technicians, safety experts and mechatronic engineers.
Alongside fulfilment centres, Amazon is looking to open two new buildings in East London for its corporate headquarters and plans to further invest in transportation infrastructure, workforce training programmes and redeveloping Bray Film Studios in Berkshire.
This latest announcement comes after Amazon revealed a prior eight billion pound investment in building, operating and maintaining data centres in the UK, a process that is to run until 2028. Here, the company hopes to 'support the UK's ambition to increase AI compute capacity', and is expected to contribute 14 billion pounds to the UK economy over five years.
In a statement, UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, welcomed Amazon's latest investment boost, which he said 'adds another major win to Britain's basket'. He continued: 'It means thousands of new jobs—real opportunities for people in every corner of the country to build careers, learn new skills, and support their families.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
23 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Thinking AI models like ChatGPT emit '50 times more CO2' but still give wrong answers
The more an AI service thinks, the more carbon it emits. Artificial Intelligence is a tool being used by millions of people the world over. AI is when computer systems perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. From homeowners asking ChatGPT for renovation advice, to the software revealing what Scottish homes could look like in the next 25 years, engaging with AI can be helpful and eye-opening, but can also come with serious risks. A recent study from MIT found that using ChatGPT for essay writing can negatively impact cognitive engagemen t and memory recall, compared to those who wrote purely from their own brain. But it's not just the personal impact AI can have, it can also damage the environment. Another study analysing different types of AI found there was a marked difference in CO2 output depending on the model. A query typed into a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, requires energy and produces more CO2 emissions. Emissions, however, depend on the model, the subject matter, and the user. Researchers compared 14 models and found that complex answers cause more emissions than simple answers. Meanwhile, models that provide more accurate answers also produce more emissions. Wondering how asking AI a question produces CO2 emissions? Well, no matter which questions we ask an AI, the model will come up with an answer, the researchers in Germany explained. To produce this information - regardless of whether that answer is correct or not - the model uses tokens. Tokens are words or parts of words that are converted into a string of numbers that can be processed by the LLM. This conversion, as well as other computing processes, produce CO2 emissions. Many users, however, are unaware of the substantial carbon footprint associated with these technologies. With that in mind, researchers measured and compared CO2 emissions of different, already trained, LLMs using a set of standardised questions. "The environmental impact of questioning trained LLMs is strongly determined by their reasoning approach," explained first author Maximilian Dauner. "Explicit reasoning processes significantly drive up energy consumption and carbon emissions. We found that reasoning-enabled models produced up to 50 times more CO2 emissions than concise response models." 'Thinking' AI causes the most emissions. Reasoning models, on average, created 543.5 'thinking' tokens per question, whereas concise models required just 37.7 tokens per question. Thinking tokens are additional tokens that reasoning LLMs generate before producing an answer. A higher token footprint always means higher CO2 emissions. It doesn't, however, mean the resulting answers are more correct. This is because elaborate detail does not always equal correctness. Subject matter also resulted in significantly different levels of CO2 emissions. Questions that required lengthy reasoning processes, for example abstract algebra or philosophy, led to up to six times higher emissions than more straightforward subjects, like high school history. The most accurate model was the Cogito model with 70 billion parameters, reaching 84.9 per cent accuracy. The model produced three times more CO2 emissions than similar sized models that generated concise answers. All is not lost, though. If you are a tech enthusiast, but also climate-conscious, you can, to an extent, control the amount of CO2 emissions caused by AI by adjusting your personal use of the technology, the researchers said. "Users can significantly reduce emissions by prompting AI to generate concise answers or limiting the use of high-capacity models to tasks that genuinely require that power," Dauner pointed out. Choice of model can make a big difference in CO2 emissions. For example, having DeepSeek R1 answer 600,000 questions would create CO2 emissions equal to a round-trip flight from London to New York. Meanwhile, OpenAI's ChatGPT consumes 500 ml of water for every five to 50 prompts it answers, according to Shaolei Ren, a researcher at the University of California, Riverside. "If users know the exact CO2 cost of their AI-generated outputs, such as casually turning themselves into an action figure, they might be more selective about when and how they use these technologies," Dauner said. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Geeky Gadgets
34 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Meta Launches Oakley AI Glasses for $399
What if your everyday eyewear could do more than just help you see? Imagine glasses that not only frame your face but also frame your world with innovative technology—seamlessly blending style, practicality, and innovation. That's exactly what Meta is promising with its latest launch: the $399 Oakley AI glasses. In a bold pivot from its VR-heavy strategy, Meta is stepping into the competitive smart glasses arena, aiming to make wearable tech more accessible and functional for everyday users. This announcement signals a new chapter for the tech giant, one where AI-powered convenience takes center stage, offering a glimpse into a future where your glasses are as smart as your smartphone. But what makes the Oakley AI glasses stand out in a market already buzzing with competitors like Apple? In this unveiling, you'll discover how Meta is tackling some of the biggest challenges in wearable tech—like usability, ecosystem integration, and affordability. From their sleek design to their practical features, these glasses are designed to appeal to a broader audience, moving beyond niche tech enthusiasts to everyday consumers. As Meta sets its sights on scaling production and redefining its role in the wearable tech landscape, the Oakley AI glasses could mark a turning point—not just for the company, but for how we interact with technology in our daily lives. Could this be the moment when smart glasses finally go mainstream? Meta's Oakley AI Glasses Why the Shift from VR to AI? Meta's decision to pivot from VR headsets to AI-powered smart glasses reflects a deliberate strategy to enhance user adoption and improve financial outcomes. While VR has been a cornerstone of Meta's Reality Labs division, its adoption has fallen short of expectations. The immersive nature of VR, while innovative, has limited its appeal to niche markets rather than the mainstream consumer base. The Oakley Meta HSTN AI glasses represent a shift toward practicality and everyday functionality. By targeting a broader market, Meta aims to offer a product that integrates seamlessly into daily life. This approach builds on the foundation laid by the Ray-Ban Stories, which sold approximately one million units. With the Oakley AI glasses, Meta is setting more ambitious goals, aiming for annual sales of 1–2 million units. This signals the company's intent to scale up its wearable technology offerings and capture a larger share of the market. Watch this video on YouTube. Challenges in Building a Connected Ecosystem One of the most significant hurdles Meta faces is the creation of a cohesive and integrated ecosystem for its devices. Unlike Apple, which has successfully developed a seamless network of interconnected products like the Apple Watch and AirPods, Meta's ecosystem remains fragmented. The Oakley AI glasses, while innovative, currently lack the deep content and app integration that Apple users have come to expect. This lack of ecosystem connectivity could hinder Meta's ability to foster strong customer loyalty. A well-integrated ecosystem not only enhances the user experience but also encourages repeat purchases and long-term brand engagement. Without addressing this gap, the Oakley glasses may struggle to achieve widespread adoption and retention. Meta must prioritize the development of a unified ecosystem to ensure its wearable devices can compete effectively in the market. Meta Launches 399 Oakley AI Glasses Watch this video on YouTube. Expand your understanding of AI glasses with additional resources from our extensive library of articles. Balancing Scalability and Profitability Scaling the production and distribution of the Oakley AI glasses presents both opportunities and challenges for Meta. The company's Reality Labs division is projected to incur a $20 billion loss this year, raising concerns about the financial sustainability of its innovation efforts. This underscores the importance of balancing scalability with profitability. At a price point of $399, the Oakley Meta HSTN glasses are positioned as a competitively priced alternative to premium offerings from competitors like Apple. However, achieving profitability will require Meta to streamline its supply chains, reduce production costs, and improve gross margins. These efforts will be critical in offsetting losses and making sure the long-term viability of its wearable AI technology. Meta's ability to scale production efficiently while maintaining quality will play a pivotal role in determining the success of the Oakley glasses. Competing in a Crowded Market The smart glasses market is becoming increasingly competitive, with Meta and Apple emerging as key players. Apple's well-established ecosystem and reputation for high-quality, user-friendly products give it a significant advantage. However, Meta is positioning the Oakley AI glasses as a more affordable and practical alternative to Apple's premium offerings. By focusing on accessibility and functionality, Meta aims to carve out a distinct niche in the market. The Oakley glasses are designed to appeal to consumers who prioritize convenience and everyday usability over luxury and exclusivity. This strategy reflects Meta's broader goal of providing widespread access to wearable technology and making it accessible to a wider audience. While the competition remains fierce, Meta's emphasis on affordability and practicality could help it gain traction in the market. The Road Ahead for Wearable AI The launch of the Oakley Meta HSTN AI glasses underscores Meta's commitment to advancing wearable technology. However, the company faces several challenges that could impact the success of this product. From building a cohesive ecosystem to achieving financial sustainability, Meta must address these issues to solidify its position in the market. To succeed, Meta will need to deliver a compelling user experience that meets the evolving demands of consumers. This includes making sure seamless integration with other devices, offering robust app support, and maintaining competitive pricing. The Oakley glasses represent a significant step forward in Meta's efforts to establish itself as a leader in wearable technology. However, their ultimate success will depend on the company's ability to innovate, adapt, and compete effectively in a rapidly evolving industry. Media Credit: Meta & Bloomberg Filed Under: Gadgets News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Labour lawmakers threaten UK PM Starmer with revolt over welfare reforms
LONDON, June 24 (Reuters) - More than 100 British Labour lawmakers have supported a move to try to block Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government from changing the welfare system, saying the package does not provide for disabled people and those with long-term health conditions. In what could be a major blow to Starmer a year after he came to power with a large majority in parliament, Labour lawmakers have spearheaded a plan to kill the government's welfare bill at a vote due next week. Due to a ballooning welfare system, Labour had in March said it planned to cut more than five billion pounds ($6.48 billion) from its welfare budget by 2029/30. The lawmakers, including the heads of select committees which probe government policy, have tabled a "reasoned amendment," used to express opposition to a proposed law. If that amendment is selected by parliament's speaker and then passed in next week's vote, it would halt the proposed law. Starmer has said welfare reform is essential to protect benefits for those who need them and get more people back into work. The welfare bill had been on course to top 100 billion pounds ($129 billion) by 2030, partly as Britain has one of the highest reported rates of working-age people out of work due to ill health among European peers. The government has argued that its proposed welfare budget cuts by 2029/30 would be backed by support for people using benefits to get back into work. Even though ministers have tried to soften the impact of changes to the sickness-related part of Universal Credit benefits and to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), designed to cover disability-related costs, dozens of lawmakers are still opposed. In their amendment, the Labour lawmakers declined to support the progress of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. They said the bill contained "dangerous and counterproductive cuts to entitlements aimed at disabled people" and lacked "measures to take proper account of the needs of people with ... long-term conditions." One Labour lawmaker who supports the government said the amendment was "very awkward" but that ministers might yet try to contain the scale of the potential rebellion. ($1 = 0.7350 pounds)
