logo
Ohio reproductive rights advocates say they're time-tested for the coming battles and attacks

Ohio reproductive rights advocates say they're time-tested for the coming battles and attacks

Yahoo10-02-2025

Abortion rights advocates and anti-abortion advocates protesting outside of the U.S. Supreme Court.(Getty Images)
Reproductive rights have been enshrined in the Ohio Constitution since 2023. Those who support those rights are readying themselves as rumblings of more ban attempts and disappearing federal government websites indicate times of struggle to come.
'It is bleak and I think in a lot of ways these are fights we've already fought, but we are also seeing new and scarier things take place,' said Jordyn Close, deputy director of the Ohio Women's Alliance.
In Ohio, anti-abortion activists are looking forRepublican lawmakers to introduce the Ohio Prenatal Equal Protection Act, which would attempt to overthrow the reproductive rights amendment passed by 57% of Ohio voters in 2023 by asserting that it violates the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, an argument legal experts have routinely criticized.
Meanwhile, with the dawn of the Trump administration last month, national anti-abortion measures began rolling out almost immediately. The week of his inauguration, one of the many executive orders President Donald Trump signed was meant to enforce the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal funds for abortion services. That order also undid two Biden-era executive orders meant to increase access to abortion services.
Trump also reinstated the Mexico City Policy, a Reagan-era order to bar foreign non-governmental organizations who receive federal funding for family planning from offering abortion as one option for families, and from referring to or counseling on abortion-related services.
Even earlier in his new term, Trump used the power of the pardon to release nearly two dozen individuals who were convicted on federal charges for blocking access to abortion clinics. He also gave a video speech at this year's March for Life rally in D.C., a rally Vice President J.D. Vance, a former Ohio senator, attended in person.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
But one of the first things that Americans noticed when the administration changed hands was the elimination of government websites, including the website that provided information on reproductive health resources.
'In general, it's so devastating that that has been taken off, because misinformation and stigma is actually the reason we're in this situation with abortion access,' said Lexis Dotson-Dufault, executive director of Abortion Fund Ohio.
Dotson-Dufault said her organization, which is not a clinic but a referral and resources service, served 6,100 people in 2024. The need continues to grow based on its service numbers, which amounted to fewer than 1,000 requests in 2021.
'Abortion funds exist because administrations long before Trump were not serving our communities in the best way possible,' Dotson-Dufault said. 'That's why we say Roe (v. Wade) was never enough, because if Roe was enough, we wouldn't need abortion funds that serve thousands and thousands of people.'
Because of the clear danger advocates see to the distribution of information about reproductive rights services, conversations in the community are going to become an even bigger part of the outreach abortion funds do.
'Our communities need to know this, it needs to be common information,' Dotson-Dufault said. 'It's really something free that people can do is sharing pro-abortion, accurate medical information.'
For Close and the Ohio Women's Alliance, bringing those resources to the public also means prioritizing 'investing in wellness this year across all our programs.'
They said that includes focusing on the Black community, for which state infant and maternal mortality numbers have ranked among the worst in the country.
'We are trying to really meet the need, the fullness of what the reproductive experience is for the average Black birthing person, whether that be abortion or other reproductive care,' Close said.
Advocates are still resolute about the power of the constitutional amendment in Ohio.
'The people of Ohio made it clear what they wanted,' Close said. 'Whether or not (legislators) seek to further erode the little democracy that is left in this state, I think no matter what happens, we have an amazing legal team, and we have the support of Ohioans.'
In January, the Republican-controlled U.S. Congress didn't waste time in bringing up bills related to abortion, one in the Senate that aimed to create penalties for health care providers who fail to care for a fetus after an attempted abortion. Laws are already in place to criminalize killing a child or an adult under federal law.
The Senate bill was introduced on Jan. 15, and had 46 cosponsors, including Ohio Republican U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno.
Democrats have successfully stalled progress on the Senate bill. Sponsors needed at least 60 senators to approve it, but it was defeated in a 52-47 procedural vote, with no Democratic votes in favor.
But bills like these and the anti-abortion sentiments publicly expressed by federal and state Republicans have driven some state medical professionals to speak up in their own way.
Dr. Lauren Beene, a founder of the advocacy group Ohio Physicians for Reproductive Rights — which championed the effort to amend the Ohio Constitution to include reproductive rights including abortion care — said her group is working on 'physician advocacy trainings,' to help doctors speak up.
'We're trying to empower doctors, help them understand how they can talk about reproductive rights,' Beene told the Capital Journal. 'I think a lot of doctors don't realize their voice.'
Physicians were spotlighted in the fight for the reproductive rights amendment after abortion bans and different regulations having to do with abortion services (including miscarriage care) caused doctors to question their own power to advise their patients. They wondered whether they'd be in legal trouble for fulfilling their medical oaths.
The grassroots trainings Beene has been a part of seek to help doctors recognize the resources and where to send patients, along with working with larger institutions like hospital systems and medical societies to make sure the correct information is getting to the public.
'I think that there's so much misinformation right now, and doctors have the ability to combat that through clearly explaining the facts and the science,' Beene said.
Uncertainty is still a problem or the doctors Beene has been in contact with.
'You could roll the dice and be surprised about what's going to happen today,' she said.
'This particular year is a scary time that we're living in, and I think that the more that we can do to prepare and empower doctors to continue to just speak out to whoever the more that we are all encouraged to do that, I think the better things will be,' Beene said.
In a legislative move separate from the U.S. Senate bill, a U.S. House resolution to bring about 'equal protection' under the 14th Amendment 'for the right to life of each born and preborn human person' was introduced on Jan. 24, and has 69 cosponsors, including Ohio Republican Reps. Warren Davidson and David Taylor.
This is national legislation that attempts the same argument that anti-abortion activists want to see made with the legislation in Ohio.
The U.S. House bill is still active, having been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary the same day it was introduced. The chair of that House committee is Ohio Republican U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan.
These moves on the federal level don't come necessarily as a surprise to reproductive rights advocates, having spent years in Ohio under a Republican-controlled General Assembly and governor who have been staunch in their anti-abortion stances.
Advocates were also unsurprised to see the state's chief law enforcement officer, Attorney General Dave Yost, is appealing a court decision that overturned the six-week abortion ban, though Yost has said his appeal argues that other laws, abortion-related or not, could be undone by the constitutional amendment.
'We have to remember the power that we have, and that these systems have not served us well in the past,' Dotson-Dufault said.
Despite the 'cascade of terrible, horrendous headlines' over the last month or so, Close said the onslaught has allowed new people to ride the wave into activism.
'I know that our communities are scared right now, but I also know that a lot of people are getting engaged in ways that they weren't before,' Close said. 'I hope they let their rage, and sadness and fear pour out and create a stronger community that can fight these injustices.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These are the Democrats who've been arrested, detained or charged under Trump
These are the Democrats who've been arrested, detained or charged under Trump

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

These are the Democrats who've been arrested, detained or charged under Trump

A handful of Democrats have either been arrested, detained or charged under the Trump administration due to the White House's crackdown on illegal immigration. Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin has condemned their treatment, arguing lawmakers are being assaulted without reason. 'Elected officials are being arrested for doing their jobs,' Martin wrote in a Wednesday statement on X. 'Once again, the Trump administration is silencing people who disagree with them in broad daylight.' Here are Democrats who have been recently apprehended by law enforcement: Several Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents handcuffed New York City Comptroller Brad Lander (D), a candidate for mayor, on Wednesday outside an immigration court for impeding law enforcement officers. Lander was escorting a defendant at immigration court while urging ICE agents to present a judicial warrant issued for the individual's arrest. 'I'm not obstructing. I'm standing here in this hallway asking for a judicial warrant,' Lander said while being handcuffed, as recorded in a video posted on X by his wife. 'You don't have the authority to arrest U.S. citizens,' Lander told them. He was swiftly rushed on to the elevator with law enforcement. but New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said at a follow-up news conference he was later released and that all charges were dropped. However, Democrats rushed to condemn consecutive arrests of their party members in recent months. 'The aggressive targeting of Democratic elected officials by the Trump administration will invariably result in law-abiding public servants being marked for death by violent extremists. The Trump administration and their squad of masked agents must change course before it is too late,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) wrote in a statement on X. 'This is America. The request for a judicial warrant and observance of law enforcement activity are not crimes. There is zero basis for a federal investigation and any such plans should be dropped forthwith,' he added. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was forcibly removed from a June 12 press conference by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). He attended the presser with federal escorts and attempted to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question. 'I'm Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla said before being swarmed by agents and forced outside the room. Trump administration officials allege that he lunged at Noem and, despite verbally identifying himself as a lawmaker, agents were unaware of his official capacity without the presence of a physical pin typically worn by members of Congress. 'Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands. @SecretService thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately. Secretary Noem met with Senator Padilla after and held a 15 minute meeting,' DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin wrote on social platform X. Padilla later spoke out about the incident, declaring it as a threat to constitutional rights and the rule of law. 'I will say this: If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers to cooks to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country,' he said. Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was federally charged for allegedly interfering with ICE agents during a visit to the Delaney Hall detention center for congressional oversight. McIver was conducting oversight at the facility alongside Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) and Rob Menendez (D-N.J.), who all say McIver didn't obstruct or impede law enforcement operations amid immigration protests outside the building. Interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba announced on June 10 a three-count grand jury indictment of McIver over the incident. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) filed a House resolution to expel the lawmaker. 'The facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: a brazen attempt at political intimidation. This indictment is no more justified than the original charges, and is an effort by Trump's administration to dodge accountability for the chaos ICE caused and scare me out of doing the work I was elected to do,' McIver said in a statement on the matter. Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan was indicted by a federal grand jury in early May for 'knowingly' concealing a migrant. Authorities allege that Dugan directed the migrant and his counsel to leave the courtroom through a 'non-public' jury door to avoid immigration authorities after telling ICE U.S. they needed a warrant to search the premises. 'As she said after her unnecessary arrest, Judge Dugan asserts her innocence and looks forward to being vindicated in court,' Craig Mastantuono, the attorney representing the judge, said in a previous statement to NBC News. Following her April arrest, Dugan was temporarily suspended by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which said 'it is in the public interest that she be temporarily relieved of her official duties.' Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D) was briefly arrested following his visit to the Delaney Hall detention center in New Jersey. Habba originally threatened to press charges but withdrew the statement after further review of the incident. 'I was cuffed, fingerprinted, took pictures of, twice — once there and once in court — for a class C misdemeanor, which you send summons to people for. You don't lock them up and take their fingerprints,' Baraka told MSNBC. 'They said the charges are too minor to have a preliminary hearing,' he added. 'So if it's too minor to have a preliminary hearing, why are you fingerprinting me and taking pictures of me and interrogating me in a room? And why are you doing it twice?' Baraka has filed a lawsuit against Habba in her personal capacity regarding his treatment, false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation in addition to accusing the interim U.S. Attorney of acting as a 'political operative, outside of any function intimately related to the judicial process.' Ricky Patel, the Homeland Security Investigations agent in charge of Newark, is also named in the suit. Rep. Jerry Nadler's (D-N.Y.) staffer was briefly detained in May after DHS agents entered the congressman's Manhattan office searching for 'protesters.' One agent accused Nadler aides of 'harboring rioters.' 'They barged in. And in barging in one of the offices, a very big, heavyset fellow pushed my aide — a very petite young woman — and they then said that she pushed back and they shackled her and took her downstairs,' Nadler told CNN. 'And she was obviously traumatized,' he added. Her detainment was again condemned by Jeffries, who said the effort was a part of a larger objective being enforced by the Trump administration. 'The administration is clearly trying to intimidate Democrats, in the same way that they're trying to intimidate the country,' Jeffries said Sunday in an interview with CNN. 'This whole 'shock and awe' strategy — this, 'flood the zone with outrageous behavior' that they've tried to unleash on the American people during the first few months of the Trump administration — is all designed to create the appearance of inevitability.'

DAVID MARCUS: Trump's base trusts him to play strong hand in Iran
DAVID MARCUS: Trump's base trusts him to play strong hand in Iran

Fox News

time12 minutes ago

  • Fox News

DAVID MARCUS: Trump's base trusts him to play strong hand in Iran

Of all the ways to try to influence President Donald Trump, the absolute worst is to threaten him. And yet, there is a segment of MAGA world podcasters and influencers insisting that if the commander-in-chief takes direct action against Iran, it will divide and crush Trump's base. Don't count on it. The argument from podcast land is that Trump ran on a promise of no new wars and that any direct American action against Iran would betray that promise and plunge America into another forever war in the Middle East. Let's slow down a bit. In his first term, Trump killed Quasim Soliemani, the top Iranian general, to howls from the left, and some of these same right-wing podcasters, that it would start World War III. It didn't. They were wrong, Trump was right. Here we are again, the president faced with a choice. He can use U.S. bunker bombs to deal the lethal blow to Iran's nuclear program, or he can take the Joe Biden route, and sheepishly back off his demand for unconditional surrender, and let Iran continue its march to nukes. Depending on the polling, about 80% of Republicans think that a nuclear Iran poses a critical threat to the United States. And while voters are more split on direct U.S. action, Trump is laser-focused on stopping Tehran's bomb. Trump excels at solving problems everyone else says are impossible. Just look at the southern border, sealed tight as a Ziploc bag, even though everyone swore only Congress could do that. Likewise, in Iran, Trump doesn't want to hear a rehashing of the 8 million reasons why nobody can stop their nuclear program. He wants to hear how to stop it, and if those urging restraint can't tell him how, he's going to listen to those who can. This goes back to the farcical threat that Trump is going to lose his base if he bombs Iran, that the guy in an Ohio diner is going to side with the podcasters over the president he voted for. How did that work out for Elon Musk? The analogy is an apt one, because Musk's threats and criticisms over the Big Beautiful Bill potentially raising the debt had real resonance among GOP voters, and yet, they chose Trump over a chastened richest man in the world. They support Trump's overarching economic goals more than they dislike the debt. Same thing in Iran. Is there skepticism about using direct American military might? Of course. This ain't a pickup game of shirts and skins. But do they trust Trump overall to stop Iran from getting nukes? Absolutely. Talk of regime change and threats to kill Iran's supreme leader understandably make Americans jittery 25 years after the launch of the disastrous war in Iraq, but Trump isn't talking about invading with boots on the ground, and his base knows this. What the podcasters don't seem to understand is that the only way to influence Trump is to influence his voters. He doesn't care how many followers an influencer has on social media, half of which could be bots from foreign information operations, anyway. Actually, one has to wonder if our geo-political foes, whose bot farms seek to manipulate social media platforms in America and sow discord, are disappointed by their return on investment. On X, it seems like to bomb or not to bomb is a divide ripping our country apart. In real life, it simply isn't. The final thing that Trump understands and that his base trusts, is that the United States was losing the international status quo under his predecessors, on global trade, on the border, on China policy, and yes, in the Middle East. In all of these cases, he is determined to reverse that trend. There is nothing wrong or unpatriotic about arguing that direct U.S. action against Iran would be a mistake, and Trump no doubt welcomes lively debate. But as Vice President JD Vance, no chickenhawk, pointed out Tuesday, this is Trump's decision to make. Trump promised that Iran would never obtain a nuke, and he has a habit of keeping his campaign promises, even when taking slings and arrows from noisy voices on his own side. There isn't a podcast in the world that can keep Trump from fulfilling this promise as he sees fit, and his base, the real power behind the administration, expects nothing less.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store