logo
Tajikistan decriminalises 'liking' social media posts deemed extremist

Tajikistan decriminalises 'liking' social media posts deemed extremist

Reuters14-05-2025

ALMATY, May 14 (Reuters) - Tajik President Emomali Rakhmon signed a law on Wednesday removing criminal liability for "liking" posts on social media containing material that publicly calls for terrorism or other serious crimes, his press service said.
Official figures show more than 1,500 people have been jailed for liking and commenting on articles that the authorities consider extremist, including videos and posts by opposition figures.
Tajikistan is a landlocked country of some 10 million people sandwiched between Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and China. Security officials there in recent months have been grappling with a string of militant attacks, some of whose perpetrators have professed support for Islamic State.
In 2018, Tajik lawmakers passed amendments criminalising public justification of terrorism online, and authorities soon began prosecuting people for liking or reacting with emojis to posts or videos found to be supporting extremism. Those found guilty could be sent to prison for up to 15 years.
Last year, Rakhmon, who has led Tajikistan since 1994, spoke out publicly against the prosecutions, saying they should be "put an end to", according to Tajik media.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Social media time limits for children considered by government
Social media time limits for children considered by government

BBC News

time14 hours ago

  • BBC News

Social media time limits for children considered by government

The government is considering introducing tougher online safety measures to limit the amount of time children can spend on social media, the BBC include a two-hour cap on the use of individual social media apps and a 22:00 curfew, as first reported by the Sunday People and the on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said he was looking at the "addictive nature of some of the apps and smartphones", when asked whether time limits would be considered. But an online safety campaigner has accused the government of delaying bringing in new laws to protect children. Ian Russell, whose daughter, Molly, took her own life at 14 after seeing harmful content online, said: "Every day the government has delayed bringing in tougher online safety laws we've seen more young lives lost and damaged because of weak regulation and inaction by big tech."Mr Russell, who backed the previous government's Online Safety Act, said only "stronger and more effective" legislation would "finally change the dial on fundamentally unsafe products and business models that prioritise engagement over safety.""Parents up and down the country would be delighted to see the prime minister act decisively to quell the tsunami of harm children face online, but sticking plasters will not do the job."Kyle told the BBC he had not been able to speak publicly about the government's plans to toughen online safety laws because legislation passed by the previous Conservative government in 2023 had yet to be enacted."This year we've had illegal content that needs to be taken down, but in July, age-appropriate material must be supplied by platforms, otherwise there'll be criminal sanctions against them," he told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg said that he had been looking carefully at what government needed to do next to "nail down harder" on safety, "understand what a healthy online life for children" looked like and "stop the barriers" towards achieving that. In January, Kyle told the BBC that laws on internet safety were "very uneven" and "unsatisfactory", following calls from campaigners to tighten the minister expressed his "frustration" with the Online Safety Act but did not commit to making changes to the legislation.A Whitehall source later told the BBC there were no plans to repeal the act.

‘It's outrageous,' says mother of UK Israel protest accused as he faces 21 months in jail before trial
‘It's outrageous,' says mother of UK Israel protest accused as he faces 21 months in jail before trial

The Guardian

time15 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘It's outrageous,' says mother of UK Israel protest accused as he faces 21 months in jail before trial

The mother of a man charged in relation to a protest at a site belonging to an Israeli arms manufacturer has said it is outrageous that he faces 21 months in jail before his case goes to trial. William Plastow, 34, who lives in Manchester, is one of the 'Filton 18', accused of taking part in a Palestine Action protest against an Elbit Systems factory near Bristol in August last year. He denies charges of criminal damage, violent disorder and aggravated burglary. Plastow, a script editor, and five more of the 18, who are all being held in prison, have been given a trial date of April next year. Custody time limits stipulate that defendants should not spend more than six months in jail awaiting trial. Under new sentencing rules for England and Wales, which allow the release of convicted criminals after serving a third of their sentences, Plastow will have served the equivalent of a sentence of more than five years before going to trial. His mother, Jane Plastow, 66, an academic at the University of Leeds, believes it is the longest anyone will have been held in jail awaiting trial on protest-related charges and fears for his mental health. In a prison diary published in Inside Time, her son wrote about having suicidal thoughts. His mother said: 'It's outrageous, it's terrible. Will is a kind of glass-half-empty guy, so he tends towards [believing in] the worst possible outcome. Every day, which has become a kind of ritual, I have to say: 'Yes, you are going to get out of there, this is not the end of your life. They are not going to be able to keep you in for years and years and years.' Because you just obviously feel so helpless and hopeless locked up in that place.' She said she had offered a surety of £50,000, using money from an inheritance, for his bail application, said he could live with her and that all internet access would be removed from the house. He also would have been tagged, had his passport and smartphone removed and had to report regularly to the police, but he was still denied bail. Jane said the judge indicated her son posed a risk of breaking the law again. 'What you're being required to prove is a negative – well, you can never prove the negative, can you?' she said. 'You can't prove that you're not going to do anything.' Another of the Filton 18, Kamran Ahmed, was granted bail but the decision was overturned on appeal. Will Plastow's partner of 10 years, Valentina Tschismarov, a script editor, said: 'I think the worst that I have personally seen him was when his bail application was denied, which obviously was really disheartening for all of us. Shortly afterwards myself and his mum went to visit him together and I was very worried at that point because he was really shaken, just out of it. 'Even on the phone in the weeks after that, he just sounded very distant and kind of broken down. It seems incredibly disproportionate. I always imagined that there were these protections in place and you couldn't just have somebody jailed without a conviction for these amounts of time. I think people are not really aware.' The longest that any Just Stop Oil activists have spent in jail awaiting trial was the nearly 10 months – still over the custody time limit – spent on remand by two of the Heathrow 10, who had planned a peaceful demonstration at the airport last July. The Filton 18 were initially arrested under the Terrorism Act, which meant they could be held for 14 days without charge. None have been charged with terrorism offences but the Crown Prosecution Service has said there was a 'terrorism connection'. The Ministry of Justice referred the Guardian to the Judicial Office, which said it could not comment on individual cases.

Kazakhstan president replaces ministers of defence and transport
Kazakhstan president replaces ministers of defence and transport

Reuters

time16 hours ago

  • Reuters

Kazakhstan president replaces ministers of defence and transport

ASTANA, June 8 (Reuters) - Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev on Sunday replaced two ministers in his government, including the transport minister, who he had previously criticized for delays in infrastructure modernisation. He fired Defence Minister Ruslan Zhaksylykov and replaced him with Zhaksylykov's deputy and Air Defence Forces chief Dauren Kosanov, according to decrees published on the president's site. Tokayev met Kosanov on Sunday and gave him several instructions, including strengthening the army's combat readiness, expanding the capabilities of the Special Operations Forces, and modernising the military's infrastructure. Zhaksylykov, previously deputy interior minister and head of the national guard, was appointed defence minister after civil unrest in January 2022 triggered by the removal of a price cap on fuel. Authorities were forced to call in troops from a Russian-led alliance of former Soviet states to quell what became a broad protest against corruption and economic hardship. Tokayev also sacked transport minister Marat Karabayev who he had reprimanded in May for problems with transport and logistics. It is not clear who will replace Karabayev. The president did not reveal the reasons for the reshuffle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store