
There is still a small chance of rescuing Wexford lagoon from the same fate as Lough Neagh
Ireland still enjoys a reasonably healthy democracy, but we should not underestimate the potential for untruths and wilful ignorance to infect our political discourse.
The Government, on the whole, does not deny climate science. So far so good. But when it comes to water quality, alternative facts are endemic.
I witnessed an example of this on June 5th. The Minister for Agriculture
Martin Heydon
was challenged outside a Department of Agriculture conference by a group of activists from Animal Rebellion over the impact of agricultural run-off into Lady's Island, an important saltwater lagoon in Co Wexford. 'Where's the evidence for that?' he replied tetchily.
It is tempting to craft a detailed response to the Minister, listing out all the studies published over the last two decades by the
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and forwarded as a matter of course to his department, but what is the point? Either the Minister is poorly informed or prefers not to know.
READ MORE
The facts are actually piled high in EPA reports
on the shelves of his own department and those of
Teagasc
and local authorities. The EPA's catchment studies show agriculture accounts for roughly 70 per cent of nitrogen inputs in the southeast of Ireland. The data overwhelmingly points to farming – livestock and tillage – as the dominant pressure on water quality. And nitrate pollution is actually on the rise at more than a third of river sites.
An Taisce's recent submission to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy
stated that the nitrogen pollution problem in the south and southeast was a result of ineffective regulation, combined with a notable lack of enforcement of the regulations we do have. All the scientific evidence points to the need for a radical reduction in fertiliser and slurry spreading in sensitive catchments.
An
EPA-funded study published earlier this year and conducted by Aquafact found a five to seven-fold reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to Lady's Island Lake would be necessary to return the lagoon to good ecological status.
[
'The lough isn't just dying, it's been killed': How Lough Neagh reached crisis point
]
This will require changes to farming practices and the construction of buffers and wetlands, as well as tree planting, to contain the nutrient losses. It will also require stepped up inspections and enforcement: since 2018, Wexford County Council has only conducted 30 farm
inspections despite the critical state of the lagoon.
The Aquafact study was considered at a hearing of the
Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy last week. There was no denial evident from the experts who addressed the committee. Not from
Wexford County Council
, nor from the
National Parks and Wildlife Service
. Their representatives pointed out that it has been known for four decades that Lady's Island, an ecologically important saltwater lagoon used by migrating birds, was in steady decline.
Local farmers are, on the whole, compliant with the environmental regulations. But if the government's Nitrates Action Plan is not fit for purpose, and permits too much nitrates and phosphates to be deposited in sensitive catchments, then nutrient run-off and pollution is inevitable.
However, the Minister for Agriculture
has yet to state in the Dáil that he will act decisively to improve water quality, hiding instead behind vague statements such as 'science is telling us things are not where they should be'.
It seems like everyone apart from the Minister for Agriculture is in agreement that radical measures are required to reduce nutrient losses. But if the Minister believes there is insufficient evidence to act, then he can justify more studies, more talk, more delays. Politically speaking, his goal is to retain the nitrates derogation (which permits higher stocking rates of cattle), not to save Lady's Island.
Retaining the nitrates derogation has become the rallying cry for the entire agricultural sector and its political backers, despite the obvious problem that it is adding to the pollution burden in our rivers, lakes and estuaries.
So it would be wrong to think of the death of Lady's Island as a tragedy. Government policy on nitrates is designed to fail, but to keep the derogation regardless. The policy is to sacrifice water quality where it cannot be improved with modest interventions, to support agricultural exports.
The Minister has a small chance of rescuing the lagoon from the fate of Lough Neagh by acting decisively to reduce nutrient pollution and to fund the required measures, but I won't be holding my breath.
Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘I couldn't think of anything worse to attend': Some Opposition TDs snub invite to US Independence Day celebration
A series of Opposition TDs have said they will not be attending American Independence Day celebrations being organised by the United States embassy. However, others are considering going due to the ties between Ireland and the US. Invites have been issued to TDs and Senators for the event next week. Labour TD Conor Sheehan said: 'I will not be attending. I couldn't think of anything worse to attend'. READ MORE He accused the US of being involved in 'illegal wars overseas' and 'the persecution of people' through immigration raids. Social Democrats Senator Patricia Stephenson said: 'we won't be attending', adding: 'given the context of the US administration at this time it's not really appropriate'. Green Party leader Roderic O'Gorman said he did not attend the same event last year 'in light of the US continued support for what's happening in Gaza so I think it's probably unlikely I'll be in a position to attend'. Party colleague Senator Malcolm Noonan said: 'I've already declined.' People Before Profit-Solidarity TD Ruth Coppinger – who has been highly critical of US support for Israel's war in Gaza – said she is part of the Dublin 15 With Palestine Group and 'we'll be outside protesting because what's happening in the world is just incredible ... We would call on all TDs to boycott it'. Independent Ireland leader Michael Collins said his party is not ruling out going to the event and will discuss the matter. He said 'if we shut the door', it would amount to 'lessening a chance of peace out there'. He also highlighted the importance of American companies employing people in Ireland. Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín said he had to check his diary but 'we'll have no problem attending'. He said Ireland and the US have a 'phenomenal relationship' and while people may have a difference of opinion with Donald Trump's administration 'there's no doubt in my mind that we need to continue to build a positive relationship'.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump uses the 'F' word on Iran-Israel ceasefire violations
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said that diplomatic efforts should have been exhausted to avoid war in the Israel-Iran conflict. Video: Bryan O'Brien

Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Leaving Cert politics and society: Essay section ‘more difficult than previous years'
The Leaving Cert politics & society exam gave students who are up to date with current affairs and went 'above and beyond' in their preparation a good chance to show off their skills, say teachers. However, the essay section of the exam – worth 50 per cent of marks – was more difficult than previous year and posed some real challenges. Emmet McQuillan, a politics & society teacher at Maryfield College, Dublin 9, said overall the paper had 'no surprises', and 'gave students who had done extra learning above and beyond a chance to show that off'. Paul McAndrew, politics & society teacher at The Institute of Education, said that after a 'promising start', many students will likely feel the essay section was a struggle. READ MORE Short questions Students were asked to consider global income inequality, how technology can help solve environmental problems, and language diversity. Mr McQuillan said ordinary level students may have struggled with the short question which asked them to 'explain the effects of racism', which provided four lines for an answer. 'You could write 40 pages' on such a question, he said. Something that may have separated H1 and H2 students were the short questions on key thinkers, which asked students to not only name the theory associated with a key thinker, but to explain the theory too. Ordinary level students were also asked to describe the role of a TD and to consider the new deposit return scheme in Ireland. Mr McAndrew students will be happy with a 'much more balanced array of questions' than in previous years in section A. 'Drawn from all over the course, the questions had a better balance of the specific and the analytic,' he said. 'Last year, questions tended towards a less pointed interaction with the course material, but this year's batch was much more direct in its concern for Hobbes, Locke, the functions of the President etc.' While prepared students will have been happy, he said a sense of concern may have crept in as material appeared that they might have hoped would be reserved for later in the paper. Data question The data questions on both higher and ordinary level papers suited students with strong critical thinking skills, according to Mr McQuillan. Higher level students were asked to evaluate the concerns of Irish voters during the recent EU Parliament election, which Mr McQuillan said suited students who had conducted 'independent, self directed learning'. Students were also asked to critique the methodology of a Red C survey, which put students on the spot as it was 'obviously something you can't learn off'. Mr McAndrew said the data-based questions started with 'a nice selection of tasks that would be familiar to any student'. 'However, part (g) will trip many students up as they needed to balance numerous aspects in a very particular and concise format,' he said. 'To adequately address this task students needed to account for information from the two texts, the practical aspects of citizen participation in democracy and the philosophical idea of the social contract.' When combined with a quote from Reinhold Niebuhr, he said students had five components to synthesise into a very short space. 'For those who had drilled this type of task it would be manageable, but it required a more refined sensibility than other tasks,' he said. Essays A broad range of open-ended essay topics appeared on the higher level paper. Students were asked to assess the role inequality plays in threats to democracy, and to consider if the right to protest is essential in a democracy. Some students may have struggled with the question which asked them to consider the rise of nationalism in society, Mr McQuillan said. 'It was phrased through the lens of Benedict Anserson, so students had to specify that key thinker, so the way that's phrased, it just means you have to be more specific'. Essays on the ordinary level paper also demonstrated an emphasis on current affairs, with students asked to consider the strengths and weaknesses of the Irish electoral system, fast fashion, and the importance of human rights in the context of recent global events. Mr McQuillan said the essays on both papers offered 'a mix of global, national and contemporary issues that students could bring their own life experiences into.' Mr McAndrew said that while higher level students should anticipate challenge in any exam, this section was more difficult than previous years. 'Firstly, students only had six questions to choose from rather than the seven of previous years, thus narrowing their opportunities to show their interests/strengths,' he said. The main challenge of this section was the 'difference between the surface appeal of the question and the deeper need to write in a manner substantive sufficient to earn the full spectrum of marks', Mr McAndrew said. For example, Question 3(b) on the right to protest was a topic on which many politically-minded students would have opinions, but this area is not a large part of the curriculum. 'Thus, there is little assigned material that could be used as evidence to make the discussion more robust,' Mr McAndrew said. 'Something similar happens on question six which starts with a Mandela quote on education's capacity to change the world, yet the question is not on education itself but on Paulo Freire's theory of education,' he said. 'A student could easily begin this essay but would struggle to balance both momentum and evidence effectively over the course of a four-page essay.' Even when a question has a clear connection to the syllabus, such as question four on sustainable development, the seeming openness of the question 'belies a series of potholes and burdens that make them precarious to approach,' Mr McAndrew said. Ultimately, he said many students will move towards question five on misinformation and question seven on nationalism as both sit 'most squarely within the remit of the course material and offer the fewest potential stumbling blocks.'