logo
UN official says Russia isn't imminently turning on Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant

UN official says Russia isn't imminently turning on Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant

Independent29-05-2025

Inspectors from the U.N. nuclear watchdog haven't seen signs of Russia moving to immediately restart the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, an agency official said Thursday, after Greenpeace raised concerns about Moscow building power lines near the facility.
The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the largest in Europe with six reactors and one of the world's 10 biggest, has been a focus of concern for the International Atomic Energy Agency and the world during the war amid fears of a potential nuclear catastrophe. The plant has been held by Russia since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, though it isn't producing power.
The city of Zaporizhzhia, about 440 kilometers (275 miles) southeast of Kyiv, is held by Ukraine and attacks have occurred around the plant as the front line is close. The IAEA rotates staff through the facility to check the plant's safety and offer its expertise.
Greenpeace sees power line construction
In a report Tuesday, Greenpeace said that satellite photos showed Russia had been building 'an electricity high voltage power line' in Russia-held areas of Ukraine's Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia regions. An Associated Press analysis of satellite photos from Planet Labs PBC of the same area also showed the construction of power lines and pylons.
'This is some of the first hard evidence of Russian moving ahead with its dangerous and illegal plans for restarting Ukraine and Europe's largest nuclear plant at Zaporizhzhia," said Shaun Burnie, a nuclear specialist at Greenpeace Ukraine, in a statement.
An IAEA official said that the agency's inspectors hadn't seen any major changes at the Zaporizhzhia plant suggesting Russia was preparing for an imminent effort to restart it, after being asked about the Greenpeace report.
'What I can say is our teams continue to confirm there is no indication at the moment that there will be any active preparations for a restart of the plant now," the official said on condition of anonymity to discuss the IAEA's assessment.
Russia hasn't acknowledged the power line project. Ukraine sent a note to the IAEA and its membership on Wednesday raising concerns about the power line construction.
'These actions represent a blatant violation of international law and an infringement on Ukraine's sovereignty,' Ukraine said in its letter. 'The construction of this transmission line is a clear indication of the Russian Federation's intent to initiate an unauthorized restart of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant — a facility that remains the sovereign property of Ukraine.'
It added: 'Any operation of the (plant) without explicit authorization of the Ukrainian nuclear regulator is illegal and poses a direct and unacceptable threat to nuclear safety.'
Zaporizhzhia remains a concern for world
Russia has suggested restarting the Zaporizhzhia plant in the past. IAEA Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi, told journalists Wednesday that the issue could be discussed on an upcoming trip he plans to make to Ukraine and possibly Russia.
'We are going to be continuing our discussions with both, in particular with the Russians on this idea of (the) restart of the plant," Grossi said. "It is a matter that requires very careful consideration.'
Zaporizhzhia's six reactors remain fueled with uranium though they are in a so-called cold shutdown — meaning nuclear reactions have stopped. However, the plant relies on external electricity to keep its reactor cool and power other safety systems. That external power has been cut multiple times in the war, forcing the plant to rely on diesel generators on site.
Further complicating potentially turning the plant back on is the 2023 collapse of the Kakhovka Dam on the Dnieper River. The plant relied on water from the river for its reservoir, forcing workers there to dig wells.
'The plant lost its main source of cooling water, so the whole system cannot work as it was originally designed," the IAEA official said. 'The consumption of water is orders of magnitude higher (when the plant is operating) compared to cold shutdown. We don't see any easy, quick fix for it.'
The Zaporizhzhia plant also has been mentioned by U.S. President Donald Trump as he's sought to reach a ceasefire deal between Russia and Ukraine. In March, Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy discussed the plant, with the American president suggesting 'the United States can recover' it.
___
The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Deadly Russian strikes condemned as 'savage' - as dozens more injured in Ukrainian city
Deadly Russian strikes condemned as 'savage' - as dozens more injured in Ukrainian city

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Deadly Russian strikes condemned as 'savage' - as dozens more injured in Ukrainian city

At least four people have been killed in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv after a series of Russian attacks. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described one of the attacks as a "savage killing", saying dozens of people had been injured. It comes after Kyiv embarrassed Moscow when it launched a daring drone raid deep inside Russia last weekend, destroying dozens of bombers. Meanwhile, attempted US-led peace talks between the two appear to be floundering. During the attacks on Saturday, Kharkiv mayor Ihor Terekhov said: "Kharkiv is currently experiencing the most powerful attack in the entire time of the full-scale war." The first wave of the Russian strike was a large drone-and-missile attack in the early hours of Saturday morning. Nightly attacks from Moscow have become a routine part of the conflict. At least three people died and 21 others were injured. There are reports that some people remain trapped underneath the rubble. Then, in the afternoon, Russia dropped aerial bombs on the city centre, killing at least one person and wounding more. Ukraine and Russia also accused one another of trying to sabotage a planned prisoner exchange. Residents reckon with Russian strikes As emergency workers fought fires at the attack sites in Kharkiv, residents had to deal with the fallout of strikes that could have claimed their lives. Alina Belous tried to extinguish flames with buckets of water to rescue a young girl trapped inside a burning building, as she called out for help. "We were trying to put it out ourselves with our buckets, together with our neighbours," she said. "Then the rescuers arrived and started helping us put out the fire, but there was smoke and they worried that we couldn't stay there. "When the ceiling started falling off, they took us out." Vadym Ihnachenko said he initially thought it was a neighbouring building going up in flames - not his own. He was forced to flee after seeing smoke coming from his building's roof. Diplomatic efforts stall Several other areas in Ukraine were also hit, including the regions of Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa, and the city of Ternopil, Ukrainian foreign minister Andriy Sybiha said. Russia acknowledged the attacks, but not the deaths, saying it had targeted military sites, while pictures show apartment blocks on fire. The regional governor, Oleh Syniehubov, said children were among those injured in the first attack. While a US-led diplomatic push for peace has led to two rounds of direct peace talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine, they delivered no significant breakthroughs. Later on Saturday, Russia and Ukraine also accused each other of endangering plans to swap 6,000 bodies of soldiers killed in action.

Donald Trump was wrong – Ukraine still holds some cards
Donald Trump was wrong – Ukraine still holds some cards

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Donald Trump was wrong – Ukraine still holds some cards

Donald Trump has been shown to be wrong, wrong and wrong again about Vladimir Putin. He was wrong again when he was asked if Ukraine's ' Spiderweb ' drone strikes against Russian bombers had changed his view of the cards the Ukrainians have: 'They gave Putin a reason to go and bomb the hell out of them,' he said. This is the same logic to which President Trump has cleaved from the start: that the Ukrainian people provoked the full-scale invasion of their country by wanting to be an independent nation facing to the west. It seemed that Mr Trump had been briefly disabused of the notion that Mr Putin wanted peace when the Russian president ignored several long telephone conversations with him and continued to bombard Ukraine, causing significant civilian casualties. ' He has gone absolutely crazy,' Mr Trump said last month. ' Needlessly killing a lot of people.' But Mr Trump responded to this month's Russian bombardment, described by the mayor of Kharkiv as the ' most powerful attack since the start of the full-scale war', by blaming the Ukrainians for giving Mr Putin a reason for intensifying the summer offensive. Any other United States president would have recognised that Mr Putin is gearing up for the summer fighting season, as Sam Kiley, our world affairs editor, reports, and would be doing so even if he had not been humiliated by Ukraine's audacious remote-control attacks on airfields thousands of miles away in different parts of Russia. Any other US president would have congratulated Volodymyr Zelensky on the attacks, which will go down in the history of special operations warfare as a brilliantly executed surprise. It turns out that when Mr Trump shamefully told Mr Zelensky in the Oval Office, ' You don't have the cards,' he was mistaken. Mr Zelensky still has the support of most of the free world. European leaders have signalled their willingness to step up whether or not Mr Trump goes through with his threat to step back from America's responsibility as a defender of freedom. The Ukrainian people remain united in their determination to defend themselves. Operation Spiderweb proved that they can take the fight deep into Russian territory, while having no territorial ambitions beyond seeking to preserve their own borders. Mr Zelensky has also exposed Mr Putin for what he really is. The Ukrainian president has given the Russian leader every chance for peace. He has been prepared to compromise on territory and alliances in a way that no leader of a sovereign nation should be asked to do. And yet Mr Putin presses on, making it abundantly clear, even to Mr Trump, that it is the Kremlin that is the obstacle to peace. Even if Mr Trump's apparent taking of sides with Mr Putin against the Ukrainian people were a cunning plan to soothe the paranoid mystical nationalism of Mr Putin and his cronies, it has not worked. Mr Putin has made it clear that he will be satisfied by nothing less than the subjugation of the whole of Ukraine by force of arms. In which case, he must be resisted. Mr Trump is right about one thing: that war is a terrible thing. But a peace built on surrender to an imperialist dictator would be no peace at all. The Ukrainian people must continue to fight, and all the nations of the world that believe in freedom, democracy and national self-determination must continue to help to defend them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store