logo
Poll: Have you changed the battery on your phone?

Poll: Have you changed the battery on your phone?

Robert Triggs / Android Authority
The Samsung Galaxy S5 was my favorite phone ever, mainly due to the removable battery. If I were out all day and running low on power, I just grabbed a spare from my bag, and I was back to 100% in 30 seconds. But that's a thing of the past on the Galaxy S line, along with most other flagships. Getting a new battery for most modern smartphones involves sending it to specialists or using your own hotshot engineering skills.
While I'm not convinced, manufacturers will tell you non-removable batteries are better. It's partly about water and dust resistance, partly about building a sleeker device, and partly about performance and safety. Sealed batteries allow for larger capacities in tighter spaces and reduce the risk of user error. But it's also made it harder to do basic upkeep when your battery inevitably declines.
Have you changed the battery on your sealed phone?
0 votes
Yes, I replaced it myself with a home kit
NaN %
Yes, I sent it to a the manufacturer or a repair shop
NaN %
No
NaN %
These days, most people don't bother replacing the battery at all. Even when the charge barely gets them through the day, they either live with it or upgrade. And while we have plenty of tips for maximising your phone's charge, there's no real substitute for a healthy cell.
We've also covered what your options are if you do want to swap your battery, including when it's worth it, how much it costs, and what to expect from third-party repair shops. But we're curious about how many of you actually go through the hassle of these steps.
Have you ever actually changed the battery in a recent phone? We're not asking about devices like my old Galaxy S5 — we mean sealed phones from the past 10 years or so. Let us know in the poll above, and feel free to share your experience in the comments below.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Intel experimenting with direct liquid cooling for up to 1000W CPUs
Intel experimenting with direct liquid cooling for up to 1000W CPUs

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Intel experimenting with direct liquid cooling for up to 1000W CPUs

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Intel is testing a new way to tackle the growing heat output of its power hungry chips. At its recent Foundry Direct Connect event, the company showcased an experimental package-level water cooling solution designed to more efficiently cool CPUs . Intel has working prototypes for both LGA (Land Grid Array) and BGA (Ball Grid Array) CPUs, with demos using Intel's Core Ultra as well as Xeon server processors. The cooling solution doesn't apply coolant directly to the silicon die. Instead, a specially designed compact cooling block sits atop the package, featuring microchannels made of copper that precisely guide the coolant flow. These channels can be optimized to target specific hotspots on the die, potentially improving heat removal where it matters the most. Intel claims the system can dissipate up to 1,000 watts of heat using standard liquid cooling fluid. That kind of thermal load isn't typical for consumer CPUs, but it could be relevant for high-end AI (Artificial Intelligence) workloads, HPC (High Performance Computing), and workstation applications. Image 1 of 9 Image 2 of 9 Image 3 of 9 Image 4 of 9 Image 5 of 9 Image 6 of 9 Image 7 of 9 Image 8 of 9 Image 9 of 9 The cooling assembly is also said to make use of solder or liquid metal TIM (Thermal Interface Material), which is said to offer better contact than polymer based TIM. Compared to a traditional liquid cooler mounted to a delidded bare die, Intel says this solution can deliver 15–20% better thermal performance. Notably, Intel's approach isn't just a lab experiment. The company has reportedly been working on this technology for years. With rising thermal demands from modern chip designs, Intel is now exploring how to produce this system for real-world deployment. While Intel refines its prototype, the enthusiast community is already experimenting with similar concepts. YouTuber octppus recently modified the heatspreader of an Intel Core i9-14900KS, machining it into a functioning miniature water block. With internal channels carved into the IHS (Integrated Heat Spreader) and sealed under acrylic, the mod somewhat mirrors Intel's concept in DIY fashion. Intel hasn't confirmed when or if this cooling approach will hit mainstream products, but the demonstration is critical for CPU thermal design. As power consumption and package density increase, direct cooling may become a necessity for both professional and enthusiast hardware in the coming future. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

I put the Galaxy S25 Edge and Galaxy S25 Ultra through a 10-round photo face-off — here's the winner
I put the Galaxy S25 Edge and Galaxy S25 Ultra through a 10-round photo face-off — here's the winner

Tom's Guide

time2 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

I put the Galaxy S25 Edge and Galaxy S25 Ultra through a 10-round photo face-off — here's the winner

Apart from its smaller battery, a big trade-off that many point out about the Galaxy S25 Edge is its camera system. Unlike the rest of the S25 lineup, the Edge only gets a dual camera setup — a 200MP main sensor paired with a 12MP ultrawide. The only thing the S24 Edge is lacking is a dedicated telephoto camera, which shouldn't be too bad, right? Well, it's tougher because of its $1,099 cost, which isn't too far away from the $1,299 sticker price attached to the S25 Ultra. Sammy's flagship comes with two dedicated telephoto cameras, a 10MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom and a 50MP one with a slightly longer 5x optical lens. They complement the S25 Ultra's 200MP main sensor and 50MP ultrawide. There are clearly differences between them, but I mention in my Galaxy 25 Edge review how its main camera performs just as good as the S25 Ultra. Still, it's going to take more than that to convince people the Edge is the one to get. It's no surprise that the Galaxy S25 Ultra is the best phone and best camera phone you can get right now, made better by its longer battery life and added S Pen utility. I've taken both phones with me to capture the same scenes, then preview them on my computer to inspect their differences. In this Galaxy S25 Edge vs Galaxy S25 Ultra photo face-off, there can only be one that comes out on top. After taking countless shots with their main cameras, I can say that their performances are more or less identical — which is a good thing. Overlooking Bryant Park's sprawling lawn, it's almost hard to tell the two apart because they're similar. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Both phones do an excellent job of exposing the entire scene, including the shadows all around the trees in the background. Details in the foreground, like the chairs with Bryant Park etched on them and the wooden box, all look the same. Farther away in the background, the surrounding buildings and skyscrapers all hold the same amount of detail. Winner: Tie This is another reason why you can't always judge a camera by its specs. On paper, it seems that the S25 Edge is at a disadvantage with its 12MP ultrawide camera — especially against the pixel packed 50MP ultrawide of the S25 Ultra. But since the phones by default downsize images to 12MP, their performances look very similar. At the corner of Broadway and 42nd street near Times Square, I pointed both cameras straight up to see how much of the scene they could capture. Even though Samsung hasn't disclosed its field of view, it appears as though the Edge has a wider one over the Ultra. Meanwhile, the exposure of the shot and details throughout the scene, like the one way and Broadway signs to the left, all appear identical. But since the S25 Edge has a smidge wider reach, I'm giving it the win here. Winner: Galaxy S25 Edge Without switching to other color profiles, it's clear that Samsung's signature style is evident in how they produce colors by default. It's all about the saturated tones with these shots inside of Whole Foods by the produce section. Many of the colors appear to be the same, like the yellow peppers on the middle shelf and green squash to the right. However, the red peppers on the top right and middle shelves are much more oversaturated with the S25 Ultra. I personally don't mind, but it's more of an unrealistic look compared to the Edge — which is still saturated in tone in my opinion. Winner: Galaxy S25 Edge Their main cameras again appear to have no major differences, as these shots from Bryant Park underneath the trees deliver the same exposure. I like how they prioritize the exposure on the trees, so the areas in shadow are brightened up a bit. With the buildings peeking from behind the trees, they're overblown by the two phones, but neither one seems to be better or worse with this. Winner: Tie Sticking with their main cameras for capturing panoramas (instead of their ultrawide cams), it's another similar outcome between the S25 Edge and S25 Ultra. Most notably, they cast the same exposure from left to right — struggling a bit with the brighter spots in the middle, which is due to how they compensate for the shot starting from the left. That area was in shadow when I started the shot more so than the rest, which explains the overexposure in the middle. Winner: Tie Both phones have 12MP (f/2.2) selfie cameras, and based on all the selfies I shot of myself, I can say they're identical. I really like how they capture the same fine details around my face, like my hairline and slight stubble. The S25 Edge and S25 Ultra capture the same details in the fabric of my hoodie. And finally, I don't see any difference in how my skin tone looks — which gets the exposure treatment to brighten me up a little. Winner: Tie With my colleague Ryan Epps as my model, the portrait shots from the S25 Edge and S25 Ultra appear identical at first glance. There's proper subject-background separation when I shot these portraits at 2x zoom, along with accurate blurring all around the edges of Ryan — including the two areas between his arms that can sometimes hang up some phones. But when I zoom into his face, I notice an over-sharpening effect applied to the S25 Ultra's shot, which does draw out a little more detail. It's also worth pointing out that the S25 Ultra also offers portrait mode in 3x and 5x zoom, which I feel are better suited for portraits. In contrast, I'm locked into either 1x or 2x zoom with the S25 Edge. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra One of the trickiest parts of capturing macro photos with both phones is getting the same focus between them, since it's really narrow the closer I get to subjects — and this is one of those examples. I will say, though, that both phones take exceptional macro shots that are rich in detail. Overall, I like how the shots came out with this yellow flower. Not only are the petals well defined, but they also capture the water droplets all around it. But it ultimately comes down to focus, which in this case goes to the S25 Edge. Winner: Galaxy S25 Edge So far in this Galaxy S25 Edge vs Galaxy S25 Ultra photo shoot-out, it's been largely a close race with neither one proving to me its cameras are considerably better. But as I've alluded earlier on, the lack of a dedicated telephoto camera with the S25 Edge could be a big trade-off for those needing to get closer. I captured these telephoto shots at 10x zoom, seeing that's where the S25 Edge maxes out — whereas the S25 Ultra goes to an ridiculous 100x zoom. Right away, there's a noticeable difference in what they capture with more detail and definition from the S25 Ultra's dedicated 50MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom. I can make out the individual bricks and other ornamental details around the building, which appear as nothing more than streaky details with the S25 Edge. For all the optimizations and enhancements that Samsung applies with the Galaxy S25 Edge's shot, its performance just can't match what an optical lens offers. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra Despite the rainy and windy conditions, the low light shots I captured with both phones appear to deliver the same qualities — which I'm not surprised given how similar their main cameras behave. The scene above was actually darker than what the images show, which proves how well they are at brightening up dark conditions with their night modes. I don't see much difference between the S25 Edge and S25 Ultra here, as they properly boost the exposure to draw out the hidden details around the tree, while also mitigating the strong light source in the background. When it comes to low light, they can turn any dim scene and make them bright. Winner: Tie Technically this Galaxy S25 Edge vs Galaxy S25 Ultra photo shoot-out is a tie after tallying up the results, but it's not in my opinion. While the Galaxy S25 Edge wins in categories like colors and ultrawide, its margin of victory is narrow in those rounds. In contrast, the Galaxy S25 Ultra proves to be superior when it comes to its portrait and telephoto performances. The former isn't a huge stretch over the S25 Edge, but its telephoto performance can't be overlooked because of the amount of detail it's able to capture. This gives the S25 Ultra an inherent advantage for capturing subjects farther away. I'm not saying that the $200 difference separating the two is justified solely by the S25 Ultra's telephoto performance, but it's just one of many things that would convince me to buy the Ultra over the Edge. Based on its performance, I would suspect the S25 Ultra would also have a benefit with video recording with its telephoto capabilities. All of these reasons validate my sentiments of the S25 Ultra being the better phone overall.

Apple iPhone Shipment Could Decline In 2025 As Tariff, Competition Play Spoil Sport: IDC
Apple iPhone Shipment Could Decline In 2025 As Tariff, Competition Play Spoil Sport: IDC

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Apple iPhone Shipment Could Decline In 2025 As Tariff, Competition Play Spoil Sport: IDC

International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker expects global smartphone shipments to grow 0.6% year over year to 1.24 billion in 2025. IDC cut the forecast from 2.3% growth in February due to high uncertainty, tariff volatility, and macroeconomic challenges leading to a slowdown in consumer spending. Growth will remain in the low single digits throughout the forecast period, with a five-year (2024-2029) compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.4% due to increasing smartphone penetration, lengthening refresh cycles, and cannibalization from used smartphones, as per IDC. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — this is your last chance to become an investor for $0.80 per share. Nancy Pelosi Invested $5 Million In An AI Company Last Year — Here's How You Can Invest In Multiple Pre-IPO AI Startups With Just $1,000. Despite the increased tensions, the U.S. and China are driving the 0.6% growth this year, according to the report. China is forecast to grow by 3% Y/Y, driven by government subsidies. In contrast, Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) is forecast to decline 1.9% in 2025 due to ongoing competition from Huawei, the overall economic slowdown, and the lack of subsidies for most of its models. However, heavy discounts during the upcoming 618 shopping festival and the anticipated iPhone 17 launch with significant hardware upgrades are expected to boost demand and limit further decline, the report stated. According to Anthony Scarsella of IDC, the U.S. Market is forecast to grow 1.9% in 2025, down from 3.3% in 2017, due to increased uncertainty and tariff-related price increases. Recent signals from the U.S. administration regarding potential tariff hikes on smartphones manufactured outside the U.S. further complicate long-term strategic planning for OEMs, according to Nabila Popal of IDC. However, India and Vietnam will likely remain the key alternatives to China for smartphone production. Still, additional tariffs of 20% to 30% on U.S.-bound smartphones could pose a serious downside risk to the current U.S. market outlook. Read Next: Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm — Invest before it's too late. 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share with a $1000 minimum. Image via Shutterstock Send To MSN: Send to MSN Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Apple iPhone Shipment Could Decline In 2025 As Tariff, Competition Play Spoil Sport: IDC originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store