Why Ukraine Fell Down the Agenda at the NATO Summit
KYIV, Ukraine -- It was yet another grim sign for Ukraine.
Russia's invasion of the country, the main topic of recent NATO summits, seemed to slide down the list of priorities at this year's annual meeting, which ended Wednesday. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine was not feted as in years past. He was not even the center of attention.
Instead, President Donald Trump took main stage at The Hague, where the summit was held. Trump has made no secret of his disdain for NATO, his desire for members to stop relying too heavily on U.S. military support and his admiration of President Vladimir Putin of Russia.
The summit's official declaration mentioned nothing about Ukraine joining the alliance, a long-standing point of discussion. A meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump yielded no specific promises about peace talks, although Trump said it was possible that the United States would send more Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine.
'Ukraine? What's Ukraine?' quipped Michael John Williams, a former adviser to NATO and now a professor of international relations at Syracuse University who attended the summit. 'The Europeans were saying how committed they are to Ukraine, especially the British, which is no surprise. But there was also really an attempt to keep controversial issues off the table. Ukraine wasn't the front-and-center discussion it has been.'
Everyone at the two-day meeting seemed to be trying to please Trump. Zelenskyy even wore a black suit jacket to meet with him, a rare abandonment of his military-style outfit -- a fashion choice that has stuck in the craw of Trump and his allies in the past.
The two leaders met for 50 minutes; it was their second meeting since their disastrous encounter at the White House in late February, when Trump publicly berated the Ukrainian president. Zelenskyy said the talks were 'long and meaningful' and thanked Trump. The U.S. president said Zelenskyy 'couldn't have been nicer' but added that they did not discuss a ceasefire.
In recent weeks, the news has also been bad for Ukraine on the ground.
Russia has intensified attacks on civilians. A barrage of ballistic missiles Tuesday killed at least 20 people and injured more than 300 others in the eastern Ukrainian city of Dnipro, according to Ukrainian officials. Aerial attacks Monday killed at least 10 people in Kyiv, Ukraine's capital, Ukrainian officials said. On Wednesday, the United Nations said the number of civilian casualties in the first five months of 2025 was nearly 50% higher than in the same period in 2024.
Russia's summer offensive is gaining territory on the battlefield, with small groups of troops crossing into the Dnipropetrovsk region of eastern Ukraine for the first time in three years.
Halyna Konovalova, 75, who lives in Druzhkivka, a town about 15 miles from the front lines in the Donetsk region, said recently that she worried the fighting would soon reach her. The distant booms of artillery already echoed every few minutes in her garden, where she grows parsley, cucumbers and tomatoes.
'We need help,' she said. 'Weapons to defend ourselves with. And what will we defend ourselves with if America won't help?'
Last week, the crisis in the Middle East overshadowed Ukraine's pleas for help at the meeting of the Group of 7 major industrialized nations in Canada. Trump left the meeting early to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict and canceled a meeting with Zelenskyy. He also rejected the idea of issuing a joint statement in support of Ukraine.
Many in Ukraine saw the U.S. decision to enter Israel's war with Iran, even briefly, by striking three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites Sunday as a sign that the United States was walking away from the war in Ukraine.
The United States, once Ukraine's biggest supporter, has not announced any new military aid packages for the country in nearly five months -- since Trump took office. The military aid authorized under former President Joe Biden is expected to run out this summer. European allies have promised more help, and Ukraine is producing more of its own weapons, particularly drones. But those weapons are not enough to make up the gap, military experts say.
'America won't help us until we do something ourselves,' said Nataliia Babych, 37, who sells hot dogs in Kyiv and started crying when she talked about the missile and drone attack Monday. 'But we just don't have the strength right now.'
'People are dying every day,' she continued, 'both civilians and soldiers. I don't think America will help us at all, because now they're focused on Iran.'
For months, Ukrainians had hoped that Trump would pressure Russia to end the war, which Moscow started with its full-scale invasion in February 2022. But after months of fits and starts, peace talks have stalled.
Almost a month ago, on May 28, Trump gave Putin another two-week deadline when asked whether he believed the Russian leader truly wanted the war to end. That deadline came and went.
One Ukrainian lawmaker, Oleksandr Merezhko, said he felt as if Trump was blaming Ukraine for the war that Russia started. Merezhko, who nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize in November largely because of the president's promise to end the conflict, decided to rescind that nomination Monday. He said Trump had engaged in double standards by attacking Iran.
'He's decisive in reacting against the authoritarian regime in Iran, but he doesn't do anything like that with regard to Putin,' Merezhko said. 'To me, it's not consistent.'
The contrast between last year's NATO summit in Washington and this week's in the Netherlands was striking.
Last year, the United States and its European allies agreed that Ukraine should have an 'irreversible' path to membership of the alliance. At this year's summit, there was no such guarantee, likely because Trump opposes it.
Mark Rutte, secretary-general of NATO, said in a news conference that the alliance continued to support Ukraine 'on its irreversible path to NATO membership.' But the official declaration only restated the alliance's 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine, whose security contributes to ours.'
Last year, Russian missiles killed at least 41 civilians in Ukraine the day before the summit began. Jens Stoltenberg, then NATO's secretary-general, explicitly condemned the 'horrendous missile attacks against Ukrainian cities, killing innocent civilians, including children.' The NATO-Ukraine Council, made up of heads of state and government, issued a statement that decried 'in the strongest possible terms Russia's horrific attacks on the Ukrainian people.'
This year, NATO allies did not collectively condemn Russia's missile attack in Dnipro on Tuesday, the first day of the summit. In addition to the 20 fatalities and 300 injured people, the attack damaged almost 50 apartment buildings, 40 educational institutions, eight medical facilities and one train.
Some countries, like France, did condemn the attack. On Monday, Rutte warned that Russia remains the alliance's biggest threat.
On Wednesday, at a news conference, Trump said 'it's possible' that Putin had ambitions beyond Ukraine. But he declined to call the Russian president an enemy. 'I consider him a person that's, I think, been misguided,' Trump said.
This year's summit ended with a commitment from most NATO allies to raise their military spending to 5% of their economic output over the next 10 years.
Danylo Yakovlev, 30, a soldier in the Ukrainian army, said that if Kyiv fell, the next targets would be countries such as Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova and Poland. Europe needed to step up, he added.
'At the end of the day, we must rely first and foremost on ourselves,' Yakovlev said. 'We cannot assume anyone will come and save us. But at the same time, we need to make it absolutely clear to all other countries: If Ukraine falls, they could be next. And they may not even have a tomorrow.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Tampa Bay's new People's Pride rejects corporate, police ties
Concerned that St. Pete Pride has grown too corporate, a group of activist organizations say they want to return the celebration to its roots. Why it matters: The People's Pride Coalition will hold its inaugural Pride Night on Friday at a time of increasing skepticism of corporate-backed Pride events and marketing campaigns. The big picture: That's especially true this year, as major companies retreat from Pride sponsorships and participation amid President Trump's attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. "They're outing themselves as not truly supporting queer people," coalition member V Garcia told Axios. The wishy-washy approach also shows that relying on corporate support isn't sustainable, added coalition member Gabby Aguilera. Zoom in: The coalition — made up of local grassroots organizations including Tampa Democratic Socialists of America and the Justice Advocacy Network — formed in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attacks and the ensuing war that has so far killed more than 50,000 Palestinians. Organizers were troubled by the big-business sponsors underpinning St. Pete Pride, such as defense contractor GE Aerospace and phosphate mining firm Mosaic, which has a troubling environmental history in Tampa Bay. They've also taken issue with the festival's police presence, a wariness that's only grown as more law enforcement agencies, including St. Pete police, sign partnerships with federal immigration authorities. What they're saying:"It just goes directly against the roots and history of Pride," which began as an uprising, Aguilera said. The other side: St. Pete Pride leaders have heard the coalition's concerns "and recognize that the origins of Pride are rooted in protest and the ongoing fight for liberation and equity for all," president Byron Green-Calisch said in a statement to Axios. Police officers are there to "ensure the safety of the more than half a million attendees expected at our Pride events." "This is a necessity, not an endorsement," he said, adding that leaders "understand that it raises valid concerns for some." Between the lines: Coalition organizers recognize the need for security and that police are typically involved with closing off city streets for parades and similar events. Cutting ties is "not going to be a quick fix," Aguilera said. The nonprofit St. Pete Pride is also working on broadening its individual donor base, new executive director Bior Guigni told Axios in a previous interview. When it comes to corporate partnerships, her goal is to ensure that "it's not just a monetary exchange, but it's also a mission alignment," she said. The latest: While GE Aerospace and Mosaic are not listed among this year's sponsors, coalition members plan to continue putting pressure on the organization to meet their demands. And while they'll march in Saturday's Pride parade, coalition members organized Pride Night for folks who identify with their mission. If you go: The event is 6-10pm Friday at Allendale United Methodist Church in St. Pete. The lineup includes live music, drag performances, crafts, free food and a free store. A $5-15 donation is suggested but not required.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU Briefs Divided Leaders on Trump's Counterproposal on Tariffs
(Bloomberg) -- European Union leaders are discussing their response to President Donald Trump's latest proposal on trade after a briefing from Ursula von der Leyen. US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts The European Commission president told EU leaders at summit talks in Brussels on Thursday evening that she had received the latest US tariff offer, according to officials briefed on the discussion who declined to give any more detail. The question dogging the leaders and the commission, which handles trade matters for the bloc, is whether to accept an asymmetrical trade deal with the US or risk escalation by striking back, provoking Trump's ire. Several member states argued against retaliation, with most suggesting that reaching a quick deal with the US is better than holding out for a perfect one, even if many of Trump's tariffs remain in place, according to two people briefed on the discussions. But there's still division, with Paris categorically rejecting any deal skewed in favor of the US and pushing for a complete removal of tariffs, another official said. The EU needs to reach an agreement with Trump by July 9, when tariffs on nearly all of the bloc's exports to the US increase to 50%. The US president says the EU takes advantage of US with its goods surplus and perceived barriers to American trade. 'We hope that the discussions with the US continue in an energetic mood in the coming days — the July deadline is coming soon,' Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden told reporters on his way into the summit. 'I wish the commission good luck.' Detailed discussions with the US are taking place on both tariffs and non-tariff barriers, as well as on key sectors, strategic purchases and regulatory matters the EU is hoping to address through its simplification agenda, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The US is asking the EU to make what the bloc's officials see as unbalanced and unilateral concessions, Bloomberg reported earlier. Discussions on critical sectors — such as steel and aluminum, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and civilian aircraft — have been particularly difficult. Officials believe the best-case scenario remains an agreement on principles that would allow the negotiations to continue beyond an early July deadline. Alongside a 10% universal levy on most goods — which is currently facing a US court challenge — Trump has introduced 25% tariffs on cars and double that on steel and aluminum based on a different executive authority. He's also working to expand tariffs on other sectors, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and commercial aircraft. Many of those duties are expected to stay, regardless of an agreement with the Trump administration, according to the people. The EU, which has been seeking a mutually beneficial deal, will assess any end-result and at that stage decide what level of asymmetry — if any — it's willing to accept. The EU's industry chief, Stephane Sejourne, told Bloomberg this week that the EU would need to respond to any tariffs — including a baseline 10% levy — with countermeasures. But some EU leaders, including Italy's Giorgia Meloni have indicated that they could live with some levies if it allows for a rapid deal that avoids an escalation in the conflict. 'When we discussed 10% with companies, it isn't particularly impactful for us,' Meloni told reporters in The Hague Wednesday after the NATO summit. 'I think a decision at 10% would enable us, as far as we're concerned, to keep working on things that we care about.' --With assistance from Charlie Duxbury, Olivia Fletcher, Michal Kubala, Lyubov Pronina, Maxim Edwards, Suzanne Lynch, Andrea Palasciano, Samy Adghirni, Donato Paolo Mancini, Jan Bratanic, Katharina Rosskopf and Sanne Wass. How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Immigration Approval Rating Hits New Low, Poll Shows
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating on immigration has dipped to its lowest mark amid his second term in the White House, a new poll from Quinnipiac University finds. Why It Matters Immigration policy remains a defining issue for Trump's presidency after fueling his 2024 election pursuit. The president campaigned fervently last year on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his border czar to execute his agenda. The administration's approach on deportations—including expanded enforcement raids, the use of military force and legal maneuvering—has intensified partisan divisions and sparked significant public protest, particularly in urban centers like Los Angeles. Federal immigration raids in Los Angeles this month led to large-scale protests, with demonstrations focused on downtown federal buildings. The unrest prompted Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, to implement a curfew for portions of the area after incidents of vandalism. What To Know In the new poll released on Thursday, the president has a 41 percent approval rating on immigration, with a 57 percent disapproval mark. The survey shows that 56 percent of voters also disapprove of the tactics employed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), compared to 39 percent who approve. The poll was conducted from June 22 to June 24 among 979 "self-identified registered voters" across the country. The poll's margin of error is 3.1 percent. In a previous Quinnipiac poll, taken from June 5 to June 9, the president's approval rating on immigration was 43 percent with a disapproval score of 54 percent. This poll's margin of error was 2.8 percent. In an April poll, the president had an approval rating on immigration of 45 percent with the pollster and 46 percent in March and February polls. Shortly after his inauguration, the president came into his second term with a 47 percent approval rating on immigration and 46 percent disapproval. This poll was taken from January 23 to January 27, with a 3.1 percent margin of error. Thursday's poll marks Trump's lowest approval rating on the issue, per Quinnipiac, and representative of an overall slide for the president month over month. President Donald Trump speaks to the media at the start of the second day of the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25 in The Hague, Netherlands. (Photo by) President Donald Trump speaks to the media at the start of the second day of the 2025 NATO Summit on June 25 in The Hague, Netherlands. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Political analyst Craig Agranoff, to Newsweek via text message on Thursday: "Trump's approval rating on immigration dropping in the Quinnipiac poll likely stems from the polarized response to his administration's aggressive deportation policies and rhetoric, which have sparked significant public debate. "While it's hard to pinpoint one specific cause, the intensity of recent immigration measures may be driving this shift," Agranoff added. "As for whether Trump cares about public opinion on this issue, his track record suggests he prioritizes his base's support over broader approval, often framing immigration as a core issue to rally his supporters, regardless of fluctuating polls." Trump, earlier this month on Truth Social: "The Biden Administration and Governor Newscum flooded America with 21 Million Illegal Aliens, destroying Schools, Hospitals and Communities, and consuming untold Billions of Dollars in Free Welfare." Trump continued: "All of them have to go home, as do countless other Illegals and Criminals, who will turn us into a bankrupt Third World Nation. America was invaded and occupied. I am reversing the Invasion. It's called Remigration. Our courageous ICE Officers, who are daily being subjected to doxxing and murder threats, are HEROES. We will always have their back as they carry out this noble mission. America will be for Americans again!" Charlie Kirk, founder and president of conservative Turning Point USA, on X, formerly Twitter, this month: "President Trump has a positive net approval rating, and no other issue contributes to his popularity more than immigration: 'He is begging for a fight on immigration because he knows what he's doing so far is working with the electorate.' Bring it on, Democrats." What Happens Next With poll numbers showing rising public opposition, any policy shifts or legal decisions in the coming weeks may further influence national debate and future immigration enforcement measures.