Jewellery demand up as gold falls 7% from peak of Rs 1 lakh per 10 gm
Representative Image
Kolkata: Gold jewellers report a gradual increase in footfalls as the yellow metal prices have fallen by 7% from a peak of ₹1 lakh per 10 grams on April 22 as the US-China trade war de-escalated and geopolitical tensions eased.
Jewellers said there is rising demand for 18-carat studded and plain jewellery, along with the traditional 22-carat jewellery, for the upcoming wedding season in June and July.
In the international market, gold prices fell more than 4% last week-the steepest weekly loss since November 2024-to touch $3,180 per troy ounce on Friday as the safe-haven demand waned after the US and China agreed to lower tariffs for 90 days last week.
The yellow metal had hit a record high of $3,500 per ounce on April 22.
Meanwhile, geopolitical situation improved as India-Pakistan tensions eased and Ukrainian and Russian officials on Friday held their first direct meeting since March 2022. 'After Akshaya Tritiya, the gold market remained dull as prices remained steep. But over the last week, we have seen consumers returning to the market as gold prices have dropped,' said Surendra Mehta, national secretary of the India Bullion & Jewellers Association (IBJA).
People are mostly buying for marriages in June. 'Some are even placing orders for the wedding months of November and December as they fear that prices may shoot up if Trump imposes a reciprocal tariff after the 90-day window,' Mehta said.
Footfalls are increasing in tier-2 and tier-3 cities as well, according to reports trickling in from the jewellers, he added.
With gold prices rising almost 24% since the start of 2025, jewellers have seen growing demand for more affordable 18-carat plain gold jewellery for weddings-a segment traditionally dominated by 22-carat gold. They noted that the lower caratage is no longer limited to studded jewellery alone.
'There is an early traction for 18 carat jewellery and I think more and more customers are going to be open to lower caratage simply because the price point has become quite a bit,' Ajoy Chawla, CEO of Tanishq, had said in the Q4 earnings call earlier this month.
He said the company was looking at lower caratage to reduce the price points. 'So, if people have been used to buying 18-carat studded, they are also now beginning to get comfortable with 14 (carat), and in the case of CaratLane (jewellery brand), they have also introduced 9-carat,' Chawla said.
IBJA's Mehta said the association wrote to the Bureau of Indian Standards, requesting the agency to come out with hallmarking unique identification numbers for 9-carat gold jewellery.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
21 minutes ago
- Motor 1
The Galaxy A7 Is Not a Samsung Phone, But a Sedan With a Huge Range
We rarely cover cars sold exclusively in China, but we're willing to make an exception on occasion if there's a compelling reason. Geely's latest product meets the criteria with its unusual name, impressive driving range, and the simple fact that it's not another SUV. Roughly the same size as a Toyota Camry, this large sedan is called the Galaxy A7, a name that immediately brought to mind Samsung's namesake smartphone from a few years back. Side note: Samsung actually made cars in Korea through a joint venture with Renault. Beyond the unexpected Samsung connection, the Galaxy A7 also evokes thoughts of the Audi A7. In China, Audi offers two versions of its luxury car: the familiar A7 Sportback, a five-door liftback built by FAW, and the lesser-known A7L sedan , which features a traditional trunk. The latter is built by Audi's other local partner, SAIC. Geely's A7 looks upscale enough to compete with cars bearing the fabled Four Rings. It's sold as a Geely Galaxy, a recently launched sub-brand focused on plug-in hybrids and EVs. Photo by: Geely Although our Chinese may be a bit rusty, one detail about the car stood out: a driving range of more than 2,100 kilometers (1,305 miles) on a full tank and a fully charged battery. It's an impressive figure, though it's worth noting it's based on the lenient China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC). The Galaxy A7 is a plug-in hybrid that pairs a small 1.5-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine with an electric motor. Geely claims a combined fuel consumption of just 2 liters per 100 kilometers, a whopping 117.6 miles per gallon. Reports from China indicate Geely will offer the Galaxy A7 with multiple lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery options, supplied by CALB and CATL. The largest will be an 18.99-kWh pack, enabling an electric-only range of 75 miles (120 kilometers), again based on the CLTC standard. In terms of size, the car measures 193.6 inches (4918 mm) in length, 75 inches (1905 mm) in width, and 58.8 inches (1495 mm) in height, with a generous 112 inches (2845 mm) wheelbase. It ticks nearly all the boxes for 2025 car trends: front and rear light bars, a massive center screen, and minimal physical controls. The Galaxy A7 comes with 17- to 19-inch wheels and weighs up to 3,825 pounds (1,735 kilograms) in its heaviest configuration. Geely Galaxy A7 Photo by: Geely While not yet official, reports suggest the electrified sedan will start at around 100,000 yuan, rising to 130,000 yuan for the top-tier version. That translates to around $14,000–$18,000, highlighting just how far ahead China is in minimizing production costs while still turning a profit. The Galaxy A7 will be manufactured by the company that owns multiple brands, including Volvo, Polestar, Lotus, Lynk & Co, Zeekr, and Farizon. Geely also owns half of Smart, 49.9% of Proton, 17% of Aston Martin, and a 9.69% stake in Mercedes, through its founder and chairman, Li Shufu. Geely Galaxy A7 12 Source: Geely See Other China-Only Cars: The Nissan N7 Is a Big Electric Sedan You Can't Buy The New Honda GT Is a Screen Nightmare Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Geely Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CDPQ and Temasek cash in on FNZ's uncommercial capital raises, leaving employee shareholders out in the cold
LONDON, June 5, 2025 /CNW/ -- Warrants issued as part of three successive FIAT transactions by global wealth management platform FNZ – raising approximately US$1.5 billion in new capital – have now been exercised by two of the institutional investors. As part of the uncommercial terms of these equity raises, FNZ's board and management issued US$1.2 billion worth of Redeemable Preference Shares alongside a bundle of 27,625 Warrants. Now, CDPQ and Temasek have exercised their Warrants, crystalising the significant dilution for employee shareholders. These Warrants enabled FNZ's institutional and private equity investors, who control the board and management, to acquire FNZ Class A shares at US$0.25 per share. This is a staggering discount compared to a potential market price of US$130,000 per share. Based on FNZ's most recent publicly available enterprise valuation of US$20 billion, the fair market cost of these shares should have been US$3.6 billion, not US$7,000. Now that CDPQ and Temasek have exercised their Warrants, they have secured 19,361 new Class A shares, representing over 70% of the total Warrants issued. Employee shareholders point to this deal as a glaring example of "non-arm's-length transactions", favouring the institutional shareholders represented by the board at the expense of employee shareholders. "This is daylight robbery and it is clear that the likes of CPP, Generation and Motive will now follow suit," said one senior FNZ employee shareholder, speaking on condition of anonymity. "Our institutional and PE investors each handed themselves a package worth billions, and in doing so have obliterated the value of the shares held by employee and former employee shareholders, who built the company." FNZ's management and board have significantly diluted employee shareholders. In addition to the Warrants, the Redeemable Preference Shares were structured with extremely high return hurdles, providing a two or three times Multiple of Invested Capital (MOIC) for redemption. The FNZ board has failed to engage with employee shareholders regarding their concerns. FNZ employee shareholders are now bringing their case to the High Court of New Zealand in what will be one of Asia Pacific's largest class actions of its kind. View original content: SOURCE FNZ Employee Shareholders View original content:
CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
America's skies may soon open up to supersonic travel. But there's still a big problem
The skies over the United States could be wide open for much faster air travel in the near future. Not just because passenger planes capable of breaking the sound barrier are in development — for the first time ever, they could be allowed to do it over American soil. Even during the days of Concorde, the supersonic plane that retired in 2003, commercial flying at speeds above Mach 1 over mainland US was strictly forbidden, largely due to concerns over noise pollution from sonic booms. Now moves are afoot to lift that restriction with a bill recently introduced in the Senate, and a similar measure in the House of Representatives. That means if the long-awaited 'Son of Concorde' ever gets here, it will have more potential supersonic routes than its predecessor. Currently, there are several supersonic passenger jets in development that aim to reach speeds beyond Mach 1 without crashing loudly through the sound barrier. NASA's experimental X-59, expected to begin flight testing in 2025, aims to reduce noise to a 'sonic thump.' And then there's Colorado-based Boom Supersonic, which is developing the Overture, the first actual supersonic passenger plane since Concorde flew into the sunset. Opening up US skies could be a step toward removing some of the hurdles it faces in becoming a reality. 'It's a super exciting year for us,' Blake Scholl, founder and CEO of Boom told CNN. Much of that excitement comes from the company's XB-1 demonstrator aircraft breaking the sound barrier in January and again in February. It did so without creating a detectable sonic boom by flying at what it calls 'boomless cruise' — also known as 'Mach cutoff' — where sound refracts away from the ground at speeds close to the sound barrier in certain atmospheric conditions. Boom aims to build the first prototype Overture engine by the end of the year and, if all goes according to the company's very ambitious timeline, American Airlines, Japan Airlines (JAL) and United Airlines could all take delivery of their very first Overtures by the end of the decade. Scholl's sales pitch is very appealing. Who doesn't want to be able to work a full day on the West Coast, jump on a supersonic flight east that evening, and either be home or in a hotel in New York or D.C. before midnight? The Overture would make those trips possible with a cruise speed of Mach 1.7 that could slash the duration of a transcontinental flight by up to half. Overture's 80 passengers could make those speedy flights in relative comfort. Renderings show luxurious seats comparable to the contemporary business class offering on any subsonic plane. Whether airlines are keen is another matter. The range of the Overture is one challenge. At about 4,888 miles, it's enough for a transcontinental flight over the US or a transatlantic hop to Europe but not enough to traverse the Pacific without a stop. And the much-touted commitments from American, JAL and United are all non-binding and, at least in the eyes of the industry, viewed as more fluff than substance. Critically, none of the airlines list the deals among their firm capital commitments in stock exchange filings. 'Boom is working in opposition to the most durable single trend in all of flying since the jet age began,' Jon Ostrower, editor-in-chief of trade publication The Air Current, said on The Air Show podcast in February. 'Airlines, fundamentally, since (the dawn of the jet age) have wanted more efficient aircraft.' By Boom's own estimates, the Overture would burn two to three times more fuel per premium seat — first or business class — than a subsonic plane, such as the Airbus A350 or Boeing 787, on an intercontinental flight. Another estimate from the nonprofit International Council on Clean Transportation puts the Overture's fuel burn at five- to- seven-times that of a subsonic long-haul jet. Airlines would recoup those added fuel costs through higher airfares. Researchers at Worms University of Applied Sciences in Germany described those fares as a 'supersonic premium' in a paper published in the Journal of Air Transport Management last year. They estimated that airfares on the Overture would need to be roughly 38% higher than the current business class fares on a New York-London flight to turn a profit. Put another way, supersonic flyers would pay roughly $4,830 one-way from New York to London in June based on current average one-way airfares of around $3,500 on Google Flights. The researchers at Worms were confident that when flying westward travelers would pay a premium for supersonic flights because they 'fly back in time,' as one of the report's authors Jan Belke told CNN. That time gain could translate into real monetary benefits. Eastbound, however, the financial case was weaker due to hours lost across time zones. While Boom's Scholl acknowledged that Overture seats will likely be priced out of budget for most passengers, he said there's still a solid business case. 'If you hit a mainstream price point — and business class is a mainstream price point — I think of it as the [Tesla] Model S of supersonic flight, it's not yet for everybody but it is a pretty big market segment,' he said. The question is how many will pay that supersonic premium? Digital communications have vastly improved from the days of the Concorde. Video calls have reduced the need for in-person meetings, and with flyers now able to answer emails or even join a virtual meeting in mid-air, in-air downtime is rapidly shrinking on subsonic flight. Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory and a long-time skeptic of Boom's business case for the Overture, estimated that Boom needs $12-15 billion to bring the Overture to market, but has only raised around $800 million to date. Boom had about $700 million, according to its last public funding disclosure in 2023. Asked how much Boom needs to develop Overture, Scholl put the number at 'under $2 billion.' He cited numerous cost savings the company has found eliminating 'inefficiencies' in the existing aerospace supply chain by, for the most part, integrating production under its own roof. This integration, Scholl added, also speeds up the development and production process. That gives him confidence in achieving its aggressive timeline of flying the Overture by 2028 and handing the first planes over to airlines a year later. Ostrower called the timeline unrealistic. Of the many challenges ahead of Boom, one is regulatory approval. The Federal Aviation Administration's certification process has slowed dramatically since the Boeing 737 MAX grounding in 2019 and 2020. Boom's timeline allows for just a year of flight tests; Airbus took about 18 months to certify the A350 from first flight in June 2013 to the first delivery in December 2014. Scholl seems unfazed by this, expressing confidence in Boom's ability to meet its targets and produce planes that, in his words, 'delete the friction of travel' by going a whole lot faster than today's jets. 'There's no guarantee of success here — statistically failure is the most likely outcome — but it's definitely possible,' Scholl said. 'The technology is there, the market is there, the passengers and airlines are there, the regulations for overland, I believe, will be there in relative short order. We just have to execute.'
