On the anniversary of his hush money conviction, Trump continues to fight criminal case
One year ago today, a jury of 12 New Yorkers convicted Donald Trump for falsifying business records as part of an alleged hush money scheme to influence the 2016 election.
The conviction left an indelible mark on Trump -- making him the first president or former president to be found guilty of a crime -- and his fight to erase that legacy continues to this day.
On June 11, a federal appeals court in Manhattan is set to hear oral arguments in the president's renewed legal fight to move his criminal case from state to federal court.
MORE: Timeline: Manhattan DA's Stormy Daniels hush money case against Donald Trump
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg opposes the move -- arguing that a case can't be removed to federal court after conviction -- but Trump's lawyers have argued the "unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current president of the United States belongs in federal court."
Trump was found guilty on 34 felony counts after prosecutors alleged that he engaged in a "scheme" to boost his chances during the 2016 presidential election through a series of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and the falsification of New York business records to cover up that alleged criminal conduct.
Ten days before Trump was sworn in as president last November, New York Judge Juan Merchan sentenced him to an unconditional discharge -- without prison, fines or probation -- saying it was the "only lawful sentence" to prevent "encroaching upon the highest office in the land."
"I won the election in a massive landslide, and the people of this country understand what's gone on. This has been a weaponization of government," Trump told the court during his sentencing.
Trump continues to vehemently deny any wrongdoing, and his lawyers have argued that his conviction relied on evidence and testimony that related to his official acts as president, including social media posts from his official Twitter account as president and testimony from his former communications director Hope Hicks.
The trial took place one month before the Supreme Court delivered a landmark ruling expanding the scope of presidential immunity, and Trump's lawyers have argued that the evidence would have not been permitted based on the high court's ruling.
Trump's lawyers attempted to use that argument to throw out the case before Trump's January sentencing, but the argument was rejected by Judge Juan Merchan, two New York appeals courts, and the Supreme Court.
"The alleged evidentiary violations at President-Elect Trump's state-court trial can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal," the Supreme Court said in a brief unsigned opinion, though four justices said they would have granted Trump's application.
For Trump's criminal defense, he relied on then-defense attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, who now serve as the deputy attorney general and principal associate deputy attorney general. Earlier this week, Trump announced that he plans to nominate Bove – who led a purge of career law enforcement officials before the Senate confirmed his nomination to help run the DOJ -- to the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.
With his former defense attorneys now working for the government, Trump earlier this year tapped the elite Manhattan law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell to handle his criminal appeal.
MORE: Trump sentencing transcript: Listen to Trump's entire hush money sentencing hearing
Lawyers with the Department of Justice also filed an amicus brief in the case this week to argue that the case should be heard -- and thrown out -- by a federal court because the jury's conviction relied on evidence that was covered by presidential immunity.
"That President Trump's defense in fact takes the form of a new constitutional immunity announced by the Supreme Court after his trial ended, rather than a new statute enacted by Congress, should if anything cut in the President's favor," lawyers with the Department of Justice argued in a brief submitted on Tuesday.
The appeal -- as well as the ongoing appeal of Trump's $83 million judgment in the E. Jean Carroll civil case and half-billion-dollar civil fraud case -- is proceeding on uncharted legal grounds as Trump wields the power of the presidency in his defense. He has characterized the prosecutors who pursued the cases against him as politically motivated, and has touted his electoral victory last November as a political acquittal.
"The real verdict is going to be Nov. 5 by the people," Trump told reporters as he left court following his conviction last year. "And they know what happened here, and everybody knows what happened here."
On the anniversary of his hush money conviction, Trump continues to fight criminal case originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
5 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Donald Trump makes big statement, says extremely hard to make a deal with China's President XI
U.S. President Donald Trump described Chinese President Xi Jinping as 'very tough, and extremely hard to make a deal with,' in a new post on Truth Social on April 6, 2025. The comment comes amid renewed speculation over a potential high-stakes phone conversation between the two leaders later this week. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' Trump wrote, emphasizing his long-standing rapport with Xi while also acknowledging the complexities of negotiating with him. This statement arrives at a crucial moment. A senior White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, recently told CNBC that Trump and Xi are likely to speak 'very soon,' though probably not on Monday. The call, if it takes place, would come amid escalating tensions between Washington and Beijing, threatening to unravel a tentative trade agreement the two nations had reached just weeks ago. The Trump-Xi dynamic remains a critical piece in the puzzle of U.S.-China relations, particularly as both sides weigh economic interests, strategic posturing, and ongoing tariff standoffs. Analysts say any dialogue between the two leaders could be pivotal in determining the future of bilateral trade and global market sentiment. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Elon Musk Lambasts Trump's Tax Bill as an ‘Abomination'
Good morning. Elon Musk blasts Donald Trump's tax bill. The UK scores an exemption from higher metal tariffs. And while there are more millionaires globally, there are fewer in Europe. Listen to the day's top stories. Elon Musk lambasted Donald Trump's signature tax bill as a budget-busting 'abomination' as Republican fiscal hawks stepped up criticism of the package. The US Senate majority leader said the deal on state and local taxes will have to change. And here's our explainer on Trump's ' Big Beautiful Bill,' which narrowly passed the US House in May.
CNBC
23 minutes ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 02/06/25
Despite facing legal challenges, two senior Trump administration officials reaffirmed on Sunday that the tariff hikes will be implemented as planned. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stated that "tariffs are not going away" while National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would uphold the policy. It has been around two months since the Trump administration introduced the new tariff measures. During this time, both the rate and the future of the policy have fluctuated repeatedly. Amid rising uncertainty, recent economic data show a noticeable decline in sentiment among U.S. consumers and small businesses. On Friday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis released the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index—a key inflation gauge watched closely by the Federal Reserve. The data indicate that American consumers are scaling back spending and increasing their savings. In April, the PCE rose just 0.2% from the previous month, a significant drop from the 0.7% increase in March. Consumer spending on durable goods such as cars, apparel, and household appliances fell sharply. Instead, most expenditures were redirected toward essentials like housing, healthcare, and food. Meanwhile, the U.S. personal savings rate rose for the fourth consecutive month, reaching 4.9% in April—up from 4.3% in March. "Consumers cautious, you know, particularly on these more discretionary, larger ticket type items, where the purchase can be deferred." In another sign of weakening sentiment, the University of Michigan reported that consumer confidence continues to slide. The final reading for May held steady at 52.2—unchanged from April—but remains near historic lows. Small businesses are also under growing pressure due to the tariff policy. According to the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), the Small Business Optimism Index fell by 1.6 points in April to 95.8, marking the second straight month below the 51-year average of 98. Ryan Petersen, CEO of freight forwarding firm Flexport, which serves many U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises, previously gave a vivid analogy in a media interview. He warned that if the Trump administration does not revise the high tariff policy, the impact on small businesses could be like "asteroid-wiping-out-the-dinosaurs kind of event. Only these aren't dinosaurs. These are dynamic, healthy businesses." "They don't have a seat at the table. They're not involved at the White House in these conversations, and so no one's really advocating on their behalf to say, hey, these tariffs are going to wipe us out." NFIB economists say uncertainty remains the primary obstacle facing small business owners. Experts tell CNBC that elevated tariffs are already eroding revenues, prompting layoffs, and could ultimately trigger a chain-reaction recession on the supply side.
