Gophers seek naming-rights deal for Williams Arena as the U financial needs grow
The Gophers athletics department is exploring a potential naming-rights deal for Williams Arena and the U will partner with Independent Sports & Entertainment in the process, the U said Thursday.
This is part of the U's efforts to create more revenue streams with the incoming estimated annual expense of $20.5 million in revenue sharing to student-athletes. That's known as the 'House settlement' and it's expected to be finalized this month and start later this year.
The naming-rights for the venue nicknamed The Barn 'is a tremendous opportunity for a company to align themselves with the University of Minnesota and with Gopher Athletics,' Director of Athletics Mark Coyle said in a statement. 'We look forward to working with ISE to find a naming rights partner that will help us continue to provide world-class experiences for our student-athletes.'
For fiscal year 2024, the Gophers reported $151.1 million in total operating revenues and $152.5 million in total operating expenses. The goal for the U is a balanced budget, but it's unclear how the U will carve out funds for this big new expense.
'We've been making hard decisions within our athletics department in terms of some of the things we will do as we move forward to help cover that cost of $20.5 million,' Athletics Director Mark Coyle told reporters on March 14. 'We feel very confident that we will be at that revenue share number. … We feel like we will get there. We feel confident about that and feel like we will give our program the best chance to succeed.'
A naming-rights deal the venue nicknamed 'The Barn' would help shrink the financial gap but not bridge it by itself.
For example, the Gophers and 3M in 2017 entered into a 14-year, $11.2 million sponsorship agreement for naming rights to the home of men's hockey, Mariucci Arena. It's now known as 3M Arena at Mariucci.
During the pandemic, the Gophers cut three men's sports — gymnastics, tennis and track and field — at the end of the 2020-21 academic year. Coyle said a budget shortfall and Title IX compliance were two reasons why cuts were necessary.
The U currently has a combined 22 men's and women's sports and it's unclear if more individual sports teams might cease operations in the near future.
ISE, according to its website, is an agency that works in management, sales, consulting and marketing, with services in strategic guidance, brand creation and global partnerships. They list a handful of clients, including ESPN, the College Football Playoff, the WNBA and college programs such as Mississippi, West Virginia, Vanderbilt and Washington State among others.
Due to the revenue sharing demands, Coyle said in March that the U has set aside a plan to explore remodeling options for Williams Arena. A year ago, the Gophers tabbed Populous, an architectural design firm, to do a feasibility study into building a new venue or possible renovations of the existing arena, which first opened in 1928.
When remodeled in 1950, the home of the men's and women's basketball teams was named Williams Arena after Dr. Henry L. Williams, a former Gophers football coach (1900-21) who did not have deep connections to U basketball.
If the U secures a naming-rights parter, they plan to recognize within the stadium Williams Arena's nearly 100-year-old history and Dr. Williams, a member of the College Football Hall of Fame.
Gophers men's basketball welcomes two new players Wednesday
How Gophers coach Niko Medved will go into the NCAA transfer portal
Two Gophers recruits back out of men's basketball program
Niko Medved's path to Gophers included steering him off hockey rinks
Another Gophers men's basketball player enters NCAA transfer portal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ohio Senate passes budget giving Browns $600 million, tax cut to wealthy, more public school money
Ohio Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon. (Photo by Graham Stokes for Ohio Capital Journal. Republish photo only with original article.) The Ohio Senate has passed a $60 billion state biennial operating budget, which includes a tax cut for the wealthy, some increased public education funding, and $600 million in funding to the Cleveland Browns for their new stadium. The total budget is expected to be around $200 billion once federal dollars come in. Ohio House Bill 96 was voted on mainly along party lines, 23-10. State Sen. Bill Blessing, R-Colerain Township, joined the Democrats to vote no. The senators increased the amount of money going to public schools from the Ohio House's proposal. The Senate budget gives public schools about $100 million more than the House. Although they follow most of the Ohio House's proposed budget, which only gives schools about $226 million of an increase for school funding, the Senate changed the funding 'guarantee' amount. Right now, some districts have guarantees that a portion of their funding will not be reduced, even if their enrollment goes down This $100 million added back would only go to high-performing or 'improving' districts. However, to be fully funded based on statistics from the Fair School Funding Plan (FSFP) from 2021, schools would need an additional $666-800 million, compared to the $226 million given by the House. Still, the Senate's version is closer to the FSFP than the House's. 'We're following the funding scheme that was put together in the first place,' Senate Finance Chair Jerry Cirino, R-Kirtland, said. 'Our bill is the closest way to get there.' They also raised the House proposal's cap on districts' rainy day funds to 50%, instead of 30%. This would mean that the schools would have to refund anything above that back to the taxpayer to provide property tax relief. 'The priority is not, obviously, in fully funding education, investing in our children and our future,' Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, said. The Senate's budget proposal still includes $600 million for a new Cleveland Browns stadium in Brook Park. However, the funding structure differs from what the Browns proposed and what the House approved earlier this year. The House proposed borrowing $600 million by issuing bonds and repaying the debt, with interest, over 25 years, at a cost of about $1 billion. The Senate is proposing a $600 million grant for the stadium using unclaimed funds. That's other people's money that the state is holding, from things like forgotten bank accounts, rent, or utility deposits or uncashed insurance policies. The Ohio Department of Commerce's website states the state is sitting on $4.8 billion in unclaimed funds. Asked about the possibility of Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine vetoing that provision, Cirino noted that DeWine said publicly he did not like the debt arrangement of the House for the $600 million. DeWine himself had proposed raising gambling taxes. 'I'm pretty confident and feel good that the governor and the House will look at our approach to it,' Cirino said. Ohio Democratic lawmakers remain staunchly opposed to the project. 'If they could find that money for the Browns and their stadium's move to Brook Park, why didn't they decide to use those funds for the schools?' Antonio asked. The budget also includes a 2.75% flat income tax. There are three income tax brackets in Ohio. Those making up to $26,000 do not need to pay state income tax. Ohioans earning between $26,000 and $100,000 pay a tax of 2.75%. Those making more than $100,000 have to pay 3.5%. State data reveals that this flat tax could result in a loss of about $1.1 billion in the General Revenue Fund. 'The dollars that we're foregoing in the flat tax are already incorporated into our overall spending,' Cirino said. Funding for schools, Medicaid, libraries, lead abatement, food banks, and child care face funding decreases from the current status or from the governor's budget. Asked about these cuts these cuts to social services for lower-income people while giving a tax cut to the state's highest earners, Cirino said Republicans think it's going to be good for the economy. 'It's going to be good for attracting people,' Cirino responded. Antonio disagreed. 'It's a gift to the wealthiest among us on the backs of the poorest and lowest-income and middle-class folks in the state of Ohio,' she said. Senate Republicans propose giving $20,000 to top high school students to encourage them to stay in the state for their higher education. The Governor's Merit Scholarship was passed in the House budget. Already existing, the House language would extend the proposal that gives the top 5% of each graduating high school class $5,000 a year to attend a public or private school in Ohio. But the Senate version reduces the scholarship to the top 2% of students. The money would also have strings attached. The scholarship recipients would be required to reside in Ohio for three years after graduation. There would be an 'expectation' that the money would be returned if they leave within the three years. Now, the Senate and House leaders will enter a conference committee, a closed-door negotiation period to create a final budget. Once a decision is made, both chambers must pass the combined bill. If it passes through both sides, it will be sent to Gov. Mike DeWine for review. In the past, he issued dozens of line-item vetoes on operating budgets. Line-item vetoing is the ability for the governor to pick and choose which policies within a larger piece of legislation get to stay or must go. The deadline for the budget to be passed is July 1. Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on X and Facebook. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Living on a prayer? House budget gets RIPTA almost halfway there in plugging $32.6 million deficit.
Public transit advocates fear service cuts may be inevitable with the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority still facing a significant deficit in the Rhode Island House's proposed fiscal 2026 budget. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Motorists were already facing a penny increase in the tax they pay for every gallon of gasoline on July 1, 2025. But now they face the possibility of paying more in order to cut the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority's (RIPTA) looming budget deficit. Under the House of Representative's version of the fiscal 2026 budget released late Tuesday night, the state's gas tax — now slated to rise from 37 cents per gallon to 38 cents on July 1 — would rise by another two cents to 40 cents, with that bump directed toward the RIPTA. The move would generate $8.7 million for the cash-strapped agency according to a summary of the proposed House budget. The House's budget also ups RIPTA's share of Highway Maintenance Account funding by $5.9 million, plugging the agency's budget gap by nearly $15 million. Revenue for the fund comes from vehicle registration fees. The total of $14.6 million helps to plug a $32.6 million deficit the agency faced in the governor's budget released in January. RIPTA CEO Christopher Durand expressed gratitude to House lawmakers for recognizing the urgent need to find more revenue for the agency in a statement Wednesday. 'The agency has long needed a consistent funding stream to allow us to better support getting Rhode Islanders to work, school and healthcare,' Durand said. 'The last time the agency saw a permanent change in its funding structure was over ten years ago.' But the remaining $18 million gap could mean RIPTA may have to lay off drivers and reduce or eliminate bus routes. Durand said the agency's staff is still analyzing the full impact that the new budget gap could have on RIPTA's services. Rhode Island's gas tax is the highest among New England states, according to January 2025 data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Motorists who buy gas in Vermont now pay 32 cents per gallon while the tax is 30 cents in Maine, 27 cents in Massachusetts, 25 cents in Connecticut and 24 cents in New Hampshire. But there are no complaints about the increased tax from AAA Northeast, which puts out weekly updates on the average cost of gas in Rhode Island. As of Monday, Rhode Island drivers paid an average of $2.97 per gallon. 'AAA Northeast generally supports gas taxes that help fund and improve broader transportation infrastructure, from roads and bridges to mass transit,' spokesperson Mark Schieldrop said in an emailed statement. 'Funding for public transportation can lead to increased use and ultimately, less traffic congestion for drivers.' The gas tax on every gallon of motor fuel purchased in Rhode Island is adjusted every two years based on inflation to comply with a 2014 law. John Flaherty, a senior adviser for GrowSmart RI, called the nearly $15 million revenue infusion 'a step in the right direction,' but still worries it's not enough to keep RIPTA's operations at existing levels. 'Until we commit to building a system that's going to work for more people in this state, we're going to continue to deal with this issue,' Flaherty said in an interview. 'It seems inevitable that there will be some service cuts.' Providence Streets Coalition Board President Liza Burkin estimates RIPTA could see 160 layoffs and significant service cuts, including paratransit service for riders with disabilities. But House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi told reporters Tuesday night that the paratransit program will remain untouched and that he did not see other service cuts as inevitable. Shekarchi pointed to an overdue efficiency study lawmakers mandated in the fiscal 2025 budget as a way the agency can save costs on staff, operations and equipment. 'I think they need to look at everything,' Shekarchi said. RIPTA's board of directors commissioned WSP to do the efficiency study on March 27 at a cost of $412,346. The study is being completed in three phases. An initial 19-page memo from Canadian-headquartered engineering consulting firm WSP was thin on details in comparing RIPTA with five peer agencies across the country. It did point to an agency's pursuit of 'universal access agreements,' defined as partnerships where employers pay an annual fee to cover their workers' fares to commute. RIPTA entered such an agreement with Amazon and through partially subsidized fares for Omni Providence Hotel employees. In a 20-page draft report issued May 30, WSP recommended investing in routes that are already high performing, potentially eliminating underperforming routes, and expanding commuter programs. Low scoring routes in the report include the 88 bus, which travels in the morning and afternoon from Simmons Village in Cranston to the Walmart off Plainfield Pike; Route 69, which connects the University of Rhode Island to the Port of Galilee; and the 59X express route in North Smithfield and Lincoln. But transit advocates want all routes to be maintained, arguing that low ridership routes often provide a vital service for the state's most vulnerable residents. They add that RIPTA is already an efficient agency. 'I have no confidence that another efficiency study is going to reveal some big savings that's going to enable us to get on with building a system that gets more people where they're going in a reasonable amount of time,' Flaherty said. Zack Mezera, Rhode Island organizer for the Working Families Party, expressed concern that lawmakers chose to raise the gas tax instead of enacting a higher income tax on Rhode Islanders earning over $625,000 a year. 'Throughout this session, Rhode Islanders have been at the State House week after week, imploring state leaders to increase revenue by having the 1% pay their fair share this year, because we can't afford to let the losses pile up,' Mezera said. The House released its proposed budget on the same evening the Rhode Island Senate unanimously confirmed Bernard Georges to join RIPTA's board of directors. Georges told Rhode Island Current he was aware of the agency's financial woes, but still needs to get up to speed. 'I need to give myself a full insight about the operations of the organization,' he said. Rhode Island Department of Transportation Director Peter Alviti Jr., the chair of RIPTA's board of directors, said the eight-member panel will be meeting on how the agency can move forward on whatever final budget is provided. 'As the Speaker said, our decisions will be informed by the efficiency study,' Alviti said in a statement Wednesday afternoon. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Missouri special session ends with passage of KC stadium funding, disaster aid
State Rep. Chris Brown, R-Kansas City, speaks Wednesday in favor of the bill he handled that would finance new or improved professional sports stadiums in Kansas City (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent). The Missouri House closed the special legislative session Wednesday with votes to finance professional sports stadiums in Kansas City and provide tornado relief for St. Louis. Three special session bills, already approved in the state Senate, are now in the hands of Gov. Mike Kehoe. He is expected to sign them quickly, putting the decision on whether to stay in Missouri in the hands of the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals, who are also considering an offer from Kansas to cross the state line. State Rep. Chris Brown, a Republican from Kansas City handling the stadium bill, asked his colleagues to do what they would do to retain any large employer. 'We really need to, or should, look at these franchises, not just as entertainment,' Brown said. 'They are entertaining, obviously, but it's an incredibly big business.' Opponents of the legislation said it improperly benefits wealthy team owners at the expense of other Missourians. They also contend the bill is unconstitutional. 'The middle class, everyday Missourian is expected to pay for this,' said state Rep. Richard West, a Republican from Wentzville. 'We've been promising for years for some form of tax relief or tax adjustment or something to ease the burden on what they have, and this is exactly the opposite of what we promised them to come up here to do.' The measure to finance new stadiums was the most controversial of the three bills, passing on a 90-58 vote, with 32 Democrats joining with 58 Republicans to provide the majority. There were 13 Democrats and 45 Republicans who voted against the bill. To finance the stadium construction, the bill sets aside tax revenue generated by the teams and economic activity at Arrowhead and Kauffman stadiums. Estimated at just under $1.5 billion over 30 years, the funding would pay for half the costs of improvements at Arrowhead and a new home for the Royals. The Kansas offer would cover 70% of the construction costs for new stadiums, but it expires at the end of the month. The bill passed Wednesday requires financing from local governments, either in Jackson County, where the teams currently reside, or Clay County, which is trying to lure the Royals. It is impossible to put a ballot measure before voters in the time remaining for the Kansas offer. House leaders from the Kansas City area had differing views on whether the teams should accept or reject Missouri's offer now that it is a firm commitment but without knowing what voters will approve in the Kansas City region. 'I don't know what the teams will do,' said House Speaker Jon Patterson, a Lee's Summit Republican. 'They have their own plan. I think that's very unlikely, but I'm just worried about the things I can control, and teams are on their own schedule and will act accordingly.' House Minority Leader Ashley Aune, a Democrat from Kansas City, said the teams should make a decision before June 30 'I would call on them to do so,' Aune said. 'We bent over backwards here in the Missouri legislature to deliver them something by the end of their imposed deadline of June 30. And I would very much like for them to hold true to that deadline and let us know where they're going before that.' Chiefs owner Clark Hunt issued a statement thanking the legislature but made no commitment. 'The passing of this legislation is an important piece of the overall effort,' Hunt said. 'While there's still work to be done, this legislation enables the Chiefs to continue exploring potential options to consider remaining in Missouri.' Patterson and Aune also disagreed on whether the extra disaster aid and property tax controls Kehoe added to the special session agenda had made the difference between success and failure on the stadium bill. Patterson said each bill was considered on its own merits and that the property tax provisions may have cost votes. The stadium legislation won 103 votes in the House in May but the bill died in the state Senate. 'I'd like to think that people took a look at both those things on their own,' Patterson said. 'I don't think anybody here voted for one thing just because of the other.' The House voted down two amendments so the bill did not require another vote in the state Senate. Patterson said it would have failed the second time around. 'A second Senate vote on the (stadium bill) would have been impossible, just the political climate after that vote,' Patterson said. 'So we were very mindful of that. I thought if it goes back, it's not going to pass.' Aune said the additional disaster aid was essential to securing Democratic votes. 'If he wanted to get this stadium done, which is an economic development opportunity for the state and a priority of our governor, it was necessary to make sure that he could shore up those votes by making folks happy in other ways,' Aune said. During debate on the special session spending bill, the House fell silent as state Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins, a St. Louis Democrat, described the devastation of her north St. Louis legislative district. Collins was home on May 16 because the General Assembly adjourned early instead of working to the final day allowed by the Missouri Constitution. She was in her car, preparing to attend a high school graduation when the tornado hit, she said. 'I watched a tornado rip through the middle of my house district,' Collins said. 'I also watched it rip off my roof, and I watched the tornado rip off my neighbor's roof. To this day, debris still sits in my front yard, and I'm a girl that has no insurance.' Four of the five Missourians who died in the tornado lived in her district, Collins said. The disaster relief provisions in the legislation address both the devastation of the May 16 tornado in St. Louis and the damages suffered by other Missourians in storms and flooding earlier in the year. They are: $100 million in the spending bill for storm recovery in the city of St. Louis; $25 million for home repairs and other housing needs through programs of the Missouri Housing Development Commission, available in any county included in a request for federal disaster aid; A tax credit worth up to $5,000 for insurance deductibles paid for residential damage in an area included in a request for federal disaster aid. The legislation would allow $90 million in claims this year and $45 million per year for future years. The provisions were demanded before the Senate vote because of uncertainty about the federal response to the tornado. Kehoe asked President Donald Trump for a federal disaster declaration for the tornado on May 25 and for April 29 storms in Scott on May 19. Trump approved both late Monday, making federal aid for emergency housing and rebuilding available to individuals and providing money to reimburse the state and local governments for recovery costs. State Rep. Raychel Proudie, a Democrat from Ferguson who is in her last term in the House, asked her colleagues to stand by St. Louis for the long-term. 'For those of us who will be termed-out next year,' Proudie said, 'we need the rest of you who will be here five years later to continue to remember this day, to remember this time, to remember these last three weeks, to continue to pour help into these communities, into these people.' The property tax cap in the stadium bill will be imposed in 97 counties. There would be 75 counties where basic tax bills would not increase more than 5% per year and 22 where no increase would be allowed. The list excludes most of the largest counties of the state and many members opposed it because the Missouri Constitution requires property taxes to be 'uniform upon the same class or subclass of subjects.' Another constitutional objection was raised that the bill improperly aids a private entity by giving state support to the Chiefs and Royals, in violation of a provision added to the Constitution in 1875. 'I haven't heard an argument yet that this bill is going to be upheld,' said state Rep. Bill Hardwick, a Republican from Dixon. 'I've only heard arguments that we should ignore the fact that it's unconstitutional.' The likelihood of the property tax provisions being blocked by the courts led at least one Democrat to vote for the bill. State Rep. Kathy Steinmetz of Columbia, speaking at a news conference after the vote, said she sees the cap as shifting the tax burden for schools to state taxpayers. 'They're ending up paying more,' she said, 'so that we can help the school districts that are not putting forth that local tax effort.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
