
California violated Title IX by allowing trans athletes on girls teams, Trump administration says
The Trump administration has found that the California department of education and the state's high school sports federation violated civil rights law by allowing transgender girls to compete on girls sports teams.
The federal education department announced the finding Wednesday and proposed a resolution that would require California to bar transgender women from women's sports and strip transgender athletes of records, titles and awards. It's the latest escalation in the Republican administration's effort to bar transgender athletes from women's sports teams nationwide.
If California rejects the proposal, the education department could move to terminate the state's federal education funding.
'The Trump administration will relentlessly enforce Title IX protections for women and girls, and our findings today make clear that California has failed to adhere to its obligations under federal law,' Linda McMahon, the education secretary, said. 'The state must swiftly come into compliance with Title IX or face the consequences that follow.
Title IX is a 1972 law forbidding sex discrimination in education.
California education and sports officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday.
Federal officials opened an investigation into the California Interscholastic Federation in February after the organization said it would abide by a state law allowing athletes to compete on teams consistent with their gender identity. That followed an executive order signed by Donald Trump that was intended to ban transgender athletes from participating in girls and women's sports.
In April, McMahon's department opened an investigation into the California department of education over the same issue.
Both investigations concluded that state policies violated Title IX. The administration has been invoking the law in its campaign against transgender athletes, launching scores of investigations into schools, colleges and states. It's a reversal from the Joe Biden administration, which attempted to expand Title IX to provide protections for transgender students. A federal judge struck down the expansion before Trump took office in January.
The administration's proposed resolution would require California to notify schools that transgender athletes should be barred from girls athletic teams and that all schools must 'adopt biology-based definitions of the words 'male' and 'female''. The state would also have to notify schools that any conflicting interpretation of state law would be considered a violation of Title IX.
Athletes who lost awards, titles or records to transgender athletes would have their honors restored under the proposal, and the state would be required to send personal apology letters to those athletes.
A similar resolution was offered to Maine's education agency in a separate clash with the administration over transgender athletes. Maine rejected the proposal in April, prompting a justice department lawsuit seeking to terminate the state's federal education funding.
Under federal guidelines, California's education office and the sports federation have 10 days to come into compliance or risk enforcement action.
The federation separately tested a pilot policy at a state track meet in May, allowing one extra competitor in three events featuring high school junior AB Hernandez, who is trans. The organization announced the change after Trump took to social medial to criticize Hernandez's participation. The justice department said it would investigate Hernandez's district and the state to determine if Title IX was being violated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
10 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump is ‘daddy' at NATO: Is the flattery working?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 US correspondent Mark Stone and security and defence editor Deborah Haynes chat all things NATO Summit - the cringe-worthy 'Daddy' moment, as well as the substance to come out of it. How is NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte handling Trump? And what next for the global conflicts commanding the agenda? If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.


Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump wants more drones and missiles, fewer F-35s in $893 billion budget request
WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump wants a pay raise for troops, more high-tech missiles and drones in next year's defense budget, while cutting Navy jobs, and buying fewer ships and fighter jets to save money, according to budget materials posted Wednesday. At $892.6 billion, the defense and national security budget request is flat compared with this year. The budget, which also includes nuclear weapons-related activities carried out by the Department of Energy and increases funding for homeland security, puts Trump's mark on the military by pulling funds away from weaponry and services to fund his priorities. The White House said the funding will be used to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific, and revitalize the defense industrial base. Most of the funding for Trump's marquee Golden Dome missile defense shield was included in a separate budget request and is not part of the latest proposal sent to Congress. In the 2026 budget Trump requested fewer F-35 jets made by Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab and only three warships. Procurement of a Virginia-class made by General Dynamics (GD.N), opens new tab and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII.N), opens new tab and 15 other ships are expected to be included in a separate appropriation bill, the Navy said. The budget asks for a 3.8% pay raise for troops, but also trims costs by retiring older weaponry including ships and planes that are more expensive to operate. Under the plan, the Navy will reduce its civilian employee workforce by 7,286 people. Compared to Biden's budget from his last year in office, which had asked for 68 F-35 jets in fiscal 2025, Trump's fiscal 2026 request seeks only 47 of the fighter jets. The budget has already sparked debate on Capitol Hill where the House Appropriations Committee's Defense subcommittee's draft bill for fiscal-year 2026 boosts the F-35 buy to 69, one more than Biden's 2025 request. The Pentagon continues prioritizing purchasing munitions and key weapons systems. The Air Force is continuing its investment the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile – Extended Range and Long Range Anti-Ship missile which have longer ranges and can be more effective in the Pacific. On the other hand, the budget seeks far fewer Precision Strike Missile, which will replace the Army Tactical Missile (ATACM) used in Ukraine. Lockheed Martin makes all three missiles. The budget also boosts spending on small drones - in part because of lessons learned in Ukraine where unmanned aircraft have proven to be an integral part of low-cost, yet highly effective warfighting. The detailed request comes as Republicans debate defense spending priorities in their sweeping $150 billion defense package contained in the pending "One Big Beautiful Bill Act". The act has already been passed the House of Representatives and will give an initial $25 billion boost to Trump's controversial Golden Dome missile defense shield. Defense spending usually accounts for about half of the U.S. discretionary budget; the rest goes to transportation, education, diplomacy and other departments.


The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump admin officials release ‘new intelligence' claiming Iran's nuclear program set back ‘years'
President Donald Trump 's administration released 'new intelligence' on Wednesday claiming Iran 's nuclear program has been set back 'years.' The new information comes after a leaked early assessment suggested military strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend only set the country's nuclear program back by mere months. The preliminary assessment, which was first reported by CNN, contradicted Trump's claims that the U.S. 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called the assessment 'flat-out wrong' in a statement to CNN. 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' Leavitt said. CNN's story was quickly matched by several other reputable news outlets and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth revealed Wednesday the intelligence assessment did exist. CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have since announced what they claim is new information revealing further damage to Iran's nuclear program. 'CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes,' Ratcliffe said in a statement Wednesday. He continued: "This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Gabbard also took to X to share the 'new intelligence,' which she says confirms what Trump 'has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do.' The national intelligence director then criticized what she called the 'propaganda media,' claiming it 'selectively release[d] portions of illegally leaked classified intelligence assessments (intentionally leaving out the fact that the assessment was written with 'low confidence').' Following the leak, the Trump administration has planned to limit the sharing of classified intelligence with Congress, Axios reported, citing four unnamed sources. The move comes as several top national security officials are set to brief senators on classified materials Thursday, according to The Washington Post. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will be at the meeting, the Post reported, citing Trump officials. Gabbard will not be in attendance. The Post previously reported that Gabbard and Hegseth are not part of a small group of officials that Trump has turned to as key advisers on the Israel-Iran conflict, which spokespeople for the Cabinet members have denied. The publication cited current and former U.S. officials as well as people close to the Trump administration in its reporting.