2 held for murder in Bokaro district
Bokaro: Two persons were arrested on Thursday in connection with the murder of one Sumit Kumar Mahto, whose body was found in Telidih Basti under Pindrajora police station on Tuesday.
"Investigations revealed that a monetary dispute of Rs 12 lakh led to the brutal killing. Sumit had taken the amount from the accused to run a brick kiln, with a condition to pay Rs 2 extra per brick if the repayment was delayed," said Manoj Swargiyari, SP Bokaro.
Sumit was strangled with a towel as part of the premeditated plan. The SP said, "Two accused persons have been arrested, while others are still at large. The police have seized a bike, towel, coconut rope, and mobile phone used in the crime, and raids are on to catch the remaining culprits." tnn
Bokaro: Two persons were arrested on Thursday in connection with the murder of one Sumit Kumar Mahto, whose body was found in Telidih Basti under Pindrajora police station on Tuesday.
"Investigations revealed that a monetary dispute of Rs 12 lakh led to the brutal killing. Sumit had taken the amount from the accused to run a brick kiln, with a condition to pay Rs 2 extra per brick if the repayment was delayed," said Manoj Swargiyari, SP Bokaro.
Sumit was strangled with a towel as part of the premeditated plan. The SP said, "Two accused persons have been arrested, while others are still at large. The police have seized a bike, towel, coconut rope, and mobile phone used in the crime, and raids are on to catch the remaining culprits." tnn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
DA case: SVU raids yield property, gold from Katihar govt officer
Patna: Special Vigilance Unit (SVU) on Thursday conducted raids at multiple properties owned by , public grievance redressal officer of Manhari in Katihar district. The SVU teams simultaneously raided multiple properties belonging to Mishra in Katihar, Patna, Manhari, and Prayagraj (Uttar Pradesh). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The raids were carried out following allegations of accumulating assets disproportionate to her known sources of income. The SVU teams searched Mishra's govt office in Katihar, her rented accommodation near circuit house in the Michabari area, and her flat in an apartment located in the AG Colony in Patna. Additionally, her property in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, was also raided, where she was found present during the operation. According to an SVU source, "Mishra, who has been serving in her current position since Oct 2024, is accused of accumulating assets disproportionate to her known sources of income. The investigation revealed that her assets exceeded her legitimate income by 84.34%, with unauthorised assets worth approximately Rs 80.11 lakh." During the raids, the vigilance officers recovered cash, land documents, records of large bank transactions, gold and silver jewellery, and expensive items. The SVU seized all these materials for detailed investigation. " Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The state govt received information about her alleged illegal accumulation of wealth, following which the case was transferred to the SVU. The agency's investigation uncovered substantial unaccounted wealth beyond her govt salary, leading to the filing of an FIR under various sections related to disproportionate assets," the SVU sources said. The raids were conducted after obtaining necessary search warrants from the court. Multiple teams were deployed to carry out simultaneous searches at all locations. While the exact findings of the raids are yet to be officially disclosed, sources suggest that important documents and evidence have been seized during the operation.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
UP cop booked for amassing Rs 10.5crin disproportionate assets over 14 yrs
Meerut: An FIR was lodged against a woman inspector, Nargis Khan, under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly amassing Rs 10.5cr in disproportionate assets during her service at the Medical police station in Meerut, police said on Thursday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Khan is currently posted in Special Investigation branch (co-operative cell) of the crime investigation department in Bareilly. A police officer in Meerut, privy to the case, said, "The FIR was lodged following a complaint by an anti-corruption officer after a year-long probe. It was stated in the FIR that the accused cop, Nargis Khan, spent more money than she earned." The FIR was lodged following the orders of the anti-corruption department in Lucknow. It was registered by the SHO of Meerut's Anti-Corruption police station, Durgesh Kumar. Khan was unavailable to comment on the matter. The FIR stated, "Inspector Nargis Khan, wife of Suresh Yadav, a businessman, acquired assets beyond her known income. The investigation revealed that from Jan 1, 2007, to March 31, 2021, Khan had an income of over Rs 5 crore 36 lakh from all known legitimate sources. But, during the same period, she spent over Rs 10 crore 59 lakh on family maintenance and acquiring assets. The expenditure exceeded the income, which is 97.5% more than her income. When asked for an explanation, Khan could not provide a satisfactory response." Earlier, she was briefly suspended in a case involving the mishandling of a girl child after the minor was recovered in Meerut. Meerut: An FIR was lodged against a woman inspector, Nargis Khan, under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly amassing Rs 10.5cr in disproportionate assets during her service at the Medical police station in Meerut, police said on Thursday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Khan is currently posted in Special Investigation branch (co-operative cell) of the crime investigation department in Bareilly. A police officer in Meerut, privy to the case, said, "The FIR was lodged following a complaint by an anti-corruption officer after a year-long probe. It was stated in the FIR that the accused cop, Nargis Khan, spent more money than she earned." The FIR was lodged following the orders of the anti-corruption department in Lucknow. It was registered by the SHO of Meerut's Anti-Corruption police station, Durgesh Kumar. Khan was unavailable to comment on the matter. The FIR stated, "Inspector Nargis Khan, wife of Suresh Yadav, a businessman, acquired assets beyond her known income. The investigation revealed that from Jan 1, 2007, to March 31, 2021, Khan had an income of over Rs 5 crore 36 lakh from all known legitimate sources. But, during the same period, she spent over Rs 10 crore 59 lakh on family maintenance and acquiring assets. The expenditure exceeded the income, which is 97.5% more than her income. When asked for an explanation, Khan could not provide a satisfactory response." Earlier, she was briefly suspended in a case involving the mishandling of a girl child after the minor was recovered in Meerut.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Drugs not recovered, man walks free after 12 years in NDPS case in Noida
Noida: Twelve years after being jailed for allegedly possessing contraband, a man was acquitted, with the prosecution having failed to convince the court about any sort of recovery. A court of additional district and sessions judge on Tuesday said the prosecution did not follow the procedures mandated under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. Judge Abhishek Pandey ordered the acquittal of Dilip Kumar, a resident of Sunpura in Mainpuri district, who was already out on bail in a case pertaining to the alleged recovery of diazepam powder by Sector 24 police in 2013. The court observed "grave lapses" in the prosecution case as the recovered substance was not produced before the court, the accused was not searched in front of any neutral witness or magistrate as mandated under Section 50 of the NDPS Act and after sending 24 grams of the recovered powder to the forensic lab, there was no mention of how the remaining one gram of powder was handled. Declaring that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused was arrested with any contraband substance, the court exonerated him from charges under Section 18/20 of the NDPS Act and said that since Kumar was already out on bail, his bailers should be recused. He was, however, directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs 30,000 and two sureties of equal value in the court. "Under established norms, the recovered powder should have been placed in two packets with proper marking and sent for forensic testing and the other kept under seal in the police station, but this has neither been detailed in the case details nor admitted by prosecution witnesses in their deposition," the court observed. The defence counsel objected to the accusations and said that the accused was falsely implicated in the case and that nothing was ever recovered from him. "It was a false story and the procedures under the NDPS Act were not followed by the prosecution," the defence counsel said, seeking exoneration from all charges. It also expressed surprise over the missing one gram of powder and the statement of prosecution witness 3, who said that he received three sealed packets from SI Yadav on the night of the arrest. "If there were three sealed packets, what was in them and where it was kept is not clear," the court observed. According to the prosecution, a police team under sub-inspector Srinivas Yadav was on regular vehicle checking duty near Videocon Square on the evening of Sept 26, 2013, when they received a tip-off about a person coming in that direction with diazepam tablets and a knife. Yadav, who registered an FIR the same day, informed the court that he, along with the police team, intercepted the accused and overpowered him when he was trying to escape. "On asking the reason for escape, he confessed to having diazepam powder and a knife. We informed him about his right to be searched before a magistrate or gazetted officer, but the accused expressed his eagerness to be searched by police and we recovered a white powder, which weighed 25grams of diazepam powder, and a knife," Yadav informed the court. Prosecution witness Yadav, who was referring to the case file during deposition, told the court that he retired in 2016 and was undergoing treatment for depression.
