Warning Scots will pay for Farage's 'reckless' plans to scrap 'Union dividend'
Nigel Farage has launched a 'reckless' plan to consider scrapping the Holyrood funding deal which helps provide an annual 'Union dividend' for every Scottish family.
The Reform UK leader was accused of a 'hare-brained suggestion' after he called for a review of the Barnett Formula and for the Scottish Parliament have more responsibility for raising the money it spends - sparking fears of savage cuts to public services like the NHS and schools or massive tax rises.
He also shrugged off the risk that he could help hand the SNP another five years in power, saying his party could get things done at Holyrood while in opposition.
On his first visit to Scotland in six years, he also doubled down on his race row with Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar and also accused First Minister John Swinney of inciting protesters by branding him a racist.
Mr Farage held a press conference in Aberdeen to warn of the threat of 'deindustrialisation' because of the SNP and Labour's opposition to new oil and gas development, before giving the press pack a slip in Hamilton.
The Barnett Formula determines that the Scottish Government must get extra funding through the block grant as a direct consequence of any public spending in devolved areas south of the Border.
It helped contribute to £1,521 more net expenditure per person in Scotland than across the UK as a whole last year.
Asked whether he would look to scrap the Barnett Formula given he has previously said English taxpayers are 'cheesed off' with the amount of extra money spent in Scotland, Mr Farage said: 'The Barnett Formula, it seems to me, is really somewhat out of date.
'What I'd like to see is a Scottish Government that is able to raise a bit more of its own revenue and a Scottish economy that has actually got genuine growth, and I don't think that can happen without this sector (oil and gas) booming.
'The Barnett Formula goes back to the 1970s. Is there an argument that it should be looked at again? Of course there is.'
He insisted that 'devolution is here to stay' but said it has not been working well.
If Scotland had to raise more of the money it spends, it could lead to massive tax rises or savage spending cuts to balance the books.
Mr Farage shrugged off polling showing that Reform's rising support will help hand the SNP another term as the largest party at Holyrood, saying that his party can shift national debate and government policy 'regardless of whether we are in power or not'.
Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay said: 'The Union dividend is worth thousands of pounds each year to every person in Scotland. Nigel Farage's reckless proposal would slash funding for our NHS, schools, roads and many other essential public services.
'Alternatively, it would mean further tax rises on hard-working Scots – or, more likely, a double whammy of both cuts and tax hikes.
'Reform's hare-brained suggestion of ripping up the Barnett formula is irresponsible. It would take a wrecking ball to our public services and cause misery for Scottish families, workers and businesses.
'The SNP must be delighted by Farage's latest idea because the only people in Scotland who would benefit from scrapping the Union dividend are nationalists. If Farage knew or cared anything about Scotland, he would know that such a reckless move would increase support for the SNP and independence.'
He added: 'Our public services are a complete mess after 18 years of SNP Government. Schools and hospitals need smart investment, not the savage cuts that would be the consequence of Reform's plan.
'Nigel Farage needs his head examined if he thinks scrapping the Union dividend is sensible.'
Mr Farage was greeted by a crowd of around 20 protesters chanting 'Nigel go home' when he arrived at Aberdeen's Pocra Quay, with one banner proclaiming 'Farage not welcome in Scotland'.
He claimed that protests had been incited by Mr Swinney saying he was bringing 'racism and hatred' into the heart of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election.
Mr Farage said he had not heard chants calling him a racist in England 'for a very long time' and said Mr Swinney used the word 'in a deliberate and very, very provocative way'.
He added: 'Do you know what, the more they insult me the more I know we must be doing something right. And I think they are in a blind state of panic. They are chucking around insults.
'I think the First Minister was yesterday trying to be inciteful in what he said. For today, I will not return the compliment. I'm not going to get involved in a war of words.'
He also doubled down on his party's controversial criticism of Mr Sarwar, after it published a social media video claiming he would 'prioritise the Pakistani community'.
Mr Farage said: 'We don't talk about race at all. We think everybody should be treated equally, we object very strongly to the segmentation of people into different types.
'And I think, to be frank, Mr Sarwar has a record of obsessing on this issue.
'There was the speech that he gave in the Scottish Parliament saying 'why are the judiciary white', 'why are these leading figures in Scotland white'. The most extraordinary speech given the statistics and figures here.
'And actually I think that speech that he gave was sectarian in its very nature, you know 'we are the south Asian community, we are going to take over the country, take over the world'.
Reform yesterday unveiled Aberdeen councillor Duncan Massey as the latest to defect to the party from the Conservatives.
Mr Farage said the party is now making 'remarkable strides' in Scotland and said polls suggest it is 'beginning to eclipse Labour' as the second-biggest party north of the Border.
Condemning the opposition of the SNP and Labour governments to new oil and gas development which he said would make the UK more reliant on imports, he said: 'We are seeing Scotland, and many parts of England and Wales, literally deindustrialising before our very eyes.
'Yes there are arguments around new industries, but for every job created in a new industry many more could be lost in conventional industries.
'We now have the most expensive commercial energy prices in the world and the whole thing is complete and utter madness.'
Reform UK Richard Tice said it is a 'tragedy' that Scotland's 'energy treasure' is being left in the sea, and backed a policy of 'drill Scotland drill'.
He said: 'If it aint broke don't fix it. We know it works and we should be accelerating it.
'I now call it net stupid zero. I think it is the greatest act of financial self harm ever imposed on this nation by people at Westminster.'
Mr Farage also yesterday said he is 'confident' of finishing third in Thursday's by-election and it would be 'a very nice surprise' to finish second.
He went on: 'Do I realistically think we could win? Well, if we do then that will be the biggest earthquake Scottish politics has ever seen.'
However, he failed to turn up to a press call organised by his own party ahead of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election on Thursday.
Instead, he chose to have a drink in a pub in Larkhall with a select few with no explanation given to those left waiting.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said 'Today the chief clown Nigel Farage finally found his way to Scotland and showed just how totally out of touch with our country he is.
'Nigel Farage turned up, admitted he can't win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election and pledged to cut funding for Scotland's NHS and public services.
'Nigel Farage is a dangerous clown and the people of Scotland see right through him.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
£350k boss at cash-strapped Scots university claims he 'doesn't know salary'
A university boss who is paid £350,000 a year yesterday said he did not know his 'precise' salary - as he did not 'carry that figure around in my head'. Professor Sir Peter Mathieson, principal of the University of Edinburgh, accepted he is 'very well-paid' but was unable to provide the exact sum. He spoke as lecturers prepare to walk out in a dispute over the university's refusal to rule out 'unacceptable' compulsory redundancies as part of plans to save £140million. The action will see members of the University and College Union (UCU) strike during an open day on June 20, followed by a further five-day walkout in September to coincide with the university's 'welcome week' for new students. Union members are also set to take part in action short of a strike, including working to contract, not covering for absent colleagues, and a 'possible marking and assessment boycott'. The UCU announced the action following a ballot which saw a 60 per cent turnout, with 84 per cent backing strikes and 93 per cent voting in favour of action short of a strike. The news came on the same day Sir Peter appeared before a Holyrood committee, where he defended his six-figure salary and acknowledged the university is not in deficit. Sir Peter insisted that paying the senior management team at the university 'nothing' would 'make largely no difference to the size of the expenditure challenge we face'. Pressed about the cuts the university is planning, including a £90million reduction in the wage bill, Sir Peter said: 'I'm confident the action we're taking now is in the best interests of the university and I am proud of the leadership my team and I are providing in delivering.' He told Holyrood's education committee he does 'not know the precise numbers' of his salary, telling MSPs when challenged on this: 'I don't carry that figure around in my head.' Sir Peter however accepted he is 'very well paid', with committee convener Douglas Ross pointing out the principal's reported salary of £418,000 is more than the combined wages of both First Minister John Swinney and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Sir Peter said when he had checked the salaries of the heads of organisations with a similar turnover to the university, 'for one of them it was £5million, for another it was £17million'. He added: 'I was made an offer by the University of Edinburgh when I was appointed and I accepted it, and I am very satisfied with the package I was offered.' He said his 'basic salary' is 'about £350,000', adding there is a pension supplement on top of this. Sophia Woodman, UCU Edinburgh University branch president, said it is 'not too late' for the strike to be averted, and she called on senior management to rule out compulsory redundancies. She said: 'Staff want a sustainable future for the university as much as anybody and we want to work with senior management to end this dispute. 'But we're clear that the use of compulsory redundancies is unacceptable. 'With the resources and reserves held by the university it can easily afford to rule out sacking staff. 'The decision to let the strike continue, with all the disruption to students that it entails and a possible marking and assessment boycott, is a matter of choice for Peter Mathieson and the university senior management. 'The union's door is open to talks and I'd appeal to them to heed this final warning, rule out compulsory redundancies and end this unnecessary dispute.' The union claimed the proposed £140million of cuts would be the 'largest ever' made by a university in Scotland, and said management have failed to make a case for cuts of this size while at the same time planning 'record' investment in buildings and infrastructure. It added that research and teaching staff are the 'backbone' of the university, and cutting them rather than buildings is a 'false economy'. Jo Grady, UCU general secretary, said: 'UCU members at Edinburgh University are ready and willing to strike to save jobs and save this university, but disruption can still be avoided. 'Edinburgh University is a wealthy university with, at the last count, over £3billion in its reserves. 'The Scottish Government should follow the lead of ministers in Wales and call on universities to use their reserves to avoid job losses.' The union said walkouts will take place on June 20 and September 8-12, with action short of a strike beginning on June 20.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves forced to back down in net zero row with Miliband
Ed Miliband has defeated an attempt by Rachel Reeves to raid one of his key net zero programs in next week's spending review, The Telegraph understands. The Treasury has for months been considering cuts to the £13.2 billion warm homes plan, which aims to insulate properties and make them more energy efficient. But Mr Miliband, the Energy Security Secretary, and Ms Reeves, the Chancellor, are understood to have reached an agreement in the past few days after fraught negotiations and the scheme will remain largely unaffected. The agreement is a boost for net zero supporters in government, chief among them Mr Miliband, who have warned against scaling back green plans. It will also likely be regarded as a sign of the Chancellor's waning influence as Downing Street seeks to placate backbenchers unhappy over spending cuts. The decision is expected to please the Left wing of the party, which is threatening to rebel against Sir Keir Starmer's plans to make cuts to welfare and has been emboldened by a memo sent to Ms Reeves by Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, demanding tax rises. However, it could complicate attempts, spearheaded by Number 10, to counter Reform, which is surging in support on a net zero sceptic platform and could outperform Labour in a Scottish by-election seat on Thursday. Spokesmen for the Treasury, the Energy Security Department and Number 10 all declined to comment, with announcements being unveiled at the spending review on Wednesday. Mr Miliband's victory can be disclosed hours after Ms Reeves warned that she would be tough with some Cabinet colleagues. Delivering a speech in Rochdale on Wednesday morning, the Chancellor said that 'not every department will get everything that they want next week' as she has had to 'say no' to things that she would support in an ideal world. Following a major about-turn by Sir Keir to appease backbenchers, millions of pensioners will be handed back their annual winter fuel payments of up to £300 next week, when the details of a reversal in last year's cut are announced. Some wealthy pensioners will still not receive the payment – meaning confusion continues on what the new policy will become – and it is unclear how the reversal will be funded. Meanwhile, the Government has announced that there will be £1 billion for an extra 500,000 free school meals over the next three years, lifting an estimated 100,000 children out of deprivation. Cabinet ministers have been locked in negotiations with the Treasury for months over the spending review, which will set out day-to-day departmental budgets for the next three years. Mr Miliband, the former Labour leader who heads up the net zero brief in government, was one of the few remaining Cabinet ministers still battling the Treasury this week. Sources last week were forced to deny reports he 'stormed out' of a meeting with Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, amid a row over cuts. Ms Rayner is also said to have clashed with the Chancellor over the spending review, with sources previously claiming she had complained 'forcibly' about proposed cuts to housing. But The Telegraph understands Mr Miliband has now reached agreement with Ms Reeves and has seen off an attempt to raid a major net zero scheme. The warm homes plan is an initiative to lift more than 1 million households out of fuel poverty by 2030, reducing energy bills as well as making houses more energy-efficient. It includes investment to insulate homes – thereby making them more energy-efficient – and grants for heat pumps. Labour promised an extra £6.6 billion for the plan in its general election manifesto last summer, taking the total to be spent on the program to £13.2 billion. A hint that Ms Reeves had given ground came on Wednesday morning when she said publicly that manifesto promises would be kept to in the spending review. The negotiations with ministers have been fraught because, despite a £300 billion boost to spending this parliament, some departments still face real-terms cuts in the years ahead. It has prompted protests from a string of departments and public officials, with police chiefs warning the Prime Minister that cuts would force them to decide which crimes to investigate. The politics of the Government have been shifting over its legal commitment to make the UK a 'net zero' carbon emitter, complicating Labour's approach. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has withdrawn her support for the target, making one of her first policy commitments of office the insistence that achieving the ambition by 2050 is 'impossible'. The repositioning, which comes despite it being the Conservatives under Theresa May who brought in the legal target, moves the Tories closer to Reform's position on net zero. Nigel Farage's party wants to scrap the policy entirely. Opinion polls show that while the public support hitting net zero, that drops markedly when voters are asked if they are willing to take a financial hit to achieve it. Mr Miliband has been the driving force behind the Government's net zero stance. Others in the Labour movement, including leading trade unions, oppose the new North Sea oil licence ban. The Energy Secretary's win comes after he lost battles over the expansion of Heathrow Airport and clashed with Sir Tony Blair when the former prime minister raised doubts over whether net zero was feasible.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Will Miliband deliver higher energy prices but still not hit net zero?
Ed Miliband is at odds with the Chancellor over how much money his department will receive in the rest of this parliament. Rachel Reeves is finalising her spending plans for the next four years, to be announced next week, and has told her colleagues that they will not all get what they want. Indeed, apart from protected budgets like the NHS and an increase in defence spending, paid for out of the overseas aid budget, all Whitehall ministries face a hit if the Chancellor is to avoid putting up taxes. But Mr Miliband is in a quandary because he has pledged to decarbonise the electricity grid by 2030. His difficulty is that this timetable lacks any credibility. A report from the House of Lords industry committee says it will require 'building more energy generation and network infrastructure at a faster pace than Great Britain has managed in recent years'. The committee suggests Mr Miliband could make his sums work through so-called 'zonal pricing'. Peers say this would enable better use of existing capacity and reduce the amount of grid – ie pylons and other connectors – thereby circumventing planning battles in the countryside. This would involve splitting the single energy market into regions with the price determined by supply and demand within each area. It would mean increasing bills in London, the South East and the Midlands, where renewables are in short supply, while they would fall in Scotland because of its plentiful wind farms. The likelihood, therefore, is that Mr Miliband will miss his targets while putting up the electricity bills of millions. That should go down well at the next election
