logo
Michigan House sues SOS Jocelyn Benson over access to election training materials

Michigan House sues SOS Jocelyn Benson over access to election training materials

CBS News2 days ago

The Republican-controlled Michigan House has filed a lawsuit against Secretary of State Jocelyn over access to election training materials used to train clerks and staff on the state's elections.
The lawsuit was filed on Thursday in the state Court of Claims after lawmakers said Benson failed to comply with a subpoena issued by GOP Rep. Jay DeBoyer.
The House requests the court acknowledge that it submitted a valid subpoena that Benson must comply with and issue an injunction preventing her or the Department of State from modifying records.
"Our commitment to bring accountability to Lansing is not just lip service," DeBoyer (R-Clay Township) said in a news release. "After going years without legislative oversight, Benson has clearly grown comfortable operating independent of the other, co-equal branches of government. For months, we have tried to get her cooperation through requests, then accommodating offers, and then legal demands. Her continued defiance now brings us to the courtroom, where we will continue to diligently work to deliver government transparency for the people of Michigan."
The Michigan Department of State says it has provided more than 3,300 pages of materials. However, it says the documents requested by lawmakers are "sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials."
The department says Benson asked lawmakers to allow a court to review the request.
"Let's be clear - the Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee is demanding information that could be used to interrupt the chain of custody of ballots, tamper with election equipment, or impersonate a clerk on Election Day," the department said in a statement. "While we are committed to transparency, we will never compromise our duty to ensure Michigan's elections are safe and secure. We look forward to working with a judge to come to a resolution that will resolve this dispute."
According to the lawsuit, the House claims that Benson and the Department of State violated the subpoena by deliberately refusing the request.
Benson argued that releasing the confidential documents to the House Oversight Committee would risk sharing them with the public. However, lawmakers disputed that claim in the lawsuit, saying the subpoena is "supported by a valid legislative purpose" and Benson's reasons for not providing the documents are meritless.
"Because elections are quickly approaching (with the next election day occurring on November 4, 2025, and primaries occurring even earlier on August 5, 2025) and the term of the 103rd Legislature is limited in duration (ending on January 1, 2027), every day Defendants obstruct access to the subpoenaed election training materials, Defendants undermine the ability of the House to fulfill its constitutional duty to regulate and safeguard the purity of elections," read the lawsuit.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alabama kindergarten teacher, 49, accused of enticing teen into bathroom for sexual encounter
Alabama kindergarten teacher, 49, accused of enticing teen into bathroom for sexual encounter

Fox News

time8 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Alabama kindergarten teacher, 49, accused of enticing teen into bathroom for sexual encounter

An Alabama kindergarten "Teacher of the Year" was arrested Friday morning on sex charges involving local teenagers. Heather Ozment, 49, who is an educator at Calera Elementary School, is charged with sexual abuse in the first and second degree and enticing a child to enter a vehicle or house for immoral purposes. The Calera Police Department said that the alleged conduct happened after school hours and did not occur at a school facility or with Ozment's students. Ozment was awarded Teacher of the Year for 2024-2025, per the school's Facebook page. "Allegations involving sexual misconduct with minors must be investigated immediately, thoroughly, and methodically, David Hyche, the chief of police at the said in a press release. "Nothing we do in law enforcement is more important than protecting the most vulnerable in our community." Hyche said that Owens House, a children's advocacy non-profit, partnered with police to conduct forensic interviews and examinations of the juvenile victims. Shelby County Schools officials said they were made aware of the allegations in April. It is unclear when the alleged crimes took place. "The teacher was immediately put on leave for the remainder of the school year while the matter was investigated by local law enforcement," according to a school statement provided to "The alleged conduct occurred after school hours and did not take place at a school facility. We are unable to provide more information as it is an employee matter." According to the Shelby County Jail, Ozment was booked into the facility on Friday and released on the same day.

Man, 72, shot during attempted armed robbery in Belmont Cragin neighborhood
Man, 72, shot during attempted armed robbery in Belmont Cragin neighborhood

CBS News

time12 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Man, 72, shot during attempted armed robbery in Belmont Cragin neighborhood

A 72-year-old man was hurt after being shot during an attempted armed robbery on the city's Northwest Side Friday night. It happened around 11:30 p.m. in the 5300 block of W. Belmont Avenue. Chicago police said the victim was parking his vehicle when an unknown armed man attempted to remove property from the victim through the vehicle's window. The victim opened his car door, and a struggle ensued between the two. That's when the gun fell to the ground and discharged, hitting the victim in the leg. The would-be robber ran from the scene. The victim self-transported to Community First Hospital in good condition. As of Saturday, there is no one in custody. Area 5 detectives are investigating.

Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M
Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M

Associated Press

time17 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M

The attorneys who shepherded the blockbuster antitrust lawsuit to fruition for hundreds of thousands of college athletes will share in just over $475 million in fees, and the figure could rise to more than $725 million over the next 10 years. The request for plaintiff legal fees in the House vs. NCAA case, outlined in a December court filing and approved Friday night, struck experts in class-action litigation as reasonable. Co-lead counsels Steve Berman and Jeffrey Kessler asked for $475.2 million, or 18.3% of the cash common funds of $2.596 billion. They also asked for an additional $250 million, for a total of $725.2 million, based on a widely accepted estimate of an additional $20 billion in direct benefits to athletes over the 10-year settlement term. That would be 3.2% of what would then be a $22.596 billion settlement. 'Class Counsel have represented classes of student-athletes in multiple litigations challenging NCAA restraints on student-athlete compensation, and they have achieved extraordinary results. Class Counsel's representation of the settlement class members here is no exception,' U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken wrote. University of Buffalo law professor Christine Bartholomew, who researched about 1,300 antitrust class-action settlements from 2005-22 for a book she authored, told The Associated Press the request for attorneys' fees could have been considered a bit low given the difficulty of the case, which dates back five years. She said it is not uncommon for plaintiffs' attorneys to be granted as much as 30% of the common funds. Attorneys' fees generally are calculated by multiplying an hourly rate by the number of hours spent working on a case. In class-action lawsuits, though, plaintiffs' attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they get paid at the end of the case only if the class wins a financial settlement. 'Initially, you look at it and think this is a big number,' Bartholomew said. 'When you look at how contingency litigation works generally, and then you think about how this fits into the class-action landscape, this is not a particularly unusual request.' The original lawsuit was filed in June 2020 and it took until November 2023 for Wilken to grant class certification, meaning she thought the case had enough merit to proceed. Elon University law professor Catherine Dunham said gaining class certification is challenging in any case, but especially a complicated one like this. 'If a law firm takes on a case like this where you have thousands of plaintiffs and how many depositions and documents, what that means is the law firm can't do other work while they're working on the case and they are taking on the risk they won't get paid,' Dunham said. 'If the case doesn't certify as a class, they won't get paid.' In the request for fees, the firm of Hagens Berman said it had dedicated 33,952 staff hours to the case through mid-December 2024. Berman, whose rate is $1,350 per hour, tallied 1,116.5 hours. Kessler, of Winston & Strawn, said he worked 1,624 hours on the case at a rate of $1,980 per hour. The case was exhaustive. Hundreds of thousands of documents totaling millions of pages were produced by the defendants — the NCAA, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC — as part of the discovery process. Berman and Kessler wrote the 'plaintiffs had to litigate against six well-resourced defendants and their high-powered law firms who fought every battle tooth and nail. To fend off these efforts, counsel conducted extensive written discovery and depositions, and submitted voluminous expert submissions and lengthy briefing. In addition, class counsel also had to bear the risk of perpetual legislative efforts to kill these cases.' Antitrust class-action cases are handled by the federal court system and have been harder to win since 2005, when the U.S. Class Action Fairness Act was passed, according to Bartholomew. 'Defendants bring motion after motion and there's more of a pro-defendant viewpoint in federal court than there had been in state court,' she said. 'As a result, you would not be surprised that courts, when cases do get through to fruition, are pretty supportive of applications for attorneys' fees because there's great risk that comes from bringing these cases fiscally for the firms who, if the case gets tossed early, never gets compensated for the work they've done.' ___ AP college sports:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store