logo
April heralds return of migratory birds to UK – unless the weather turns cruel

April heralds return of migratory birds to UK – unless the weather turns cruel

Yahoo17-04-2025

Despite TS Eliot's famous reworking of the opening lines to Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, April is not usually the cruellest month, weather-wise. For birders, it sees the welcome return of the majority of long-distance migrants from their winter quarters in sub-Saharan Africa – including warblers, flycatchers and chats, along with those masters of the air: swallows, martins and swifts.
Both we and the birds hope for clear skies and soft southerly winds, allowing these global voyagers to safely cross the Channel to Britain.
But from time to time, April's weather feels more like February or March, with a bitingly cold airstream from the north or east, rather than the south. April 1989 was one of the coldest on record, with persistent northerly winds bringing widespread snowfalls, stopping those returning migrants in their tracks.
Just five years later, April 1994 had equally bad weather, but this time from a very different direction. That year, a series of Atlantic depressions brought cool, unsettled weather, rain and westerly winds. Once again, this presented a formidable barrier to returning migrants, and delayed their arrival.
Some of the worst spring weather conditions for birds occurred in April 1981, with easterlies bringing heavy snowfalls. Towards the end of that month, heavy north-easterly gales caused a major 'wreck' of seabirds in the North Sea, many of which were swept inland on the strong winds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic
Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump for uninviting him and his family from the White House picnic. Paul has opposed the Trump administration's decision to 'actively' seek to suspend habeas corpus. Habeas corpus — the constitutional freedom that translates to 'you should have the body' in Latin — ensures that detained individuals, whether or not they are citizens, are able to physically appear in front of a judge. 'I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Paul told reporters on Wednesday. 'I just find this incredibly petty. I mean — I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the president.' The picnic is an annual event held by the White House on the South Lawn, which members from both aisles of Congress typically attend. 'They've decided they want to declare war on my family and exclude us from the White House, and I just think it's incredibly petty,' Paul added on Wednesday, saying that White House staffers are 'running sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' Paul said his son, daughter-in-law and infant grandson were supposed to attend the picnic with him. He also added that he did not receive an explanation as to why they all were no longer invited, and he's not sure if the revoked invitation came from Trump or his staffers. Habeas corpus is 'one most fundamental rights we have,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells it they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' Paul has drawn Trump's ire on more than one occasion in recent days. Earlier this month, Paul voiced concerns about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' prompting Trump to take jabs at him online. 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' Paul also criticized Trump's upcoming military parade on Saturday, Trump's birthday. Paul told HuffPost the parade reminded him of the Soviet Union and North Korea. The White House did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. Trump Seethes Over Rand Paul Continuing To Oppose 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million

FEATURE: A reopened nuke launch site in Okinawa reveals a dark legacy
FEATURE: A reopened nuke launch site in Okinawa reveals a dark legacy

Kyodo News

time29 minutes ago

  • Kyodo News

FEATURE: A reopened nuke launch site in Okinawa reveals a dark legacy

By Satomi Ishihara, KYODO NEWS - 1 minutes ago - 13:27 | All, Japan The tranquil village of Onna is one of Okinawa's most beautiful spots. Scenic beaches, dramatic rock formations and lavish seaside resorts dot the coast. But there's a dark legacy here -- a former nuclear cruise missile launch site built during the postwar U.S. military occupation. The Mace B cruise missile launch site is the last remainder of four that were constructed in the 1960s. Opened to the public for the first time this spring, the large concrete building, roughly 9 meters tall and 100 meters wide, sits on a hill facing the East China Sea. The United States occupied Okinawa from 1945 to 1972. As Cold War tensions increased, it accelerated its deployment of nuclear weapons on the main island despite anti-nuclear sentiment in Japan following the radioactive contamination of a Japanese fishing boat in the mid-1950s. The Fukuryu Maru No. 5 was exposed to fallout from the U.S. Castle Bravo nuclear weapon test at Bikini Atoll in 1954, killing one crew member and sickening the other 22. Following Okinawa's return to Japanese rule in May 1972, Soka Gakkai, a major Japanese Buddhist organization, purchased the lot that included the Onna launch site in 1976. With this year marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, the group restored the interior and opened the base to the public in March. Some 3,000 people have visited so far. "It gave me goosebumps. I was aware of problems involving U.S. military bases, but I had no idea about the deployment of nuclear weapons (in Okinawa)," said a 41-year-old woman who was visiting the site from Sapporo, northern Japan, with her parents. "Okinawa might not exist now if any nuclear missiles had been fired," she said. Isao Kuwae, 61, secretary general of Soka Gakkai in Okinawa, suggested that when the missile base was being erected local contractors may not have known what they were building. He added the Onna site is "the only place where you can see with your own eyes the past presence of nuclear weapons in Okinawa." A Mace B cruise missile was said to have a payload 70 times more powerful than the atomic bomb that the U.S. military dropped on Hiroshima in August 1945, killing an estimated 140,000 people by the end of the year. With a range of over 2,000 kilometers, the missiles, deployed at the bases in Okinawa in the first half of the 1960s, could strike China and parts of the Soviet Union. They were reportedly made ready for war during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. But with the subsequent development of new missiles, the need for Mace B missiles diminished. They were removed from Okinawa starting in 1969, when the Japanese and U.S. governments agreed on Okinawa's return to Japan without nuclear weapons. Although Japan regained sovereignty and independence in 1952 under the terms of the San Fransico Peace Treaty, Okinawa continued under U.S. military rule for the next 20 years. In 1967, Japanese Prime Minister Eisaku Sato declared the so-called three non-nuclear principles -- not producing, not possessing and not allowing any nation to bring nuclear weapons into Japanese territory. At the time, the U.S. had some 1,300 nuclear weapons in Okinawa. "The three principles came into existence because there were nuclear weapons in Okinawa," said Masaaki Gabe, 70, professor emeritus at the University of the Ryukyus. "The Japanese government felt assured because of U.S. protection." Despite occupying approximately 0.6 percent of Japan's total land area, Okinawa still hosts some 70 percent of U.S. military facilities in the country, Gabe noted. In Yomitan, another Okinawa village where Mace B missiles had been deployed, Junshi Toyoda, 65, a local government official involved in compilation of the village history, said that present fears about the possible deployment of long-range missiles still exist. Threats from contemporary missiles with a firing range of several thousand kilometers overlap with those caused by the presence of nuclear weapons in the past. "The fact that nuclear weapons exist today makes it easier to feel the crises that was close to home during the Cold War era. I hope people will first learn about the deployment history of nuclear weapons in Okinawa," Toyoda said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store