The International Criminal Court is not doing its job
The International Criminal Court (ICC) should intervene only where national legal systems fail – a principle that is known as complementarity. So why has it gone after Bibi Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of a country with a legal system so independent that he is already on trial there? And why, with so much evidence, is no living Palestinian terrorist facing arrest by the ICC in connection with the Hamas-led October 7 attacks on Israel?
Next week a panel of senior parliamentarians led by historian Lord Roberts of Belgravia will publish the 7 October Parliamentary Commission Report. The ICC should pay attention. For the report is expected to offer harrowing insight into the barbaric acts carried out by Hamas.
October 7 was no ordinary terrorist act. The catalogue of crimes included murder, hostage-taking, arson, mutilation and rape – much of it recorded and live-streamed by Hamas. Even corpses were kidnapped.
Israel had been routinely condemned for its blockade of Gaza which critics said was grossly disproportionate. But by 7 October Hamas had amassed vast quantities of advanced weapons and munitions. Far from being disproportionate, the blockade had in fact been far less than adequate.
There is no doubt that Hamas intended to launch a widespread attack against the civilian population in Israel. Under international law, acts of extermination, murder, torture or rape committed as part of such an attack against civilians amount to crimes against humanity.
Under the Genocide Convention, acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group may amount to genocide. That is what Hamas intended – and still intends.
Much is being said about the alleged disproportionality of Israel's response. But proportionality is a much-misunderstood concept.
Belligerents must ensure that in every attack the risk to civilian life or property is not excessive in relation to the military advantage they anticipate. What counts as excessive? It depends on the circumstances.
In the past, grim ratios between combatant and civilian deaths are believed to have been employed by countries, including Western ones. Grim though they might be, the fact that they exist means that those belligerents are seeking to abide by the basic principles of the law of armed conflict: distinguish between civilians and combatants at all times, and never deliberately target the former. But the destruction of civilian life was Hamas's central objective.
Proportionality also defines the measure of what overall a state can do in self-defence. The overall military force must be proportionate to the objective of stopping and repelling the attack and, where that attack was not an isolated occurrence, preventing future ones. With an attack on the scale of 7 October, and an enemy that controls territory and resources and publicly shares its intention to plan more attacks, it can hardly be suggested that Israel's legitimate self-defence objectives have been met.
Imagine if scores of small towns and villages had been destroyed in Britain, with thousands killed and wounded, and hundreds raped, mutilated or taken hostage. And then imagine the enemy sitting a stone's throw away, continuing to launch rockets and planning more.
What would be a proportionate response?
The leaders of Hamas were so bent on the destruction of Jewish life that they orchestrated and executed the biggest pogrom against Jews since the Holocaust.
The ICC should be acting against them, not Netanyahu.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
NATALIE LISBONA: As sirens wail I text a friend in her shelter. She tells me a missile has just killed seven... it could easily have been us
Yesterday was terrible, and relentless. A day of strikes which begins in the early hours of Sunday morning, 2.19am in fact, with the hideous, piercing shriek that rings out from my phone and means a fresh Iranian attack is imminent. Once again I scramble to get three kids, two dogs, bottled water and a flashlight into the bomb shelter in our backyard. Then I text my colleagues in London: 'We're being attacked.' It's the third day of the Iranian missile onslaught and civilians are still being targeted by the regime. The Houthis – Iran-backed militants in Yemen – also join in by sending missiles. The middle of the night seems a favourite time to attack, probably to grind down our morale by depriving us of sleep. Though of course the attacks continue in the day. Since there is no internet or wi-fi in the shelter we turn on an old-fashioned radio. The door is shut tight with a special lock – Israelis had them installed after Hamas 's October 7 massacres, when many terrorists forced their way into shelters, shooting those inside or throwing grenades. There is enough of a mobile signal to send an SMS to my friend who lives in the city of Bat Yam, next door to Tel Aviv, asking if she and her family are OK. And then the sirens wail again, putting me in mind always of Second World War films about the Blitz. At first we hear the loudest roar – enough to silence my chatty kids, and even Lula, the lunatic chihuahua, for once. Our other chihuahua, Super Ted, is shaking like a leaf. At a guess it was probably an Israeli fighter jet. Then several very, very loud booms. At one point I could swear a gush of air blew inside the shelter, but I am weary and half asleep. 'I am really scared, Mummy,' one of my teens cries. What on earth can I tell her? My friend texts me: 'That was the loudest noise I have ever heard.' Just a few blocks away from her home in Bat Yam, a direct hit from a ballistic missile has killed seven, including two children, with more than 100 injured and others still unaccounted for. At the time of writing, there are three still missing, likely to be trapped under rubble. It doesn't bear thinking about. 'It could have been us,' she says. 'I am shaking,' she tells me after sending a video taken from a friend's balcony yesterday, in which a huge ball of fire crashes through the night sky at ferocious speed into a civilian area. The Israel Defence Forces say that those who died were not in their bomb shelters. Why on Earth not? My only conclusion is that they have become desensitised. I have now lost count of the times we have had to run to the shelter. It's all a big blur, and the only way I can remember is by checking my phone for the time stamps on the air-raid alerts. The most recent at the time of writing, 4.08pm and 8.34pm. No doubt we will be back in the shelter before dawn. Israelis are constantly asking, 'How long is this to continue?' I have been told it could be weeks. On Saturday night, before the onslaught, we were laughing about a message being endlessly forwarded on WhatsApp that advises people to pack cash and passports in case they have to make a run for it. My friend has done exactly this, but I joke that we wouldn't get very far because all the airports are closed. In one video now all over social media, a man jokes that he only survived the missile blast that devastated the front room of his home because of divine intervention – a sudden call of nature that sent him to the lavatory. In the face of adversity, the Israelis are full of humour. It is a nation that can cope with suffering. Since the State of Israel was born almost 80 years ago, its citizens have had to survive the countless terror attacks, long before October 7. They cannot forget, though, that more than 50 of their compatriots are still being held hostage by Hamas in Gaza. The country is feeling it. One friend, a mum of two, told me: 'I am in a state of shock and sadness, how much more should Israelis endure?' These latest attacks feel like something different. One of the world's crazed regimes launching its vast arsenal in a fanatical attempt to wipe you from the face of the earth. But Israelis realise their present suffering cannot be avoided. They have no choice but to fight for their future. If Iran were to get nukes, the whole world would be held hostage to the mullahs. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday raised the terrifying prospect that the Iranians were planning to give nukes to their proxies – Hamas in Gaza, the Houthis in Yemen and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Dana Berry, a mother of two, sums up the national mood: 'We are nervous but confident. It's not easy for families with children but I believe it's for the better. 'The world will be a safer place today than it was yesterday,' she says. This morning I receive a flurry of messages from people asking if we are OK. I wonder how many times they must have asked us this now. Sleep-deprived and drained by constant worry for loved ones, Israelis know they are suffering for a greater cause: the safety of the world against a nuclear armed rogue state. The question is, when will this all stop?
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Gaza 'being forgotten' as Israel and Iran descend into all-out war
Gaza is being overlooked and left in a 'complete communications blackout' after the exchange of fire between Israel and Iran, a TV personality has warned. The latest escalation of tensions between the countries has removed the spotlight from Gazans as eight civilians were killed and dozens wounded in a shooting near food distribution points on Sunday, according to Palestinian health officials. TV personality Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall said the latest developments were 'catastrophic' for Gaza as the media focus switched to air strikes in Tehran and Tel Aviv, and pressure has eased on Israel from the international community. He told BBC's Laura Kuenssberg: 'One of things I've been thinking about is the Middle Eastern story that for the first time isn't really on the front pages, and that's the people of Gaza. 'This is an absolute disaster for them. At a time when international concern about the mounting atrocities of innocent civilians being slaughtered in their food queues was really beginning to shake loose, today the Saudi French summit on the state of Palestine has been postponed indefinitely.' 'Gaza has just been in a complete communications blackout as if things couldn't get any worse. I think we need to spare a thought for them', he added. Israel's military did not immediately comment on the attack at the food distribution site, which occurred more than 20 months after the war in Gaza was first ignited by Hamas's October 7 attack. Early on Friday, Israel turned its focus on Iran, targeting nuclear infrastructure and, more recently, oil fields. On Sunday night, Israel reportedly targeted Iran's foreign ministry building. Mohammad Kazemi, the head of the Intelligence Organisation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and his deputy were also killed in air strikes, the Iranian news agency Tasnin. Meanwhile, fires were reported near the city of Haifa following a wave of Iranian air strikes in northern Israel, with several patients rushed to hospitals. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Witnesses in Gaza said Israeli forces opened fire around dawn towards crowds of desperate Palestinians heading to two aid sites in Rafah. Experts and aid workers say Israel's blockade and military campaign have caused widespread hunger and raised the risk of famine. The shooting was metres from a site operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a group that Israel and the United States hope will replace the UN aid distribution system. The international body says the new group violates humanitarian principles. There have been near-daily shootings near the sites since they opened last month. Witnesses say Israeli forces have repeatedly fired on the crowds and health officials say scores have been killed. The military has acknowledged firing warning shots at what it says were suspects approaching its forces. 'There were wounded, dead, and martyrs', Ahmed al-Masri said Sunday as he returned from one of the sites empty-handed. 'It's a trap.' Umm Hosni al-Najjar said she joined the crowd heading to the aid point in Rafah's Tal al-Sultan neighbourhood at around 4.30am local time. She said the shooting began as people were advancing to the site a few minutes after her arrival. 'There were many wounded and martyrs,' she said. 'No-one was able to evacuate them.' The Nasser Hospital in the nearby city of Khan Younis said it received eight bodies after the shooting. The aid system rolled out last month has been marred by chaos and violence, while the UN system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order, despite Israel loosening a total blockade it imposed from early March to mid-May. Israel and the US have accused Hamas of siphoning off aid from the UN-run system, while UN officials say there is no evidence of systematic diversion. The UN says the new system does not meet Gaza's needs, allows Israel to control who gets aid and risks further mass displacement as people move closer to the sites. Two distribution sites are in the southernmost city of Rafah, which is now mostly inhabited, and all three are in Israeli military zones that are off limits to independent media. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation insisted there had been no violence in or around the distribution points. It has warned people to stay on the designated routes and recently paused delivery to discuss safety measures with the military. More Trending Hamas started the war with its attack on southern Israel on October 7 2023, when Palestinian militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took another 251 hostage. The militants still hold 53 hostages, fewer than half of them alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel said it had eliminated 20,000 militants. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Three ways latest Middle East crisis could make life more expensive in the UK MORE: All 9 countries on the UK Foreign Office 'no go' travel list MORE: Is it safe to travel to Cyprus? Latest Foreign Office tourist advice after Israel strikes Iran
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
KEVIN MAGUIRE: 'This isn't UK's war - we risk repeating Middle East mistakes'
That Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu is behaving like the menacing leader of a rogue state is a truth that Keir Starmer dare not speak but must beware or Britain will be dragged into another bloody Middle East war. Scuppering nuclear talks that had a reasonable prospect of success by attacking Iran was the calculated act of an Israeli Prime Minister who daily treats the British Prime Minister with contempt by ignoring pleas to end the unforgivable slaughter and suffering of Palestinians in Gaza. Iran isn't Britain's conflict and to be sucked into a conflagration, should pleas for restraint be ignored by the two sides, would risk repeating the mistakes of Iraq and Afghanistan. Deploying RAF jets and military to protect British personnel and bases may be a sensible precaution. Fighting with Israel would not when a traditional ally is run by the most reactionary Right-wing group in its history. Netanyahu's itched to assault Iran for years, Donald Trump the first US President to let him to call the shots. Stopping Iran developing nuclear weapons to join Britain, Israel, US, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan and North Korea as the world's 10th country with the doomsday bomb is desirable if also hypocritical of those retaining or bolstering their own WMD arsenals. How the international community halts proliferation since Trump, in his first Presidency, unilaterally ripped up a treaty shackling Tehran, is a huge challenge. But a Netanyahu who on his watch didn't keep Israelis safe from the horrendous Hamas pogrom is endangering his people. He isn't interested in a two-state solution with Palestinians, Israeli war crimes in Gaza and settler violence in the occupied West Bank the river-to-the-sea drive of extremists in his own cabinet. Hezbollah in Lebanon was decapitated at the cost, it must be remembered, of many civilian casualties. Regime change in oppressed, illiberal, despotic Iran would, depending on who came next, in all likelihood be a gain for that country and wider world. But Netanyahu is out of control, a truth Starmer knows and should follow even while biting his tongue. Bright and a terrific talker, young transplant patient Charlie Frieland is truly inspiring when much of his childhood was stolen by kidney disease. I watched as MPs and Peers hung on his every word as the 15-year-old detailed without a hint of pity the anguish and suffering he endured. Wes Streeting too, the UK Health Secretary quipping that speaking after articulate Charlie at a Parliamentary meeting organised by Lord Dave Watts was a hospital pass. Charlie's on the mend, 'I've been handed back my childhood' since the transplant he said, and is a champion of home dialysis which Streeting is committed to expanding. It saves patients travelling long distances and the NHS precious resources, costing between £16,000 and £23,000 per patient annually against £20,000 to £23,000 in a unit and up to £33,000 when transport is included. Streeting has only one kidney after losing the second to cancer so is acutely aware of why the NHS is a lifeline. Increasing home dialysis from 17.4% would benefit more Charlies and demonstrate extra cash is invested wisely. By chance a close friend of mine with dodgy kidneys recently started treatment at home and works or watches TV while his blood is cleaned. Frieland and Streeting could prove an unstoppable force for good, transforming lives and the nation's health. A wrecker never a builder, blockhead Nigel Farage is the Mr No of British politics. Opposing change for the sake of it, particularly when that change is popular and demonstrably beneficial, is the instinctive hostility of a golf club bore stuck in the 1950s. We saw it again with his boorish, let's reverse the deal, reaction to Foreign Secretary David Lammy's historic deal with Spain to ease border controls with Gibraltar. Gibraltar's elected First Minister, charismatic Fabian Picardo, is delighted but true to form old stick-in-the-mud Nige was instantly against. The boozer with no idea how to stop the boats, and whose latest false promise is sending men back down South Wales' shut pits rather than creating better paid, safer hi-tech jobs, is shallow and clueless. I'm making exposing him and them a personal mission. Laugh? I nearly died guffawing when judges ruled 20% VAT on private school fees is a rare Brexit freedom. Dismissing a legal challenge from privileged parents, the High Court opined that Labour imposing the surcharge to fund breakfast clubs and extra teachers for the great unwashed would not have been possible under EU law. 'This is therefore one respect in which the UK's exit from the EU has increased the scope of Parliament's freedom to determine policy,' concluded the legal eagles. Now, Brexit remains a living standards-hurting, trade-destroying £100billion-plus disastrous national own goal. But thank you very much Nigel Farage, Boris Johnson and Kemi Badenoch for the private school VAT you all oppose. Losers.
