
Florida Republican's bill would make Trump orders permanent in bid for US 'dominance' in key industry
FIRST ON FOX: A Republican Florida congressman is looking to codify several of President Donald Trump's executive actions pertaining to domestic energy production through legislative action he took Monday.
Rep. Byron Donalds, who has been endorsed by Trump to replace term-limited Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, introduced the "Strengthening American Nuclear Energy Act" in an effort to codify four of the president's executive actions related to boosting nuclear energy production and use in the United States. Trump signed the orders late last-month.
"In November, the American people granted us an unprecedented mandate to implement President Trump's America First Agenda. Now more than ever, it's up to Congress to hold up our end of the bargain," Donalds told Fox News Digital. "Energy security is national security, and it's imperative that our nation re-asserts our dominance in the nuclear space."
On May 23, Trump signed four executive orders aimed at accelerating the development and deployment of nuclear energy in the United States.
One of those orders, the "Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies for National Security," directs the Army to build a nuclear reactor "at a domestic military base or installation" by September 30, 2028. The order also directs the Secretary of Energy to establish artificial intelligence data centers that run on nuclear energy at Department of Energy facilities across the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia, with the goal of having the first one completed within the next 30-months. Finally, in addition to these measures and others, the wide-ranging executive order directs the country to pursue at least 20 new international nuclear cooperation agreements.
Meanwhile, another one of the orders that Donalds' legislation seeks to codify compels the Secretaries of Defense, Transportation and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to prepare a comprehensive report within 240 days of when the order was signed. The report is supposed to include a national strategy to support the management of spent nuclear fuel and other "high-level waste," an evaluation of the current reprocessing and recycling efforts related to spent nuclear fuel and recommendations on how to improve it, and a program to develop methods and techniques for transporting used and unused nuclear fuel.
The order also includes several other timelines, including one for the publication of a report on how to strengthen domestic uranium conversion capacity and enrichment capabilities. It also imposes timelines for the government to update its nuclear energy policies to spur production, and says that at least 10 large nuclear reactors must be under construction no later than 2030.
The final two orders from Trump, which Donalds is seeking to codify, are largely aimed at reducing regulatory burdens surrounding nuclear energy production.
The first of the two seeks to reform the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in order to help accelerate domestic nuclear energy production. The order aims to do away with what it describes as the NRC's excessive caution that has hindered the growth of nuclear energy in the United States.
The second regulatory-focused nuclear energy directive from Trump is aimed at reforming the Department of Energy's nuclear reactor testing, in an effort to speed up the development of nuclear power plants. For instance, the order requires officials at the Energy Department to revise internal procedures to ensure that new reactors can become operational within two years of when builders apply to construct it.
The safety risks of nuclear energy have long been a debate among energy policymakers in Washington. Part of Trump's orders are to expedite some of the safety regulations which his administration claims have been stifling domestic nuclear energy production.
However, nuclear energy experts, such as Ernest Moniz, an Obama-era energy secretary and nuclear physicist, have said Trump's move to reform the NRC could be problematic.
"Reorganizing and reducing the independence of the NRC could lead to the hasty deployment of advanced reactors with safety and security flaws," Moniz told the Washington Post. "A major event would, like those in the past, increase regulatory requirements and set back nuclear energy for a long time."
Others, such as Paul Dickman, a former senior staffer on the NRC, have said Trump's reforms have "no scientific foundation."
"You can't just do this by fiat," Dickman told the Post.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, GOP Senators Discussed Cutting SALT Break in Tax Bill
Donald Trump and Republican senators discussed ways to scale back the $40,000 state and local tax deduction cap in the House version of the president's tax-cut bill, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said. 'There really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the SALT issue,' Thune told reporters as he departed the meeting with Trump on Wednesday.

Miami Herald
32 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Temu suffers major loss as consumers change their tune
Chinese online marketplace Temu, which became famous for selling a wide range of products priced between $1 and $50, appears to be suffering the consequences of harsh decisions it made a few months ago in response to a growing threat. In April, President Donald Trump made several crucial changes to his tariff policy (tariffs are taxes companies pay to import goods from overseas). He imposed a whopping 145% tariff on all goods imported from China. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Trump also signed an executive order on April 2 to end a trade rule called "de minimis," which took effect in May. This rule allowed goods from China that are less than $800 to enter the U.S. country duty-free with minimal inspections. Related: Temu quietly makes drastic decision as consumers switch gears He also issued an executive order on April 9 imposing a 120% tax on small parcels under $800 from China, Hong Kong, and Macau. In response to these changes, Temu posted a notice on its website warning customers that it will have to increase its prices. "Due to recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs, our operating expenses have gone up," said Temu on its website. "To keep offering the products you love without compromising on quality, we will be making (a) price adjustment starting April 25, 2025." Temu also quietly pulled back its advertisements on Google, Instagram, and Facebook, and saw its ranking on the App Store in the U.S. fall from the top 10. However, in May, Trump announced that the U.S. had lowered its 145% tariffs on China to 30%. The 120% tax on small parcels also dropped to 30%, which provided some relief to Temu. Image source: Chayanuphol for Shutterstock Despite these changes, Temu has seen the number of its daily app users in the U.S. drop by 58% in May, according to recent data from Sensor Tower. A recent report from Reuters also revealed that Temu's average customer growth in January was 37.5% year-over-year, and in May, that average dropped to 8.8%. The retailer's average sales growth was also 14.4% in January, but in May, sales stopped growing and declined by 15.7%. The drop in sales comes after Temu decided last month to stop shipping products from China and sell directly to customers in the U.S. in a desperate attempt to keep prices low on its website. Related: Kohl's makes major store changes to win back customers "All sales in the U.S. are now handled by locally based sellers, with orders fulfilled from within the country," said Temu in a statement. "The move is designed to help local merchants reach more customers and grow their businesses." It also added a notice on its website informing customers that there will be no extra charges for items shipped from local warehouses. "No import charges for all local warehouse items and no extra charges upon delivery," said Temu on its website. "Items marked with the 'Local Warehouse' tag are shipped from within your country or region. This means you do not need to pay any import taxes or customs fees." It is no surprise that fewer consumers are making purchases on Temu's website, as many are concerned about encountering higher prices due to Trump's tariffs. According to a survey from Omnisend in February, 56% of Americans are worried that tariffs will increase prices. Also, 29% of Americans said that if prices rise, they would immediately stop or make fewer purchases from sellers in China. More Retail: Costco quietly plans to offer a convenient service for customersT-Mobile pulls the plug on generous offer, angering customersKellogg sounds alarm on unexpected shift in customer behavior Amid this change in consumer behavior, Temu's parent company, PDD Holdings, revealed in its first-quarter earnings report for 2025 that its operating profit (a company's profit after expenses) declined by 38% year-over-year during the quarter. During an earnings call on May 28, PDD Holdings Co-CEO Lei Chen said the decrease in operating profit was partially due to the company's merchants being "under considerable pressure" due to tariffs. "Radical change in external policy environment such as tariffs has created significant pressure for our merchants, who often lack the capability to adapt quickly and effectively," said Chen. Related: Ross Stores makes drastic decision customers will see in stores The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Miami Herald
37 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump defense chief to rename Navy ship — is that common? Historians weigh in
President Donald Trump's administration is planning to rename a U.S. Navy ship. Is this a common practice? Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is set to rebrand the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler named after the California politician and Navy veteran, according to CBS News. Other news outlets have confirmed this report. Milk served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors — becoming one of the first openly gay elected officials in the country — before his assassination in 1978. When asked to comment on the report, a Pentagon spokesperson told CBS News that Hegseth 'is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos.' The defense secretary, a former Fox News anchor, has made some negative remarks about LGBTQ people in the past. In his 2024 book, he wrote that policies permitting gay individuals to serve in the military are 'part of a 'Marxist' agenda,' according to The Guardian. Hegseth is also no stranger to rebranding military assets. He previously ordered the renaming of North Carolina's Fort Liberty to Fort Bragg and Georgia's Fort Moore to Fort Benning — restoring their original names, which were associated with the Confederate generals Braxton Bragg and Henry Benning. But, defense officials noted that the restored names now honor World War II solider Roland Bragg and World War I solider Fred Benning. Naval historians told McClatchy News that the U.S. Navy has a fairly long history of rebranding existing vessels — particularly in the distant past — but they stressed that renaming ships explicitly for ideological reasons has little precedent. Long history of renaming ships 'Historically, renaming U.S. warships has been very common,' John Beeler, a history professor at the University of Alabama, who researches military and naval history, told McClatchy News. He cited the example of the USS New York, an armored cruiser built in 1893, which was rebranded to the USS Rochester in 1917, the year the U.S. entered World War I. There were a number of reasons why existing vessels might have had their names switched. For one, they could have been renamed after their role in the Navy changed, or after their capture during wartime, Jason Smith, a history professor at Southern Connecticut State University, who researches maritime history, told McClatchy News. 'At other times, naval vessels have been renamed when a newly commissioned ship was slated to be given the preexisting name, which necessitated renaming the older vessel,' Smith said. David Winkler, a professor at the Naval War College, echoed this view. 'At the turn of the century the Navy named a bunch of armored cruisers for states,' Winkler told McClatchy News. 'When we started building battleships, such as the Pennsylvania, California, and Washington, the cruisers having those names became the Pittsburgh, San Diego, and Seattle.' Further, during the second world war, the escort carrier Midway was restyled as the St. Lo in 1994, allowing a larger battle carrier to take the name Midway. Winkler noted that, 'lore has it that getting your ship name changed is a sign of bad luck,' as the 'St. Lo would be sunk at the Battle of Leyte Gulf.' And, in recent decades, ship renamings have become more rare, he said. A spokesperson for the Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment from McClatchy News. The Navy enters 'the culture wars' But, despite the Navy's history of rebranding commissioned vessels, the Trump administration appears to be venturing into somewhat uncharted waters, historians said. 'What is not common is renaming ships for overtly ideological reasons,' Beeler said. Smith reinforced this view, saying that 'renaming ships for political reasons has been virtually unheard of until recently…' He noted that the sole precedent is the renaming of the the USS Chancelorville and USNS Maury — both styled after Confederate figures — which occurred in 2023, during former President Joe Biden's tenure. These renamings came at the recommendation of a congressional commission established in the wake of the killing of George Floyd. One vessel was renamed the USS Robert Smalls after a former slave who aided the Union in the Civil War, and the other was restyled the USNS Marie Tharp in honor of a ground-breaking oceanographic cartographer, according to the New York Times. Now, the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk could further cement this new practice of recasting vessels for political reasons, experts said. And, the Milk may only be the beginning. CBS News reported that numerous other ships could see their names changed. Among those on a 'recommended list' are the USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Thurgood Marshall. 'The Navy and its ships have entered—somewhat begrudgingly, I think—into the culture wars along with so many aspects of American public life today,' Smith said.