TD Paul Murphy has 'no regrets' about detention in Egypt during March to Gaza
People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, who was detained on two occasions in Egypt while participating in the Global March to Gaza, has said he has no regrets about what occurred as he believes elected representatives have a 'much higher responsibility' to highlight the humanitarian crisis in the region.
Deputy Murphy, who returned to Ireland on Tuesday, told The Hard Shoulder on Newstalk that large numbers of people in Gaza are facing starvation.
Advertisement
'There's huge numbers of aid trucks not being allowed in by the Israeli authorities.
'So, the idea being to highlight to the world how this is happening and how aid has been weaponised in a really extreme way – half a million people are on the verge of starvation.'
'And to try to apply pressure on the Israeli regime to lift that blockade, to allow humanitarian access.
'Also, to apply pressure to our own Governments in the west, which are complicit in the genocide.'
Advertisement
Deputy Murphy said that the Israeli Government is responsible for shortages of food and medicine in Gaza. However, the Israeli Government maintains that Hamas is abusing the supplies that cross over to Gaza.
The Dublin South-West TD, who was detained along with other activists before he made it to Rafah, acknowledged that what occurred was very 'disappointing.'
However, he said that he hoped his arrest meant that 'further attention has been shone on this issue.'
'That was really a key point, to make people aware that this is still happening [and] it's getting worse on a daily basis,' he said.
Advertisement
'On Friday, it was clear we were being followed and questioned by secret police everywhere.
'Basically, there was a plan to get to a certain point and assemble to get closer and closer to Rafah.
'People got broken up into different groups; I was in a particular group that got to this place called Izmalia.
'When we got there, there were soldiers there to take our passports, to hold us there, to detain us there and to drag us away.'
Advertisement
Deputy Murphy claims that some 'very nasty tactics' were then inflicted on other activists.
'The lights would be turned off and not police would be allowed in - hired thugs of the regime,' he said.
'To go in and whip people and stuff - so, quite brutal behaviour.'
Deputy Murphy vowed to continue his campaigning for the Palestinian cause.
'I think all of us, not just politicians, have a duty to stop the genocide that's happening.
'But I think there's a much higher responsibility on those in the public eye, with public profiles.
'If they can use those profiles to raise awareness about what's happening, to increase pressure on both the Israeli Government and Governments in the west.
'I think it's the right thing to do, even if there's a certain risk involved.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel's assumption US would get drawn into Iran war is being put to the test
Israel's attack on Iran was carried out with Donald Trump's approval, government officials in Israel claim, and it appears to have been unleashed in the expectation – but not certainty – that the US would ultimately get drawn into the war. That assumption is now being put to the test as the US president weighs a decision on whether to join an assault he has increasingly embraced in his public pronouncements. Israeli officials have said it would have been unthinkable for prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to have ordered the attack in the early hours of Friday morning against Trump's wishes, and that there was little ambiguity about the US leader's preferences. 'This president makes it pretty clear what he wants,' one of the officials said during a visit to a bomb site near Tel Aviv this week. In the Israeli version of events, an agreement in principle dates back to a letter Trump sent to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in March, giving Iran 60 days to accept tight constraints on its nuclear programme. The clock started ticking on 12 April, the date of the first round of US-Iranian negotiations in Oman. Netanyahu seems to have accepted the same 60-day window to hold off on military action and to give diplomacy a chance. He has said that Operation Rising Lion had originally been planned for April. It was postponed and last Thursday marked day 61 on Trump's calendar. That night some 200 Israeli planes took off on their first sorties. As the deadline approached, the US withdrew non-essential personnel from embassies in the Middle East, but Trump appeared to discourage an Israel attack, saying it might 'blow' the chances for a sixth round of negotiations due on Sunday. It is unclear whether this was a ruse to put Iran off its guard, as some Israeli officials claimed, or a genuine call for a few more days leeway. If the latter, it was already too late. The Israeli attack plan involved precise coordination. Mossad commandos and drones had been pre-positioned, and waiting several days for talks – which Trump was pessimistic about anyway – would have compromised the prospects for the whole operation as well as the safety of Israelis already behind Iranian lines. The diplomatic option was almost certainly doomed from the start. After some initial wavering immediately after the Israeli attack began, Trump stuck to the inflexible and maximalist position that Iran stop enriching uranium permanently - now one of Israel's primary war aims. Once the operation had begun, Trump quickly swung his support behind it, noting on his Truth Social platform: 'Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' The 'second chance' seemed to be an option to return to the table and bow to Trump's demands, using the leverage of Israel's military might to produce a diplomatic triumph for the president. With every passing day of Israel battlefield success however, Trump has warmed to a military solution, declaring himself on Tuesday to be 'not too much in the mood to negotiate', and even claiming ownership of the campaign, announcing 'we now have complete and total control of the Iranian skies'. Israel is now counting on Trump to stake a direct claim to glory and join the operation, now that the risks of failure and downed planes have been minimised. 'The whole operation is premised on the fact that the US will join at some point,' an Israeli official told CNN. 'We are waiting for the decision of the president,' another senior official told the network. Israel has yet to attack Iran's most secure enrichment facility, at Fordow, which is built into a mountain with up to 100 metres of rock above it. Only the US Air Force has penetrating bombs of the size that have the best chance of making a dent in such defences, although even with those 13,000kg (30,000lb) munitions success is not guaranteed. As the war has progressed, so has the clamour in Israel for US involvement, along with uncertainty over whether Netanyahu has a Plan B if Trump opts to watch from the sidelines. 'We need to hope that this actually happens, and possibly very soon,' the veteran commentator, Ben Caspit, wrote in Ma'ariv newspaper on Wednesday. 'Take all the credit, Donald. The important thing is that you ultimately decide to join.' Writing in Yedioth Ahronoth, Shimon Shiffer argued: 'Without the involvement of the United States, the war with Iran will not reach a decisive conclusion that justifies our assault on the ayatollahs' regime and the heavy price that Israeli citizens are paying with their lives and property. 'Mr President, come save the world,' Shiffer wrote. 'Come save us from Iran. Come save us from ourselves.'
BreakingNews.ie
35 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Teen involved in Tristan Sherry murder melee buried gun and drugs for Hennessy gang, court hears
A teenager who was convicted of violent disorder during the melee in which steakhouse assassin Tristan Sherry was beaten to death was caught less than six months later burying a gun and ammunition alongside more than €60,000 of drugs in a park for the Hennessy crime gang, the Special Criminal Court has heard. The 18-year-old Dublin teenager, who can not be named because he was a minor when he came before the courts, pleaded guilty to a number of offences at Tolka Valley Park, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, on May 7th/8th, 2024. Advertisement Among the charges were the possession of one or more controlled drugs, to wit cannabis, diamorphine, cocaine and ketamine valued at €13,000 or more, for the purpose of unlawfully selling or otherwise supplying the drugs to another. He was also charged with the possession of 630g of a drug named Phenacetin. In addition, he was charged with the possession of a side-by-side shotgun and the possession of 15 rounds of 9 x 18mm Makarov calibre Sellier and Bellot made ammunition and ten 12 Gauge ELEY Olympics shotgun cartridges. At the Special Criminal Court on Wednesday, Garda Daniel Sweeney gave evidence to prosecutor Fiona Murphy SC, that on May 7th, 2024, a drugs unit working undercover in Blanchardstown observed the defendant digging in the ground. When the gardaí approached, they saw the butt of a shotgun sticking out of the ground, poorly covered in cling film. Eight packages wrapped in black cling film were beside the hole, with four containing cannabis to a value of €2,672, while the other four contained a drug used for mixing cocaine. Advertisement Gda Sweeney said that the scene was preserved until the following morning, when gardaí returned to the area and located another two packages in a lightly covered hole that was 3m away from where the defendant had been sitting the previous evening. In one package were ten shotgun cartridges, while in the second package were 15 9mm bullets. Gda Sweeney said that another hole was discovered 1.5m away from this, containing further packages. In these, gardaí found diamorphine worth €38,962, cannabis worth €11,472, cocaine worth €3,206, and ketamine to a value of €8,230. The garda said that the defendant was engaged in this activity in the context of the Hennessy criminal gang and had been carrying this out at their behest. The defendant was on bail at the time for violent disorder at the Steakhouse where Tristan Sherry shot and fatally wounded Jason Hennessy snr before being beaten to death. Advertisement The defendant was subsequently convicted and is now serving a sentence for that offence of two years and four months, with the final year suspended. The defendant was 17 at the time of the offending but has since turned 18. Defence counsel, Padraig Dwyer SC said his client came from a very challenged background and had been acting on the behalf and under the direction of other people. Mr Dwyer put it to Gda Sweeney that the defendant had a weapon for his protection, as he had reason to be concerned for his own safety. Advertisement To this, Gda Sweeney said: 'In my opinion, I don't think he'd have any concerns for his own safety. He was burying guns and drugs for the Hennessys, and that organisation is involved in shootings and drug trafficking.' Addressing the non-jury, three-judge court, Mr Dwyer said that the defendant was a young man with a very difficult childhood, and he asked the court to have regard to the great difficulties he had faced in his life. Judge Karen O'Connor, presiding, adjourned the matter to July 7th next for sentencing. In a separate matter, the Special Criminal Court previously found the teenager guilty of violent disorder at Browne's Steakhouse in Blanchardstown on Christmas Eve, 2023. Advertisement During a trial last year, the court heard that gangland figure Jason Hennessy Snr was celebrating with about 30 people, including the defendant. Ireland Sean McGovern changes legal team in challenge to e... Read More Tristan Sherry and a second gunman entered the restaurant with their faces covered and hoods up. Hennessy Snr suffered a fatal gunshot wound as he grappled with Sherry, but he managed to drag the gunman to the ground. Others in the party piled in on Sherry, stamping on his torso and head, stabbing him repeatedly and using various objects, including an iron bar and a stool, to beat him to death. Three people were convicted of murder arising out of the assault on Sherry. The defendant in this case initially hid under a table, but when he emerged, he engaged in violence against Sherry, who was lying prone on the ground, for about five seconds.
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump draws Pentagon into Bush-era Groundhog Day over Iran as he shuns intelligence to justify war
George W. Bush and his administration of neocons spent years building a spurious case for the war in Iraq. They collated sketchy intelligence about supposedly hidden weapons of mass destruction, fed it to a pliant press, went through the motions of seeking United Nations resolutions and formed a ramshackle coalition of the willing before going to war. It took Donald Trump all of five seconds to create his own WMD scandal. That came aboard Air Force One Tuesday morning when he rebuked his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, for sharing a U.S. intelligence assessment that Iran was not seeking a nuclear weapon. 'I don't care what she said, I think they were very close to having one,' he told the press corps. It's Groundhog Day in the Pentagon. The U.S. stands on the precipice of joining another war in the Middle East to relieve another dictatorial regime of its non-existent deadly arsenal, but there are at least some procedural differences this time around. In rejecting the assessment of U.S. intelligence agencies in favor of his own instincts, Trump appears to want to skip every step in the Manufacturing Consent handbook and declare war based on instinct alone. Rather than send Marco Rubio to the United Nations with satellite photos, audio recordings and vials of undisclosed substances as Bush did with then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, Trump opted to simply declare that Iran could never have nuclear weapons and begin mobilizing the U.S. military to act in support of Israel's ongoing attack. Whereas Powell had a well of intelligence to draw on, however faulty, to build his argument in front of the world, it seems Trump has barely even glanced at his own agencies' work. Gabbard testified to Congress as recently as 26 March that 18 U.S. intelligence agencies continue to assess that 'Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.' Trump's flippant dismissal of that assessment is no small thing. It could be the determining factor in whether the U.S. joins a war against a sovereign nation, potentially putting American lives at risk across the Middle East and beyond. Rather than busy himself with studying the intelligence that should weigh on those decisions, the president spent most of the last few days posting erratically on social media, calling on 10 million people who live in Iran's capital Tehran to evacuate, for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER, ' and even threatening the assassination of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. 'We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' he wrote on Truth Social. Trump's position is all the more surprising given that his political rise was fuelled in part by his positioning as a critic of the so-called 'forever wars' of the Bush era, particularly the Iraq War. He shocked his fellow candidates during the Republican primary debates in 2016 when he accused them all of being complicit in the falsehoods that led to the war. 'I want to tell you. They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, there were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction,' he said. This time around, Trump appears to be playing the opposing role in building a faulty premise for a destructive war in the Middle East. MAGA billed itself as the destroyer of neoconservatism, but now in the White House and with their hands on the missile launcher and the B-52's they look and sound much the same. This is also the same person who said of Barack Obama in 2011: 'Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective. So the only way he figures that he's going to get reelected — and as sure as you're sitting there — is to start a war with Iran.' Trump's role in the build-up to this war didn't begin this week, either. His decision to dismantle a previously successful nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers paved the way for the carnage of today. In 2015, then-President Obama and a coalition of world powers managed to broker an agreement with Iran in which it agreed to dismantle much of its nuclear program, place limits on how much uranium it could enrich, and open its facilities to inspections in return for sanctions relief. China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States, the European Union and Iran all signed on to the deal — a remarkable feat of diplomacy. All believed the deal was working. Israel believed the deal was too lenient, and then-presidential candidate Trump campaigned on a promise to completely dismantle it. In 2018, as president, Trump pulled out of the deal and initiated new sanctions against Iran. Tehran started to increase uranium enrichment and build up its stockpile once more, and removed monitoring equipment from nuclear facilities. Over the past few years, Iran increased its enrichment to record levels of purity, close to the level needed to make a bomb. Still, U.S. intelligence agencies did not change their assessment that Iran was seeking a nuclear weapon, and the Trump administration was engaged in a new round of talks over the program. At the same time, Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was signaling that he was readying an attack on Iran. He has claimed for decades that Iran was on the brink of building a nuclear weapon, a development that he insisted required a military confrontation to avoid. As early as 1992, as a member of the Israeli parliament, he claimed Iran was 'three to five years' away from a bomb. Three years later, in a book titled 'Fighting Terrorism,' he again claimed Iran was 'three to five years' away from acquiring a nuclear weapon. In 2012, he gave a widely mocked speech to the United Nations in which he held up a picture of a cartoon bomb while claiming Iran was roughly one year away from building a bomb. None of those warnings came to pass, but they were treated no less seriously. While Netanyahu believed military action was the only way to remove the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran, he had been kept at bay by successive U.S. presidents. Earlier this year, it appeared he was closer than ever to making that move. In April, he asked Trump for the 30,000-pound American GBU-57 bunker buster bomb, which can only be carried by U.S. aircraft, to destroy a nuclear site deep underground at Fordo, according to the New York Times. Trump reportedly refused and asked Israel to allow his negotiations a chance. But as the talks dragged on through the months, Trump lost patience. When Israel decided to launch its attack this month, the U.S. and Iran were days away from meeting again. No new intelligence showing an increased nuclear threat has been presented or claimed by the Trump administration beyond the president's passing comment on Air Force One. And senior administration officials told the New York Times they were unaware of any new intelligence showing a rush to build a bomb. There are obvious differences with Iraq, of course. This war has already begun. Israel has already taken out Iran's air defenses and is bombing military and nuclear infrastructure across the country at will. It was Israel's fait accompli that appears to have brought Trump around. The war has already begun. Trump may be able to join it in a limited capacity and claim victory, but the days of claiming the mantle of an anti-war president are over.
