Who Is Mohamed Sabry Soliman? Suspect Behind 'Targeted Terror Attack' In Boulder, Colorado
Last Updated:
Mohamed Sabry Soliman, who reportedly overstayed a US visa after arriving in 2022, was identified as the suspect in a targeted terror attack in Boulder, Colorado.
At least six people were injured in what the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) immediately described as a 'targeted terror attack" at the Pearl Street outdoor mall in Boulder, Colorado.
The group targeted by the suspect, identified as 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman, had gathered to raise attention to Israeli hostages held in Gaza.
Soliman yelled 'Free Palestine" and used a makeshift flamethrower in the attack, said Mark Michalek, the special agent in charge of the Denver field office.
Soliman was later taken into custody.
WHO IS MOHAMED SABRY SOLIMAN?
According to US President Donald Trump's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, Soliman had overstayed his visa in the United States and had been allowed to work by the previous administration.
Multiple media reports suggest Soliman is an Egyptian native. However, an official confirmation on the same was awaited.
Reports also suggested Soliman had arrived in the United States on a B-2 visa in August 2022.
More details on his home and family were not immediately available.
Soliman was also injured and was taken to the hospital to be treated, but authorities didn't elaborate on the nature of his injuries.
The attack took place at the popular Pearl Street pedestrian mall, a four-block area in downtown Boulder, where demonstrators with a volunteer group called 'Run For Their Lives' had gathered to raise visibility for the hostages who remain in Gaza.
It occurred more than a week after the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington by a Chicago man who yelled, 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza" as he was being led away by police.
Tensions in the United States over Israel's war in Gaza have recently heightened, spurring an increase in antisemitic hate crime as well as moves by conservative supporters of Israel, led by Donald Trump, to brand pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic.
Trump's administration has detained protesters of the war without charge and cut off funding to elite US universities that have permitted such demonstrations.
Meanwhile, FBI leaders in Washington said they were treating the Boulder attack as an act of terrorism, and the Justice Department — which leads investigations into acts of violence driven by religious, racial or ethnic motivations — decried the attack as a 'needless act of violence, which follows recent attacks against Jewish Americans".
'This act of terror is being investigated as an act of ideologically motivated violence based on the early information, the evidence, and witness accounts. We will speak clearly on these incidents when the facts warrant it," FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said in a post on X.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:
June 02, 2025, 08:38 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Explained: Why Trump Is Silent On Ukraine's Drone Daring Drone Attack On Russia
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has not so far said a word on Ukraine's daring drone assault deep inside Russian territory. The operation destroyed dozens of strategic bombers and reportedly dealt a $7 billion blow to Moscow's military power. But it is Trump's silence that is now making the loudest noise in American politics. As Ukraine and its allies cheered the historic 'Operation Spiderweb', Trump's base erupted not with support, but suspicion. 'Why did not they tell Trump?' asked one MAGA (Make America Great Again)-aligned account on X. Another wrote simply, 'Where is Trump?' Pro-Trump influencer Jack Posobiec speculated on Steve Bannon's War Room about whether the Biden administration had secretly backed the plan, which had been in the works for 18 months – possibly during Trump's final year in office. Charlie Kirk, a key MAGA figure, said the attack reached 'very deep into Russia' and questioned potential American involvement. Known online as DC Draino, Rogan O'Handley alleged without evidence that it was a 'false flag' designed to pull the United States into World War III. Former Pentagon official Dan Caldwell warned that attacking nuclear-capable bombers was reckless and could provoke Russian retaliation against the NATO. He urged the United States to halt any support that may have helped enable the strike. Base vs. Strategy In MAGA circles, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is often dismissed as a 'globalist puppet'. While Russia's missile attacks on Ukrainian civilians receive scattered attention, Ukrainian military moves like this one spark immediate outrage. Now Trump finds himself trapped between two factions of his own party. On one side are establishment Republicans calling for tougher sanctions on Russia and continued military support for Ukraine. On the other is the MAGA base, which is loud, online and increasingly conspiratorial, demanding that the United States withdraw entirely and stop aiding Ukraine. They want Trump to condemn the drone strike. So far, he has not. In past comments, Trump has criticised both Russia and Ukraine, and he has long cast himself as the only leader capable of brokering peace. But now, as Ukraine lands one of its most strategic hits in the war, Trump is missing from the moment. Experts believe he is intentionally holding back to preserve his image as a neutral and peace-minded dealmaker. 'He wants to look presidential,' said one observer. But in a moment of global drama and domestic division, silence is beginning to look like indecision. Drones and Drama Codenamed as 'Operation Spiderweb', the Ukrainian strike took 18 months to plan. Over the weekend, Ukraine's military launched more than 100 drones at five separate Russian air bases – thousands of miles behind enemy lines. According to Ukrainian officials, intelligence operatives smuggled drones inside truck cabins, waited in Russian territory for the right moment and then launched the attack. A total of 117 drones struck strategic aircraft, including Tu-95, Tu-22M3, Tu-160 bombers and A-50 surveillance planes. Videos posted online showed drones zipping into the air from truck rooftops, a scene one viewer likened to a 'sci-fi movie'. The strike reportedly caused billions in damage and took out aircraft that are hard, if not impossible, for Russia to replace quickly. But while Ukraine celebrated, MAGA influencers fumed. And Trump, the man who has said he could end the war in 24 hours, said nothing. Peace at a Price Meanwhile, peace talks in Turkey failed to produce any breakthrough. Russia once again demanded that Ukraine withdraw from the territories it claims. Ukraine asked for a full ceasefire, the return of abducted children and a summit between Zelensky and Putin. Russia refused. The only progress came in the form of a prisoner exchange. Ukraine's defense minister said all POWs under 25 or in poor health would be swapped. Russia promised to return 6,000 bodies and at least 1,000 prisoners but refused to budge on territorial claims. The timing of Ukraine's drone strike, just before the talks, led to speculation it was meant to give Kyiv leverage. But in MAGA circles, it is being cast as a betrayal of Trump's ceasefire push. Now, as MAGA voices grow louder and more paranoid, a new question is taking shape. Is Trump still in control of his movement or is he falling behind it? For a man who built his brand on always having a line and always dominating the narrative, Trump's silence is no longer a strategy. It is a statement.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"No mediation": Karnataka Film Chamber demands apology; Kamal Haasan's 'Thug Life' release hits snag
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 3 (ANI): The ongoing controversy surrounding Kamal Haasan's movie 'Thug Life' has taken a new turn, with the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) reaffirming its demand for an apology from the actor. The dispute revolves around Haasan's controversial remarks at the audio launch of the film in Chennai, where he suggested that 'Kannada is born out of Tamil.' After a meeting with film industry representatives, KFCC President M Narasimhalu emphasised the chamber's firm stance on the issue, stating that the actor's comments have angered both the government and pro-Kannada organisations. He insisted that Haasan must apologise to the people of Karnataka for his remarks before any further discussion could take place. 'He has spoken about our language, and the government, pro-Kannada organisations, everyone is angry. He should apologise. Let him come and discuss,' Narasimhalu said. He further added that the KFCC was not prepared to make any decisions or offer mediation without an apology from Haasan. He said that the KFCC's stance is clear: no mediation or resolution can take place without Haasan acknowledging the hurt caused by his statement. 'We want an apology from Kamal Haasan. There are rules, and this concerns four states,' Narasimhalu said. Meanwhile, the Karnataka High Court has adjourned the hearing of the petition concerning the release of 'Thug Life' to June 10, 2025. The court had previously intervened after the KFCC decided to block the film's release in the state due to the controversy surrounding Haasan's comments. The film's producers filed the petition seeking a court order to allow the release of 'Thug Life' as scheduled on June 5, 2025. The court noted that Haasan's letter to the KFCC in response to their demand did not include the word 'apology,' further complicating the matter. The court has provided time for dialogue between the petitioners and the KFCC, allowing the producers to engage with the film body in an attempt to resolve the issue. In the interim, the producers have agreed not to release the movie in Karnataka until the matter is settled. In an attempt to quell the rising tensions, Kamal Haasan addressed the KFCC in a heartfelt letter. He clarified that his remarks, made at the Thug Life audio launch, were misunderstood and taken out of context. Haasan explained that his words were spoken out of 'genuine affection' for Dr. Rajkumar's family and were intended to convey unity, not to belittle Kannada. 'It pains me that my statement at the Thug Life audio launch--spoken out of genuine affection for the legendary Dr. Rajkumar's family, especially Shiva Rajkumar--has been misunderstood and taken out of context,' Haasan wrote. He emphasised his respect for the Kannada language, and said, 'Like Tamil, Kannada has a proud literary and cultural tradition that I have long admired. My love for the language is genuine, and I have great respect for the love that Kannadigas have for their mother tongue.' Haasan also reiterated his support for all Indian languages, including Kannada, and urged that his statement be viewed in the spirit of unity and respect for the people of Karnataka. He expressed regret for the embarrassment caused to Shiva Rajkumar, who had attended the event, and emphasised that his intention was never to divide communities but to strengthen bonds through cinema. As the legal battle continues, Kamal Haasan remains hopeful that the controversy will be resolved amicably and that 'Thug Life' will be able to release as planned in Karnataka. He expressed confidence that the situation would ultimately strengthen his relationship with the people of the state. 'Cinema must remain a bridge between people--never a wall that divides them. This was the intent of my statement,' Haasan said. He added, 'I have never been nor would ever want to give any room for public unrest and animosity.' (ANI)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Gaza War: Israeli military opens fire near aid centre; at least 27 Palestinians killed - The Economic Times Video
Israeli spokesperson David Mencer defended the IDF's actions in Gaza after at least 27 Palestinians were killed near an aid distribution point, claiming troops responded to perceived threats with warning shots. Despite mounting casualties and international concern, Mencer insisted the IDF did not fire on civilians and continues to support humanitarian access.
