
Turning Qatari 747 into Air Force One could cost $1 billion and take years, experts say
Converting a Qatari-owned 747 jet into a new Air Force One for President Donald Trump would involve installing multiple top-secret systems, cost over $1 billion and take years to complete, three aviation experts told NBC News.
They said that accepting the 13-year-old jet would likely cost U.S. taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars over time, noting that refurbishing the commercial plane would exceed its current value of $400 million. The project might also not be completed by the end of Trump's term in 2028.
Richard Aboulafia, an analyst and consultant on commercial and military aviation, said he thought turning the Qatari jetliner into Air Force One would cost billions and take years.
'You're taking a 747, disassembling it, reassembling it, and then jacking it up to a very high level,' said Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory, a consulting firm.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Aviation experts refer to Air Force One as the most complicated aircraft on the planet. The plane is meant to serve as a secure communication center in the sky — including command and control of nuclear weapons — and allow the president to issue orders to military and government agencies in the event of war or other emergency.
Experts said the idea made no financial or practical sense given that Boeing is already deep into a multiyear effort to convert two 747s to replace current Air Force One planes. They said that the contract for refurbishing the Qatari 747 would likely go to Boeing as its original manufacturer.
'Since you're also disassembling and reassembling the jet for security reasons, you're probably going to go with the people who know it better,' Aboulafia said. 'If you have to rip the plane apart, that's more of a Boeing job.'
Some of the work could be done by L3 Harris, which specializes in this kind of work. The work would likely be done in Greenville, Texas. Qatari officials have said that the possible transfer of an aircraft for use as a new Air Force One plane is under consideration but no final decision has been made.
Dismantled, part by part
The Qatari jumbo jet would have to be effectively dismantled, part by part, to ensure there were no listening devices, spyware or other security vulnerabilities that could allow foreign powers to eavesdrop on the president's plane.
It would then have to be fitted with costly, sophisticated systems for secure government communications, midair refueling, missile defense, countering electronic jamming and protecting against electro-magnetic pulse attack. There would likely need to be quarters added for White House medical staff and the Secret Service.
Installing the new systems could push the project into the 2030s, according to Aboulafia, who said that equipping the plane with mid-air refueling capability alone would be 'enormously time-consuming.'
The White House says the jet would be handed over to Trump's presidential library foundation by the end of his term in January, 2029. That would presumably require the removal of all the sensitive government equipment installed on the aircraft.
Trump could override current Air Force security rules but usually employees working on presidential aircraft or similar sensitive projects need a high-level security clearance, known as a 'Yankee White' clearance, according to an industry member who asked not to be named. In the past Boeing has struggled to find enough workers with the necessary security clearances to do the work.
'A real relief for Boeing'
In 2018, the Air Force issued a contract to Boeing to convert two 747s to eventually serve as new Air Force One aircraft, for $3.9 billion. In 2019, the Pentagon estimated that the total estimated cost of building, equipping and testing the planes would be higher, at about $5.3 billion.
The project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. The jets were supposed to be ready by last year but may not be delivered until 2029.
At a congressional hearing on May 8, Darlene Costello, principal deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, technology, and logistics, told lawmakers that the new planes could be ready by 2027 by reducing some of the requirements for the aircraft.
In 2022, Boeing's then-CEO, Dave Calhoun, suggested the firm should not have accepted the Trump administration's terms in 2018 on the new Air Force One.
For Boeing, converting the Qatari jetliner under a new contract could be good news as it has lost money on the fixed-cost contract it agreed to during Trump's first term, as it has had to absorb major cost overruns, Aboulafia said.
'This would be a real relief for Boeing,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
NATO ministers to discuss defence spending hike ahead of key summit
BRUSSELS, June 5 (Reuters) - NATO defence ministers will gather in Brussels on Thursday to discuss how to meet Donald Trump's demand for significant increases in spending, less than three weeks ahead of a key summit of the alliance in The Hague. The U.S. president has said NATO allies should boost investment in defence to 5% of gross domestic product, up from the current target of 2%. Diplomats say the European allies understand that hiking defence expenditure is the price of ensuring a continued U.S. commitment to the continent's security and that keeping America on board means allowing Trump to be able to declare a win on his 5% demand during the summit, scheduled for June 24-25. "We have to go further and we have to go faster," NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told reporters on Wednesday. "A new defence investment plan will be at the heart of the NATO summit in The Hague," he added. In a bid to meet Trump's 5% goal, Rutte has proposed alliance members boost defence spending to 3.5% of GDP and commit a further 1.5% to broader security-related spending, Reuters has reported. But details of the new investment plan will likely continue to be negotiated until the very eve of the NATO summit. "We have to find a realistic compromise between what is necessary and what is possible really to spend," German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Wednesday. Countries remain divided over the timeline for a new pledge. "There's not unlimited time," U.S. ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker told reporters on Wednesday. Rutte has proposed reaching the 5% by 2032 – a date that some eastern European states consider too distant but which some others see as too early and unrealistic given current spending and industrial production levels. A 2032 target is "definitely too late", Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Wednesday, arguing for a target of 2030 at the latest. There is also an ongoing debate over how to define "defence-related" spending, which might include spending on cybersecurity and certain types of infrastructure. "The aim is to find a definition that is precise enough to cover only real security-related investments, and at the same time broad enough to allow for national specifics," said one NATO diplomat.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
What we know about Trump's latest travel ban
Donald Trump has signed a ban on travel to the US from 12 countries citing national security risks, according to the White US president said the list could be revised if "material improvements" were made and additional countries could also be added as "threats emerge around the world". This is the second time he has ordered a ban on travel from certain countries. He signed a similar order in 2017, during his first term in office. Which countries are affected? Trump has signed a proclamation banning travel to the US from nationals of 12 countries:Afghanistan MyanmarChad Republic of the CongoEquatorial GuineaEritreaHaitiIranLibyaSomaliaSudanYemenThere are an additional seven countries whose nationals face partial travel restrictions: BurundiCubaLaosSierra LeoneTogoTurkmenistanVenezuela Why has a ban been announced? The White House said these "common sense restrictions" would "protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors".In a video posted to his Truth Social website, Trump said the recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado "underscored the extreme dangers" posed by foreign nationals who had not been "properly vetted".Twelve people were injured in Colorado on Sunday when a man attacked a group gathering in support of Israeli hostages, throwing two incendiary devices and using a makeshift man accused of carrying out the attack has been identified as an Egyptian national. What has been the reaction to the ban? Trump's latest order, which is expected to face legal challenges, drew a swift response, at home and abroad. Somalia promised to work with the United States to address any security issues. In a statement, Somalian ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan Abdi, said his country "values its longstanding relationship" with America. Venezuela's Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello warned that "being in the United States is a great risk for anyone, not just for Venezuelans".Democrats were quick to condemn the move."This ban, expanded from Trump's Muslim ban in his first term, will only further isolate us on the world stage," Pramila Jayapal, a Democrat congresswoman from Washington, says in a social media Democrat, congressman Don Beyer, says Trump "betrayed" the ideals of the US' founders. What happened last time? Trump ordered his original travel ban during his first term in the White House in featured some of the same countries as his latest order, including Iran, Libya and Somalia. However it drew heavy criticism for being a "Muslim ban" as six out of the eight countries listed were predominantly Muslim. It also faced challenges in the courts so was revised multiple times before it was eventually implemented in 2018. President Joe Biden, who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience."


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with 'hostile attitudes' to the US
President Trump has signed an order banning people from 12 countries from entering the US. He said Sunday's attack in Colorado had shown "the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas". "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," he said in a video statement. The countries affected are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The White House said they posed a "very high risk" to the US and had poor screening and vetting to identify dangerous individuals. People from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will also face partial restrictions. Mr Trump's proclamation said America must ensure people entering don't have "hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles" - and don't support terror groups. The move echoes a controversial executive order enacted eight years ago during his first term, when he banned people from predominately Muslim countries. The countries initially targeted then were Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. President Trump said on Thursday that policy was a "key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil". His new list adds more countries, but notably removes Syria after Mr Trump met the country's leader recently on a trip to the Middle East. Athletes and their coaches competing in the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics, both of which are taking place in the US, will be exempt. Permanent US residents and existing visa holders are also among those unaffected. Trump cites 'what happened in Europe' to justify new ban President Trump hailed travel restrictions imposed during his first term as "one of our most successful policies". It was also one of the most controversial, with what became known as "the Muslim ban" sparking widespread protest. Thousands gathered at US airports to oppose the detainment of travellers arriving from affected countries. The then German chancellor, Angela Merkel, said the fight against terrorism didn't justify suspicion of people based on their faith. Her French counterpart at the time, President Hollande, warned against the dangers of isolationism. Still smarting perhaps from that criticism, Trump announced his new ban with a commitment to "not let what happened in Europe happen to America". In addition to restrictions on 12 countries and partial restrictions on another seven, he warned others could be added as "threats emerge around the world". In a second proclamation, the US president escalated his war with Harvard University, suspending international visas for new students and authorising the secretary of state to consider revoking existing ones. Having blamed Joe Biden for "millions and millions" of "illegals" in America, he issued a third proclamation ordering an investigation into the use of autopen during Biden's presidency. In a memorandum, President Trump claimed his predecessor's aides used autopen to sign bills in a bid to cover up his cognitive decline. If we didn't know what the Trump administration meant when they talked about "flooding the zone", we know now. The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat to the US. The ban takes effect from 9 June but countries could be removed or added. The proclamation states it will be reviewed within 90 days, and every 180 days after, to decide if it should be "continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented". "These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information," said White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson. President Trump's first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a "Muslim ban". It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes - or held at US airports when they landed. Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign. It faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version of it in June 2018, with judges calling it "squarely within the scope of presidential authority".