Just Stop Oil climate protesters tried to halt The Open
Three Just Stop Oil protesters deliberately disrupted the Open Golf Championship by throwing orange powder, letting off a smoke flare and sitting on the golf course, a trial has heard.The trio breached the perimeter of the roped-off 17th hole at the course in Wirral, Merseyside, to be greeted with angry shouting from the crowd, while golfer Billy Horschel helped a marshall to remove one demonstrator.George Birch, Noah Crane and Lucy Timlin, have denied charges of intentionally or recklessly causing a public nuisance at Liverpool Golf Club at Hoylake on 21 July 2023.The judge at Liverpool Crown Court warned jurors to ignore a silent protest outside the court.
Opening the case, Rebecca Smith, prosecuting, told the jury the three-day tournament was viewed by hundreds of thousands of members of the public both on television and at the course with various professional and semi-professional golfers competing to win the coveted trophy and a £3m prize fund.The jury, which was shown police body-cam and other footage of the defendants, heard Mr Crane, now 19, was the first to cross the perimeter of the viewing area.Wearing a distinctive white T shirt embossed with Just Stop Oil he held a flare high above his head emitting orange smoke, Ms Smith said.
'Cause obstruction'
He was booed and shouted at by spectators as he walked across the grassed area as they expressed "their displeasure at the defendant for disrupting their enjoyment".Ms Timlin ran onto the green and 17th hole area as Mr Crane was arrested and removed before throwing orange powder, running a short distance and then sitting down, the trial heard.Miss Smith continued, "It is at this stage, having put his marker down and unable to take a shot that the professional golfer Billy Horschel walks, from where he is stood down the green to assist a marshal in removing Ms Timlin, who is continuing to cause an obstruction."Mr Birch, now 21, entered the restricted area and was grounded by a marshal he was until removed by police.Miss Smith claimed the defendants "either knew their actions would disrupt play" or could have reasonably foreseen it.As the hearing began, Judge Gary Woodhall made the jury aware of a silent protest outside the court, warning them to set aside feelings or prejudices and sympathy or lack of sympathy.The court heard Mr Birch, of Forest Road, Huncote, Leicestershire, Mr Crane, of Aylsham Road, Buxton, near Norwich, and Ms Timlin, 46, of High Lane in Chorlton, Manchester, all made no comment when later questioned.The trial continues.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
6 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Dale Vince's High Court claim against Daily Mail publisher thrown out
Mr Vince brought legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over an article headlined 'Labour repays £100,000 to sex pest donor', published in June 2023. The story reported that the Labour Party was handing back money to donor Davide Serra with a picture showing Mr Vince holding a Just Stop Oil banner. This picture, published in print and on The Mail+ app, was changed to one of Mr Serra online 47 minutes after publication, while the original picture of Mr Vince remained in the print version. An employment tribunal in 2022 heard Mr Serra had made sexist comments to a female colleague which were found to amount to unlawful harassment related to sex. Mr Vince claimed ANL misused his personal data and that the publication of his photograph with this story would lead readers to believe he had been accused of sexual harassment. ANL had defended the claim, with its lawyers previously telling the High Court in London that it was an abuse of process and a 'resurrection' of a libel claim that was dismissed last year. In a judgment on Monday, a High Court judge threw out the data protection claim. Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no real prospect that Mr Vince will succeed on his claim. 'As in the defamation proceedings, it is accepted that on reading the text of the article published in Mail+ and the Daily Mail any ordinary reader would very quickly realise that Mr Vince was not being accused of sexual harassment. 'Considered on this basis the personal data relating to Mr Vince was processed fairly.' He said there was 'every reason' why the data protection claim should have been heard with the defamation claim last year. 'Both claims arose out of the same event, the publication of the article in Mail+ and the Daily Mail,' he added. 'Both claims rely on the same factual circumstances, namely the juxtaposition of the headline, photographs and caption, and the contention that the combination of the headline and the photograph created the misleading impression that Mr Vince had been accused of sexual harassment.' Following the decision, Mr Vince said he planned to appeal. He said: 'What we're dealing with here is a media law that predates the internet. Think about that. Essentially, UK law says that people read entire articles and not just headlines. 'We all know this is untrue, the internet has changed everything, modern attention spans are famously small and shrinking, dwell times on articles are measured in seconds and media organisations have an abundance of data on this.' He continued: 'The judge said if you read the whole story, you'd realise the headline was not about me, begging the question why was my face highlighted in the articles perhaps. 'But more importantly, people don't read entire articles, the law assumes it – but does so wrongly, against all data and against common sense.'
Powys County Times
6 days ago
- Powys County Times
Dale Vince's High Court claim against Daily Mail publisher thrown out
Green energy industrialist Dale Vince's High Court claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail has been thrown out by a judge. Mr Vince brought legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over an article headlined 'Labour repays £100,000 to sex pest donor', published in June 2023. The story reported that the Labour Party was handing back money to donor Davide Serra with a picture showing Mr Vince holding a Just Stop Oil banner. This picture, published in print and on The Mail+ app, was changed to one of Mr Serra online 47 minutes after publication, while the original picture of Mr Vince remained in the print version. An employment tribunal in 2022 heard Mr Serra had made sexist comments to a female colleague which were found to amount to unlawful harassment related to sex. Mr Vince claimed ANL misused his personal data and that the publication of his photograph with this story would lead readers to believe he had been accused of sexual harassment. ANL had defended the claim, with its lawyers previously telling the High Court in London that it was an abuse of process and a 'resurrection' of a libel claim that was dismissed last year. In a judgment on Monday, a High Court judge threw out the data protection claim. Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no real prospect that Mr Vince will succeed on his claim. 'As in the defamation proceedings, it is accepted that on reading the text of the article published in Mail+ and the Daily Mail any ordinary reader would very quickly realise that Mr Vince was not being accused of sexual harassment. 'Considered on this basis the personal data relating to Mr Vince was processed fairly.' He said there was 'every reason' why the data protection claim should have been heard with the defamation claim last year. 'Both claims arose out of the same event, the publication of the article in Mail+ and the Daily Mail,' he added. 'Both claims rely on the same factual circumstances, namely the juxtaposition of the headline, photographs and caption, and the contention that the combination of the headline and the photograph created the misleading impression that Mr Vince had been accused of sexual harassment.'
South Wales Guardian
6 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Dale Vince's High Court claim against Daily Mail publisher thrown out
Mr Vince brought legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over an article headlined 'Labour repays £100,000 to sex pest donor', published in June 2023. The story reported that the Labour Party was handing back money to donor Davide Serra with a picture showing Mr Vince holding a Just Stop Oil banner. This picture, published in print and on The Mail+ app, was changed to one of Mr Serra online 47 minutes after publication, while the original picture of Mr Vince remained in the print version. An employment tribunal in 2022 heard Mr Serra had made sexist comments to a female colleague which were found to amount to unlawful harassment related to sex. Mr Vince claimed ANL misused his personal data and that the publication of his photograph with this story would lead readers to believe he had been accused of sexual harassment. ANL had defended the claim, with its lawyers previously telling the High Court in London that it was an abuse of process and a 'resurrection' of a libel claim that was dismissed last year. In a judgment on Monday, a High Court judge threw out the data protection claim. Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no real prospect that Mr Vince will succeed on his claim. 'As in the defamation proceedings, it is accepted that on reading the text of the article published in Mail+ and the Daily Mail any ordinary reader would very quickly realise that Mr Vince was not being accused of sexual harassment. 'Considered on this basis the personal data relating to Mr Vince was processed fairly.' He said there was 'every reason' why the data protection claim should have been heard with the defamation claim last year. 'Both claims arose out of the same event, the publication of the article in Mail+ and the Daily Mail,' he added. 'Both claims rely on the same factual circumstances, namely the juxtaposition of the headline, photographs and caption, and the contention that the combination of the headline and the photograph created the misleading impression that Mr Vince had been accused of sexual harassment.'
