Elon Musk calls Donald Trump-backed tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has criticised US President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, calling it "outrageous" and a "disgusting abomination".
The bill, which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax breaks, was passed by the House Republicans in May, and has been described by the president as a "big, beautiful bill".
The tech billionaire hit out at the tax cuts on his platform X, writing: "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.
"Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it."
In American politics, "pork" is a political metaphor used when government spending is allocated to local projects, usually to benefit politicians' constituencies.
Musk left the administration abruptly last week after working to cut costs with his team, the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency - known as DOGE - with the ambition of sacking federal workers and cutting red tape.
The White House brushed Musk's comments aside, claiming they did not surprise the president.
In a press conference on Tuesday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that "the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill".
She added: "This is one, big, beautiful bill.
"And he's sticking to it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Markets sink amid Trump and Musk tension
Markets sink amid Trump and Musk tension originally appeared on TheStreet. On June 6, the overall cryptocurrency market cap decreased by 3.42% to $3.36 trillion, with losses concentrated in large-cap cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum (-5.4%), Solana (-8.7%), and Dogecoin (-13.3%), as per Kraken. Bitcoin remained stable, down only 1.8% to $104,002, with 24-hour trading volume at more than $41.8 billion. Altcoins across the board saw weekly losses exceeding 2%, with Cardano, XRP, and BNB all suffering notable declines. However, Bitcoin had a small gain of 0.3% over the last hour. BNB saw a 0.4% gain, while Solana had a similar hourly gain of 0.7%. Cardano saw the most significant hourly gain of 1.3% on the hourly bounce. Other cryptocurrencies, such as Dogecoin and XRP, experienced hourly bounces of 0.6% and 0.1%, respectively. The overall decline is occurring alongside broader macro and political tensions, while we observe an escalating war of words between U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. After Musk condemned Trump's $1.5 trillion "Liberation Day" spending bill for a "disgusting abomination", the former allies had a bitter exchange across social media. Musk, who has recently resigned from the Department of Government Efficiency, accused Trump of being ungrateful and claimed credit for helping the GOP win the 2024 elections. Trump dismissed the drama, telling Politico, "It's going very well, never done better", although aides set up a call to reconcile. Speaking alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, he suggested that Musk's anger stemmed from losing electric vehicle (EV) subsidies, which he believes will negatively impact Tesla. The feud has already sown uncertainty in the already jittery markets over debt risks and policy uncertainty. With crypto sentiment already teetering, analysts warn that U.S. political instability could encourage further outflows from tokens such as DOGE and ADA, which are more retail-heavy. Markets sink amid Trump and Musk tension first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Polkadot's DOT Retakes Important $3.96 Level as Buyers Step In After Pullback
Polkadot DOT bullish momentum has potentially returned, after the token retook an important support level at $3.96, according to CoinDesk Research's technical analysis model. DOT experienced a 7% correction from $4.038 to a low of $3.753 before establishing "strong support" and rebounding strongly, according to the model. The token is currently 1.3% lower, trading around $3.97. The broader market gauge, CoinDesk 20 CD20 index, was 0.8% lower at publication time, also recovering from a sharp move lower amid a tussle between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Technical analysis highlights: DOT-USD experienced a 7.06% correction from $4.038 to a low of $3.753 before establishing strong support. Price formed an ascending channel after the correction, reclaiming the $3.95 level with increasing buying pressure. Significant volume spike of over 5.9 million during the correction phase, followed by 1.7 million volume during the recovery period. Key resistance established at $3.98-$4.00 zone with immediate support at $3.95. Higher low pattern formed after brief pullback, confirming bullish momentum Psychological $3.96 level successfully defended, reinforcing recovery narrative. Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster
There is a statistic in my colleague Laurence Iliff's story on the failure of full-size electric pickups that, pardon the pun, shocked me. The combustion and hybrid Toyota Tundra had more new-vehicle registrations during the first quarter than the entire industry's collection of full-size electric pickups — by a lot. That statistic is in no way a brag on the Tundra, which remains a distant No. 5 in what is now a five-horse segment since the death of the even slower-selling Nissan Titan. According to S&P Global Mobility, the Tundra recorded a meager 36,895 new registrations in the U.S. in the first quarter, while the Ford F-150 Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer, Rivian R1T and GMC Sierra EV collectively posted about 22,000 registrations. By comparison, combustion-powered pickups from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC and Ram reached 478,823 registrations in the first quarter, S&P said. Were it not for investments and expectations that rival the size of the immense front fascias on virtually all of the aforementioned full-size behemoths, this failed experiment would already be over. The score: Newtonian Physics ∞, Hype & Hope 0. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. I can't begin to fathom how many tens of billions of dollars were spent by automakers and their suppliers developing and building those full-size electric pickups over the last decade. You can, however, get some sense of how bad the miss was when you look at the sales/production volumes auto executives anticipated, including Elon Musk's quarter- to half-million annual sales estimate for the Cybertruck, or Ford's initial F-150 Lightning estimate of up to 150,000 sales annually. So why did full-size electric pickups fail so badly? I would argue that it wasn't just physics — though the need for a bigger, more expensive battery to push these bigger vehicles farther as long as they are not towing anything shouldn't be minimized. But I think a share of the responsibility for this collective flop also lies with the companies' product planning departments. While all vehicles are compromised in some form or fashion by the time they reach consumers, full-size electric pickups lack a fundamental quality that has made their combustion-powered counterparts the U.S. sales champs for decades: Uncompromised utility. The legacy pickups are renowned for accomplishing whatever task their owners set them to. That unstoppable capability is what gave rise to the 'lifestyle' pickup in the first place, as consumers desired at least a taste of that confidence, even if they rarely, if ever, actually needed that power. Product planners and their auto executive bosses failed to account in their sales projections for just how much compromise an electric-pickup owner would face in everyday life. Sure, the trucks have some excellent features, including loads and loads of torque, but so do their combustion counterparts. And while it may cost extra fuel to tow a trailer with those combustion-powered vehicles, a heavy trailer sucks up a battery pack's juice quickly — and recharging is not nearly as quick and convenient as a gas station fill-up. It's the same reason that battery-electric semis are probably doomed to failure: It's just the wrong technology for that use case. Sorry. In a world ruled by logic and not emotion, society would consign new technologies to the areas where they have the greatest advantage. Battery-electric powertrains make the greatest sense in vehicles with limited mass and with limited demands, while hydrogen (and diesel) is more efficient in larger, demand-dependent vehicles where towing capability is paramount. We don't live in that world, unfortunately, which is why full-size electric pickups are failing. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
