What's the difference between apes and monkeys?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
On its face, a comparison of monkeys and apes seems straightforward: Modern primates have defining physical features and behaviors that clearly sort them in different categories.
Beginning with living animals, those differences are easy to pick out. Most monkeys have tails; some have prehensile tails, which means they can grasp and hold things. They're quadrupeds, meaning they use all four limbs to get around. They have four limbs that are about the same length, as well as a flexible spine.
Monkeys can be subdivided into Old World and New World classifications based on where they live. Old World monkeys live in Africa and Asia, while New World monkeys live in Central and South America, according to the Pan African Sanctuary Alliance. Old World monkeys are also known as African-Eurasian and New World monkeys as Neotropical.
Apes, on the other hand, don't have tails. Their "orthograde" body plan makes them capable of standing upright and gives them disproportionate limbs, with long arms and shorter legs. Inversely, humans — which are also apes — have long legs and shorter arms. Apes also have a larger brain relative to their body size than monkeys do, which has critical implications for intelligence.
"There is a significant difference in intelligence between monkeys and apes," Becky Malinsky, curator of primates at the Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, told Live Science in an email. "While monkeys are capable of complex thinking, they generally have a lower cognitive capacity than apes."
Related: What did the last common ancestor between humans and apes look like?
Apes can be subdivided into the great and lesser apes based on their size. Great apes include chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), eastern gorillas (Gorilla beringei), western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) — all of which live in Africa — and orangutans (Pongo), which live in Southeast Asia. Lesser apes comprise gibbons and siamangs, which live in Southeast Asia. Although humans are also great apes, this article focuses on non-human primates.
But when you consider their evolutionary history, the difference between apes and monkeys is murkier.
"From the surface, it seems like a very easy thing to discuss," Sergio Almécija, a senior research scientist of biological anthropology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, told Live Science. "But that superficial impression, I think, [is] based on living animals only."
According to a review published in the journal Science in 2021, of which Almécija is the lead author, humans diverged from apes — specifically chimpanzees — between 9.3 million and 6.5 million years ago.
RELATED MYSTERIES
—Why do chimpanzees throw poop?
—Could monkeys really type the complete works of Shakespeare?
—Why haven't all primates evolved into humans?
But apes and monkeys diverged from their last common ancestor even longer ago: between 23 million and 34 million years ago, according to a 2013 paper published in the journal Nature. The authors analyzed the oldest known fossils from Old World (African-Eurasian) monkeys and apes, found in the Rukwa Rift Basin in southwestern Tanzania: a partial jawbone with three teeth from an ape, and a single molar from a monkey. The team classified these novel fossil primates, calling the ape Rukwapithecus fleaglei and the monkey Nsungwepithecus gunnelli. Geological dating of the rock layer in which these fossils were found indicate they're about 25.2 million years old.
Still, there's much more to learn about how primates evolved over millions of years. "The fossil record can lead to varying interpretations and debate," Malinsky wrote.
"It's really much more complex than we think," Almécija said. "We don't have as much information as we think we do to answer some of these questions."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
6 hours ago
- Fast Company
Japan's ispace fails second private moon landing attempt
A Japanese company trying to land a spacecraft on the moon Friday said that the unmanned lander is believed to have crashed into the lunar surface. The Tokyo-based private space exploration company ispace reported that its Resilience lunar lander successfully initiated its descent onto the moon, but lost communication shortly afterward. Resilience made its descent from 100 kilometers above the moon's surface to 20 kilometers normally and its main engine fired to initiate the deceleration process before ispace's connection to the spacecraft's telemetry went dark. Five hours after initiating the landing sequence and attempting to remotely reboot the craft, mission control determined that regaining the connection wasn't possible and declared an end to the mission, known as Mission 2 SMBC x HAKUTO-R Venture Moon. A crash landing upends the mission According to the company's early findings, the laser rangefinder Resilience used to calculate the distance to the surface of the moon was operating on a delay, an error that likely prevented the lander from slowing down for a successful landing. Given those findings, ispace concluded that its signature spacecraft 'likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface.' 'Given that there is currently no prospect of a successful lunar landing, our top priority is to swiftly analyze the telemetry data we have obtained thus far and work diligently to identify the cause,' ispace CEO Takeshi Hakamada said, adding that the company would issue a detailed report on its findings. The failed lunar mission follows ispace's first attempt in 2023, which also ended with a bang. That craft, the Hakuto-R lunar lander, free-fell out of the sky for 5 kilometers before smashing into the lunar surface after onboard sensors miscalculated its altitude. The lunar south pole in the spotlight With interest in Mars on the upswing, humanity's drive to get back to the moon seemed to have waned in recent decades before a recent flurry of new lunar excitement. In 2023, India became the fourth nation to successfully land on the moon, joining the U.S., the former Soviet Union, and China. The following year, Japan joined their ranks when the country's JAXA space agency nailed a historic pinpoint landing on the moon, but pulled the feat off accidentally upside-down. For national space agencies, the spirit of scientific exploration isn't the only thing putting the moon back in focus. The moon's icy south pole is believed to house water frozen in shadowed craters, a resource that would prove invaluable for future human activity on the moon, or even as a hydration waystop for space exploration beyond it. That context is useful for understanding why manned moon missions are back on the docket for NASA, which wants to establish the first 'long-term presence' on the lunar surface and plans to put humans back on the moon in 2028, optimistically. China has its own plans to send astronauts to the moon by 2030, the first stepping stone toward its goal of establishing a lunar research station. Private partnerships power the new space race Lunar interest isn't just waxing among national space agencies. Private spaceflight companies around the globe have scrambled to get into the mix, with some like ispace sending their landers up with a ride from SpaceX rockets. Firefly Aerospace, based in Austin, Texas, made history of its own in March when its Blue Ghost lunar lander reached the lunar surface, making it the first private company to soft land on the moon. A lunar lander from Houston-based Intuitive Machines followed closely behind but touched down at an odd angle, preventing the solar panels that power it from recharging to carry out its mission objectives. Both lunar missions carried equipment for NASA through a program known as Commercial Lunar Payload Services, an initiative that will allow the agency to conduct scientific research through private moon missions. Between global powers with designs on lunar ice and a lucrative web of public-private partnerships, the moon is the next big prize in the space race – one we're going to be hearing a lot more about in the coming years.
Medscape
8 hours ago
- Medscape
Crepidiastrum Denticulatum Extract
Crepidiastrum denticulatum , a member of the Asteraceae family that is also known as Youngia denticulatum , is traditionally consumed as a vegetable in Korea. The plant is known to confer antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity as well as protective effects. Air pollutants exact a toll on the skin, promoting the development of acne, atopic dermatitis, pigmentary changes, and wrinkles. C denticulatum is seen on skin cream labels as Pollux CD to help shield the skin against various stressors found in air pollution, including particulate matter, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons containing benzo[a]pyrene, heavy metals, and ultraviolet (UV) B radiation. C denticulatum is included in anti-aging skin care (and found in Zerafite Wrinkle Defense Barrier Cream) because it has been found to increase autophagy and decrease cellular senescence. This column focuses on the available evidence that supports the use of this natural extract in skin care. Leslie S. Baumann, MD Autophagy and Protection Against Skin Pollution In 2019, Yoon et al. screened numerous natural extracts to quantify their autophagy activation efficacy in cultured dermal fibroblasts, given the spate of evidence that autophagy activation can protect the skin from oxidation-induced cellular damage and signs of aging. Cells treated by C denticulatum extracts demonstrated the greatest autophagic vacuole development in the noncytotoxic range. The investigators reported that C denticulatum treatment yielded the phosphorylation of adenosine monophosphate kinase, although it did not suppress the mammalian target of rapamycin. They also assessed the anti-pollution activity of the extract using model substances, benzo[a]pyrene and cadmium chloride, with the C denticulatum extract treatment of the skin, particularly as anti-inflammatory, antipollution cosmetic agents. Anti-aging In 2020, Park et al. studied the influence of various UVB radiation levels on the development of the functional constituents of C denticulatum . They observed that none of the UVB levels (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.25 W m-2) conferred negative effects on shoot dry weight after 6 days of 6-h exposure. Shoot fresh weight was suppressed by the higher energy treatments (1.0 and 1.25 W m-2). Total carotenoid content was elevated by 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 W m-2 energy levels. Antioxidant capacity, hydroxycinnamic acid content, and multiple sesquiterpenes were augmented on day 4 by 0.25 W m-2 treatment. The researchers determined that they had identified the potential of 0.25 W m-2 UVB to efficiently synthesize bioactive constituents of C denticulatum without suppressing growth. In a 2015 study, Kim et al. investigated the impact of various youngiaside extracts on extrinsic aging. In evaluating the molecular mechanisms of the extracts in UVB-irradiated HaCaT keratinocytes and human dermal fibroblasts, they found that the C denticulatum constituents reduced matrix metalloproteinase expression and production. Collagen expression and synthesis were also increased in human dermal fibroblasts. Furthermore, the investigators observed that the extracts significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme expression, thus down-regulating the reactive oxygen species generated by UVB exposure. Other notable results included decreased phosphorylation of I-kappa-B-alphaand IKK alpha/beta , suppressed nuclear factor kappa-B (NF kappa-B) p65 nuclear translocation, and robust inhibition of pro-inflammatory mediators. The investigators concluded that the tested substances found in C denticulatum have the potential to prevent and treat cutaneous aging. Animal Studies Indicate Protective Benefits In 2014, Ahn et al. found that an ethanol extract of C denticulatum significantly shielded retinal ganglion cells from eradication caused by optic nerve crush in a mouse model of glaucoma. They also determined that the primary active constituents of the herbal extract were the hydroxycinnamic acids chicoric acid and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, which have demonstrated the capacity to protect from retinal damage in multiple in vivo and in vitro studies. Later in 2014, Yoo et al. reported on the antioxidant and detoxifying activity of C denticulatum extracts. The researchers found that the botanical agent exerted hepatoprotective benefits against chronic alcohol-induced liver damage in rats. Specifically, rats treated with C denticulatum experienced substantial attenuation of fatty liver symptoms, with normalization of antioxidative capacity and lipid peroxidation of the liver. The functions of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione peroxidase were also restored through treatment with C denticulatum . More recently, in 2018, the oral administration of a C denticulatum extract was found to exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity in improving acute renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Conclusion
Gizmodo
12 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Private Japanese Lander Crashes Into the Moon in Second Failed Attempt
A private Japanese spacecraft crashed into the Moon while attempting the country's first commercial lunar landing on Thursday, June 5, the company has confirmed. This is the second failed moon mission for Tokyo-based ispace, which launched the Resilience lander aboard SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket in January. ispace lost communication with Resilience less than two minutes before its scheduled landing on the Moon, the Associated Press reports. In a statement released this morning, the company explained that the spacecraft's descent initially went smoothly. But once it reached an altitude of roughly 12 miles (20 kilometers) above the lunar surface, mission control lost telemetry with the lander. After trying and failing to regain contact, ispace concluded that Resilience had most likely crash landed on the lunar surface, ending the mission. 'Given that there is currently no prospect of a successful lunar landing, our top priority is to swiftly analyze the telemetry data we have obtained thus far and work diligently to identify the cause,' said Takeshi Hakamada, founder and CEO of ispace, in the statement. Based on currently available data, it appears that the source of the mishap was a malfunction of the laser device that measures the distance between Resilience and the lunar surface, ispace stated. As a result, the lander failed to sufficiently slow down to make its planned soft landing. Resilience launched aboard SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket on January 15, and entered lunar orbit on May 6, according to NASA. The 2,200-pound (1,000-kilogram), prism-shaped lander carried five payloads, including a tiny rover called Tenacious, a water electrolyzer experiment, an algae-based food production module, and a deep space radiation monitor. But perhaps most interesting—or at least, most unusual—was the adorable miniature house Resilience aimed to establish on the lunar toy-sized white-trimmed red cottage, appropriately named 'the Moonhouse,' was designed by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg. On his website, Genberg states that he has been dreaming of putting a little house on the Moon for 25 years. Sadly, however, this whimsical work of art was unable to fulfill its destiny. The demise of Resilience is reminiscent of ispace's first attempt to land a spacecraft on the Moon in April 2023. That mission also ended in a crash landing after the lander ran out of propellant while approaching the surface. ispace is one of several companies aiming to provide commercial payload transportation services to the Moon. But so far, only Firefly Aerospace has achieved a fully successful private lunar landing. The company launched its Blue Ghost lander on the same Falcon 9 rocket that ferried Resilience to the Moon in January. Despite two consecutive failures, ispace aims to launch two more Moon missions in 2027. The company will debut the larger, upgraded Apex 1.0 lander for these missions, but whether it proves to be more capable than Resilience remains to be seen. 'We know it's not going to be easy,' ispace director and CFO Jumpei Nozaki told reporters during a press conference a few hours after the mission failure, according to 'But it's hard. It has some meaning and significance of trying.'
