logo
Ways Companies Can Navigate Trump's Constantly Shifting Tariff Policies

Ways Companies Can Navigate Trump's Constantly Shifting Tariff Policies

Forbes4 days ago

President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order imposing tariffs on imported goods during a ... More 'Make America Wealthy Again' trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC. Touting the event as 'Liberation Day', Trump announced sweeping new tariffs targeting goods imported to the U.S. on countries including China, Japan and India. (Photo by)
President Donald Trump's on-again/off-again tariff policies and pronouncements have created an economic roller coaster for business executives, making it challenging for them to know how to respond, and creating concerns for what may lie ahead.
Many business leaders likely breathed sighs of relief when a federal international trade court ruled Thursday that most of the tariffs were illegal—until another court reinstated the tariffs the next day, pending an appeal of the decision by the Trump administration.
The ruling by the trade court 'has significantly undermined President Trump's tariff strategy, casting doubt on the legitimacy of his actions and weakening his negotiating position with trade partners. However, businesses have also suffered collateral damage. Uncertainty remains high, hindering their managers' abilities to plan effectively. In effect, the verdict has added one more piece to the puzzle and one more variable to consider in planning,' Usha Haley, the Barton Distinguished Chair in International Business at Wichita State University, explained in an email interview with me.
In an earlier story, I shared recommendations on the steps business leaders could take to help mitigate the impact of Trump's first round of tariffs, which were announced on April 2. Now, in the aftermath of the dozens of times he had changed his policies, it makes sense for business leaders to consider taking a reality check concerning the effectiveness of their response to the tariffs—and what they should do differently going forward.
The uncertainty has forced many companies back into crisis mode until the dust settles. 'Companies crave predictability. Right now, they're stuck in no man's land—unsure whether to pass costs on to consumers, hold inventory, renegotiate contracts, or pivot to alternative suppliers. This type of limbo makes it nearly impossible to forecast effectively. For public companies, that means revised earnings guidance. For smaller ones, it means cash flow strain and stalled investment,' David Warwick, a supply chain expert and an executive vice president at OverHaul, noted in an email message to me.
'As a luxury interior design firm sourcing furniture globally, we've felt the impact of tariff uncertainty. Flexibility is key, along with diverse vendor relationships, proactive planning, and clear communication help us maintain momentum even as conditions shift,' Fabian Rivas, CEO of Enliven Interiors, an interior architecture and design studio, observed in an email message to me.
A best practice for managing a crisis is to be nimble and ready to adjust and respond to changing circumstances. 'The unpredictable back-and-forth of President Trump's tariffs has highlighted the importance of having flexible, well-prepared supply chains. Companies should look at spreading their risk by sourcing from a wider range of countries, holding extra stock where it makes sense, and having contracts in place that allow for quick changes when needed. It's also essential to make sure internal teams are kept up to date and ready to respond when new rules come into force with little notice." Jeremy Solomons, CEO of UK-based Export Management Services, told me in an email interview.
Despite the latest changing and shifting tariff-related circumstances, there are some basic priorities that business leaders should keep in mind. In a dynamic and unpredictable environment such as this, 'you must devote time to maintaining relationships with your suppliers, even as you might limit or pause your purchases from them. They might be unhappy in the moment, but they will appreciate the effort and will go out of their way to find ways of working with you as circumstances evolve,' Moshe Cohen, a senior lecturer at Boston University's Questrom School of Business, advised in an email message to me.
Another priority for companies could be to be preparing and updating worst-case or next-case scenarios in anticipation of a decision by the appeals court, and to be ready for the impact of that decision.'In the logistics space, we're highly sensitive to this volatility as companies struggle to navigate where tariffs will ultimately land, which directly impacts their production planning, supply chain decisions, and capital investments. This uncertainty creates a downstream effect where our clients are strategically waiting and running multiple planning scenarios rather than making firm commitments on spending and inventory orders,' Corey Dong, CEO of Enru Logistics, advised in an email message to me.
And don't forget to keep customers informed about how the next turn in the tariff roller coaster ride will impact them,'Companies need to be constantly proactive and public about how they are absorbing the impacts of the tariff volatility, to mitigate or eliminate disruptions,' Judi Durand, a crisis communications specialist at Judi Durand Consulting, told me via email. Those steps include reassuring clients on a daily basis, communicating with stakeholders about the impact of changes to Trump's tariff policies, and telling customers how those changes will impact them, she said.
It's not unusual for the impact of a crisis to weigh heavily on business executives, and to dampen their outlook and spirit. That's all the more reason to maintain a healthy and positive attitude, no matter what happens next. 'It's important that you remain opportunistic and lock in buying opportunities as they arise. An unstable buying environment creates short-term opportunities, as suppliers look to shed inventory, or as international agreements temporarily lower tariffs costs in various markets. Above all, you should stay positive and avoid panic-buying, balancing opportunistic deals with a long-term strategy,' Cohen at Boston University concluded.
Finally, corporate executives should take advantage of the current lull to review and update their crisis management plans to ensure they reflect current realities in the marketplace. Then be prepared to adjust the plans as needed when the appeals court issues its ruling about the future of Trump's tariffs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump defense chief to rename Navy ship — is that common? Historians weigh in
Trump defense chief to rename Navy ship — is that common? Historians weigh in

Miami Herald

time33 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump defense chief to rename Navy ship — is that common? Historians weigh in

President Donald Trump's administration is planning to rename a U.S. Navy ship. Is this a common practice? Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is set to rebrand the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler named after the California politician and Navy veteran, according to CBS News. Other news outlets have confirmed this report. Milk served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors — becoming one of the first openly gay elected officials in the country — before his assassination in 1978. When asked to comment on the report, a Pentagon spokesperson told CBS News that Hegseth 'is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos.' The defense secretary, a former Fox News anchor, has made some negative remarks about LGBTQ people in the past. In his 2024 book, he wrote that policies permitting gay individuals to serve in the military are 'part of a 'Marxist' agenda,' according to The Guardian. Hegseth is also no stranger to rebranding military assets. He previously ordered the renaming of North Carolina's Fort Liberty to Fort Bragg and Georgia's Fort Moore to Fort Benning — restoring their original names, which were associated with the Confederate generals Braxton Bragg and Henry Benning. But, defense officials noted that the restored names now honor World War II solider Roland Bragg and World War I solider Fred Benning. Naval historians told McClatchy News that the U.S. Navy has a fairly long history of rebranding existing vessels — particularly in the distant past — but they stressed that renaming ships explicitly for ideological reasons has little precedent. Long history of renaming ships 'Historically, renaming U.S. warships has been very common,' John Beeler, a history professor at the University of Alabama, who researches military and naval history, told McClatchy News. He cited the example of the USS New York, an armored cruiser built in 1893, which was rebranded to the USS Rochester in 1917, the year the U.S. entered World War I. There were a number of reasons why existing vessels might have had their names switched. For one, they could have been renamed after their role in the Navy changed, or after their capture during wartime, Jason Smith, a history professor at Southern Connecticut State University, who researches maritime history, told McClatchy News. 'At other times, naval vessels have been renamed when a newly commissioned ship was slated to be given the preexisting name, which necessitated renaming the older vessel,' Smith said. David Winkler, a professor at the Naval War College, echoed this view. 'At the turn of the century the Navy named a bunch of armored cruisers for states,' Winkler told McClatchy News. 'When we started building battleships, such as the Pennsylvania, California, and Washington, the cruisers having those names became the Pittsburgh, San Diego, and Seattle.' Further, during the second world war, the escort carrier Midway was restyled as the St. Lo in 1994, allowing a larger battle carrier to take the name Midway. Winkler noted that, 'lore has it that getting your ship name changed is a sign of bad luck,' as the 'St. Lo would be sunk at the Battle of Leyte Gulf.' And, in recent decades, ship renamings have become more rare, he said. A spokesperson for the Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment from McClatchy News. The Navy enters 'the culture wars' But, despite the Navy's history of rebranding commissioned vessels, the Trump administration appears to be venturing into somewhat uncharted waters, historians said. 'What is not common is renaming ships for overtly ideological reasons,' Beeler said. Smith reinforced this view, saying that 'renaming ships for political reasons has been virtually unheard of until recently…' He noted that the sole precedent is the renaming of the the USS Chancelorville and USNS Maury — both styled after Confederate figures — which occurred in 2023, during former President Joe Biden's tenure. These renamings came at the recommendation of a congressional commission established in the wake of the killing of George Floyd. One vessel was renamed the USS Robert Smalls after a former slave who aided the Union in the Civil War, and the other was restyled the USNS Marie Tharp in honor of a ground-breaking oceanographic cartographer, according to the New York Times. Now, the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk could further cement this new practice of recasting vessels for political reasons, experts said. And, the Milk may only be the beginning. CBS News reported that numerous other ships could see their names changed. Among those on a 'recommended list' are the USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Thurgood Marshall. 'The Navy and its ships have entered—somewhat begrudgingly, I think—into the culture wars along with so many aspects of American public life today,' Smith said.

Bollinger Motors Has Been Saved From the Brink of Death
Bollinger Motors Has Been Saved From the Brink of Death

Motor 1

time33 minutes ago

  • Motor 1

Bollinger Motors Has Been Saved From the Brink of Death

Bollinger Motors has been saved. Mullen Automotive has acquired an additional 21 percent of the company, bringing its total ownership to 95 percent. Despite having complete control over Bollinger, Mullen said the automaker will maintain 'its own brand identity and focus.' Bollinger reportedly went into receivership earlier this year after company founder and former CEO Robert Bollinger sued the automaker, who left in 2024. He claimed Bollinger Motors owed him $10 million, but all that should be in the company's past. According to Mullen announcing the acquisition, it has 'resolved recent claims and debt that had led to a court-ordered receivership for Bollinger.' The court has discharged and removed the receiver and dismissed the case, Mullen says. Bollinger customers should expect 'business as usual,' which includes sales, services, and warranty coverage. The company will continue to develop the B4 chassis cab , its all-electric Class 4 commercial truck. Bollinger will utilize Mullen's resources to accelerate development and integrate the B4 into Mullen's EV ecosystem. Bollinger was founded in 2015 with initial plans to develop a mid-size electric pickup and an SUV. However, the B1 and B2 never entered production, and the company shifted focus to an electric commercial truck. Production for that began last September. More Cheap EVs Fiat's First Three-Wheel EV Is This Super Cute Delivery Truck Opinion: I Love and Loathe Bezos's Cheap Pickup Truck Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Mullen Automotive Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store