President Teddy Roosevelt Conserved Millions of Acres of Federal Lands. It Was His Greatest Legacy
This story, Teddy Roosevelet's American Game Trails,' appeared in the January 1991 issue of Outdoor Life.
Ask most Americans to name five presidents and, chances are, Theodore Roosevelt will be among them. Without question, T.R. was one of the most memorable characters to ever occupy the White House. With his thick, pince-nez spectacles, bristling mustache and horselike teeth, his looks alone made him hard to forget.
His accomplishments also were in a class apart. Besides having a political career that took him from the New York State Assembly to the highest office in the nation, he was also a cattleman, an ornithologist, a taxidermist, an explorer, a military hero and a prolific writer whose books and articles covered subjects as diverse as the life of Oliver Cromwell and the Hopi Snake Dance.
The one constant force in T.R.'s phenomenal life was his passion for wild things. This fascination with nature began during his boyhood on Long Island, New York, where young. Teddy devoted his leisure hours to studying birds, collecting natural 'artifacts' for his 'museum' and learning the art of taxidermy. By the time he finished Harvard in 1880, Roosevelt was recognized in scientific circles as an accomplished naturalist. He. had also developed a taste for the outdoors that could not be satisfied by the tame environs of the East.
Like many an adventurous young man of that day, T.R. headed West. 'It was still the Wild West in those days,' T.R. later wrote, 'the West of Frederic Remington's drawings … of the Indian and the buffalo hunter, the soldier and the cowpuncher. It was a land of vast silent places, of lonely rivers, and of plains where the wild game stared at the passing horseman.' In short, it was Teddy's kind of place.
Despite a total lack of experience with livestock, he bought two cattle ranches, the Elk Horn and the Chimney Butte, along the Little Missouri in the badlands of present-day North Dakota. While he still maintained his home in the East, over the next nine years, Teddy's ranch house became his spiritual headquarters. Much of his time during those days was spent hunting, both on the plains near his ranches and in the mountains to the north and to the west. His reminiscences of those years, recorded in a trilogy of hunting books (Hunting Trip of a Ranchman, Ranchlife and the Hunting Trail and The Wilderness Hunter), are now classics of American big-game hunting lore.
'When the friends of the special interests in the Senate woke up, they discovered that 16 million acres of timberland had been saved for the people … before the land grabbers could get at them.'
-Teddy roosevelet
The rugged, hardy life of the frontier excited Roosevelt even more than the abundance of big game. When recounting an antelope hunt in the Badlands of the Dakotas, Roosevelt stated, 'The number of cartridges spent compared to the number of pronghorn killed was enormous, but the fun and excitement of the chase were the main objects … the actual killing of game was of entirely secondary importance.'
Teddy found his own abilities tested on more than a few occasions. In a 1908 article for Everybody's Magazine, he recalled how something as seemingly simple as a Christmas deer hunt could suddenly turn into near tragedy in the wilderness.
T.R. and one of his cowhands were returning from a successful hunt, each with a whitetail slung behind his saddle. A frozen river lay between them and home. Not realizing that a recent spell of unseasonably mild weather had weakened the stream's covering of ice, the two men urged their heavily laden mounts onto the frozen river. 'About midway,' Teddy wrote, 'there was a sudden, tremendous crash, and men, horses and deer were scrambling together in the water amid slabs of floating ice.' Fortunately, the river was shallow, 'and no worse work resulted than some hard work and a chilly bath. But what cared we? We were returning triumphant with our Christmas dinner!'
Disaster once more stalked Roosevelt in Idaho's Coeur d'Alene country. While searching for goat sign along a mountain ridge, T.R. lost his footing. Before he could recover his balance, he slid headlong over the brink of a steep ledge and fell into the top of a pine tree below, which broke his fall. Roosevelt came to rest in the crown of a small balsam fir some 60 feet from where his flight had begun, everything intact but his dignity.
That close call didn't dull T.R.'s keenness for adventure one whit. Later that same day, he prevailed upon his companions, John Willis and Bill Merrifield, to lower him by lariat over the edge of a 300-foot canyon wall to give him a better photographic angle on an especially spectacular waterfall. His mission completed, T.R. signaled for Merrifield and Willis to hoist him up. To their dismay, they found their combined strength insufficient to bring Roosevelt back to the top. He dangled over the rapids below for two hours while his partners frantically sought a way out of the predicament. Finally, in desperation, they lowered him even farther into the canyon, playing out all of the line they had between them. When at the literal end of his tether, T.R. tossed his camera down to Merrifield (who had walked around and gotten down below him) for safekeeping, then plunged 25 feet into the rapids below. He surfaced downstream, soggy, but otherwise in 'bully' condition.
Once, while hunting alone in Montana's Bitterroot Range, Teddy found his quarry itself to be the source of some unbargained for adventure. Slipping through the pines surrounding his camp, Teddy spied an oversize grizzly padding along the woodland floor. The shot was a close one, and Teddy took slow, deliberate aim.
He shot, and the grizzly crashed off into a laurel thicket. Long seconds passed as Teddy waited, unsure of his next move. Without warning, the bear appeared on the hillside above the laurel scrub, searching the woods below for his enemy. Again Roosevelt fired. This time, instead of fleeing, 'the great bear turned with a harsh roar of fury and challenge, blowing the bloody foam from his mouth, so that I saw the gleam of his white fangs; and then he charged straight at me. …'
T.R. shot a third time, slamming the bear with a chest shot that ran the length of the bruin's body — but the grizzly came on. Roosevelt jacked his fourth and last round into the chamber. Matadorlike, he leaped aside, barely avoiding the beast's claws, and fired his final shot as the bear passed by.
The bear fell, apparently dead, a few yards from where Roosevelt was standing. T.R., his rifle empty, watched in horror as the grizzly regained his feet. Roosevelt clumsily struggled to replenish the spent magazine. But a fifth shot was not to be necessary. The bear's head dropped, and the grizzly fell for the last time.
Teddy's rather heroic accounts of his hunting exploits prompted his detractors to brand him a braggart and a blowhard. Certainly T.R. was no shrinking violet; he didn't mind telling others of his accomplishments. And he was an exceptionally skilled outdoorsman, a fact that has caused his name to appear on the pages of this magazine numerous times over the years.
In a 1932 Outdoor Life article, for instance, Texas hunter John 'Catch 'Em Alive' Abernathy recalled how the president had kept up with him on an exceptionally grueling wolf hunt across a prairie-dog-burrowed landscape, even when saddle-toughened cowboys in the group had dropped out of the chase. 'He deserved more credit for staying with me in that hazardous race than I did for catching the wolf. For the president … to have outridden several seasoned, daredevil riders on the hard 10-mile race was no mean accomplishment.'
As cougar hunter John Lesowski noted in a July 1967 article in Outdoor Life, while hunting in Colorado in 1901, Teddy Roosevelt shot one of the largest mountain lions ever killed. It weighed 227 pounds, wrote Lesowski, and its skull was the first recorded in the Boone and Crockett Club record book. The cougar still stands as the fourth biggest ever recorded in Boone and Crockett.
Related: Our Editor-in-Chief Interviews Teddy Roosevelt After His Mountain Lion Hunt, From the Archives
Despite his successes, T.R. freely confessed his own mistakes and inadequacies as candidly as he detailed his triumphs, often making himself the butt of his own jokes in the process. In Hunting Trip of a Ranchman, for instance, he somewhat sheepishly admitted that he had on more than one occasion stealthily approached what he took to be a black bear only to discover that the object of his stalk was a charred log.
Roosevelt's writings placed him among the foremost authorities of his day on American big-game animals, but his fascination with wildlife extended beyond the beasts of the chase. The tiny creatures of the wild, too, took much of his attention, and his hunting books are filled with digressions concerning his observations of the lesser birds and beasts of the field. In The Wilderness Hunter, for example, Roosevelt slips from a first-person narrative of a stalk for pronghorns into a five-page discussion of the relative musical merits of the Western skylark and the Southern mockingbird. Later, in the same book, he just as effortlessly shifts from a recap of a caribou hunt into an eyewitness account of the bloodthirsty hunting habits of the tiny water shrew.
Teddy's preoccupation with all aspects of the outdoors quite naturally drew him to the fore of that first awakening of environmental activism. In 1888, he, along with Forest and Stream editor George Bird Grinnel, founded the Boone and Crockett Club, for which T.R. served as president for six years. From its very beginning, Boone and Crockett was actively involved in the protection of wildlife habitat. Among its early successes was the passage by Congress of the 1894 Protection Act (for which the club vigorously lobbied), which brought a halt to the game slaughter, timber cutting and mindless commercial development that then threatened Yellowstone National Park.
In 1901, after two years as governor of New York, Teddy was elected vice-president of the United States. The following year, while hunting in the Adirondacks in upstate New York, Roosevelt received word that President McKinley had been seriously injured during an assassination attempt. Eight days later, McKinley succumbed to his wounds, and T.R. became the 26th president of the United States.
The 'bully pulpit,' as Teddy called his new office, offered him the greatest opportunity of his life to advance his conservation agenda, and he took fullest advantage of it. Forest protection ranked high on T.R. 's list of priorities, and he made liberal use of a law that allowed the president, by proclamation, to transfer federally owned lands into the national forest system. As might be expected, he met with considerable opposition. But to Teddy, politics were just another occasion for adventure, and in true T.R. style, he triumphed.
One of Teddy's most decisive victories over the foes of conservation came in 1907, when his opponents secured an amendment to that year's agricultural appropriations bill barring T.R. from placing any more federal land in the northwestern United States under the administration of the Forest Service. The bill passed, and it was to become law within a matter of days unless vetoed by the president (something T.R. did not wish to do). The special-interest groups thought they had T.R. over a barrel.
'But for four years,' Teddy later wrote, 'the Forest Service had been gathering field notes as to what forests ought to be set aside in [the affected] States.' Working feverishly against the four-day deadline, T.R. and National Forest chief Gifford Pinchot converted that rough data into a plan to create national forests in the Northwest. 'When the friends of the special interests in the Senate … woke up,' Teddy gleefully recalled in his autobiography, 'they discovered that 16 million acres of timberland had been saved for the people … before the land grabbers could get at them.'
By the end of his second term, the total national forest acreage had increased from 43 million to 194 million.
But that was far from the sum of T.R.'s contributions to the protection of woodlands and wildlife. According to Roosevelt's own account, his administration saw the number of national parks double; the establishment of four big-game refuges and 51 bird sanctuaries; the enactment of the first Alaskan game laws; the establishment of an 18,000-acre National Bison Range in Montana; the passage of the National Monuments Act; and the convening of the first national conference on conservation.
In the midst of all that activity, Teddy still found time for a hunting trip or two. In 1902 he went South to Mississippi's Yazoo Delta to undertake a mounted bear hunt 'after the fashion of the old Southern planters. The president's guide for this excursion was Holt Collier, a bear hunter and dog handler of such prowess that his name is still remembered in parts of Mississippi today, a half-century after his death. Despite Collier's best efforts, the choreography of hound, horse and bruin necessary to allow the president the shot he wanted never quite materialized. It looked as if Teddy was to be disappointed.
By the end of Roosevelt's second term, the total national forest acreage had increased from 43 million to 194 million.
But Collier was determined to please the president, and, finally, he and his hounds managed to bring a bear to bay in a dense canebrake. Although many stories circulate about what actually happened, apparently Collier, whose bear hunting tactics were rooted more in meat-hunting practicality than in gentlemanly notions of sportsmanship, roped the bear, · drove it back to the presidential camp, and tied the defeated beast to a tree. Roosevelt was summoned to administer the coup de grace.
T.R. took one look at the pitiable prisoner and declined to shoot. To kill a bear under such conditions, he said, simply would not be sporting. Roosevelt's refusal was subsequently caricatured in a popular editorial cartoon entitled 'Drawing the Line in Mississippi.' Enterprising businessmen capitalized on the event by bestowing the name 'Teddy' on a style of stuffed toy bears that has been popular ever since.
Roosevelt held a great deal of contempt for the wanton destruction of wildlife — especially where the killing was for commercial purposes. Market hunters, Roosevelt believed, 'had no excuse of any kind' for their nefarious activities. He reserved his highest scorn, though, for that 'certain class of wealthy people' who purchased the meat, hides and heads of animals the professionals killed. 'There is always an element of the absurd [in] trophies of the chase which have been acquired by purchase,' Roosevelt said.
On the other hand, Roosevelt maintained that 'very little appreciable harm' was ever done to game populations by legitimate sportsmen hunting for food or trophies. Blind opposition to 'all hunting of game,' he firmly believed, was 'a sign of softness of head, not of soundness of heart.'
The anti-hunting element was particularly incensed over the president's celebrated 1903 trip to Yellowstone National Park with poet-naturalist John Burroughs. Hunting, of course, was prohibited in Yellowstone, and the anti-hunters, convinced that T.R. planned to try for big game during the outing, were more than a little disturbed about the president's intended visit to that great Rocky Mountain wildlife reserve.
T.R. did break the no-hunting rule — but just barely. As Burroughs and Roosevelt were riding cross-country in a touring sleigh, Burroughs recalled, 'the president jumped out, and, with his soft hat as a shield to his hand and, captured a mouse that was running along over the ground near us. He wanted it for [U.S. Biological Survey Chief] Dr. [Hart] Merriam, on the chance that it might be a new species.' The rodent, it turned out, was not new to science, but Roosevelt was the first to document its presence in the park.
After leaving the White House, T.R. expanded his hunter-naturalist career to new horizons. In 1909, he led a highly publicized and highly successful expedition to Africa to secure big-game specimens for the Smithsonian Institution. His account of the trip, entitled African Game Trails, did much to popularize African safaris among American big-game hunters. In 1962, more than a half-century later, American sportsmen would still be enjoying T.R.'s trip, retraced by his great-grandson, Jonathan Roosevelt, on the pages of Outdoor Life.
What was perhaps Roosevelt's most ambitious project came in 1913, when, in cooperation with the Brazilian government, he set out to explore the River of Doubt, a stream of the wild interior of the Amazon Basin, so named because its route through the jungle was, quite literally, unknown.
For once in T.R.'s heroic life, it looked as if his great teeth had bitten off more than he could chew. Too many years away from the hardihood of ranch life had added inches to his waist and softened his once rugged frame. Moreover, the jungle expedition faced every imaginable hardship: impassable waterfalls and death-dealing rapids; short rations; swarms of biting, stinging insects; malaria and dysentery; even the threat of attack by hostile natives. By the time the group reached civilization, it had spent two months in the Brazilian jungles and covered 1,500 miserable miles of previously unexplored wilderness.
T.R., now feeling the reigns of old age tugging on him, would never be the same robust man again. He returned to his family home at Sagamore Hill to a quiet life of reading and writing. He died in his sleep in the early hours of January 6, 1919.
'Only those are fit to live who do not fear to die,' Teddy wrote shortly before his death, 'and none are fit to die who have shrunk from the joy of life and the duty of life. Both life and death are parts of the same Great Adventure.'
Related: A New Bill Would Strip the President's Power to Designate National Monuments, Which Was Established by TR
No one will ever accuse Teddy Roosevelt of having shrunk from joy or duty, and certainly not of having shrunk from adventure. Indeed, adventure is his legacy to us today.
Jim McCafferty is the author of a children's book entitled Holt And The Teddy Bear about Theodore Roosevelt's famed Mississippi black bear hunt, which was the legendary birthplace of the 'Teddy Bear.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
6 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Should I Feel Guilty About Using My AC?
Air conditioning is one of our great guilty pleasures. When your town is suffocating under a 100-degree heat dome, there's nothing like the sweet relief that comes from returning home, cranking up the AC, and leaving behind the sweltering outdoor atmosphere for the cooler, crisper indoor one. As the first major heat wave of 2025 bakes the Northeast, South, and Midwest, nearly 150 million Americans are discovering that fact anew. But air conditioning comes at a high price. The two billion units operating worldwide are responsible for 7% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the United Nations Environment Program—a figure that is expected to double by 2030 and triple by 2050, when more than five billion units are projected to be in use. This will drive a climate spiral, with increased carbon output pushing global temperatures even higher, leading to still more air conditioning use and still higher temperatures and on and on. 'Air conditioning is becoming a lifeline in this overheated world,' says Ankit Kalanki, a cooling expert at RMI, a research and public policy group originally known as the Rocky Mountain Institute. 'It's no longer a luxury. We rely on air conditioning for comfort, to feel productive, to feel safe and healthy, and this is an invisible driver of electricity demand and emissions.' That fact leaves a lot of people feeling guilty over their own AC use. Our grandparents got by with fans, light clothing, drawn shades and cold drinks; even in the face of climate change, couldn't we do the same for at least routine summer heat? 'The feeling of guilt comes from a sense of responsibility to do something,' says Fionnuala Walravens, senior campaigner at the Environmental Investigation Agency, a green advocacy group. 'We ask ourselves 'What can we change?'' AC guilt is only a piece of the larger phenomenon of climate guilt, the responsibility and even shame many people feel if they aren't recycling perfectly, composting regularly, driving minimally, and keeping energy consumption as low as possible. 'There are often a lot of emotions that are connected,' says Wendy Greenspun, a clinical psychologist who is affiliated with Climate Psychology Alliance North America, an educational nonprofit. 'There is sadness, anger, anxiety, fear—lots of different emotions that I put under the umbrella of climate distress. Guilt may be one of those.' Managing all of those emotions—and taking all of the green steps to ameliorate them—can be a considerable lift, and almost no one can claim to be a perfect climate citizen. But when it comes to air conditioning there are plenty of coping measures—ways to keep your use of cooling in check while at the same time accepting that in an increasingly sweltering world, air conditioning is a daily essential. The most significant—if most expensive—step you can take to reduce the carbon footprint of your air conditioner is to scrap any model you bought 15 years ago or earlier and upgrade to a new one. In 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) banned the sale of new AC units (either central AC or window models) that use Freon—also known as R-22—as a coolant. Freon, which can leak from home units and often has to be replaced and topped off by a service person, has a so-called global warming potential (GWP) of nearly 2,000—meaning it packs 2,000 times the planet-heating punch of an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide. New units now use Puron Advance—also known as R-454B—which has a GWP of just 465. That's still considerably more than CO2 (which, by definition, has a GWP of 1), but a whole lot less than R-22. 'Industry is transitioning to alternatives that have a much lower environmental footprint,' says Kalanki. 'There is a lot of promise when it comes to what kind of refrigerants can provide similar cooling without impacting performance.' Disposing of old units is a bit more complex than just tossing them in a town dump. Many state or local laws require that refrigerant first be drained by an EPA-certified technician, after which the AC can be recycled or carted off by local curbside pickup programs. Kalanki also recommends buying what are known as smart air conditioners, units that connect to WiFi and can monitor energy use and be controlled remotely via phone. Smart AC's make it possible to pre-cool your home, turning the unit on when you're away to lower the temperature before you return, allowing you to shut the AC off—or at least turn it down—during peak evening use when air conditioners are commonly operating at their maximum. That can make a big difference to the larger world as air conditioners currently account for 40% to 60% of peak demand on the grid in the summer. Keeping your electricity use low in those hours also saves money, as energy companies often charge more for power consumed in that window; curbing consumption at such times can also help avoid grid crashes or blackouts. 'A smartly designed unit,' says Kalanki, 'can sense and measure how much of an energy load is required to cool a space. You can really reduce energy consumption significantly.' Architects and designers of apartments and single family homes have a role to play too. Better insulation, for example, can not only keep out the cold in winter, but keep in the cool during summer. Shades and awnings to screen out the sun can help too, as can painting roofs white—instead of the common black tar seen in cities—which reflects away the heat and light that black roofs absorb. 'There are a host of these passive strategies that can be used when buildings are designed,' says Kalanki. Buying, renting, or renovating a home with a mind toward these efficiencies, as well as installing new, upgraded AC units and heat pumps can not only reduce your carbon load, but reduce your emotional load—bringing down some of the guilt that comes with gobbling too much power in the summer months when energy use spikes. A few other simple adaptations can help as well. Businesses like law firms and banks can relax their suit and tie rules during the summer, says Walravens, lightening the load on office air conditioners that have to make the environment cool enough for people wearing dark layers in triple-digit temperatures. Adjusting our own internal thermostats can help too. As of 2022, 88% of American homes had air conditioning, compared to fewer than 10% of European homes, according to MIT Technology Review. And we drive our units hard. One TIME analysis from 2022 found that U.S. residences are kept at around 74° F even when no one is home, and 70° F when the family returns. 'We have to change our mindset a little,' says Walravens. 'The reality is we can survive and be productive at higher temperatures. That may at first seem a little bit daunting, but it's going to use a lot less energy and cause a lot less guilt.' Of course, you didn't cause the climate crisis all by yourself and you can't remotely fix it alone either. The best you can do is play your small part and let go of the sense that you're to blame. 'We as individuals can be change agents,' says Michaela Barnett, a civil engineer and the owner of KnoxFill, a bulk sales business that seeks to limit the use of single-use containers. 'We can reconceptualize the way that we think about our individual actions for change and the way we're living in line with our values. But we should also give ourselves grace and patience, not bearing all of the weight either, because that's not productive.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fighting for Freedom on Raritan Bay by John Schneider Provides a Rarely-Told Story of the Revolutionary War's Struggle on the Waters of New Jersey and New York
KEYPORT, N.J., June 25, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- In his new book, acclaimed historian John Schneider revisits a moment when independence was still a fragile idea, and Monmouth County's shores were on the verge of war. Published by CreateAVision Media, the book tells a rarely—if ever—told story of America's war on the water: the brutal and daring conflict waged across Raritan Bay, New York Harbor, the Atlantic Ocean, the Long Island Sound, and the many associated rivers, creeks, and marshes. This forgotten maritime theater was a crucial front in the struggle for independence—yet most Americans have never heard its full story. "History didn't just happen on battlefields," Schneider says. "It happened in rowboats, in the dead of night, on wind-swept bays and bloodied beaches. I wrote this book to immerse readers in the emotional struggles of the people who lived it—to make them feel what it meant to risk everything for freedom." Through vivid storytelling, Schneider captures the imagination of readers and brings them into the minds and hearts of patriots, loyalists, militia leaders, and spies. Readers will discover figures like Joshua Huddy, Colonel Tye, and Nathaniel Scudder, alongside George Washington, General Sir Henry Clinton, and other major players—both celebrated and unknown. With an innovative blend of narrative history and original research, the book explores covert raids, midnight crossings, British naval blockades, and harrowing escapes across the waterways that divided and defined the colonies. The Deadliest Place in the American Revolution One of the most sobering truths revealed in the book is that these same waterways led directly to what became the deadliest place in the American Revolution: the British prison ships anchored in New York Harbor. More than 11,000 Americans perished in squalid, inhumane conditions — more than twice the number of battlefield deaths in the entire war. Many were captured in or near the very coastal regions in the Tri-State Area, making this story one of both strategic action and tragic consequences. Schneider includes an extensive addendum featuring: A compelling account of how the Declaration of Independence was developed Biographies of "unknown patriots" who played vital roles Maps, rare documents, and firsthand perspectives that ground the narrative in real-life sacrifice and resistance As a complement to the book, he has also produced a series of historical video segments, available at: About the Author John Schneider is a historian, television host, educator, and the founder of CreateAVision Media. He was recently honored as one of Monmouth County's Top 50 Historians of the Last 50 Years for his contributions to preserving and promoting Revolutionary War history in New Jersey. He has produced hundreds of historical documentaries for his weekly 30-minute television program on Comcast, making history personal and accessible to audiences throughout the region. A former executive with ABC, Mutual Broadcasting, and AT&T, Schneider blends storytelling with scholarship to bring history to life. His published works include: Fighting for Freedom on Raritan Bay A Historical Journey Across Raritan Bay History of Sandy Hook History of Highlands, NJ Embracing Life's Journey He lives in Keyport, NJ, just steps from the waters that once served as both barrier and battleground in America's earliest fight for liberty. Availability Fighting for Freedom on Raritan Bay is available now at on and through select bookstores and historical organizations. Video content available at View original content: SOURCE CreateAVision Media LLC Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati


Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
How Your Choice Of Major Can Impact Your Ivy League Admissions Odds
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA - July 18, 2023: Lehman Hall is a Georgian-revival building by Charles ... More Coolidge completed in 1925. Lehman Hall, located in Harvard Yard, is the student center of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS). Choosing a major is one of the most exciting and consequential decisions in the college admissions process. Not only can a student's choice of program impact their future career path, but it can also have an immediate impact on their college admissions prospects. While your intended major isn't a binding commitment to a specific academic path, it can play a critical role in shaping how admissions officers evaluate your application. An applicant's intended major tells a story about how they foresee using their background, skillset, and core passions on their college campus and in their future profession. Thus, students shouldn't just apply to a major that initially appeals to their interests or a field they assume is exciting or lucrative; instead, students should devote time to researching their selection strategically. As applicants weigh their options, here are three key insights to consider about how an intended major can impact a student's odds of admission at top schools: A Student's Intended Major Should Align with Their Hook For many students, college is a time to reinvent themselves and try new things. While you might dream of trying new clubs, joining an intramural sports league, or learning a new language, your intended course of study should be a natural continuation of the coursework, extracurricular activities, and independent learning you completed during your high school years. Starting freshman and sophomore years, students should begin intentionally exploring their interests and narrowing their involvements based on their guiding passions. The foundational interest(s) that students pursue constitute their hook—from the leadership positions they assume in clubs and organizations to the advanced courses they take and summer programs they participate in, a student's applicant profile should clearly demonstrate their hands-on experience with and genuine enthusiasm for their intended area of study. This does not mean that a student should pursue activities related to only one subject; in fact, some of the most eye-catching and dynamic hooks are those that demonstrate a student's creative, interdisciplinary perspective by bringing together two or more distinct disciplines. Admissions officers at top schools don't just want to see that a student has a passing fancy for a particular subject—they want to see the demonstrable ways in which they have already engaged with that discipline through hands-on experiences in and outside of the classroom. It is not enough to take a couple of classes or join a school club related to the major you choose during your junior year—top schools expect students to have interned in the profession, conducted independent research with a professor, developed a passion project to use their discipline to better their communities, won competitions, or participated in a related, prestigious, merit-based summer program. Choosing a major that clearly and compellingly corresponds to your hook will show admissions officers that you are knowledgeable about your field and prepared to dive into challenging coursework when you arrive on campus. Students' interests will likely change and develop throughout high school; some will reach senior year unsure about which major to choose. In these cases, students should focus on telling a clear story through their application so that it doesn't appear as though they have arbitrarily chosen a major in a field in which they lack experience. For instance, a student with an extensive resume of robotics competitions, clubs, and summer programs who initially intended to pursue engineering might discover they are more interested in medicine after taking Anatomy and Physiology. These students might choose to study biomedical engineering, which bridges the gap between their interests in medicine and engineering. Alternatively, they can strategically use their essays to show how the problem-solving skills, detail-oriented mentality, and technical skills they gained have uniquely prepared them for medical study. Less Popular Majors Can Boost Your Chances—But Only If You've Done Your Research Given the popularity of majors such as business, psychology, and political science, many students assume that applying to an obscure or unpopular major will boost their odds of admission, as they will be competing against fewer applicants. To a certain extent, this is true—the admissions pool for popular areas of study is often highly saturated. This can make it more challenging for students to catch admissions officers' eyes, whereas it can be easier to stand out in the smaller pool for underenrolled majors. But this doesn't mean that applying to study Egyptology will guarantee you a spot at your dream school. Admissions officers can clearly identify a student who has applied to a major solely because of its higher admissions rate. Not only should applicants' major selection clearly align with their hook (meaning that a student with coursework and activities related to physics will make for a poor Egyptology applicant), but they should also demonstrate a depth of knowledge about the nuances of the major to which they are applying (for instance, why they want to pursue Egyptology rather than archaeology or classical studies). Instead of opting for a lesser-known major because you think it might give you a competitive edge, consider this path only if it makes sense within the broader narrative of your application. A student with years of independent Latin study, a summer internship with a museum of antiquities, and a passion project in the digital humanities diagramming Egyptian papyri is a strong candidate for Egyptology—a student who has spent their high school career preparing for a major in political science who happens to like reading about Egypt in their free time is not. Look for Niche Programs Within More General Fields Finally, while students shouldn't pursue a niche or obscure major simply to leverage their chances of acceptance, one of the most effective strategies for major selection is to look at majors offered in subdisciplines of your broader field. For instance, business is a highly saturated major, but if you have a keen interest in music, you might apply to music management or production. Comparative literature is a broad field, but if you know you enjoy Afrocaribbean literature, you might consider applying to Latinx studies. Likewise, Politics, Philosophy, and Economics might offer you a more specific and tailored experience than political science. Finding and educating yourself about these programs requires time, effort, and introspection—students should explore the options available to them, consider the specific niche they hope to fill within their given field, and choose the degree path that most closely aligns with their particular interest within the discipline. Of course, the same program might not be offered at each of the schools to which they are applying, so applicants should research offerings at each school on their list and tailor their applications accordingly. Choosing a major involves more than simply identifying a topic of interest—it requires students to consider why they are interested in a particular subject and how they hope to uniquely contribute to their field. Starting early, prioritizing introspection, and conducting extensive research will help students not only identify the right program for them, but also maximize their chances of success in the competitive admissions process.