Fijian In Abu Dhabi Worried About Pacific Communities In Middle East
, Presenter/Producer of Pacific Waves
Fiji's Embassy in Abu Dhabi says its closely monitoring the situation in Iran and Israel as tensions remain high.
Israel carried out a dozen strikes against Iranian military and nuclear sites on Friday, claiming it acted out of self-defence, saying Iran is close to building a nuclear weapon.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Israel that "severe punishment" will follow.
Fiji's Embassy in Abu Dhabi is urging the Fijian community there to remain calm, stay informed, and reach out to the Embassy should they have any concerns or require assistance during this period of heightened regional tensions.
A Fiji national in Abu Dhabi said he's yet to hear how other Pacific communities in the Middle East are coping amid the Israel-Iran conflict.
Speaking to Pacific Waves from Abu Dhabi, Fiji media specialist Kelepi Abariga said the situation is 'freaky and risky'.
Abariga has lived in Abu Dhabi for over a decade and while he is far from the danger zones, he's concerned for his 'fellow Pacific people'.
"I just hope they are safe as of now, this is probably the first time Israel has attacked Iran directly," he said.
"Everybody thinks that Iran has a huge nuclear deposit with them, that they could use it against any country in the world. But you know, that is yet to be seen.
"So right now, you know we from the Pacific, we're right in the middle of everything and I think you know, our safety is paramount."
Abariga isn't aware of any Pacific people in Tehran but said if they are, they are most likely working for an NGO or the United Nations.
However, Abariga said there are Fiji nationals working at the International Christian embassy in Jerusalem and Solomon Island students south of Israel.
He also said that the Fijian troops are stationed at Golan Heights near Israel.
While Abariga describes Abu Dhabi as the safest country in the Middle East, he said the politics in the region is volatile.
"It's been intense like that for all this time, and I think when you mention Iran in this country [UAE], they have all the differences so it's probably something that has started long way before."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Unease over Israel/Iran conflict
Shortly after news broke of Israel's aerial attacks on Iran, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon made the cautious understatement they were an "unwelcome development" for the Middle East. He also said the military action between the two countries could be potentially catastrophic for that area and a huge concern for New Zealand. Foreign minister Winston Peters said it was "critical that all actors prioritise de-escalation". He and Mr Luxon saw the best way to regional security as ongoing talks between the United States and Iran. So far, there seems little hope of that. Even at this distance, the ramping up of military action in this fraught area will be adding to everyone's unease about the state of the world, the behaviour of some of the big players involved to date, and fears about what they might do next. Since Friday, the conflict has intensified after retaliation from Iran to the original attacks which Israel had said were intended to target Iran's nuclear programme. There has been considerable speculation about the timing of Israel's action, particularly when there were United States-Iranian nuclear negotiations planned for last weekend. While it was no secret there was increasing tension between Israel and Iran, it had been reported US President Donald Trump was trying to dissuade Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from attacking Iran while the US was continuing these negotiations. The initial attacks were clearly well-planned, with Mr Netanyahu insisting Israel had to attack now because Iran was becoming so close to weaponising its enriched uranium, a "clear and present danger to Israel's very survival". However, there are questions about the reality of this portrayal of the situation and whether it is more likely a cynical ploy by Mr Netanyahu to avert the international community's gaze from the horror of Gaza and shore up his own support at home. As some commentators have pointed out, the war on Gaza has not ended but the international pressure over starvation and civilian deaths, and indeed the media spotlight on it, has been superseded by concern about the implications of the Israel-Iran conflict. Mere hours after the Israeli attack, it was reported food shipments and distribution in Gaza stopped and a French-Saudi summit looking at how to achieve wider recognition for a Palestinian state was postponed indefinitely. The possibility of Israel's action having the perverse effect of garnering domestic support for the unpopular Iran regime, particularly as civilian deaths mount, should not be discounted. The escalation of the conflict has not been a triumph for Mr Trump. On the campaign trail he boasted he would be a peacemaker, quickly solving international crises through his toughness, ability to make deals, and the respect with which he was held by foreign leaders. In his inauguration address he claimed his proudest legacy would be that of a peacemaker and unifier. It is difficult to see any evidence of that, domestically or internationally. The US response to the Israeli attacks was confused, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio initially describing them as a unilateral action but then Mr Trump later insisting that he knew about the operation in advance, and it somehow coincided with the end of a 60-day ultimatum he had given Iran to make a deal on the nuclear question. Iran regards the US as being complicit in Israel's attack, accusing the US of aiding and enabling it, and therefore sharing in the responsibility of the consequences. The best that can be said about the pronouncements from the players involved in the conflict is they illustrate the adage truth is the first casualty of war. While people living here might take some solace in being thousands of kilometres away from the conflict, we will not be immune to the effects of it. The price of oil has already risen internationally, but the Automobile Association says any effect here from that would not be seen for around a month. The hope will be that the market will stabilise quickly, but presumably that would require some de-escalation of the conflict. In the meantime, we can do little but hold our breath as we watch and wait for some cool and competent heads to prevail to stop the bloodshed.
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
UN Ocean Conference Delivers Unified Call To Action And Strong Commitments
Nice, France, 13 June 2025 – The 2025 United Nations Ocean Conference concluded today with more than 170 countries adopting an intergovernmentally agreed declaration committing to urgent action to conserve and sustainably use the ocean. The political declaration titled Our ocean, our future: united for urgent action calls for concrete steps to expand marine protected areas, decarbonize maritime transport, combat marine pollution, and mobilize finance for vulnerable coastal and island nations, among others. The declaration – together with bold voluntary commitments by States and other entities – constitutes the Nice Ocean Action Plan, successfully concluding the five-day Conference with a boost to environmental multilateralism. 'Pledges made this week must be rigorously implemented, tracked, and scaled,' said United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs Li Junhua, who served as the Conference Secretary-General. 'The momentum we have generated must carry us forward to COP30, global and regional ocean forums, and national decision-making, and translate into decisive national action.' Voluntary commitments made during the Conference include: The European Commission, as part of its Ocean Pact, announced an investment of 1 billion EUR to support ocean conservation, science and sustainable fishing. French Polynesia pledged to create the world's largest marine protected area to safeguard its seas, covering its entire exclusive economic zone, approximately 5 million square kilometres (1.93 million square miles). New Zealand committed over 52 million US dollars towards supporting enhanced ocean governance, management and science in the Pacific Islands region. Germany launched a 100 million EUR immediate action programme for the recovery and clearance of legacy munitions in the German Baltic and North Seas – the first of its kind. Indonesia, the World Bank and other partners launched a Coral Bond, a groundbreaking financial instrument designed to mobilize private capital to conserve coral reef ecosystems within marine protected areas in Indonesia. Thirty-seven countries, led by Panama and Canada, launched the High Ambition Coalition for a Quiet Ocean — the first high-level political initiative to tackle ocean noise pollution on a global scale. Italy committed 6.5 million EUR to strengthen surveillance by the Coast Guard in marine protected areas and on oil platforms, including through a satellite surveillance system capable of detecting potential oil spills in real time. Canada contributed 9 million US dollars to the Ocean Risk and Resilience Action Alliance to help Small Island Developing States and coastal developing countries increase their resilience to the impacts of climate change through nature-based solutions. Spain committed to creating five new marine protected areas that would allow protection of 25% of its marine territory. A collective of United Nations agencies and global partners launched a co-design process for One Ocean Finance — a bold new effort to unlock billions in new financing from ocean-dependent industries and blue economy sectors. A Conference report, listing the voluntary commitments in an annex, will be published after the Conference. The Marine Biodiversity Treaty (BBNJ Agreement) In a big step towards entry into force of the Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ Agreement), 19 more States ratified the Agreement in the margins of the Conference, and 20 more signed it, bringing the total number of signatures to 136, and ratifications to 50 States plus the European Union. Ten more ratifications are needed for the Agreement to enter into force. The BBNJ Agreement, adopted in June 2023, is a crucial legal instrument to protect marine life and ecosystems in the two-thirds of the ocean that lie beyond any country's jurisdiction. About the Conference From 9 to 13 June 2025, 55 Heads of State and Government, along with 15,000 participants from civil society, business, and science, participated in the UN Ocean Conference co-hosted by the Governments of France and Costa Rica, including more than 450 side events, to accelerate action and mobilize all actors to conserve and sustainably use the ocean. Ten Ocean Action Panels produced forward-looking recommendations to guide implementation across key themes — from marine pollution and nature-based solutions to the role of women, youth, and Indigenous Peoples in ocean governance. The fourth UN Ocean Conference, in 2028, will be co-hosted by Chile and the Republic of Korea.
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
‘The Answer Is Us': Global Indigenous Congress Issues Urgent Call Ahead Of COP30
12 June Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities from the world's major tropical forest regions have released a powerful new declaration from their First Global Congress, held in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. The declaration outlines urgent demands ahead of COP30 — including land rights, direct climate finance, and protection for environmental defenders — and calls for Indigenous leadership to be centered in global climate and biodiversity solutions. Below are several quotes from the Congress: 'We are tired of false solutions and initiatives disconnected from our ways of life and the realities in our territories,' said Sonia Guajajara, Minister of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil. 'The time has come to invest in innovative mechanisms that treat us as partners, not beneficiaries. The answer is us.' 'Countries must recognize historical injustices; it's important to enshrine this in a legal code,' said Albert K. Barume, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 'As an act of recognition and protection, the right to self-determination and traditional authorities must be recognized.' 'This Congress is historic because, for the first time, we have united as Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities from the world's three great forest basins to defend our rights, our territories, our cultures, and our identities,' said Joseph Itongwa, coordinator of the The Network of Indigenous and Local Populations for the Sustainable Management of Forest Ecosystems in Central Africa (REPALEAC). 'Even where laws are weak or unenforced, we see strong local commitment. We urge countries like the Republic of Congo and others in Central Africa that have ratified key conventions to put them into action — our rights must be recognized based on the evidence we have provided. We must continue working every day to secure legal recognition, the demarcation of our lands, and respect for our traditional knowledge, which protects the 50% of biodiversity that still remains intact.' 'This is not just about money; it is about friendship and solidarity. The answer is us. All of us,' said Rukka Sombolinggi, Secretary General of the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN) in Indonesia. 'Let's walk together and create a better funding environment for all Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. We have our mechanisms already, let's test them out!' 'I believe this Congress will contribute to reinforcing the partnership between governments, donors, strategic allies, and the Indigenous People and Local Communities' rights movement,' said Dr. Solange Bandiaky-Badji, Coordinator and President of the Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI). 'We have to work together; we have to work in partnership and to support one another, because ensuring Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities legal recognition will contribute to not just their prosperity but to peace and stability in all countries.'
