US Pacific Ally Intercepts Russian Warships Near Coast
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Japan—an ally of the United States—intercepted two groups of Russian warships sailing off its coast over the weekend, as Russia's Pacific Fleet began a large-scale drill in the Far East.
Newsweek has contacted the Russian defense and foreign ministries for comment by email.
Why It Matters
Japan forms part of the First Island Chain—a defensive line of islands in the western Pacific Ocean—along with Taiwan and the Philippines, under a U.S. maritime containment strategy aimed at restricting Russian and Chinese naval activities in the region in the event of war.
While fighting Ukrainian forces in Europe, Russia continues to flex its military power in the Indo-Pacific region by deploying naval task groups. This comes against the backdrop of an unresolved territorial dispute with Japan over a group of islets in the Russian Far East.
What To Know
A pair of Russian warships was spotted transiting the La Pérouse Strait—known in Japan as the Soya Strait—eastward into the Sea of Okhotsk from the Sea of Japan (referred to as the East Sea in South Korea) on Saturday, the Japanese Defense Ministry revealed on Monday.
The Russian vessels were identified by their hull numbers as the destroyer Admiral Tributs and the frigate Marshal Shaposhnikov, both assigned to the country's Pacific Fleet. The La Pérouse Strait lies between Russia's Sakhalin Island and Hokkaido, the northernmost Japanese main island.
Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry announced that, starting Monday, the Pacific Fleet would carry out a planned exercise in multiple areas across the Pacific Ocean—including the Sea of Okhotsk and the Sea of Japan—lasting through the end of the month, Tass reported.
Ships assigned to the Pacific Fleet have been departing from their bases for designated areas, according to the report, which added that the exercise would involve up to 40 vessels, more than 30 aircraft and helicopters, over 5,000 personnel, and Bastion coastal missile systems.
A second group of Russian naval vessels passed through the Tsushima Strait—which lies between Japan and the Korean Peninsula—on Sunday, according to the Japanese Defense Ministry. The group transited northeast from the East China Sea toward the Sea of Japan.
It consisted of three ships, including two corvettes—the Hero of the Russian Federation Aldar Tsydenzhapov and the Rezky—and a supply vessel. They departed their Far Eastern base in Vladivostok in February for a deployment in the Asia-Pacific region.
Maps provided by the Japanese Defense Ministry show that neither Russian naval group entered Japan's territorial waters, which extend up to 13.8 miles from its coastline.
What People Are Saying
The Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement on Monday: "During the [Pacific Fleet's exercise], a set of measures will be worked out to search for and track submarines of a simulated enemy, the organization of anti-ship and air defense of detachments of ships on the sea passage and the delivery of joint missile strikes on single and group sea target positions. Practical skills will also be strengthened to repel attacks by enemy aircraft, drones and unmanned boats."
Japan's defense white paper of 2024 commented: "Russia has been conducting intensive military activities in the Far East encompassing the Northern Territories, while continuing its aggression against Ukraine. Russia has also been observed engaging in joint activities with China involving aircraft and vessels."
The Northern Territories, also known as the Southern Kuril Islands in Russia, are a group of four islands ruled by Moscow captured from Japan following the end of World War II.
The Russian destroyer Admiral Tributs arrives in Manila, the Philippines, for a visit on June 9, 2018.
The Russian destroyer Admiral Tributs arrives in Manila, the Philippines, for a visit on June 9, 2018.
ELOISA LOPEZ/AFP via Getty Images
What Happens Next
More Russian military vessels are expected to appear in waters surrounding Japan as the Pacific Fleet's exercise continues. It remains to be seen how Japan will respond, especially as it also faces a growing naval threat from China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
All the Signs Trump Is Preparing for a US Attack on Iran
Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As an unprecedented conflict between Israel and Iran dragged on into a fifth day, President Donald Trump has increasingly indicated that he was seriously considering a direct intervention in the fight. And while the Pentagon has thus far maintained that U.S. forces were operating in a purely "defensive posture," while also assisting Israeli interceptions of Iranian missiles, evidence is mounting that the White House is marching toward military action against the Islamic Republic. Trump's Threats Intensify Just prior to Israel launching its large-scale campaign on Thursday, Trump had signaled a willingness to continue nuclear negotiations with Iran, the sixth round of which had been scheduled to be held in Oman last Sunday. Even after the initial Israeli strikes began, Trump called on Tehran to double down on efforts to reach an agreement. As of Monday, however, Trump has adopted a notably more ominous tone. Shortly before his abrupt exit from the G7 meeting being held in Canada, he called on residents of Tehran, home to nearly 10 million people, to immediately evacuate, and later met with top national security officials at the White House Situation Room. The president further hardened his language on Tuesday, claiming on his Truth Social platform that "we have complete and total control of the skies over Iran," appearing to suggest the U.S. was already a party to the conflict. He even alleged to know the exact location of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, referring to the top Iranian authority as "an easy target," though, "we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." "But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers," Trump continued. "Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" He then called for "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!" in a follow-up post apparently aimed at Iran. Two U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets fly in formation over an undisclosed location in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, on April 5, 2025. Two U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets fly in formation over an undisclosed location in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, on April 5, 2025. Staff Sergeant Gerald R. Willis US Builds Up Regional Footprint Over the weekend, aviation watchers noticed dozens of U.S. air tankers being deployed to Europe. Such aircraft are necessary to refuel warplanes conducting forward operations from afar and reports later tied their movement to tensions building in the Middle East. Then, on Monday, the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier diverted from the South China Sea to the Middle East, where it would join the USS Carl Vinson carrier strike group that entered the Arabian Sea in April. If the U.S. were to conduct a strike on Iran's heavily fortified underground Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, the weapon most widely believed to be involved would be the GBU 57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator. The only aircraft certified to carry the 15-ton bomb is the B2 stealth bomber, capable of delivering strikes from bases 6,000 miles away. The closest base to Fordow is the U.S. Naval Facility Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. Meanwhile, other U.S. staff and family members that could potentially be exposed to hostile fire on the ground have reportedly been authorized to leave posts in Bahrain, Iraq and Kuwait since last week, in the lead up to Israel's opening strikes. U.S. Central Command is estimated to have roughly 40,000 personnel in the Middle East. State Department Forms Task Force As for other U.S. citizens looking to leave the region, they are being asked to contact a new task force announced Tuesday by State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce. "The task force is a group of people who are working taking the calls of people, of American citizens around the world, making sure that they get connected with what they may need that region," Bruce said. Such an initiative she said, "is something that the State Department does when there's a situation that requires it, and this is one of those times." Before taking questions, Bruce said it would be a "little bit of a different day for the briefing," as "there will be less than I can answer for you because of the circumstances that we're dealing with around the world." Throughout the press conference, she declined to "characterize what President Trump says or tweets," including whether or not he sought to support Israel's strikes against Fordow, or even sought to pursue regime change in Iran. A general view of The White House as U.S. President Donald Trump returns from the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. A general view of The White House as U.S. President Donald Trump returns from the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 17, 2025 in Washington, Fades Bruce also would neither confirm nor deny whether or not the U.S. remained open to diplomacy with Iran at this stage. Neither the U.S. nor Iran has announced any new diplomatic overtures since Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced the suspension of nuclear talks over Israel's sweeping campaign of strikes against sites and personnel tied to Iran's military and nuclear program. Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, however, did hold separate conversations on Tuesday with Araghchi and Trump's special envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff. A readout of the conversation did not mention any messages passed between the U.S. and Iranian diplomats but contained an urgent plea from Abdelatty to avoid further escalation. Vance's New Tone Vice President JD Vance is often viewed as one of the most senior advocates of restraint in the Trump administration. Like Trump, he has criticized past administration for becoming mired in foreign conflicts, a key voter message he hammered on the campaign trail last year. Back in March, Vance was among the few senior officials to initially doubt the utility of the decision to begin launching strikes against Iran's Yemeni ally, Ansar Allah, also known as the Houthi movement, according to Signal chats leaked by The Atlantic. On Tuesday, as Trump ramped up his rhetoric against Iran, Vance issued a lengthy personal appeal in defense of the president's decision-making process on X, formerly Twitter. Look, I'm seeing this from the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but there's a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some things directly on the Iran issue: First, POTUS has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that… — JD Vance (@JDVance) June 17, 2025 He said the president "may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment," while acknowledging that "people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy." "But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals," Vance continued. "Whatever he does, that is his focus."
Newsweek
35 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Pledge of No New Wars Runs Into Reality of Middle East
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump entered office vowing to bring a swift end to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Five months in, foreign conflicts are now threatening to overshadow Trump's second term as a new war escalates between Israel and Iran and concerns grow that the United States could soon take an active role in fighting Tehran. Trump referred to himself as an anti-war president upon his return to the White House and even argued that his efforts to broker peace around the world deserved a Nobel Peace prize. But the Israel-Iran conflict has highlighted Trump's challenge in shaping foreign affairs while maintaining political support at home with the isolationist and ascendent MAGA wing of the Republican Party. "Trump has found that making peace is hard," said Richard Gowan, the UN director of the International Crisis Group. A Marine stands outside the West Wing of the White House on June 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. A Marine stands outside the West Wing of the White House on June 17, 2025 in Washington, reality has quickly set in as Trump considers what role the U.S. should play in the strikes Israel launched against Iran last week to end Tehran's nuclear program. Israel has targeted Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities, including the fortified site at Fordow, but most experts believe it can't destroy the underground compound without special U.S. bunker-busting bombs that can only be flown by American military aircraft. "In the case of Iran, if the U.S. goes in that would be a massive show of military force," Gowan said. "But it could also end up with Trump getting sucked into a Middle East quagmire, which is exactly what he accused his predecessors of doing." Trump signaled Tuesday that the U.S. may join Israel in a direct strike against Iran, though he has also said that Tehran still wants to strike a nuclear deal with the U.S. despite missing a recent White House-imposed deadline to reach an agreement. In social media posts throughout the day, Trump called for Iran's "unconditional surrender" and suggested that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, could be targeted for assassination. "We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least for now," Trump said Tuesday in one message on Truth Social, suggesting the U.S. knows his location. The threat is a contrast from Trump's rhetoric in his first weeks back in the White House, when he promised to make good on a campaign pledge to disentangle America from foreign conflicts even as he launched trade wars that roiled the global economy. Trump touted the start of peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine as an early victory, but the talks have since failed to make any significant progress toward ending that war. Israel ramped up its military operations in Gaza in the months since Trump took office, coinciding with an increase in violent conflicts on Trump's watch, according to a report released Tuesday by the Institute for Economics and Peace. Smoke rises over Tehran, Iran after a reported Israeli strike on June 16, 2025. Smoke rises over Tehran, Iran after a reported Israeli strike on June 16, 2025. Stringer/Getty Images There are 59 active conflicts between nation states, an increase from last year and the most since World War II, according to the institute's 2025 Global Peace Index. Of course, Trump isn't the first U.S. president to see his domestic agenda updated by foreign affairs beyond his control. Trump's recent predecessors — from former Presidents George W. Bush to Joe Biden — also became directly or indirectly enmeshed in foreign wars. But Trump's situation is somewhat unique, given the growing foreign policy divide among lawmakers in his own party. Joining Israel's fight with Iran would anger MAGA hardliners and drive a wedge between them and establishment Republicans who want Tehran to end its push to develop nuclear weapons. "Trump's supporters are in different places. Some, like [Rep.] Marjorie Taylor Greene, are saying you can't be part of Make America Great Again if you go to war in the Middle East," said Daniel Byman, the director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "But other voices in the Republican Party see Iran's nuclear program as a major threat to U.S. national security." Beyond the domestic politics, Trump's calculus is further complicated by Israel's increasingly aggressive posture towards Iran. Israel may not be willing to back down if the U.S. pushes for a quick end to hostilities to avoid a broader regional war, Middle East analysts who spoke to Newsweek said. And there is no guarantee Trump could swiftly end the conflict by having the U.S. join Israel in the war, said Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. "When a country has spent years enriching uranium like Iran has, you need some sort of diplomatic agreement that leads to mechanics verifying that everything has been locked down or destroyed," Katulis said. "There's no fool-proof military solution."
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Lindsey Graham Takes a Swipe at Marjorie Taylor Greene Over Iran
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Lindsey Graham took a swipe at Marjorie Taylor Greene on Tuesday after the Georgia representative scorned those in the "America First/MAGA" movement who are "slobbering" for the United States to get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. Graham said in an interview that Greene "doesn't understand the threat" that Iran poses. Why It Matters President Donald Trump's MAGA coalition has fractured in recent days as the isolationist wing, which includes Greene, split with Iran hawks like Graham over the Iran conflict. The MAGA battle over Trump's policy vis-à-vis Iran has been happening for months as the administration worked to negotiate a new nuclear agreement with the Islamic Republic. But the infighting kicked into high gear last week, when Israel launched a number of airstrikes at Iran that wiped out its military and intelligence chain-of-command, destroyed nuclear infrastructure and took out key scientists working on Iran's nuclear program. The strikes, which have killed more than 220 people in Iran since Friday, marked the most serious escalation of the conflict to date. Iran has responded with retaliatory strikes of its own that have killed 24 people in Israel and injured more than 500. Senator Lindsey Graham at the U.S. Capitol on June 11, 2025. Senator Lindsey Graham at the U.S. Capitol on June 11, 2025. J. Scott Applewhite/AP What To Know "Everyone is finding out who are real America First/MAGA and who were fake and just said it [because] it was popular," Greene wrote Monday on X, formerly Twitter. "Unfortunately the list of fakes are becoming quite long and exposed themselves quickly." "Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA," she added. Fox News host John Roberts asked Graham to weigh in on Greene's remarks during a Tuesday interview, noting that there's "opposition within your own party to all of this." The South Carolina Republican quickly cut in, saying, "You could put them in a phone booth. Those Republicans who are opposed to supporting Israel against Iran, you could literally put in a phone booth." Robert continued: "Marjorie Taylor Greene says anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First or MAGA," Roberts told Graham, reading from Greene's post. "Wishing for murder of innocent people is disgusting. We are sick and tired of foreign wars." "Yeah, I mean, I like Marjorie, but to be honest with you, she doesn't understand the threat, in my view," Graham said. "If you don't understand that Iran, a religious theocracy, religious Nazis, would use a nuclear weapon to kill all the Jews, you don't listen to what they say." "They're a threat to us, they're a threat to the state of Israel," Graham added. "It is not in the world's interest to give this religious fanatic a nuclear weapon." "Somebody's got to deal with it," the senator said, adding that Trump "is the right man" to do so and that the president has "been very measured." He noted that Trump set a 60-day time frame to negotiate a new nuclear deal and that the administration's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, repeatedly met with the Iranians to come to an agreement. "They tried very hard to get Iran to the table. I appreciate reaching out and trying to do this diplomatically," Graham said. "I appreciate Witkoff, I appreciate President Trump trying. Well, it's not working. You can't have unless both people want peace and what the Iranians want is to kill all theJews and kill us and the answer is no, we're not going to let them do that." What People Are Saying Senator Lindsey Graham, earlier this week on X: "No one can say that President @realDonaldTrump has not tried to seek peace regarding Ukraine-Russia and Israel-Iran. He has gone the extra mile and I appreciate that. However, you have to have willing partners to make peace. Iran played the same old game with the wrong guy. God bless Israel, God bless the United States and God bless President Trump." Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, on X: "Real America First/MAGA wants world peace for all people and doesn't want our military killed and forever injured physically and mentally. We love our U.S. military and love them helping to secure our borders and our cities for the defense of OUR PEOPLE AND OUR COUNTRY. She added: "We have spent TRILLIONS in the Middle East and we have dealt with the aftermath of death, blown apart bodies, never ending suicides, and disabling PTSD. All because they told us propaganda as to why we must sacrifice our own to defend some other country's borders and some other country's borders." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
