logo
Porter County paring down vote center sites from 44 to 40

Porter County paring down vote center sites from 44 to 40

The Porter Board of Elections & Registration is expected to pass a resolution at its meeting later this month to close four of its 44 vote centers. State law requires a unanimous vote and a signed amendment to enact the change.
Slated for elimination are: Ogden Dunes Fire Station at 111 Hillcrest Road in Ogden Dunes; the old Best Western, 6200 Melton Road, Portage; Hampton Inn & Suites at 1451 Silhavy Road in Valparaiso; and Boone Grove Middle School at 325 W. 550 S in Boone Grove.
The former Ogden Dunes site has eight other vote center locations within five miles, and the Woodland Park vote center, which is one of the county's most popular, is within two miles. There are 12 other vote centers within five miles of the Portage hotel, as well as seven locations within three miles and 12 locations within five miles of Hampton Inn & Suites, as well as three within two miles. Boone Grove Middle School is less than five miles from the vote center at Boone Grove High School.
After studying a report put together by Porter County Clerk Jessica Bailey and Elections & Registration Office staff, the members of the four-person board, which included proxy Jennifer Klug who sat in for member Jeff Chidester, agreed during the May 29 meeting that it was a good idea but put off the formal vote until elections office staff could reach out to county party chairs as a courtesy.
Their next meeting is on June 26.
'It just makes more sense to lower down to 40 considering when we started the vote center conversation we knew we were going over and above and beyond,' said Bailey, who explained that Porter County has had more vote centers than any other county.
'I think the conversation in and around that was kind of trying to shock-proof the change,' added Board President Paul Rausch of the choice to have more vote centers than other counties when the county moved from precinct voting to vote centers in 2022.
'And we didn't know where people wanted to go,' Bailey added. 'Now we have a better understanding of where people prefer to go.'
Elections officials spoke of the change as more of a consolidation than a closure as machines and poll workers from the four vote centers being eliminated will be used at busier centers where they are more needed.
'Going to vote centers was hard, but we always knew that there were going to be adjustments that were going to be made,' said Board Vice President Ethan Lowe. 'Now that we've been through one cycle we've got the data.'
In other business, the board congratulated Elections & Registration Office staff for its receipt of the 2024 Clearing House Award from the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission. The staff was one of only 53 honored nationally.
The award was for best practices in recruiting, training, and retaining poll workers. The county has over 300 poll workers and has been implementing an app that allows them to communicate with each other, election judges, and office staff without sharing personal information.
Bailey said elections staff began introducing poll workers to the app during training sessions so they would be well-versed with it by Election Day. 'We were able to keep communicating all day long,' she said.
LeAnn Angerman, a representative from U.S. Senator Jim Banks' office, made a special trip to the meeting to praise the staff for receipt of the award. 'Their work doesn't go at all unnoticed,' she said. 'For them to get the award is a pretty big honor. We just want to acknowledge that.'
Rausch said that while a fellow board member just commented last month that it's a privilege to watch the work being done month in and month out, year in and year out, 'it's gratifying that other groups of people and the ripples in the pool are growing and it's a testament to the work they are doing,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Our Voters' Guide to New York's Democratic Primary
Inside Our Voters' Guide to New York's Democratic Primary

New York Times

time14 hours ago

  • New York Times

Inside Our Voters' Guide to New York's Democratic Primary

Here are two things I know about American politics: Our choices in elections matter more than ever, and our trust and interest in the process is shakier than ever. Voting can have enormous consequences, yet many people don't believe their vote makes a difference and, perhaps because of that, don't look closely at which candidates best match their priorities, concerns or values. Coming out of the 2024 election, I've been thinking a lot about ways that Times Opinion can help readers assess politicians, understand issues and make informed decisions. Today we are publishing The Choice, a new form of civic journalism from Times Opinion, which we intend as a public service for voters during election seasons. Our inaugural project focuses on the Democratic primary race for mayor of New York, one of the most important U.S. elections this year. The Choice brings together 15 New Yorkers who are deeply involved in the life of the city and draws on their expertise, experience and range of viewpoints to assess the nine main Democratic candidates for mayor. Some members of our group are experts on key issues in the race or on communities and neighborhoods, politics and leadership and the corporate world — all things that matter greatly to the future of New York. Our editors spoke to scores of New Yorkers this winter and spring about taking part in the project and chose these 15 in hopes that their commitment to the city and their insights will prove helpful to voters. Over the past two months, our panel conducted their own research on the candidates and six key issues that will be important for the next mayor. Affordability in particular is a cornerstone of the project, given the cost of living in New York today. Times Opinion asked the members of our panel to rate the candidates on the six issues as well as choose the candidate that they thought would make the best mayor. Many members of our panel began their work still uncertain about their top pick; some even donated to candidates whom they ended up not picking. (We disclose all donations from panel members in the project.) Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Supreme Court declines to hear GOP request to review Pa. provisional ballot ruling
Supreme Court declines to hear GOP request to review Pa. provisional ballot ruling

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court declines to hear GOP request to review Pa. provisional ballot ruling

A GOP challenge to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling on provisional ballots is dead after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case. The high court's rejection June 6 means county boards of elections must count provisional ballots cast by voters who find out their mail-in ballots have been rejected under the state Supreme Court's decision in October. The case at issue, Faith Genser et al vs. the Butler County Board of Elections, stemmed from a lawsuit filed after the 2024 primary election by two Butler County voters. They claimed they were disenfranchised when the board refused to count provisional ballots the voters cast on Election Day, after learning their mail ballots were disqualified for missing dates. Pa. politics: Erie County Democrats have slimmest voter registration edge in decades The board of elections reasoned the Pennsylvania Election Code says provisional ballots from voters whose mail-in ballots are 'timely received' can't be counted, even if the voters' mail-in ballots are rejected. In its 4-3 decision, the state Supreme Court found the Elections Code requires county elections officials to count provisional ballots if no other ballot is attributable to the voter, and as long as there are no other issues that would disqualify their provisional ballot. The U.S. Supreme Court did not explain its decision not to hear the appeal. Attorneys for the RNC and Republican Party of Pennsylvania did not respond to an email requesting comment. 'Republicans don't think every rightful vote should count. We disagree, and now, the Supreme Court has sided with us. Pennsylvanians deserve to have their say in every election ― full stop,' Democratic National Committee Chairperson Ken Martin said in a statement. The case is one of many involving 'paperwork errors' on vote-by-mail-ballots, since absentee voting without an excuse became an option in 2019 with the passage of Act 77. 'Every election, thousands of Pennsylvania mail ballots are voided due to common technical mistakes made by voters,' Rich Ting, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Pennsylvania, said. 'Thanks to Faith Genser and Frank Matis fighting for their right to vote, all Pennsylvania voters who make those mistakes are guaranteed the right to vote by provisional ballot as a failsafe.' The ACLU of Pennsylvania and the Public Interest Law Center with pro-bono counsel from Dechert LLP represented Genser and Matis in their lawsuit. 'The Supreme Court's determination not to hear this case means that Pennsylvanians who make a technical mistake with their mail-in ballots will have a way to fix the mistake instead of losing the opportunity to vote,' Ben Geffen, senior attorney at the Public Interest Law Center, said. In its petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, the GOP argued the state Supreme Court usurped the Pennsylvania Legislature's authority to set the 'times, places and manner' for congressional elections, leaning on a premise known as the 'independent state legislature theory.' That theory asserts that the U.S. Constitution reserves the authority to set the times, places and manner of elections exclusively for state legislatures. In opposition, the DNC and Pennsylvania Democratic Party asserted that the U.S. Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction, because the case falls outside the limited circumstances in which it can review the judgment of a state's highest court. Such appeals are allowed only when a federal law is in question, a state law is claimed to conflict with federal law or 'where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution.' The June 6 decision is the second time the U.S. Supreme Court has passed on reviewing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision. In November it refused to place a stay on enforcement of the ruling days before the presidential election. The Pennsylvania General Assembly has taken steps to pass amendments to clarify the vote-by-mail law in recent weeks. House Bill 1396, sponsored by Speaker Joanna McClinton, D-Philadelphia, would give election workers up to a week before Election Day to prepare to count mail-in ballots, a process that has been a bottleneck for election results in parts of the state, and has provided fodder for election deniers. The measure would remedy other ambiguities in Act 77, such as making clear that county election officials must notify voters if their mail ballots are rejected. It passed the House with a 102-101 vote along party lines May 13. Peter Hall has been a journalist in Pennsylvania and New Jersey for more than 20 years, most recently covering criminal justice and legal affairs for The Morning Call in Allentown. Pennsylvania Capital-Star is part of States Newsroom, the nation's largest state-focused nonprofit news organization. This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: Supreme Court won't hear GOP challenge to PA provisional ballot ruling

Despite anger over Israel conscription, Netanyahu coalition survives government dissolution vote
Despite anger over Israel conscription, Netanyahu coalition survives government dissolution vote

News24

time15 hours ago

  • News24

Despite anger over Israel conscription, Netanyahu coalition survives government dissolution vote

Israel's government survived a bid to dissolve parliament. Ultra-Orthodox parties voted to retain Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition. The opposition hoped to force elections. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition survived an opposition-backed effort to dissolve parliament on Thursday, as lawmakers rejected a bill that could have paved the way for snap elections. Out of the Knesset's 120 members, 61 voted against the proposal, with 53 in favour. READ | Netanyahu admits supporting anti-Hamas Gaza militants: 'What is bad about that?' The opposition had introduced the bill hoping to force elections with the help of ultra-Orthodox parties angry at Netanyahu over the contentious issue of conscription for deeply religious Jews. While the opposition is composed mainly of centrist and leftist groups, ultra-Orthodox parties that are propping up Netanyahu's government had earlier threatened to back the motion. Saeed Qaq/Anadolu via Getty Images Local media reported on Thursday morning however that most ultra-Orthodox lawmakers ultimately agreed not to support the proposal to dissolve the government. After their failed vote, the opposition will now have to wait six months to submit another bill. Opposition faction leaders had said on Wednesday that their decision to bring the bill to the Knesset for a vote was 'made unanimously and is binding on all factions'. They added that all opposition parties would freeze their lawmaking activities to focus on 'the overthrow of the government'. Netanyahu's coalition, formed in December 2022, is one of the most right-wing in the country's history. It includes two ultra-Orthodox parties - Shas and United Torah Judaism (UTJ). The two parties had threatened to back the motion for early elections amid a row over compulsory military service. Military service is mandatory in Israel but under a ruling that dates to the country's creation - when the ultra-Orthodox were a very small community - men who devote themselves full-time to the study of sacred Jewish texts are given a de facto pass. Jaafar Ashtiyeh/AFP Whether that should change has been a long-running issue. Efforts to scrap the exemption and the resulting blowback have intensified during the nearly 20-month war in Gaza as the military looks for extra manpower. Netanyahu is under pressure from his Likud party to draft more ultra-Orthodox men and impose penalties on dodgers - a red line for parties such as Shas, who demand a law guaranteeing their members permanent exemption from military service. Ahead of the Thursday morning vote, Israeli media reported that officials from Netanyahu's coalition were holding talks with ultra-Orthodox leaders hoping to find common ground on the issue. Mohammad Mansour/AFP In an apparent bid to allow time for those negotiations, Netanyahu's coalition filled the Knesset's agenda with bills to delay the dissolution vote. Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Wednesday that bringing down the government during wartime would pose 'an existential danger' to Israel's future. 'History will not forgive anyone who drags the state of Israel into elections during a war,' Smotrich told parliament, adding that there was a 'national and security need' for ultra-Orthodox to fight in the military. Netanyahu's government is held together by an alliance between his Likud party, far-right groups and ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties, whose departure would mean the end of the government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store