Could Stratford replace St Pancras as the gateway to Europe?
The transport tech giant Uber is to take on Eurostar through the Channel Tunnel – but you may need an Uber to reach the departure station in east London.
Uber has teamed up with a start-up operator, Gemini Trains, to promote a planned rival service linking London with Paris and Brussels.
If the partners are permitted to launch trains to Continental Europe, they will not start from the terminal at St Pancras – but six miles down the track at Stratford International.
'Stratford is actually a bit of a blank canvas,' said Adrian Quine, chief executive of Gemini Trains. 'It's a bit like London City airport as opposed to Heathrow or Gatwick: it's very quick and easy to get through. It's going to be far less crowded, so we think it's a bit of a jewel in the crown.'
When the High Speed 1 (HS1) line from London St Pancras International to the Channel was constructed, the suburban station at Stratford was fitted out to handle passengers heading for France and beyond. But it has only ever been used for domestic Southeastern trains using the high-speed track to stations in Kent, with the international facilities lying idle.
Mr Quine said: 'Stratford might not be so central as St Pancras, but I think door to door from central London, it's going to be as quick, if not quicker.'
Stratford is served by the Elizabeth Line from central London, Heathrow airport and Reading. Two Underground lines – the Central and Jubilee – provide other connections. The London Overground and Greater Anglia operate many trains to and from Stratford.
An Uber from central London to the east London station currently costs around £24.
Gemini Trains says it will also serve Ebbsfleet in north Kent en route to the Continent. Ebbsfleet, along with Ashford International, was mothballed after a combination of Covid and Brexit led to Eurostar abandoning the Kent stations.
Mr Quine said that services from Stratford to Paris Nord and Brussels Midi could begin by 2030.
Gemini Trains is one of several contenders aiming to compete with Eurostar, which has had the cross-Channel passenger market to itself since the tunnel opened in 1994.
The start-up plans to purchase 10 new trains for the service and promises 'competitive fares on comfortable high-quality and frequent train services between the UK and continental Europe'.
The Independent calculates that this relatively small fleet might operate 10 round-trips per day to Paris and a further five to Brussels and back. Mr Quine said it would have two classes; Eurostar has three.
Under the marketing agreement, Uber would co-brand the Gemini Trains service and sell tickets through its app. It already sells Eurostar tickets along with domestic rail, and co-brands the Thames Clipper ferry service through London.
Andrew Brem, general manager of Uber UK said: 'This collaboration with Gemini Trains is our latest step in how we're helping people get where they want to go. We're excited about the opportunity to bring our brand to the iconic Channel Tunnel journey.'
Mr Quine said: 'Innovation and value are at the very heart of what we do so it's really exciting to be teaming up with Uber, an instantly recognisable global brand which has revolutionised the travel industry. Now passengers will be able to enjoy the same value and comfort on brand new 'cutting edge' trains at the touch of a button.'
Rob Burgess, founder of the frequent-flyer website Head for Points, said: 'This is arguably a logical step for Uber. It has had success selling Eurostar tickets via its app, because of the 5 per cent cashback it offers, and the Uber Boat branding on the River Thames boat shuttles appears to be successful.
'It seems a win for both sides. Eurostar's brand is strong, the Gemini brand is not. Uber will be a great help here.
'However, there is a long, long way to go before Gemini can get the necessary permissions and get its hands on rolling stock. Uber can pick up some free publicity now without having to worry about delivering anything in the short or even medium term."
As well as Gemini Trains, Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Group and Italy's state railway operator FS Italiane Group are hoping to start services from London to Paris.
The High Speed 1 line and the Channel Tunnel are both running at about half their capacity.
London St Pancras Highspeed, which runs both the terminal station and HS1, says there is the potential for passenger numbers to triple from 11 million to 35 million by 2040.
The infrastructure operator's chief executive, Robert Sinclair, told The Independent 's daily travel podcast: 'With competition comes more choice, more destinations, lower fares and lower emissions, so we can see the market really opening up.'
His organisation plans to turn much of the St Pancras international arrivals complex into a departure area.
Eurostar's general secretary, Gareth Williams, said: 'We support competition and growth through international rail.' But the incumbent has raised concerns about a lack of train depot capacity at Temple Mills, near Stratford.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
HSBC to inject $4 billion into its private credit funds
LONDON, June 2 (Reuters) - Europe's biggest bank HSBC (HSBA.L), opens new tab will inject $4 billion into its private credit funds, amid a wider push by banks into the booming market as profits from traditional lending have come under pressure. HSBC said it will invest the cash into HSBC Asset Management's (HSBC AM) alternative credit funds, with the aim of attracting additional capital from external investors to build a $50 billion credit fund within five years. The fast-growing $2 trillion global private credit market provides lending to companies outside the more highly-regulated banking system, and is dominated by private equity giants like Blackstone (BX.N), opens new tab and Ares Management . Banks have been trying to muscle in, with some such as Citi (C.N), opens new tab and UBS (UBSG.S), opens new tab partnering with existing players Apollo (APO.N), opens new tab and General Atlantic. Others like Deutsche Bank ( opens new tab and HSBC have moved to build their own ventures. "It's an arms race," Nicolas Moreau, CEO of HSBC AM, told Reuters, adding that having greater HSBC group backing for its private credit funds would help the firm attract external money. While small in the context of HSBC's $3 trillion balance sheet, the move is part of CEO Georges Elhedery's strategy to drive up revenue in higher-returning areas like private credit rather than relying on low-returning bank loans. Reuters first reported in April that HSBC was exploring options to accelerate growth in private credit. HSBC AM's private credit unit is playing catch up against more-established players. It has deployed $7 billion across 150 transactions since launching in 2018. The new funds will be invested globally, with an initial focus on areas including direct lending in the UK and Asia, Moreau added.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
It's time to put renewed emphasis on life skills for our young people
Worse, the same report suggests that the prospect of securing a good job is just as dependent now as it was 20 years ago on who you know, rather than what you know. Perhaps most worrying, the report suggests that in a world where the nature of work is changing very rapidly, young people are being prepared by the education system for a career in traditional professions which might not even exist in the very near future, so significant is going to be the impact of AI. You could dismiss the report, except for the fact that it comes from a source as authoritative as the OECD. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is a Paris-based think tank that is, admittedly, dominated by the world's richest countries, but it is also noted for producing the best comparison statistics on education in the world. READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM – poll In fact, the report is so persuasive because what the researchers did was compare current world data with data from 20 years ago, when they first undertook work of this sort, and they would appear to be shocked to find that so little has changed. I am not surprised by this. If anyone had told me when I was at university, in the 1970s, that I would be making most of my income as a social media content creator, I would have been bemused by the suggestion. No-one had heard of the internet, or YouTube, or electronic recording data of the type we now use. Nor did any of the technology we use to consume social media exist back then. I make the point for a good reason. If my own career has changed this radically, and the rate of change in the nature of work is increasing and things are changing more often, what is it that we should now be training young people so that they have skills that may support them for decades, rather than a year or two at most after they leave either school or university? I have had six university appointments over the past 28 years and I appreciate the value of an academic education. But what I also realise is that this type of education, which dominates Highers and university courses, does not suit most people. In fact, in many disciplines, unless you want to be an academic, it is not much use at all. That is most especially true as far too many courses do not encourage much critical thinking at undergraduate level. All that means I am not surprised by what the OECD has found. I know that there might be exceptions to my comments in the case of some applied disciplines, such as medicine or veterinary science, and some engineering courses, but even then, these subjects exist in a real-world context once the person studying them has left university. To ignore this fact when they are training is quite ridiculous. So, what do I suggest we should do? I think the time has come for the unnecessary focus on academic disciplines in education to go. If the tiny minority who want to pursue a career in that area need concentrated training, that is for postgraduate education, above all else. At the level of Highers, in particular, the focus has to be very heavily on life skills. Of course, two or three more specialist subjects should be taken, but as important as these might be, so are essential and transferable life skills to ensure that people have the opportunity to change careers as time develops, as will inevitably happen to almost everyone now. So, what skills do I think are required? Try this list, which are things that matter to me now as an employer (which I am): Effective written communication Effective verbal communication Applied numeracy, including how to construct business-oriented spreadsheets Basic bookkeeping, accounting and budgeting An outline of the tax system Website creation and management The essentials of marketing Time management Basic employment law and contract law There is no job that exists for anyone over the age of 21 that does not require most skills, and most young people arrive in employment missing many of them. If, however, young people arrived with them, it would then be relatively easy for employers to provide more vocational training after the age of 21, using apprenticeship schemes if appropriate. Even those schemes are, however, at present, being hindered by a lack of these basic essentials, even among graduates. My suggestion is that at least 40% of the required undergraduate courses should also be cut on these issues. The result would be degrees that might be useful, and more fun to study, which is an issue that really matters to me when I know that so many students do not get very excited by their undergraduate university courses at present. Scotland could make these changes. Everyone would be a winner.
Times
6 hours ago
- Times
AI could free 30,000 civil servants from routine admin, study finds
Nearly 30,000 civil servants could be freed from carrying out routine admin every year if AI is rolled out across Whitehall, a government study has suggested. More than 20,000 civil servants across Whitehall took part in a three-month trial to use generative AI for help with tasks such as drafting documents, summarising meetings, and handling emails. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said this saved the equivalent of giving 1,130 full-time workers out of the 20,000 a full year back every year. Extrapolated across the whole civil service workforce of 514,395 people, the trial suggests 29,063 could be freed up for other work using AI. It comes as a study from the Alan Turing Institute found AI could support up to 41 per cent of tasks across the public sector. The artificial intelligence institute found that teachers spend nearly 100 minutes a day on lesson planning but up to 75 per cent of this could be supported by AI, while civil servants spend about 30 minutes daily on emails, where it is believed AI could cut this effort by more than 70 per cent. Civil servants in the government trial used AI to cut through jargon and streamline consultations, while work coaches utilised it to speed up support for jobseekers. They used tools such as Microsoft 365 Copilot to assist with drafting documents, summarising lengthy emails, updating records, and preparing reports. Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, will highlight the results alongside Sir Tony Blair at the SXSW London festival on Monday. The two will discuss reimagining government and public service delivery in the age of AI. Last month, a separate government trial found AI is more impartial than civil servants in analysing responses to new policies and consultations. A new AI tool to sort responses to public consultations found that about 75,000 days of work could be saved, while civil servants themselves said it removed opportunities for them to 'project their own preconceived ideas' into processes and 'takes away the bias and makes it more consistent'. • Consult, the new tool that will be used across government, is part of Humphrey — a bundle of AI tools being used across Whitehall and named after Sir Humphrey Appleby, the fictional permanent secretary in Yes Minister. The tool categorises responses under broad headings and assigns them based on whether they agree or disagree with proposals or if they are unclear. At present this is done manually by civil servants who comb through about 500 consultations a year, with responses in the thousands. The tool will also help with the increasing number of template responses to consultations organised by campaign groups. However officials also said there was a rise in the number of campaigning organisations that encouraged people to use AI to write consultation responses, which could lead to a situation where AI is analysing responses written using trial of Consult was used to analyse responses to a Scottish government consultation on cosmetic procedures. Testers found that the majority of the time the AI agreed with what a human reviewer would have said. Officials who worked with Consult on the test said they were 'pleasantly surprised' that AI analysis provided a 'useful starting point' in its initial analysis, with others noting that it ultimately 'saved [them] a heck of a lot of time' and allowed them to 'get to the analysis and draw out what's needed next'. Kyle said: 'These findings show that AI isn't just a future promise — it's a present reality. Whether it's helping draft documents, preparing lesson plans or cutting down on routine admin, AI tools are saving civil servants time every day. That means we can focus more on delivering faster, more personalised support where it really counts.'
