logo
Why the Name ‘Operation Sindoor' Must be Examined Closely

Why the Name ‘Operation Sindoor' Must be Examined Closely

The Wire07-05-2025

Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Opinion
Why the Name 'Operation Sindoor' Must be Examined Closely
Sangeeta Barooah Pisharoty
34 minutes ago
India's ruling party narrative had been hurt in Pahalgam, especially as PM had cast the Opposition as mangalsutra-snatchers less than a year ago.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Donate now
Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri addresses a press conference regarding 'Operation Sindoor', in New Delhi. Photo: PTI
New Delhi: Not many Indians would remember that the Indian government's deadly strike at the Karachi airport which broke the back of the Pakistan Navy in the 1971 war, was called Trident — named after the deadly weapon, the Trishul, carried by Lord Shiva.
If you can't recall the name of that decisive Indian operation from the 1971 war against Pakistan which India won decisively, and which altered the course of history for the sub-continent, the answer is that the government of the day had then treated it as a national security operation — not to wield the 'trident' to its domestic constituency for political messaging. Let alone establish prime minister Indira Gandhi as the leader of a muscular government; the 'Durga' who could teach Pakistan a lesson at will.
Fifty-five years later, on the morning of May 7, Indians across the country woke up to another Indian operation in Pakistan, code-named 'Operation Sindoor.' This Indian operation that struck at nine strategic locations within Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK) to hit terrorist dens across the border, is not comparable to 'Operation Trident' — not in terms of its effect, certainly not in terms of its aim. That's because unlike Operation Trident, Operation Sindoor is also expected to deliver dividends in domestic politics to the government of the day, or rather the Prime Minister.
The BJP's impromptu slick video making the PM and not the armed forces the hero of the moment bears ample witness to that.
Indian military operations against Pakistan, thus far, have been named variously; mostly to signify valour and national resolve — Operation Vijay was to take back Kargil during the Prime Ministership of Atal Vihari Vajpayee; Operation Meghdoot to secure the Siachen glacier from Pakistan army in 1984; and Operation Parakram was to flush out terrorists during the 2001 attack on the Indian Parliament. The security operation against the Pakistan-backed terrorists striking Mumbai in 2008 was named Operation Black Tornado. That was the last big civilian attack in India by Pak-backed terrorists before the horrific Pahalgam terror attack took place.
But Operation Sindoor would likely stand apart from all these previous Indian operations against Pakistan or Pak-backed terrorists, primarily because it has been named specifically to send out a political message to the domestic constituency.
Prior to Operation Sindoor, the political benefit of the 2019 Balakot airstrike against a Jaish-e-Mohammad training camp was reaped by the Modi government in the 2019 general elections, but let's not overlook that the name, Balakot, was drawn from a Pakistani town where the air strikes were carried out by India. Such a name also has its uses. That strike had since popularised the term then used by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) — ghar me ghus ke margenge (We will enter your homes to kill you). The May 6-7 operation is also an extension of that political term utilised against Pakistan by the ruling party but Sindoor, in coming times, can be way more potent than Balakot from the Hindutva lens. The protector has finally risen to the occasion to protect the honour of the Hindu women?
As expected, by 10 am on May 7, the Modi government's first political messaging to its domestic constituency through the specificity of the name of the military operation was made visible. Two women officers were strategically picked to address the first press briefing in New Delhi on the post midnight operation with a carefully designed logo also officially displayed.
Media reports at once highlighted that their presence was to signify a revenge taken by the widows of those killed in that horrific attack in Baisaran on April 22 whereby their 'sindoor' (the Hindu vermilion mark signifying their married status) was wiped out.
No sooner did the news about the operation break, BJP social media handles began highlighting the name of the military operation in Pakistan to feed the notion of raw, brawn power of the Modi government. Pro-government news channels have begun taking that political messaging forward. A Times Now headline said: ' Behno ka chheena thaa sindoor, Ab chatai dhool (Those who snatched away our sisters' vermilion have now been taught a lesson).'
Simultaneous to the press briefing, hundreds of phones pinged across the country, carrying messages from various BJP leaders celebrating Modi for carrying out Operation Sindoor. One such WhatsApp message sent out by senior party leader Sunil Deodhar said — ' Ghar me ghus kar mara hai, kabar tumhari khodi hai; Bharat ki gaddi par betha, baap tumhara Modi hai. Operation Sindoor.' (We have entered your homes to kill you; we have dug your graves; your grand daddy Modi is sitting on the chair that rules Bharat).
The messages sent out by the ruling party through media and social media celebrating Operation Sindoor is understandable considering the military operation was also to have some control over the huge pressure that had built up domestically since the terror act; many had rightly questioned whether there was any security lapse leading to so many deaths of innocent people.
It is noteworthy that during the 2024 Lok Sabha election campaign, PM Modi specifically made another marker of HIndu matrimony, the mangalsutra, a political message, by telling crowds first in Rajasthan and then in other towns that the opposition Congress 'was after their women's mangalsutras.' After the Pehalgam attack, some satirists remarked on the irony of the Modi government's security failure having cost 26 women their mangalsutra.
Many from within the right wing ecosystem also wanted Modi to be seen taking punitive action against Pakistan at once. Not having seen it coming, the frustration was growing. Hours before Operation Sindoor, former Jammu and Kashmir governor Satya Pal Malik had told The Wire that Modi 'won't do anything'; he is a 'darpok' (coward). Malik had, in fact, held up the opinion of the domestic constituency that had wanted to see Modi act on his strong words against Pakistan too; and thereby continue to live up to his muscular image.
In the days to come, the Modi government naming a military operation after sindoor, the hallmark of a devoted Hindu wife in a patriarchy, may likely come under academic scanner too, considering it is the first time a gender related nomenclature has been appended to an Indian security operation. But what must be attached to it is also the fact that some brave widows of the Pahalgam terror act did feel abandoned by the same forces who are now celebrating a revenge supposedly taken in the name of their 'Sindoor'.
Those women were heavily trolled and shamed simply because what they had said publicly even after suffering huge personal losses seemed to have not quite matched the dominant narrative that the ruling party had hoped from the Pahalgam episode. No top leader of the party or the Sangh Parivar came forward in the support of those widows who chose to speak up against communalising their personal loss.
Today's rejoicing within the Sangh Parivar ecosystem is another example of the use of a message which has been handed over to them by the Modi government. The purpose is to once again try and dominate the public narrative over the more pertinent questions of the serious internal security lapse and loss of 26 lives that had cast a long shadow over the public conversation.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Pahalgam Shows Why 'Over-Propaganda' Can Send a Leader Riding the Tiger
'Pahalgam Attackers Communicating With Pakistan-Based Handlers, Our Response Proportionate': Govt
'Firm and Decisive Action': Modi Reiterates Pahalgam Stand After Meeting With Angola President
The PM Has Vowed To Make Pakistan Pay. But What About Those Who Foment Communal Hostility at Home?
'We Will be the First to Die': Uri Residents Voice Fears as India-Pakistan Tensions Escalate
Of All the Responses Modi Can Come Up With to Pahalgam, Plunging India Into War is the Worst
'They Called Me a Terrorist': Kashmiri Students in Punjab Face Assault After Pahalgam Attack, Forced to Flee
Live | Pakistan Says it 'Reserves the Right to Respond' to Indian Military Action
Kashmir Youth Picked Up By Army After Pahalgam Found Dead; NC, PDP Allege Foul Play
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma
Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma

The Wire

time19 minutes ago

  • The Wire

Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma

Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Law Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma Rekha Sharma 4 minutes ago The Supreme Court's swift move to initiate contempt proceedings against journalist Ajay Shukla for a critical YouTube video contrasts sharply with the way BJP MP Nishikant Dubey was handled. Nishikant Dubey (left) and Ajay Shukla in the background. In the foreground is the Supreme Court. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now On May 30, a Supreme Court bench headed by the Chief Justice of India initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against Ajay Shukla, a Chandigarh-based journalist, for posting a video on YouTube allegedly containing scathing and scandalous remarks against some senior judges of the Supreme Court. The bench observed that though the Constitution guarantees to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression, this is subject to reasonable restrictions and that such a right does not permit someone to defame a judge or bring into disrepute the institution of the judiciary. Having said so, the court directed that the offending video be taken down forthwith. It also asked the Attorney General and the Solicitor General to assist the court on the next date of hearing. Though the video is no longer available, it is widely believed that contain some allegedly objectionable remarks against Justice Surya Kant, who is next in line for the Chief Justiceship, and Justice Bela M. Trivedi, who retired mid-May. It may be stated, at the very outset, that the dignity, majesty and honour of the Supreme Court, or for that matter any court of justice must be protected at all cost by every person including by the Supreme Court itself. That said, fair criticism of a judicial decision and the conduct of a judge – provided it is done in good faith and on accurate facts – also needs to be equally protected. In this background, while no one can question the right and the prerogative of the Supreme Court to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Shukla, the action taken has given rise to certain questions. Not very long ago, highly objectionable and vicious remarks were made by Nishikant Dubey, a Lok Sabha member of the ruling party, against the then CJI, Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Dubey held him singularly responsible for all the alleged 'civil wars' in the country. He also alleged that the Supreme Court was taking the country towards anarchy. These remarks were not only highly toxic and outrageous, they had the potential to rock the very foundation of our judicial system and erode the people's faith in the judiciary and almost bordered on 'blasphemy'. And yet, even though the fountain head of the judiciary was personally targeted, it neither caused any stir nor a ripple. There was a sphinx like silence. No judge deemed it fit to issue any suo motu criminal contempt notice against the errant MP. It was the Supreme Court Bar Association which raised its voice, and urged the Attorney General to grant consent for initiating contempt proceedings against Dubey. The AG neither on his own nor on the request of the Bar Association has till date given or declined to give his consent. This, despite the fact that he as the first law officer of the country, has a duty to uphold the dignity and majesty of the court of which he is an integral part. It ultimately fell on the lot of Justice Khanna himself to give a befitting response to the likes of Dubey. Though the bench headed by him dismissed a petition which sought contempt action against the MP, he gave a very measured and dignified response to him. Holding that the comments were highly irresponsible and reflected a penchant to attract attention by casting aspersions on the Supreme Court and its judges, he wrote that the courts are not so fragile as flowers to wither and wilt under such ludicrous statements. He further observed, 'We do not believe that the confidence and the credibility of the courts in the eyes of the public can be shaken by such statements'. Kudos to Justice Sanjiv Khanna for such a befitting response. Going by media reports, Justice Bela Trivedi has not been given a farewell by the Supreme Court Bar Association. The CJI is reported to have expressed his disapproval over the decision of the Bar Association, and so has Justice A.G. Masih, who said that tradition must be followed. It is for the first time in the history of the Supreme Court that such a tradition has been broken. The bar, it is said, is the judge of the judges. It is not for nothing that Justice Bela Trivedi has been denied the honour of a farewell by the bar. The question is why did things come to such a pass? It should set both bench and bar thinking. Undoubtedly, a long standing tradition has been broken but, then, judgeship is not a blank cheque. It comes with responsibility. The bar not only helps judges make the justice delivery system work, it also acts as a watchdog. The bar has, by its action, sent a loud and clear message. It is time for judges to remember that they too are under watch. They may, in a given case, fail to grasp some suspected hidden meaning of a column written in English by an Oxford educated professor and leave the job of deciphering it to some police officer, and that too not from a particular state. But if they fail to take action against a minister who made a highly objectionable statement in simple and understandable Hindi, it does raise eyebrows. It is in such matters that the bar has to play its role. And, if it does play its role, there should be no protest. Rekha Sharma is a former judge of the Delhi high court. This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Central Hall | Governors Increasingly Acting like Political Agents as Constitutional Morality Erodes 'Same Sex Marriage Not Legalised But Couples Can Very Well Form A Family': Madras HC Indian Astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla-led Mission to International Space Station Pushed to June 10 'Highly Irresponsible': BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Faces Supreme Court Wrath Why the Process of 44 MLAs 'Forming the Government' in Manipur Is Not Straightforward US Supreme Court Rules $1.29 Bn Lawsuit Against ISRO-Owned Antrix to Proceed Modi-Shah Face Dilemma As Their Stormtroopers Cross All Limits of Propriety The Arrest and Trial of Professor Azaan M Free Speech on Eggshells: What the Ali Khan Mahmudabad Case Signals for All of Us About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

‘Attack on Religious Right of Kashmir's Muslims,' Says Mirwaiz as J&K Govt Bar Eid Prayers at Srinagar Eidgah
‘Attack on Religious Right of Kashmir's Muslims,' Says Mirwaiz as J&K Govt Bar Eid Prayers at Srinagar Eidgah

The Wire

time35 minutes ago

  • The Wire

‘Attack on Religious Right of Kashmir's Muslims,' Says Mirwaiz as J&K Govt Bar Eid Prayers at Srinagar Eidgah

Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Government 'Attack on Religious Right of Kashmir's Muslims,' Says Mirwaiz as J&K Govt Bar Eid Prayers at Srinagar Eidgah The Wire Staff 11 minutes ago The chairman of moderate Hurriyat Conference was also reportedly put under house arrest. Hurriyat Conference Chairman and Chief Cleric of Jammu and Kashmir Mirwaiz Umar Farooq. Photo: PTI/File. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now Srinagar: Jammu and Kashmir authorities have barred congregational Eid prayers from taking place at the Eidgah grounds in Srinagar today (June 7) without specifying any reason in writing. The chairman of moderate Hurriyat Conference, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq was also reportedly put under house arrest. In a post on X, Mirwaiz, who is also the chief cleric of Kashmir, said that the Jamia Masjid, Kashmir's biggest mosque in the summer capital Srinagar, was also locked by the authorities where the Eid prayer was scheduled to be organised on Saturday morning. Mirwaiz said that the grand mosque was closed on the eve of Eid for the seventh consecutive year following the reading down of Article 370 when Jammu and Kashmir was bifurcated and demoted into two Union territories by the Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP)-led Union government. 'In a Muslim-majority region, Muslims are deprived of their fundamental right to pray — even on their most important religious occasion celebrated across the world! What a shame on those who rule over us, and on those elected by the people who choose to remain silent as our rights are trampled over, again and again,' he said. Mirwaiz told The Wire that security forces barricaded the entry to his house on Saturday morning without any official intimation, 'They didn't allow me to come out to lead the Eid prayers. It is an attack on the basic religious right of the Muslims of Kashmir,' he said. No permission In a statement on Friday (June 6), Anjuman Auqaf Jama Masjid, the managing body of the historic mosque, said that the authorities didn't give permission for organising the Eid prayers at the Eidgah ground where thousands of people from different parts of Kashmir gathered to participate in the congregational prayers when J&K was a state. The managing body's statement said that it 'deeply regrets' the denial of permission for organising the prayer at the Eidgah ground which was planned 'in keeping with the longstanding Islamic tradition and the collective religious sentiment of the people'. The statement said that due to the refusal, the congregational prayers were going to be organised at Jamia Masjid on Saturday morning where Mirwaiz would deliver sermon 'on the philosophy and spirit of Eid and Qurbani (sacrifice)'. 'Auqaf urges all worshippers to attend the Eid prayers at Jama Masjid in large numbers and partake in the message of unity, sacrifice, and submission to the will of Allah (SWT) that Eid-ul-Adha embodies,' the statement said. However, the 14th century architectural marvel in Nowhatta locality of downtown Srinagar was closed on Saturday with police and paramilitary troopers turning away the worshippers who tried to gather for the Eid prayers while Mirwaiz was put under house-detention. A flock of pigeons flies past Jamia Masjid, Kashmir's oldest mosque in Nowhatta locality of downtown Srinagar, amid snowfall on December 27, 2024. Photo: Ubaid Mukhtar. This is not the first time that the authorities have locked Kashmir's largest mosque for worshippers on the eve of Eid without specifying any reason in writing. After J&K was bifurcated and split into two union territories, authorities have not allowed the Anjuman to organise congregational prayers at the mosque on sacred days of the Islamic calendar. On March 31, the mosque was locked by authorities on Eid-ul-Fitr while Mirwaiz was also put under house arrest. Authorities have also closed the mosque on the occasions of important islamic events including on Fridays, Shab-e-Qadr and Jummat-ul-Vida. J&K's security administration, which is under the Union home ministry, has unofficially cited the fears of law and order breakdown in the sensitive downtown locality which has been an epicentre of anti-India and pro-freedom protests to justify the ban of congregational prayers. Meanwhile, Eid prayers were held in the rest of the Union territory with thousands of people congregating in major shrines and mosques, including at the Asar-e-Sharief in Hazratbal of Srinagar, Khanqah-e-Moula in Budgam district's Chrari Sharief and other mosques and religious places on Saturday to mark the occasion. Following the reading down of Article 370 in 2019, the BJP-led Waqf board of J&K has taken over the management of most shrines and mosques in the Union territory, a decision which has been criticised by the Mirwaiz and other political parties. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News The Search for the 'Bandung Spirit' The Grand Tamasha of Jammu and Kashmir Politics Unchallenged at Home and Abroad: Jawaharlal Nehru's Leadership With the Non-Aligned Movement As Plane to Srinagar Faced Storm Mid-Air, Request to Detour into Pak Airspace Turned Down Lone NC MP in All-Party Delegations to Not Join His Group, Cites Urs at Native Village Allahabad HC Upholds Trial Court's Order For Survey of Sambhal's Shahi Jama Masjid India Revokes Security Clearance To Turkish Airport Services Firm, Defers Initiation of Ambassador Kharge Alleges Modi Cancelled J&K Visit Due to Intel Report Before Pahalgam Attack India-Pakistan Stand-Off: Main Updates of May 10 About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

India Is Fifth Largest Economy, Their Presence At G7 Meeting Makes Sense: Canada PM
India Is Fifth Largest Economy, Their Presence At G7 Meeting Makes Sense: Canada PM

India.com

time39 minutes ago

  • India.com

India Is Fifth Largest Economy, Their Presence At G7 Meeting Makes Sense: Canada PM

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Friday (local time) said that G7 countries will hold discussions on important issues, including security and energy, in their upcoming summit, adding that India's presence at the intergovernmental political and economic forum is essential. Carney said that India being the fifth largest economy and the most populous country in the world must be at the seat. "Let's put the two aspects in context- first is, we are in the role- Canada's in the role of the G7 chair and in those discussions as agreed with our G7 colleagues, include important discussions on energy, security, on digital future, critical minerals amongst others and partnerships actually in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing world," he said. Carney said that India is central to a number of supply chains, which makes its presence pertinent at the G7 chair consultation. "There are certain countries that should be at the table for those discussions, and in my capacity as G7 chair, I will consult with some others to make those determinations. India is the fifth largest economy in the world, effectively the most populous country in the world, central to a number of those supply chains at the heart of a number of those supply chains, so it makes sense," he said. Carney said that India and Canada are acting on law enforcement, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi has accepted his invitation. "In addition, bilaterally we have now agreed importantly to continued law enforcement to law enforcement dialogue so there's been some progress on that recognizes issues of accountability I extended the invitation to Prime Minister Modi for in in that context and he has accepted it," he said. PM Modi on Friday confirmed he would attend the upcoming Group of Seven (G7) leaders summit in Canada after an invitation from newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. "Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister Mark J Carney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit," he said in a post on X. The announcement comes after a period of severely strained relations between the two countries, triggered by Canadian allegations that Indian agents were involved in the June 2023 assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar--a Canadian citizen and prominent pro-Khalistan activist--outside a Sikh temple in Vancouver, as per DW News. India strongly denied the claims, and both nations expelled senior diplomats in a tit-for-tat escalation, DW News reported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store