
I've just received two penalty notices. This war on motorists has gone far enough
If you drive around this country on a regular basis you might be forgiven for thinking that everyone in power hates cars. Whether they're running national government or local councils, it appears that if you sit behind the wheel of a vehicle you are seen as the enemy.
How else to explain some of the baffling measures introduced in recent years to make driving more expensive, more difficult and a lot less fun than it used to be?
Smart motorways, clean air zones, bus lanes, speed bumps, emergency gates, cycle superhighways and low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) have all conspired to frustrate and annoy motorists going about their daily business.
But finally, there might be some light at the end of the tunnel – even if the tunnel has just acquired a new toll charge that it never used to have.
For the past five years LTNs have been a battleground between local residents and campaigners all over the country. They grew up mainly as a result of Covid restrictions being put in place by over-zealous local burghers who saw restriction of travel as a silver bullet to reduce pollution. And campaigners who saw an opportunity to get people out of their cars and into – as they call it – more active forms of travel.
The trouble with LTNs, though, is that they are rarely well through out. Closing off entire streets to through traffic just pushes the congestion somewhere else – usually onto main artery roads that they become permanent traffic jams pumping yet more fumes into the air.
In some parts of London the battle for parking spaces, delivery van access and exemptions for disabled badge holders were painted as culture war issues pitting Net Zero zealots against entire communities who were objecting to their imposition.
Now it looks as though the law has finally stepped in to bring some common sense to the discussion.
Just last week the High Court ruled that Lambeth Council in South London was wrong to ignore local objections to its latest scheme. Not only that, it acted unlawfully. The council could now be forced to do away with the bollards, the planters and all the other paraphernalia that has been the bane of people's everyday lives in West Dulwich.
To add insult to injury the judge in the case, Mr Justice Smith, criticised the council for ignoring a report from campaigners at the West Dulwich Action Group who highlighted the unintended consequences of the LTN.
Lambeth Council say they are still measuring what the impact of the judgment will be before they decide what to do next. But residents are angry that they spent public money defending a lawsuit that they knew they couldn't win.
For their part the council claims LTNs are helping them to combat climate change. Just how they're doing that is anyone's guess.
The flip side of all those fines of course, in addition to effectively being an extra tax on road users in the borough, is that some businesses have been hurt, impacting the local economy.
There have been similar objections raised elsewhere in the country. Business owners in Oxford have been complaining about restrictions which force people to drive ridiculously circuitous routes to get from one part of the city to another.
And in Manchester the clean air zone has once again been put on ice while the pros and cons of installing it are weighed up.
Taxi drivers in Newcastle are refusing to enter some parts of the city because of the cost of charges and fines.
One thing is for certain, if victorious LTN challenges become the norm there will be many councils looking for more ways to raise revenue. In some areas they are installing ever more sophisticated traffic cameras that aim to catch people using their phones while driving.
In the part of London where I live they've come up with an ingenious wheeze. Simply change the usage of the road at specific times.
Last weekend I awoke to not one, but two penalty charge notices, for driving my car down a street that I've used for years without any problems.
It turns out that it has now been designated for use by pedestrians and cyclists only during the hours of 8.30-9.15am and 3-3.45pm. Naturally the new sign explaining all this is not very easy to see and looks like it applies to a different street.
That'll be £160 for each penalty notice to Southwark Council – discounted to £80 each if paid within two weeks.
Of course I've appealed but I'm not holding out much hope. After all, this is a racket we're all involved in. I fear that, even if LTNs are no more, green zealots will concoct new and ever more imaginative methods of rinsing drivers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Don't think Nigel Farage will kill off the Tories? Just look at Reform UK's surge in Scotland
If you were doubting that Nigel Farage had a serious chance of heading a hard-right British government in 2029, the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse just poured a bucket of particularly icy water over your head. Though Labour won the Scottish parliamentary byelection, defying predictions it would be beaten into third place, Reform UK chalked up more than a quarter of the vote – trailing the victors by an unsubstantial 1,500 voters. This tells a devastating story. Nigel Farage's outfit seriously outperformed the level of support indicated by Scottish polling: the last four surveys had Reform on between 12% and 19%, yet it secured 26% of the vote after standing here for the first time. This suggests it is mobilising previous non-voters whom pollsters are not picking up. The latest UK-wide YouGov poll, which asked people how they would vote if there were a general election tomorrow, put Reform in first place, eight points ahead of Labour. Imagine if that polling in fact underestimates their reach. There is, however, an important caveat. The multimillionaire businessman Zia Yusuf did an impressive job as Reform's chair in professionalising its operations: his resignation speaks to a perennial threat of internal chaos. Like Ukip, Reform may be hobbled by its excessive dependence on its frontman. The SNP, meanwhile, has ruled Holyrood for nearly two decades in an age in which most incumbents are clobbered. The party has lost its best asset, Nicola Sturgeon. Even so, it did not expect to lose 17 points in this byelection. Its activists are divided on whether this loss is down to the party soft-pedalling on the independence cause, or failing to address voters' bread-and-butter concerns. It seems almost certain that it suffered the opposite phenomenon to Reform: its demotivated supporters stayed at home. The byelection offered up yet more striking evidence that the Tories are being replaced as the standard bearers of the right, as they bagged a paltry 6% of the vote. This is the end stage of a process kickstarted by David Cameron in 2010: try to placate the right of his own party by throwing them endless red meat, making them fatter and hungrier. It's the same phenomenon that is unfolding across the west: the old centre-right is dying, and being replaced by a radical right that is increasingly contemptuous of democratic norms. Given Reform's racist claim that the Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, would 'prioritise the Pakistani community', its defeat is hardly reassuring, as it still finds popular support among hardcore Scottish unionists. As the pre-eminent psephologist John Curtice notes, Labour was in fact down on its already weak 2021 performance in this seat, triumphing only because of the fragmentation of the electorate. The result shows Labour is not on course to retake the seat of Scottish power, he concludes. The big message, he says, is that if Farageism is making inroads even in Scotland, its strength has been underestimated. What next? Starmer's foot soldiers have a strategy. Having achieved unparalleled unpopularity by attacking state provision for disabled people and elderly people, they are opting for a 'squeeze' message. They believe Farage replacing the Tories is beneficial, because he has a lower ceiling of support than the traditional party of the right. Our electoral system will force voters to make a binary choice between a Labour government they strongly dislike, and a Farage premiership most fear. The choice is between two bad options – and they're hoping that voters will pick the least worse. Cast your mind back to the decision of Hillary Clinton's team to intentionally promote Donald Trump as the Republican standard-bearer for much the same reason. That didn't go well. Labour must surely understand how Farage's capacity to enthuse non-voters raises the ceiling to an unpredictable height. Starmer's team clearly looks to Canada, where an incumbent liberal government was on course for electoral meltdown, until progressives abandoned the leftwing New Democrats to prevent the hard-right Conservatives triumphing. Yet there are key differences. One is the small factor of the US president openly planning to annex their country. Another is that although Justin Trudeau's administration may have been deeply disappointing from a progressive perspective, it did not ceaselessly alienate its natural supporters, as Labour has done, including by adopting rhetoric on immigration associated with the far right. Labour won about two-thirds of the seats in the general election with only one-third of the overall vote share. Surely it recognises that Reform could do the same. This ability is only entrenched by our first past the post electoral system, which even the former Conservative minister Tobias Ellwood has described as 'dated and unrepresentative'. Faced with a choice between lesser evils, the strategy for progressives ought to be clear: cement a pact between the Green party and other leftwing candidates, focus on 50 or so seats, and throw every resource at them. In a resulting hung parliament, they could force an end to this antiquated electoral system. But the central belt of Scotland just underlined an important lesson. The west is in crisis: the rise of the radical right is both a symptom and an accelerant, and nowhere is immune. Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist


The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kemi Badenoch admits she is still learning how to lead the Tories: ‘It takes a while'
Kemi Badenoch has admitted she is still learning how to lead the Conservatives after seven months in job, amid dire poll ratings for the party. The Tory leader on Friday said 'it takes quite a while to learn how to do the job ' and that 'every week it gets better and better'. It came a day after her shadow chancellor promised she 'will get better', with the Conservatives tumbling in the polls and falling to fourth in a Scottish by-election on Thursday. 'She will get better through time at the media, she will get better through time at the dispatch box at PMQs,' Mel Stride said. Asked about his comments on Friday, Ms Badenoch said: 'People often assume that the minute you come into a job like being leader of the opposition, that you are ready to go. 'It actually takes quite a while to learn how to do the job, and what I have been saying is that every week it gets better and better. 'Every week I have more experience, and this is what every leader of the opposition has found from Margaret Thatcher to David Cameron.' She added that lots will change before the next general election, highlighting the outbreak of Covid and the war in Ukraine in the last election cycle. And Ms Badenoch said: 'There is going to be so much more that people are going to see, not just from me, but from the Conservative Party. 'We were down at the last election, but we are not out.' It came as the Tory leader shifted her party decisively in favour of pulling Britain out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), a stance her leadership rival Robert Jenrick has long called for the Conservatives to adopt. Ms Badenoch said the convention has become a "sword" to "attack democratic decisions", resulting in Britain being unable to police its borders and deport foreign criminals. 'This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I am calling lawfare. It isn't just damaging our security, it's also damaging our prosperity,' she said. She stopped short of vowing to adopt leaving the ECHR as policy, but said 'I do believe that we will likely need to leave'. And she said she had tasked a team of legal experts to look at how Britain could pull out of the convention and what the impact would be, promising to announce the results at the party's conference in October. Ms Badenoch all but guaranteed a set-piece moment at the Manchester meet in which she will formally call for Britain to ditch the ECHR. Delivering her speech in Westminster, Ms Badenoch also sought to stress that the Conservatives are still the main opposition to Labour, despite the party's dire performance in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. The Tories won just 6 per cent of the vote, with Labour fending off Reform UK and the SNP to win the seat. Answering questions after a speech on Friday, Mrs Badenoch dismissed Reform as a "protest party" and said claims it was the real opposition were "nonsense". Describing Reform as "another left-wing party", she said: "What they're trying to do is talk this situation into existence. "Labour is going to be facing the Conservative Party at the next election and we're going to get them out."


BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Droitwich firm calls for recruitment to support solar panel drive
A solar panel company has called for a recruitment drive to support a government announcement for mandatory panels on the the majority of new-build homes from Secretary Ed Miliband said the move was "just common sense" and solar panels would save the typical household £500 a year on energy regulations will require developers to add panels unless the buildings fall under certain exemptions such as being covered by Hayward, managing director of Solar Select in Droitwich, said the move could lead to issues with getting skilled labour in place. He said: "In 2027 companies will gear up for it and start their own in-house training, but obviously it helps if it's government-backed for apprenticeship schemes."He also said it was important the buildings had a "sensible amount" of panels fitted."I'm sure the industry will welcome this move," he said. "What we'd like to also see is a sensible amount of panels put on there." Solar panels, or photovoltaics, capture the sun's energy and convert it into electricity to use in your to the Energy Saving Trust, domestic solar panels are generally about 3.5kWp (kilowatt peak) - meaning they typically generate that much power at peak government said the new rules would be included in the Future Homes Standard published in the autumn but there would be a transitional period for developers to adjust to the regulation Herefordshire's Green Party MP Ellie Chowns said she was glad the "government had seen sense" on making solar panels mandatory but was also cautious."We should be making sure they're properly insulated, we should be making sure they're flood resilient, and [that they're] prevented from overheating," she added. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.