logo
Samuel L. Jackson, Pierce Brosnan Western ‘The Unholy Trinity' Gallops to U.K. via Signature

Samuel L. Jackson, Pierce Brosnan Western ‘The Unholy Trinity' Gallops to U.K. via Signature

Yahoo18-05-2025

U.K. production, sales and distribution outfit Signature Entertainment has acquired the U.K. and Irish rights to Samuel L. Jackson (The Hateful Eight) and Pierce Brosnan's (The World Is Not Enough) Western The Unholy Trinity from Film Bridge International.
The movie is set in the 1870s and tells the story of 'a young man (who) returns to a Montana town to avenge the wrongful execution of his father and reclaim his fortune,' according to a synopsis. It also features David Arquette (Scream 3), Brandon Lessard (Classified) and Gianni Capaldi (Damaged).The film, produced by Jeanne Allgood (Terminator Salvation), Kellie Brooks, Colin Floom (The Old Way), Michele Gray (Sugar Mountain) and Richard Gray (Murder at Yellowstone City), was written by Lee Zachariah (The Bazura Project) and directed by Gray. The deal was negotiated between Signature Entertainment's acquisitions and development executive Max Hart and Film Bridge International managing director Jordan Dykstra. 'With screen icons like Samuel L. Jackson and Pierce Brosnan leading the charge, Westerns like this rarely grace the independent market,' said Hart. 'Packed with action, impressive production values, and a brilliant score, we can't wait to bring this epic tale to U.K. and Irish audiences in 2025.'
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Joe Don Baker, Rugged Star of 'Walking Tall,' Dies at 89
Ciara and Adam Lambert to Perform at amfAR Gala
Cannes: French Actor Banned From Red Carpet Amid Rape Allegations
Founded in 2011, Signature, led by founder and CEO Marc Goldberg, has become a key independent distributor in the U.K. and has expanded into production and international sales. Its recent releases include Lily James, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Himesh Patel comedy Greedy People; Aaron Eckhart action thriller Chief of Station; and indie horror movie Terrifier 3. The company recently also acquired action thriller The Prosecutor, directed by and starring Hong Kong superstar Donnie Yen (Ip Man), for the U.K. and Ireland.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now
"A Nutless Monkey Could Do Your Job": From Abusive to Angst-Ridden, 16 Memorable Studio Exec Portrayals in Film and TV
The 10 Best Baseball Movies of All Time, Ranked

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Game of Thrones RTS is launching in 2026
A Game of Thrones RTS is launching in 2026

The Verge

timean hour ago

  • The Verge

A Game of Thrones RTS is launching in 2026

I'm not sure how it took so long, but a real-time strategy game set in Westeros is finally in the works. The new game is called Game of Thrones: War for Westeros, and it's described as a 'classic, premium' RTS game for PC that will let players take control of the various houses and factions in George R.R. Martin's fantasy universe. The game is being developed by PlaySide Studios, and will include both a single-player campaign and multiplayer options. Here's the official description: In War for Westeros, players will lead the armies of House Stark, House Lannister, House Targaryen, or the Night King in ruthless free-for-all battles where trust is fleeting and power is everything. Engaging in epic real-time strategy battles, forging strategic alliances, and weaving deceit against rival forces will be key. Each faction offers deeply asymmetric strategies, with signature heroes, armies, and mechanics forged from the brutal legacy of Westeros. Players can deploy infantry, cavalry, siege engines, giants, and dragons to break enemy lines as they work to outplay and outmaneuver rivals with inspiring hero abilities and the ruthless instincts of a true war commander.

Where Does ‘Doctor Who' Go From Here?
Where Does ‘Doctor Who' Go From Here?

Gizmodo

time2 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

Where Does ‘Doctor Who' Go From Here?

The end of the latest season of Doctor Who would be controversial for a good many reasons beyond its shocking cliffhanger ending—from its confounding narrative choices to its complete character re-writing of its latest companion—but perhaps what has made it reach another level of ire is that, for the foreseeable future, this might be it. Right now, the continuation of Doctor Who on TV is in about as unsure a place as it can be for the first time in 20 years. Of course, the show has contemplated disaster across those two decades, but we mostly learned of those moments well after the fact: on the public front, Doctor Who persisted into the institution it has become, in spite of it all. But Doctor Who ends its latest run of episodes without that public acknowledgement of its own inevitability. For all the talk of scripts and eventual, possible continuity, right now there is currently no further Doctor Who confirmed beyond a five-episode spinoff series, War Between the Land and the Sea. The show will not air this holiday season; for the first time since it returned, a third season of this Disney-BBC partnership era has not been commissioned. Doctor Who, on-screen at least, is currently standing on the edge of a proverbial cliff. That does not mean that Doctor Who is necessarily dead. Doctor Who will always live on in some form or another: it did back in 1989 when it was first cancelled, thriving in books, audio dramas, the brief spike of the 1996 TV movie, all before it came roaring back to life again in 2005. It also doesn't mean that there aren't options for the series, either, even in this moment of uncertainty. Let's explore a few of them. Option 1: Doctor Who Continues As-Is Of all the options on the table right now, this seems like the least likely. Not because of the perspective of Doctor Who's shaky reputation coming out if its finale, and its wild stunt-casting Hail Mary to close out Ncuti Gatwa's time on the show (it's currently unclear whether or not Billie Piper is going to be a full-fledged 16th incarnation of the Doctor; much like the show's current status, details about that are still up the air), but because at this point it's pretty much logistically impossible for the series to make a return any time soon unless it enters production immediately. A week out from the finale and with no official statement on the renewal of the BBC's licensing partnership with Disney—with the latter already having made it clear that there was going to be a review of Doctor Who's viewership across the latest season before any decision about the deal—it seems unlikely that we're going to hear anything soon, whether Disney backs out or carries on financially supporting the series. A Christmas special for 2025 is already out of the picture at this point; one was not included in the original agreement. And even if we got news of a deal imminently, the likeliness of a new season of Doctor Who being broadcast before 2027 narrows to the point of impossibility with each passing day. The question is, however, even if Doctor Who was renewed in the immediate future, should it continue as-is? It's become clear—and it's also clearly part of the reason why an official renewal didn't come with the conclusion of the latest season—that Doctor Who has struggled in the past few years to reclaim a wider audience again. Putting aside right-wing culture war accusations of overt 'wokeness' in the series (it has arguably been an era where Doctor Who's long-standing progressive themes have never been so purely surface-level), a mix of a streaming-first approach that has shaken up broadcast times in Doctor Who's home nation and plotlines that are failing to energize either diehard fans or new audiences has led to the series being on a ratings decline. In a period that was meant to be a new onboarding point for curious global audiences—a new Doctor, a new companion, a distancing for recent and further flung continuity threads—the series has instead wrapped itself in increasing insularity, building its dramatic climaxes on arcane connections to Who's past and season arcs that build towards the return of increasingly obscure old villains, while also paradoxically failing to capitalize on those returning characters. Even if Doctor Who was greenlit for more seasons, whether or not its current self is working would remain uncertain. Option 2: Doctor Who Takes a Break So maybe the show takes a break that's longer than the logistically enforced couple of years it would take to continue on as it has been. Whether that's three years rather than two, whether it's three or four or even five, it would give the show the chance to have a creative reset behind the scenes and return with a renewed plan for its future and a renewed energy with a completely new Doctor and companion. That doesn't necessarily mean that much changes behind the scenes, but it could depending on the length of the break. We have, at least, the upcoming War Between the Land and the Sea to act as something already made that could be broadcast in the place of a traditional season. But given the current uncertainty as to what Billie Piper's role in this transitional period could be—whether she's the Doctor at all, whether she's a regeneration similar to David Tennant's 14th and won't stick around long, or whether she is indeed a fully-fledged incarnation that will stay as the face of the series for multiple seasons—perhaps we could even see something akin to what happened with Doctor Who in 2009. Then, as the series prepared to transition between the exit of both its main star in David Tennant and its creative leadership in showrunner Russell T Davies, Who went on a quasi-break for the year, instead broadcasting four one-off special episodes throughout 2009, while a new creative team under Steven Moffat began working on getting the next era of the show ready for broadcast in 2010. Maybe after War Between the Land and the Sea we'll see a similar 'specials' era for Piper, before a return to regular seasons with a new incarnation of the Doctor. Regardless, it would give time for Doctor Who's creative team to take a look at the last couple of years of the show, see what's working and what isn't, and lay out a new plan for what the series could eventually look like upon its return. Option 3: Doctor Who Dies (But Not Really) Or maybe, this is it. In not having a deal renewed at all, whether with Disney's help or without it, Doctor Who is effectively cancelled as it was back in 1989. On screen Who goes out with Piper's smiling face cutting to credits, a more open-ended but similar conclusion akin to the Seventh Doctor and Ace walking off into adventures unseen at the end of 'Survival.' Of course, this means that we know that even if Doctor Who on TV is dead, it really isn't dead at all. Just as was the case nearly 40 years ago, the show's first wandering into 'The Wilderness Years,' as they came to be known in Doctor Who fandom, didn't really mean that Who ceased to exist. Virgin's New Adventures novels carried on the stories of the Doctor and Ace, and yet further beyond, providing a treasure trove of stories pushing the world of Doctor Who beyond the imaginings of its televised self. The Big Finish audio drama series began in 1999 and continues to this day, simultaneously giving Paul McGann's Eighth Doctor from the TV movie a whole life of adventures while also revisiting Doctors past, enriching their own histories with more stories and spinoffs. In fits and starts, we did still get glimpses of new Doctor Who media, from the cheesy reunions of Dimensions in Time, to the aforementioned attempted revival with the 1996 movie, and then things like the online web animation Scream of the Shalka in 2003. But while Doctor Who wasn't regularly on TV any more, it was far from dormant. We've already seen the series survive one such period, only to come back and change the face of genre television all over again. Who's to say it couldn't do the same again? After all, cheating death is part of the key to Doctor Who's longevity!

License to play: How James Bond games fill the gap between films
License to play: How James Bond games fill the gap between films

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

License to play: How James Bond games fill the gap between films

Every few years, James Bond disappears from the silver screen—though he is rarely gone for long. However, in recent years, during these pauses between films, it is often video games that have kept the British superspy alive in popular culture. With varying degrees of success, these games have done more than just tie in with films; they have created a legacy, shaping the Bond mythos in ways a film never could—and keeping fans engaged while the future of the franchise is decided. With the future of the franchise still undetermined after its acquisition by Amazon MGM Studios, video game developer IO Interactive hopes to keep the tradition alive with 007 First Light. The first high-profile example came after the release and subsequent critical and commercial success of Goldeneye in 1995. There had been a six-year wait since the previous film, Licence to Kill, and it would be another few years before the follow-up, Tomorrow Never Dies, appeared in cinemas. In that second gap, Goldeneye 007 for the Nintendo 64 burst onto the scene. Developed by Rare, the game's impact was huge, and it became one of the most influential first-person shooters of all time. For many players of a certain age, this game represents the quintessential James Bond of the era and is remembered by some fans even more fondly than the movie on which it was based. Goldeneye 007 set a precedent. Over the next two decades, Bond video games became a way to extend the life of the films and tell original stories. Titles like Agent Under Fire, Nightfire, and Everything or Nothing were released during Pierce Brosnan's tenure as the superspy, harnessing the tone and world of the movies but introducing new plots, characters, and gadgets. For many, these games essentially became unfilmed Bond adventures. And nowhere is that truer than in 2004's Everything or Nothing, which featured the voice acting and likenesses of Pierce Brosnan, Judi Dench, and John Cleese and included an original villain in the form of Willem Dafoe's Nikolai Diavolo. It felt like a full-fledged Bond story in game form, giving Pierce Brosnan one last hurrah amid a four-year delay in film production as fans waited for Daniel Craig to take up the mantle. The four-year gap between Quantum of Solace in 2008 and Skyfall in 2012 marked another notable lull in Bond's cinematic presence. Activision stepped in with games like James Bond 007: Blood Stone, the first Bond game with an original story since Everything or Nothing. Like that game, it featured the likenesses of then-current Bond, Daniel Craig, and series mainstay Judi Dench. It may not have revolutionised the genre like Goldeneye 007, but it served its purpose: keeping Bond moving, shooting, and quipping until the next film arrived. Now, as the world waits to learn who will take up the mantle after Daniel Craig's departure in 2021's No Time To Die—and amid an acquisition by Amazon MGM Studios—the upcoming Bond game from IO Interactive could not arrive at a better time. The game, from the studio behind the Hitman series, promises an original origin story, untethered from the movies but with the lore and tone that fans expect. From the recent trailer released at Sony PlayStation's State of Play event on June 4, 2025, it is clear that the studio holds the series' history in high regard, with John Barry's iconic theme from On Her Majesty's Secret Service making an appearance. Amid shifting cultural expectations, studio negotiations, and high-profile casting speculation, video games offer fans of the franchise something simpler: the ability to be Bond. Following the divisive ending of No Time To Die and amid seemingly never-ending radio silence from Amazon MGM Studios, the ability to don a virtual tuxedo will hopefully be enough for the time being. Until the next film appears in cinemas, James Bond will live on in video games. "License to play: How James Bond games fill the gap between films" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store